Project Search School in Stuart, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 63.

200 HOSPITAL AVE
Stuart, FL 34993

Project Search School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Martin County:

58
Stuart:

52
Project Search School:

63

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (772) 219-1200 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 43
School number: 80
School type: Adult
District Name: MARTIN
Grade range: ADULT
Principal: Maryellen Quinn-Lunny
The function/setting of the school: Hospital
The main educational program offered at the school: Special Education
School Web Address: www.sbmc.org

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

74%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
PROJECT SEARCH:

74%
State average from 133 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

93%
State average from 133 schools:

87%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

61%
State average from 133 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 133 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
PROJECT SEARCH:

77%
State average from 133 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

70%
State average from 133 schools:

59%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
PROJECT SEARCH:

75%
State average from 133 schools:

65%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

590
State average from 133 schools:

541
Percent Tested
PROJECT SEARCH:

100%
State average from 133 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

42%
State average from 133 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

45%
State average from 133 schools:

43%
Region: 3

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1072 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1073 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 332
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1029
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 977

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1030
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 978
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 592 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 592 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 179
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 582
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 555

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 582
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 555
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 133 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 134 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 126
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 118

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 127
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 119
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 238 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 238 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 78
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 215
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 208

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 215
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 208
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 443 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 444 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 136
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 415
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 393

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 416
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 394
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 63 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 131 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 131 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 125
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 117

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 125
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 117
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

72%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

66%
State average from 133 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

91%
State average from 133 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

47%
State average from 133 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 133 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 133 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

69%
State average from 133 schools:

65%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
PROJECT SEARCH:

69%
State average from 133 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

550
State average from 133 schools:

557
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 133 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

39%
State average from 132 schools:

48%
Minority Rate
Here:

43%
State average from 133 schools:

42%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 993 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 993 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 312
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 961
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 910

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 961
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 909
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 568 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 568 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 172
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 556
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 523

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
PROJECT SEARCH:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 556
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 523
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 152 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 152 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 55
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 147
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 147
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 177 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 177 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 53
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 167
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 162

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 167
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 161
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 380 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 380 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 116
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 362
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 338

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 362
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 338
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 112 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 112 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 110
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 110
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
PROJECT SEARCH:

1763
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

25%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
PROJECT SEARCH:

72%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1880
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

30%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

74%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1918
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

27%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

16%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

58%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
PROJECT SEARCH:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
PROJECT SEARCH:

38%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
PROJECT SEARCH:

1%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

53%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
PROJECT SEARCH:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
PROJECT SEARCH:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1721
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

19%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
PROJECT SEARCH:

21%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

60%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1865
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
PROJECT SEARCH:

325
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

24%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

70%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
PROJECT SEARCH:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1931
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

42%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

75%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
PROJECT SEARCH:

1754
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1848
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1914
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1698
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1852
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1913
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 320
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Stuart, FL
  5. Project Search School in Stuart, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.