Quest High School in North Branch, Michigan (MI)

2007 Student Enrollment: 57

Female Enrollment: 26
Male Enrollment: 31


9th Grade Enrollment: 1
10th Grade Enrollment: 13
11th Grade Enrollment: 24
12th Grade Enrollment: 19


9th Grade Female Enrollment: 1
10th Grade Female Enrollment: 4
11th Grade Female Enrollment: 12
12th Grade Female Enrollment: 9


10th Grade Male Enrollment: 9
11th Grade Male Enrollment: 12
12th Grade Male Enrollment: 10

2006 Student Enrollment: 53

Female Enrollment: 23
Male Enrollment: 30


9th Grade Enrollment: 1
10th Grade Enrollment: 6
11th Grade Enrollment: 25
12th Grade Enrollment: 21


9th Grade Female Enrollment: 1
10th Grade Female Enrollment: 4
11th Grade Female Enrollment: 12
12th Grade Female Enrollment: 6


10th Grade Male Enrollment: 2
11th Grade Male Enrollment: 13
12th Grade Male Enrollment: 15

2005 Student Enrollment: 58

Female Enrollment: 22
Male Enrollment: 36


9th Grade Enrollment: 3
10th Grade Enrollment: 16
11th Grade Enrollment: 17
12th Grade Enrollment: 22


9th Grade Female Enrollment: 2
10th Grade Female Enrollment: 11
11th Grade Female Enrollment: 4
12th Grade Female Enrollment: 5


9th Grade Male Enrollment: 1
10th Grade Male Enrollment: 5
11th Grade Male Enrollment: 13
12th Grade Male Enrollment: 17

2004 Student Enrollment: 26

Female Enrollment: 6
Male Enrollment: 20


9th Grade Enrollment: 2
10th Grade Enrollment: 8
11th Grade Enrollment: 9
12th Grade Enrollment: 7


9th Grade Female Enrollment: 1
10th Grade Female Enrollment: 2
11th Grade Female Enrollment: 1
12th Grade Female Enrollment: 2


9th Grade Male Enrollment: 1
10th Grade Male Enrollment: 6
11th Grade Male Enrollment: 8
12th Grade Male Enrollment: 5

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Statistics:

Met Overall AYP: No
Met Math AYP: No
Met English AYP: No

School Safety Practices:

Warning codes used to alert faculty of a critical incident: Yes
Tactical evacuation route for students or entry routes for emergency support teams: Yes
Off-site staging area for assembly and communication at the onset of critical incident: Yes
Emergency communication tree or plan: Yes
Facility blueprints and site plan on file with emergency support team: Yes
Control access to site during school hours (doors locked or monitored): Yes
Control access to grounds during school hours (gates locked or monitored): Yes
Students required to pass through metal detectors each day: No
Visitors required to pass through metal detectors: No
Campus closed for most students during lunch: Yes
Integrated home-land security in school practices into school safety plans: Yes
Random sweeps for weapons: No
Require clear book bags or ban book bags: No
Require students to wear badges or picture IDs: No
Require staff to wear badges or picture IDs: No
Provide staff training in risk assessment: No
Security cameras used to monitor the school: Yes
Telephones provided in most classrooms: Yes
Emergency button provided in lavatories: No
In compliance with the state law that requires that a student who brings a firearm to school be expelled for one year: Yes
In compliance with Elem. and Sec. Edu. Act (ESEA), that requires referral to juvenile delinquency system of any student who brings a firearm to school: Yes
School wide training in positive behavioral support and interventions: No

School Safety Plans:

Safety plan exists - Shootings: Yes
Safety plan exists - Riots: Yes
Safety plan exists - Bomb scares or comparable threats (excluding fire): Yes
Safety plan exists - Disaster planning (tornadoes, floods, chemical spill, etc.): Yes
Safety plan exists - Hostages: Yes
Safety plan exists - Lock down: Yes

School Prevention Programs:

Implemented a violence prevention curriculum: Yes
Practiced behavior modification/intervention with students: Yes
Provided group counseling (social work) or therapeutic activity for students: Yes
Provided peer mentoring or coaching program: Yes
Provided peer mediation (student court) in resolving conduct problems: Yes
Provided conflict resolution training to staff and students: No
Provided programs that promote a sense of social integration among students: Yes
Established a hot line for students to report problems: No
Provided training and assistance in classroom management to teachers: Yes
Revised or reviewed school wide discipline policy: Yes
Made architectural or environmental modifications to reduce crime or violence: No
Used a paid law enforcement or security service: Yes
Implemented a drug prevention service: Yes
Conducted community service projects on prevention: Yes
Implemented teacher/staff training on violence/drug prevention: No
Conducted public/parent awareness activities on violence/drug prevention: Yes
Offered after-school or before-school programs: Yes
Provided alternative education programs: Yes
Underwent curriculum acquisition or development: Yes
Provided services for out-of-school youth (school-age): No
Administered special one-time events (not included in the above mentioned programs): Yes
Involved organizations in administering drug and violence-prevention services via joint service delivery (including referrals): Yes
Involved organizations in administering drug and violence prevention services via teacher/staff training: No
Involved organizations in administering drug and violence prevention services via public awareness activities: No
Involved organizations in administering drug and violence prevention services via fund raising: No
Allowed students to participate in the design, delivery or critiquing of a drug or violence prevention program: Yes
Balanced and restorative justice conferencing (aka transformative conferencing): No

Attendance Statistics:

2007 4-Year Cohort Graduation Statistics:

2007 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Math Statistics:

Students Tested: 13

Students Scoring Partially Proficient: 3
Students Scoring Below Proficient: 10




Did Not Meet Standard: 13

2007 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Reading Statistics:

Students Tested: 13

Students Scoring Proficient: 5
Students Scoring Partially Proficient: 5
Students Scoring Below Proficient: 3




Met Or Exceeded Standards: 5
Did Not Meet Standard: 8

2007 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Writing Statistics:

Students Tested: 13

Students Scoring Proficient: 1
Students Scoring Partially Proficient: 6
Students Scoring Below Proficient: 6




Met Or Exceeded Standards: 1
Did Not Meet Standard: 12

2007 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Science Statistics:

Students Tested: 12

Students Scoring Advanced: 1
Students Scoring Proficient: 5
Students Scoring Partially Proficient: 2
Students Scoring Below Proficient: 4




Met Or Exceeded Standards: 6
Did Not Meet Standard: 6

2007 Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) Social Studies Statistics:

Students Tested: 13

Students Scoring Proficient: 1
Students Scoring Partially Proficient: 5
Students Scoring Below Proficient: 7




Met Or Exceeded Standards: 1
Did Not Meet Standard: 12

1. All Cities
2. Michigan forum
3. Michigan
4. North Branch, MI
5. Quest High School in North Branch, Michigan (MI)

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.