R. Dan Nolan Middle School in Bradenton, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 67.

6615 GREENBROOK BLVD
Bradenton, FL 34202

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Coastal Behavioral Healthcare Residential Treatment Center School (10.8 miles):

92
Phoenix Academy School (10.4 miles):

72
R. Dan Nolan Middle School:

67
Braden River Middle School (2.6 miles):

57
Mcintosh Middle School (8.3 miles):

47
Manatee For The Arts School (11.6 miles):

36
Booker Middle School (8.9 miles):

15
Triad School (10.8 miles):

6
R. Dan Nolan Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Manatee County:

42
Bradenton:

45
R. Dan Nolan Middle School:

67

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (941) 751-8200 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 41
School number: 752
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: MANATEE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (941) 751-8210
Principal: Nancy High
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 13
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 67
Senate District: 21
School Web Address: www.manatee.k12.fl.us

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

74%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

83%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

89%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

52%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

76%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

51%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

76%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

560
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

25%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

22%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 4

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 832 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 832 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 271
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 797
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 754

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 797
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 754
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 652 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 652 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 217
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 626
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 591

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 626
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 591
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 125 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 125 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 118
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 112

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 118
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 112
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 210 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 210 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 71
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 200
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 194

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 200
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 194
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 98 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 98 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

80%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

81%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

93%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

56%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

69%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

582
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

21%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

18%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 814 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 814 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 269
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 778
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 737

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 779
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 736
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 662 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 662 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 222
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 636
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 609

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 637
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 610
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 102 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 102 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 171 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 171 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 51
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 152
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 143

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 153
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 143
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 114 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 114 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 107
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 103

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 107
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 101
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

80%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

80%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

93%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

54%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

79%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

62%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

72%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

586
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

20%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

20%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 832 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 832 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 275
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 800
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 728

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 801
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 730
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 663 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 663 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 222
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 645
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 595

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 646
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 596
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 118 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 118 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 90
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 163 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 163 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 153
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 139

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 153
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 140
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 101 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 101 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 88
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

76%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

74%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

96%
State average from 539 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

44%
State average from 538 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

60%
State average from 539 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

68%
State average from 539 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

58%
State average from 539 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

539
State average from 539 schools:

523
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 539 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

18%
State average from 541 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

18%
State average from 542 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 773 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 772 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 224
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 738
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 737
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 633 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 633 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 193
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 616
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 615
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 95 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 95 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 140 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 139 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 122
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 122
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 101 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 101 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

76%
State average from 526 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

78%
State average from 526 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

94%
State average from 526 schools:

89%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

64%
State average from 526 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

78%
State average from 526 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

69%
State average from 526 schools:

72%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

459
State average from 526 schools:

425
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 526 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

18%
State average from 525 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

16%
State average from 526 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 731 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 731 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 227
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 704
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 686
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 619 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 619 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 195

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 600
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 586
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 66

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 63
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 129 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 129 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 35
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 117
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 112
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 97 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 97 (98%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 27

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 91

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 86
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

68%
State average from 505 schools:

59%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

69%
State average from 505 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

81%
State average from 506 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 505 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

62%
State average from 505 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

58%
State average from 505 schools:

66%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

397
State average from 506 schools:

397
Percent Tested
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

98%
State average from 506 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

20%
State average from 506 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

13%
State average from 506 schools:

50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1838
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

31%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

17%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

78%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1921
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

339
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

34%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

14%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

77%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1907
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

19%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

57%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1902
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

12%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

52%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

20%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

16%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

36%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1675
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

253
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

35%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

61%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

30%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

9%
State average:

17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

9%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

37%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

49%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1799
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

37%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

28%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

11%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

76%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1891
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

32%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

79%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1953
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

28%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

14%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

78%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1895
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

35%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

50%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1887
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

59%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

27%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

32%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

18%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

41%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1808
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1888
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1949
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

323
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1809
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1736
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1788
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

336
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1864
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1962
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

337
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1819
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1916
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 280
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 88%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1789
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1894
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1964
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1710
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

273
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1713
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

261
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

263
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1787
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1880
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1969
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

339
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1764
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

255
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1849
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

290
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

270
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

687
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

77
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

272
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

697
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

79
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

286
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

704
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

78
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

17
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

684
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

52
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

22
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

685
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

44
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

12
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 285
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

305
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 51%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 24
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

251
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 17%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 58%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1777
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1782
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1719
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 63

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1874
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

330
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1881
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1818
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 63

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1908
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1920
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1834
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 86

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1735
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1751
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1721
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 30

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1836
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1843
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1772
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 71

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1933
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

330
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 81%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1946
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1875
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 71

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 261
Mean Scale Score
Here:

686
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 76
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 275
Mean Scale Score
Here:

692
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 76
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 230
Mean Scale Score
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

700
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 75
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 261
Mean Scale Score
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

687
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 77
Number Sense (max 10): 7
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 275
Mean Scale Score
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

704
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 81
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 230
Mean Scale Score
R. DAN NOLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL:

715
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 81
Number Sense (max 9): 7
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 230
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

316
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 60%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 92%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 84%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Bradenton, FL
  5. R. Dan Nolan Middle School in Bradenton, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.