Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Prairie Trail Elementary School in Flower Mound, TX
(PK-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 95
Address
 5555 TIMBER CREEK RD
Flower Mound, TX 75028
Telephone
(469) 713-5980
(make sure to verify first before calling)
City-data.com school rating
95
Students
643
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
44.2
Free lunch eligible students
55
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
18
School district
LEWISVILLE ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Not a Title I school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
FOUNDERS CLASSICAL ACADEMY OF FLOWER MOUND (1.5 miles):

97
BRIARHILL MIDDLE (1.2 miles):

95
Prairie Trail Elementary School:

95
LAMAR MIDDLE (0.6 miles):

93
MARCUS H S (0.6 miles):

90
TIMBER CREEK EL (1.3 miles):

86
VALLEY RIDGE EL (1.0 miles):

74
DEGAN EL (1.2 miles):

55
HUFFINES MIDDLE (1.3 miles):

44
Prairie Trail Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Denton County:

69
Flower Mound:

93
Prairie Trail Elementary School:

95

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 643
Enrollment in 2015: 609
Enrollment in 2014: 532
Enrollment in 2013: 576
Enrollment in 2012: 635
Enrollment in 2011: 690
Enrollment in 2010: 718
Enrollment in 2009: 728
Enrollment in 2008: 739
Enrollment in 2007: 758
Enrollment in 2006: 722
Enrollment in 2005: 723
Enrollment in 2004: 661
Enrollment in 2003: 677
Enrollment in 2002: 657
Enrollment in 2001: 621
Enrollment in 2000: 524
Enrollment in 1999: 442

Prairie Trail Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05Total
All students110811111191112109643
Female students - 575741305052287
Male students1515470616257356
American Indian/Alaska Native students - - - - - 1 - 1
Asian students - 192024141719113
Hispanic students - 172025141314103
Black students - 25387227
White students1645454486868357
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander students - - - - - - 11
Two or More Races students - 612576541

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 1
Kindergarten enrollment: 108
1st grade enrollment: 111
2nd grade enrollment: 111
3rd grade enrollment: 91
4th grade enrollment: 112
5th grade enrollment: 109

Prairie Trail Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 287 (44.6%)
School:

44.6%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 356 (55.4%)
Here:

55.4%
Texas:

50.1%

Prairie Trail Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 1 (0.2%)
Prairie Trail Elementary School:

0.2%
Texas:

0.4%
Asian enrollment: 113 (17.6%)
Prairie Trail Elementary School:

17.6%
State:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 103 (16.0%)
School:

16.0%
State:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 27 (4.2%)
Prairie Trail Elementary School:

4.2%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 357 (55.5%)
Prairie Trail Elementary School:

55.5%
Texas:

32.3%
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander enrollment: 1 (0.2%)
School:

0.2%
Texas:

0.1%
Two or More Races enrollment: 41 (6.4%)
Prairie Trail Elementary School:

6.4%
State:

2.1%

Prairie Trail Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 73 (11.4%)
Here:

11.4%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 55 (8.6%)
Prairie Trail Elementary School:

8.6%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 18 (2.8%)
Here:

2.8%
Texas:

6.2%

Prairie Trail Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 44.2

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 4
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 4
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 9
Number of FTE nurses: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
School:

14.6
Texas:

15.6

Prairie Trail Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $2,161,731
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 41 (Salary Expenditures: $2,076,005)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $125,240)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $83,974)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $108,312
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $2,485,114
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $2,593,601
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 1 (Salary Expenditures: $180,791)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 5 (Salary Expenditures: $83,974)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $109,100

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic28
  • Asian28
  • White4
  • Multirace2
  • IDEA4
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 62 (male: 36, female: 26)
  • Hispanic: 28 (male: 14, female: 14)
  • Asian: 28 (male: 20, female: 8)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.

    Students with disabilities served under IDEA

  • Hispanic8
  • Asian11
  • White53
  • Multirace11
  • LEP4
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 83 (male: 55, female: 28)
  • Hispanic: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
  • Asian: 11 (male: 7, female: 4)
  • White: 53 (male: 37, female: 16)
  • Two or More Races: 11 (male: 7, female: 4)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (all male)

    Students with disabilities served under Section 504

  • Hispanic4
  • American Indian2
  • Asian2
  • Black2
  • White10
  • Multirace2
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 22 (male: 16, female: 6)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all female)
  • Asian: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,162 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
School:

1.9%
Texas:

5.2%

Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2

Percent of 1st grade students retained
Prairie Trail Elementary School:

1.8%
Texas:

6.1%

Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 2 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2

Percent of 2nd grade students retained
Prairie Trail Elementary School:

1.8%
Texas:

4.8%


Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)

This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic4
  • Asian16
  • White13
  • Multirace2
  • IDEA2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 35 (male: 20, female: 15)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Asian: 16 (male: 8, female: 8)
  • White: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Prairie Trail Elementary School:

54.4
State:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
End-of-course (EOC)
Algebra I students tested: 1
Algebra I # Answer Documents Submitted: 1


3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,489
  • Males1,513
  • Females1,463
  • Hispanic1,426
  • Asian1,524
  • White1,483
  • Multirace1,589
Math Average Scale Score:

1,489
State:

1,453
Math students tested: 119
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 120

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.9 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.1 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.3 (62%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.8 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 33%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 27%

17%
33%
23%
27%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,513, Tested: 63, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 35%)
17%
24%
24%
35%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,463, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 18%)
16%
43%
23%
18%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,426, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 13%)
30%
35%
22%
13%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,524, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 37%)
5%
37%
21%
37%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,483, Tested: 64, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 22%)
16%
36%
26%
22%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,589, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 9%, Masters: 64%)
18%
9%
9%
64%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,486
  • Males1,491
  • Females1,481
  • Hispanic1,428
  • Asian1,491
  • White1,497
  • Multirace1,516
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,486
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 119
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 120

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.4 (87%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.5 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10 (72%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 30%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 21%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 33%

16%
30%
21%
33%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,491, Tested: 63, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 33%)
17%
26%
24%
33%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,481, Tested: 56, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 32%)
14%
36%
18%
32%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,428, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%, Approaches: 44%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 13%)
26%
44%
17%
13%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,491, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 26%)
16%
31%
27%
26%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,497, Tested: 64, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 39%)
14%
27%
20%
39%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,516, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 45%)
9%
27%
19%
45%

3rd Grade (Spanish)
Math students tested: 3
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 3


Reading students tested: 3
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 3


4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,601
  • Males1,601
  • Females1,601
  • Hispanic1,568
  • Asian1,720
  • Black1,531
  • White1,574
  • Multirace1,589
Math Average Scale Score:

1,601
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 126
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 128

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.3 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.8 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.2 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.8 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 31%

17%
29%
23%
31%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,601, Tested: 77, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 32%)
18%
27%
23%
32%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,601, Tested: 49, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 29%)
14%
33%
24%
29%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,568, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 28%)
24%
28%
20%
28%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,720, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 64%)
20%
16%
64%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,531, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 0%)
20%
40%
40%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,574, Tested: 61, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 23%)
21%
31%
25%
23%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,589, Tested: 6, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 17%)
50%
33%
17%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,592
  • Males1,588
  • Females1,599
  • Hispanic1,552
  • Asian1,695
  • Black1,526
  • White1,571
  • Multirace1,629
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,592
State:

1,496
Reading students tested: 128
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 128

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.3 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10 (77%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 18%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 41%

16%
18%
25%
41%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,588, Tested: 78, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 40%)
17%
18%
25%
40%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,599, Tested: 50, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 42%)
16%
16%
26%
42%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,552, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 30%)
20%
30%
20%
30%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,695, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 4%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 68%)
4%
4%
24%
68%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,526, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 20%)
40%
20%
20%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,571, Tested: 61, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 36%)
20%
14%
30%
36%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,629, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 43%)
29%
28%
43%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,877
  • Males3,804
  • Females3,991
  • Hispanic3,689
  • Asian4,284
  • Black3,942
  • White3,796
  • Multirace3,881
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,877
State:

3,570
Writing students tested: 127
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 127

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4 (50%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.8 (60%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.4 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 22%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 34%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 14%

30%
22%
34%
14%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,804, Tested: 77, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 34%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 10%)
34%
23%
33%
10%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,991, Tested: 50, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 20%)
24%
20%
36%
20%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,689, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 47%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 7%)
47%
16%
30%
7%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,284, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 52%, Masters: 28%)
8%
12%
52%
28%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,942, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 20%)
20%
40%
20%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,796, Tested: 60, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 12%)
32%
26%
30%
12%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 3,881, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 14%)
29%
28%
29%
14%

4th Grade (Spanish)
Math students tested: 3
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 3


Reading students tested: 3
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 3


Writing students tested: 3
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 3


5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,701
  • Males1,702
  • Females1,700
  • Hispanic1,693
  • Asian1,727
  • Black1,595
  • White1,702
  • Multirace1,733
Math Average Scale Score:

1,701
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 89
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 91

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.6 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.5 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7 (78%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.4 (85%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 12%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 36%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 49%

3%
12%
36%
49%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,702, Tested: 60, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 52%)
3%
12%
33%
52%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,700, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 11%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 45%)
3%
11%
41%
45%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,693, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 8%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 50%)
8%
42%
50%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,727, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 6%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 63%)
6%
31%
63%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,595, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 20%)
40%
20%
20%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,702, Tested: 51, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 39%, Masters: 45%)
2%
14%
39%
45%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,733, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 80%)
20%
80%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,686
  • Males1,670
  • Females1,719
  • Hispanic1,652
  • Asian1,725
  • Black1,541
  • White1,679
  • Multirace1,835
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,686
State:

1,546
Reading students tested: 90
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 91

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7 (87%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 13.6 (85%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.3 (81%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 10%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 32%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 54%

4%
10%
32%
54%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,670, Tested: 61, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 46%)
7%
9%
38%
46%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,719, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 72%)
10%
18%
72%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,652, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 55%, Masters: 36%)
9%
55%
36%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,725, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 5%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 67%)
6%
5%
22%
67%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,541, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 20%)
60%
20%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,679, Tested: 51, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 57%)
14%
29%
57%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,835, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 40%, Masters: 60%)
40%
60%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All4,160
  • Males4,152
  • Females4,175
  • Hispanic4,012
  • Asian4,159
  • Black3,694
  • White4,196
  • Multirace4,585
Science Average Scale Score:

4,160
State:

3,771
Science students tested: 90
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 90

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.8 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.7 (83%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.9 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 9.5 (79%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 20%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 41%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 31%

8%
20%
41%
31%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,152, Tested: 61, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 46%, Masters: 28%)
7%
19%
46%
28%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,175, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 38%)
10%
21%
31%
38%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,012, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 55%, Masters: 18%)
9%
18%
55%
18%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,159, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 33%)
6%
27%
34%
33%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,694, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 20%)
40%
40%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,196, Tested: 51, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 49%, Masters: 27%)
6%
18%
49%
27%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 4,585, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 100%)
100%

6th Grade
Math students tested: 2
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 2


Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 2


Health & Safety


Harassment & Bullying:
Show data for

(State average from 919 schools)

An allegation is a claim or assertion that someone has done something wrong or illegal, typically made without proof.

Harassment or bullying on the basis of disability refers to intimidation or abusive behavior toward a student based on actual or perceived disability. Harassing conduct may take many forms, including verbal acts and name-calling, as well as non-verbal behavior, such as graphic and written statements, or conduct that is physically threatening, harmful or humiliating. The conduct can be carried out by school employees, other students, and non-employee third parties. Bullying on the basis of disability constitutes disability harassment.
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of disability: 1
Allegations of harassment or bullying on the basis of disability per 1,000 students
School:

1.6
State:

1.0
Students reported as harassed or bullied on the basis of disability: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2

Students disciplined for bullying or harassment on the basis of disability: 2 (all male)
  • Two or More Races: 2
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2



Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)

A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic2
  • Asian4
  • White10
  • LEP2
  • IDEA4
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 16 (male: 7, female: 9)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all female)
  • Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
School:

24.9
Texas:

147.9

Restraint and Seclusion:
Show data for

(State average from 2,148 schools)

Physical restraint refers to a personal restriction that immobilizes or reduces the ability of a student to move his or her torso, arms, legs, or head freely. The term physical restraint does not include a physical escort. Physical escort means a temporary touching or holding of the hand, wrist, arm, shoulder or back for the purpose of inducing a student who is acting out to walk to a safe location.
Total Number of students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint: 11 (male: 9, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)

Students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint per 1,000 students
Prairie Trail Elementary School:

17.1
State:

6.8


Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)

In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.

    Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension

  • Hispanic2
  • White2
  • LEP2
  • 5042
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 4 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • White: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
  • Section 504: 2

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss Flower Mound, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents