R.J. Frank Academy Of Marine Science & Engineering School in Oxnard, CA
(06-08 • Public • Regular School)
City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in California) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 16
- Address
- 701 N. Juanita Ave.
Oxnard, CA 93030
- Telephone
- (805) 385-1536
(make sure to verify first before calling)
- City-data.com school rating
- 16
- Students
- 1,237
- Classroom Teachers (FTE)
- 61.4
- National School Lunch
Program (NSLP) Status - No
- Free lunch eligible students
- 871
- Reduced-price lunch
eligible students - 178
- School district
- Oxnard
- Charter school
- No
- Title I status
- Title I schoolwide school
- Magnet School Indicator
- No
- Shared Time Indicator
- Missing
- Adult education offered
- No
No street view available for this location
Ratings
This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
R.J. Frank Academy Of Marine Science & Engineering School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:California: | 46 |
Ventura County: | 47 |
Oxnard: | 18 |
This School: | 16 |
Students & Teachers
Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 1,237
Enrollment in 2015: 1,358
Enrollment in 2014: 1,277
Enrollment in 2013: 1,255
Enrollment in 2012: 1,224
Enrollment in 2011: 1,198
Enrollment in 2010: 1,159
Enrollment in 2009: 1,153
Enrollment in 2008: 1,186
Enrollment in 2007: 1,213
Enrollment in 2006: 1,336
Enrollment in 2005: 1,361
Enrollment in 2004: 1,327
Enrollment in 2003: 1,234
Enrollment in 2002: 1,116
Enrollment in 2001: 1,076
Enrollment in 2000: 994
Enrollment in 1999: 970
R.J. Frank Academy Of Marine Science & Engineering School - Historical enrollment
Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
Grade | G06 | G07 | G08 | Total |
---|
All students | 413 | 409 | 415 | 1,237 |
Female students | 204 | 199 | 200 | 603 |
Male students | 209 | 210 | 215 | 634 |
American Indian/Alaska Native students | 1 | - | - | 1 |
Asian students | 17 | 26 | 24 | 67 |
Hispanic students | 386 | 365 | 377 | 1,128 |
Black students | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
White students | 3 | 12 | 9 | 24 |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander students | - | 2 | 1 | 3 |
Two or More Races students | 2 | 3 | 3 | 8 |
Enrollment by grade:
6th grade enrollment: 413
7th grade enrollment: 409
8th grade enrollment: 415
R.J. Frank Academy Of Marine Science & Engineering School - Historical enrollment by grade
Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
Female enrollment: 603 (48.7%)R.J. Frank Academy Of Marine Science & Engineering School: | 48.7% |
State: | 49.4% |
Male enrollment: 634 (51.3%)
R.J. Frank Academy Of Marine Science & Engineering School - Historical enrollment by gender
Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 1 (0.1%)
Asian enrollment: 67 (5.4%)
Hispanic enrollment: 1,128 (91.2%)R.J. Frank Academy Of Marine Science & Engineering School: | 91.2% |
California: | 46.0% |
Black enrollment: 6 (0.5%)
White enrollment: 24 (1.9%)
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander enrollment: 3 (0.2%)
Two or More Races enrollment: 8 (0.6%)
R.J. Frank Academy Of Marine Science & Engineering School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity
Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 10,111 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 1,049 (84.8%)R.J. Frank Academy Of Marine Science & Engineering School: | 84.8% |
State: | 61.2% |
Free lunch eligible students: 871 (70.4%)Here: | 70.4% |
California: | 52.8% |
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 178 (14.4%)Here: | 14.4% |
California: | 8.6% |
R.J. Frank Academy Of Marine Science & Engineering School - Lunch Program Eligibility
Teachers and support:
(State average from 12,394 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 61.4
Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 4
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 19
Number of FTE psychologists: 1
Student/Teacher RatioSchool: | 20.1 |
California: | 22.8 |
R.J. Frank Academy Of Marine Science & Engineering School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio
School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds:
$5,274,270- Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 63 (Salary Expenditures: $4,111,752)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 0.7 (Salary Expenditures: $7,189)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $312,590)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 11 (Salary Expenditures: $842,740)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds:
$349,060Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,:
$5,492,770- Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $4,195,344
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 0.7 (Salary Expenditures: $7,189)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $433,514)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 12.8 (Salary Expenditures: $856,723)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds:
$326,753 Limited English Proficiency:
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs
- Hispanic421
- Asian13
- Native Hawaiian2
- IDEA67
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 436 (male: 244, female: 192)
- Hispanic: 421 (male: 236, female: 185)
- Asian: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 2 (all female)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 67 (male: 47, female: 20)
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs
- Hispanic559
- Asian10
- White2
- IDEA67
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 571 (male: 295, female: 276)
- Hispanic: 559 (male: 290, female: 269)
- Asian: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
- White: 2 (all female)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 67 (male: 47, female: 20)
Students with disabilities:
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.
Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 99 (male: 71, female: 28)
- Hispanic: 95 (male: 67, female: 28)
- White: 4 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 68 (male: 46, female: 22)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504
- Hispanic22
- Black2
- White2
- LEP10
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 26 (male: 21, female: 5)
- Hispanic: 22 (male: 17, female: 5)
- Black: 2 (all male)
- White: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
Students with disabilities served under IDEA
- Hispanic98
- Native Hawaiian4
- Black4
- White4
- LEP68
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 110 (male: 82, female: 28)
- Hispanic: 98 (male: 70, female: 28)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 4 (all male)
- Black: 4 (all male)
- White: 4 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 68 (male: 49, female: 19)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 13 (male: 11, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 13 (male: 11, female: 2)
Gifted and Talented:
(State average from 5,551 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment
- Hispanic58
- Asian10
- Black2
- White2
- Multirace4
- LEP7
- IDEA2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 76 (male: 31, female: 45)
- Hispanic: 58 (male: 20, female: 38)
- Asian: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
- Black: 2 (all male)
- White: 2 (all male)
- Two or More Races: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 13 (male: 9, female: 4)
- Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
- Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 studentsR.J. Frank Academy Of Marine Science & Engineering School: | 10.5 |
State: | 93.6 |
Statewide Student Assessments
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments:
(State average from 10,463 schools)
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments (SB) is one of the online summative assessments - part of California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System.
The summative assessments are comprehensive, end-of-year assessments of grade-level learning that measure progress toward college and career readiness. Each test in English language arts/literacy (ELA) and mathematics is comprised of two parts: (1) a computer-adaptive test and (2) a performance task, administered within a selected testing window available at 66 percent of the instructional year for grades three through eight, and grade eleven.
The summative assessments are aligned with the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) for ELA and mathematics. The tests capitalize on the strengths of computer adaptive testing efficient and precise measurement across the full range of achievement and timely turnaround of results.
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All27%
- Males24%
- Females31%
- Asian60%
- Hispanic22%
- White38%
ELA students tested: 1,236
ELA students with scores: 1,235
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 27% |
State: | 49% |
Standard Not Met:
47.5%Standard Nearly Met:
25.2%Standard Met:
21.8%Standard Exceeded:
5.6%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2459.1, Students tested: 406, Standard Not Met: 49.1%, Nearly Met: 28.4%, Met: 18.8%, Exceeded: 3.7%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2480.2, Students tested: 414, Standard Not Met: 50.2%, Nearly Met: 21.0%, Met: 21.0%, Exceeded: 7.7%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2505.9, Students tested: 416, Standard Not Met: 43.0%, Nearly Met: 26.2%, Met: 25.5%, Exceeded: 5.3%)R.J. Frank Academy Of Marine Science & Engineering School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All12%
- Males12%
- Females12%
- Asian20%
- Hispanic8%
- White7%
Math students tested: 1,273
Math students with scores: 1,273
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 12% |
State: | 38% |
Standard Not Met:
65.4%Standard Nearly Met:
22.9%Standard Met:
7.5%Standard Exceeded:
4.2%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2435.7, Students tested: 421, Standard Not Met: 62.2%, Nearly Met: 26.4%, Met: 8.1%, Exceeded: 3.3%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2449.0, Students tested: 428, Standard Not Met: 65.2%, Nearly Met: 23.1%, Met: 7.2%, Exceeded: 4.4%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2451.5, Students tested: 424, Standard Not Met: 68.9%, Nearly Met: 19.1%, Met: 7.3%, Exceeded: 4.7%)R.J. Frank Academy Of Marine Science & Engineering School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All31%
- Males24%
- Females38%
- Asian55%
- Filipino56%
- Hispanic25%
ELA students tested: 1,205
ELA students with scores: 1,202
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 31% |
California: | 48% |
Standard Not Met:
42.0%Standard Nearly Met:
27.0%Standard Met:
25.0%Standard Exceeded:
6.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2465.1, Students tested: 400, Standard Not Met: 45.0%, Nearly Met: 29.0%, Met: 20.0%, Exceeded: 5.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2494.1, Students tested: 403, Standard Not Met: 46.0%, Nearly Met: 21.0%, Met: 26.0%, Exceeded: 7.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2524.5, Students tested: 402, Standard Not Met: 34.0%, Nearly Met: 32.0%, Met: 30.0%, Exceeded: 5.0%)R.J. Frank Academy Of Marine Science & Engineering School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All14%
- Males14%
- Females13%
- Asian30%
- Filipino31%
- Hispanic11%
- White25%
Math students tested: 1,228
Math students with scores: 1,224
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 14% |
California: | 37% |
Standard Not Met:
58.0%Standard Nearly Met:
28.0%Standard Met:
9.0%Standard Exceeded:
4.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2448.4, Students tested: 408, Standard Not Met: 54.0%, Nearly Met: 29.0%, Met: 11.0%, Exceeded: 5.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2462.1, Students tested: 413, Standard Not Met: 56.0%, Nearly Met: 31.0%, Met: 10.0%, Exceeded: 3.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2470.3, Students tested: 407, Standard Not Met: 65.0%, Nearly Met: 23.0%, Met: 8.0%, Exceeded: 4.0%)R.J. Frank Academy Of Marine Science & Engineering School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All26%
- Males20%
- Females33%
- Asian59%
- Filipino62%
- Hispanic21%
- White45%
ELA students tested: 1,287
ELA students with scores: 1,283
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 26% |
State: | 44% |
Standard Not Met:
44.0%Standard Nearly Met:
29.0%Standard Met:
22.0%Standard Exceeded:
4.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2469.5, Students tested: 377, Standard Not Met: 47.0%, Nearly Met: 27.0%, Met: 20.0%, Exceeded: 6.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2492.7, Students tested: 395, Standard Not Met: 46.0%, Nearly Met: 27.0%, Met: 22.0%, Exceeded: 5.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2504.2, Students tested: 515, Standard Not Met: 42.0%, Nearly Met: 33.0%, Met: 23.0%, Exceeded: 3.0%)R.J. Frank Academy Of Marine Science & Engineering School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All14%
- Males14%
- Females15%
- Asian21%
- Filipino27%
- Hispanic12%
- White9%
Math students tested: 1,320
Math students with scores: 1,316
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 14% |
State: | 34% |
Standard Not Met:
58.0%Standard Nearly Met:
28.0%Standard Met:
10.0%Standard Exceeded:
5.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2453.7, Students tested: 384, Standard Not Met: 54.0%, Nearly Met: 31.0%, Met: 9.0%, Exceeded: 6.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2467.9, Students tested: 410, Standard Not Met: 57.0%, Nearly Met: 30.0%, Met: 10.0%, Exceeded: 4.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2470.7, Students tested: 526, Standard Not Met: 62.0%, Nearly Met: 24.0%, Met: 10.0%, Exceeded: 5.0%)R.J. Frank Academy Of Marine Science & Engineering School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
California Alternate Assessments:
(State average from 1,579 schools)
The new California Alternate Assessments (CAAs) are based on alternate achievement standards-called the Core Content Connectors-and linked to the Common Core State Standards. The CAAs are online tests for students with an individualized education program (IEP) that designates the use of an alternate assessment to measure student progress on alternate achievement standards. This alternate assessment is part of the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System and replaces the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) for English language arts and mathematics.
ELA students tested: 17
ELA students with scores: 17
Percentage Level 3: | 0% |
California: | 15% |
Level 1:
82.3% The student showed limited understanding of core concepts.Level 2:
17.6% The student showed foundational understanding of core concepts. Level 3:
0.0% The student showed understanding of core concepts.All Grades:
Math students tested: 16
Math students with scores: 16
Percentage Level 3: | 0% |
State: | 6% |
Level 1:
87.5% The student showed limited understanding of core concepts.Level 2:
12.5% The student showed foundational understanding of core concepts. Level 3:
0.0% The student showed understanding of core concepts.All Grades:
ELA students tested: 16
ELA students with scores: 16
Percentage Level 3: | 6% |
State: | 11% |
Level 1:
69.0% The student showed limited understanding of core concepts.Level 2:
25.0% The student showed foundational understanding of core concepts. Level 3:
6.0% The student showed understanding of core concepts.All Grades:
Math students tested: 16
Math students with scores: 16
Percentage Level 3: | 0% |
California: | 5% |
Level 1:
81.0% The student showed limited understanding of core concepts.Level 2:
19.0% The student showed foundational understanding of core concepts. Level 3:
0.0% The student showed understanding of core concepts.All Grades:
Paper-based CAASPP:
(State average from 9,784 schools)
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System includes paper-based tests:
California Standards Tests (CSTs) - The CSTs for science in grades five, eight, and ten are administered only to students in California public schools. All questions are multiple-choice. These tests were developed specifically to assess students' knowledge of the California content standards in science.
California Modified Assessment (CMA) - The CMA for science was administered to eligible students in grades five, eight, and ten. The CMA is a standards-based test for students with an individualized education program who meet the eligibility criteria adopted by the State Board of Education. The Elementary and Secondary Education Act called for a range of assessments appropriate to students' abilities. The CMA provides an appropriate assessment for a small percentage of students allowing them to demonstrate their knowledge of skills in the California academic content standards for science.
CST Science students tested: 390
CST Science students with scores: 386
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 39% |
California: | 54% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
18.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
17.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
26.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
22.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
18.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 331.3, Students tested: 390, Far Below Basic: 18.0%, Below Basic: 17.0%, Basic: 26.0%, Proficient: 22.0%, Advanced: 18.0%)18.0%
17.0%
26.0%
22.0%
18.0%
CMA Science students tested: 14
CMA Science students with scores: 14
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 0% |
State: | 38% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
35.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
36.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
29.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
0.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
0.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 266.1, Students tested: 14, Far Below Basic: 35.0%, Below Basic: 36.0%, Basic: 29.0%, Proficient: 0.0%, Advanced: 0.0%) CST Science students tested: 485
CST Science students with scores: 485
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 44% |
California: | 56% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
14.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
18.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
24.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
25.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
19.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 338.6, Students tested: 485, Far Below Basic: 14.0%, Below Basic: 18.0%, Basic: 24.0%, Proficient: 25.0%, Advanced: 19.0%)14.0%
18.0%
24.0%
25.0%
19.0%
CMA Science students tested: 21
CMA Science students with scores: 21
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 24% |
State: | 38% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
23.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
10.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
43.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
24.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
0.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 310.3, Students tested: 21, Far Below Basic: 23.0%, Below Basic: 10.0%, Basic: 43.0%, Proficient: 24.0%, Advanced: 0.0%) CST Science students tested: 595
CST Science students with scores: 595
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 50% |
California: | 60% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
8.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
13.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
29.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
26.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
24.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 352.8, Students tested: 595, Far Below Basic: 8.0%, Below Basic: 13.0%, Basic: 29.0%, Proficient: 26.0%, Advanced: 24.0%)
CMA Science students tested: 36
CMA Science students with scores: 36
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 19% |
State: | 39% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
9.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
22.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
50.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
14.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
6.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 321.5, Students tested: 36, Far Below Basic: 9.0%, Below Basic: 22.0%, Basic: 50.0%, Proficient: 14.0%, Advanced: 6.0%) The Physical Fitness Test:
The Physical Fitness Test (PFT) for students in California schools is the FITNESSGRAM. The main goal of the test is to help students in starting life-long habits of regular physical activity.
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 433, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 52.7%, Needs Improvement: 31.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 16.1%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 433, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 50.8%, Needs Improvement: 19.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 29.8%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 433, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 54.7%, Needs Improvement: 45.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 433, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 86.1%, Needs Improvement: 13.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 433, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 39.5%, Needs Improvement: 60.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 433, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 71.1%, Needs Improvement: 28.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 406, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 61.8%, Needs Improvement: 28.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 9.9%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 406, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 57.4%, Needs Improvement: 19.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 23.1%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 406, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 55.2%, Needs Improvement: 44.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 406, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 88.7%, Needs Improvement: 11.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 406, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 40.6%, Needs Improvement: 59.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 406, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 73.9%, Needs Improvement: 26.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 411, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 52.1%, Needs Improvement: 34.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 13.6%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 411, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 52.1%, Needs Improvement: 20.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 27.7%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 411, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 61.1%, Needs Improvement: 38.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 411, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 88.3%, Needs Improvement: 11.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 411, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 54.0%, Needs Improvement: 46.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 411, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 85.4%, Needs Improvement: 14.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 607, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 55.2%, Needs Improvement: 31.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 13.3%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 607, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 52.2%, Needs Improvement: 19.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 27.9%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 607, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 66.4%, Needs Improvement: 33.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 607, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 83.0%, Needs Improvement: 17.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 607, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 46.1%, Needs Improvement: 53.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 607, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 74.1%, Needs Improvement: 25.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 625, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 53.3%, Needs Improvement: 20.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 26.2%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 625, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 40.0%, Needs Improvement: 14.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 45.9%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 625, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 49.4%, Needs Improvement: 50.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 625, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 80.8%, Needs Improvement: 19.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 625, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 48.5%, Needs Improvement: 51.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 625, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 71.2%, Needs Improvement: 28.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 600, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 52.5%, Needs Improvement: 24.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 23.5%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 600, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 44.8%, Needs Improvement: 12.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 42.9%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 600, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 66.0%, Needs Improvement: 34.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 600, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 85.5%, Needs Improvement: 14.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 600, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 57.2%, Needs Improvement: 42.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 600, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 67.3%, Needs Improvement: 32.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
California English Language Development Test:
(State average from 9,932 schools)
Students in kindergarten through grade twelve whose home language is not English are required by law to take an English skills test. In California, the test is called the California English Language Development Test (CELDT).
R.J. Frank Academy Of Marine Science & Engineering School - students who met CELDT criterion (all grades)
All Grades:Student Count: 510
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 167
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 33.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 189
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 65
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 34.0% |
State: | 39.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 489.7 |
California: | 532.4 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 496.1 |
California: | 518.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 484.9 |
State: | 518.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 496.5 |
State: | 522.0 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 175
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 45
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 26.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 504.2 |
State: | 547.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 499.1 |
California: | 534.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 490.5 |
State: | 529.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 491.2 |
California: | 530.2 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 146
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 57
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 39.0% |
State: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 528.8 |
California: | 556.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 529.3 |
California: | 547.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 504.9 |
State: | 536.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 515.8 |
State: | 537.0 |
All Grades:Student Count: 449
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 150
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 33.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 180
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 47
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 26.0% |
California: | 41.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 501.9 |
State: | 536.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 501.5 |
State: | 523.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 455.1 |
State: | 520.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 492.2 |
California: | 524.6 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 142
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 61
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 43.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 552.8 |
State: | 550.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 508.9 |
State: | 536.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 482.5 |
State: | 530.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 512.4 |
State: | 532.1 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 127
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 42
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 33.0% |
California: | 49.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 526.7 |
California: | 562.4 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 527.3 |
State: | 552.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 478.0 |
California: | 539.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 508.7 |
California: | 541.2 |
All Grades:Student Count: 505
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 153
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 30.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 157
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 33
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 21.0% |
State: | 38.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 512.7 |
California: | 535.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 502.0 |
California: | 521.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 476.0 |
State: | 519.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 502.7 |
California: | 522.6 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 151
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 43
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 28.0% |
State: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 510.1 |
California: | 551.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 520.5 |
State: | 538.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 483.9 |
California: | 532.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 498.5 |
California: | 532.1 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 197
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 77
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 39.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 533.7 |
State: | 562.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 533.0 |
California: | 552.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 495.5 |
State: | 543.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 525.7 |
State: | 541.5 |
All Grades:Student Count: 456
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 219
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 48.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Grade 7:Student Count: 248
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 125
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 50.0% |
California: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 566.6 |
State: | 549.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 545.8 |
California: | 538.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 530.5 |
State: | 533.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 554.6 |
California: | 535.2 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 208
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 94
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 45.0% |
State: | 49.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 578.6 |
California: | 564.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 559.7 |
California: | 554.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 539.7 |
State: | 545.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 560.9 |
California: | 545.9 |
All Grades:Student Count: 437
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 140
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 32.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Grade 7:Student Count: 241
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 87
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 36.0% |
State: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 552.0 |
State: | 557.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 526.8 |
State: | 539.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 521.3 |
State: | 543.2 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 547.8 |
State: | 540.4 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 196
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 53
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 27.0% |
State: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 556.4 |
California: | 570.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 532.6 |
State: | 552.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 524.5 |
State: | 551.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 551.0 |
State: | 548.6 |
All Grades:Student Count: 397
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 167
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 42.0% |
State: | 35.0% |
Grade 7:Student Count: 235
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 110
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 47.0% |
California: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 562.2 |
State: | 566.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 537.8 |
State: | 544.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 544.1 |
California: | 543.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 551.1 |
State: | 545.1 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 162
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 57
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 35.0% |
California: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 565.0 |
State: | 579.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 545.2 |
State: | 558.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 533.9 |
State: | 553.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 548.7 |
California: | 555.6 |
All Grades:Student Count: 466
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 162
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 35.0% |
State: | 31.0% |
Grade 7:Student Count: 219
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 90
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 41.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 556.1 |
California: | 559.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 529.7 |
State: | 542.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 523.6 |
California: | 548.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 530.5 |
State: | 534.4 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 247
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 72
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 29.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 556.5 |
California: | 570.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 531.2 |
State: | 557.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 523.2 |
State: | 562.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 543.6 |
State: | 544.1 |
Accountability
Adequate Yearly Progress:
(State average from 9,846 schools)
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) - Accountability system mandated by federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Statistics are based on test results of the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program, the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE), and the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA).
R.J. Frank Academy Of Marine Science & Engineering School - Adequate Yearly Progress status
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White96
- Multirace100
- SED98
- LEP99
- With Disabilities98
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 1,097 out of 1,113 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 25 out of 25 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 39 out of 39 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- White: 96% (tested 22 out of 23 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 98% (tested 1,054 out of 1,071 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 738 out of 742 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 98% (tested 100 out of 102 enrolled)
Math Participation RateSchool: | 99.0% |
California: | 96.1% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black86
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED99
- LEP99
- With Disabilities98
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 1,118 out of 1,128 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 25 out of 25 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 39 out of 39 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 86% (tested 6 out of 7 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 24 out of 24 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 1,075 out of 1,086 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 754 out of 758 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 98% (tested 100 out of 102 enrolled)
Met all AYP Criteria: Yes
Number of AYP criteria met: 9
Number of AYP criteria possible: 9
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)Attendance rate (calculated by using average daily attendance data) : 97
Met Attendance rate Target: Yes
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
ELA Participation RateR.J. Frank Academy Of Marine Science & Engineering School: | 98.0% |
California: | 95.2% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic98
- American Indian100
- Asian97
- Filipino98
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED98
- LEP100
- With Disabilities97
- Hispanic: 98% (tested 1,184 out of 1,205 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 97% (tested 26 out of 27 enrolled)
- Filipino: 98% (tested 44 out of 45 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 28 out of 28 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 98% (tested 1,134 out of 1,157 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 640 out of 643 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 97% (tested 106 out of 109 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic23
- Asian65
- Filipino67
- White52
- SED23
- LEP8
- With Disabilities10
- Hispanic: 23% (268 out of 1,165 valid scores)
- Asian: 65% (17 out of 26 valid scores)
- Filipino: 67% (29 out of 43 valid scores)
- White: 52% (14 out of 27 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 23% (251 out of 1,116 valid scores)
- English Learners: 8% (51 out of 627 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 10% (9 out of 91 valid scores)
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Math Participation RateR.J. Frank Academy Of Marine Science & Engineering School: | 99.0% |
California: | 94.9% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED99
- LEP100
- With Disabilities98
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 1,211 out of 1,220 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 28 out of 28 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 46 out of 46 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 28 out of 28 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 7 out of 7 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 1,164 out of 1,173 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 657 out of 660 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 98% (tested 107 out of 109 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveR.J. Frank Academy Of Marine Science & Engineering School: | 14.7% |
State: | 33.3% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic13
- Asian35
- Filipino40
- White22
- SED12
- LEP4
- With Disabilities7
- Hispanic: 13% (152 out of 1,174 valid scores)
- Asian: 35% (9 out of 26 valid scores)
- Filipino: 40% (17 out of 43 valid scores)
- White: 22% (6 out of 27 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 12% (140 out of 1,125 valid scores)
- English Learners: 4% (26 out of 629 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 7% (6 out of 92 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 10
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 89.2%
ELA Participation RateR.J. Frank Academy Of Marine Science & Engineering School: | 99.0% |
California: | 98.2% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White96
- Multirace100
- SED99
- LEP99
- With Disabilities96
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 1,134 out of 1,143 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 16 out of 16 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 39 out of 39 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 13 out of 13 enrolled)
- White: 96% (tested 23 out of 24 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 1,059 out of 1,067 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 837 out of 844 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 96% (tested 130 out of 136 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveR.J. Frank Academy Of Marine Science & Engineering School: | 36.3% |
California: | 55.7% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic34
- Asian87
- Filipino66
- Black54
- White59
- SED33
- LEP28
- With Disabilities19
- Hispanic: 34% (370 out of 1,099 valid scores)
- Asian: 87% (13 out of 15 valid scores)
- Filipino: 66% (25 out of 38 valid scores)
- Black: 54% (7 out of 13 valid scores)
- White: 59% (13 out of 22 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 33% (337 out of 1,030 valid scores)
- English Learners: 28% (231 out of 815 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 19% (24 out of 126 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 89.5%
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White96
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,140 out of 1,143 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 16 out of 16 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 39 out of 39 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 13 out of 13 enrolled)
- White: 96% (tested 23 out of 24 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,065 out of 1,067 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 842 out of 844 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 135 out of 136 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveR.J. Frank Academy Of Marine Science & Engineering School: | 28.9% |
State: | 59.6% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic27
- Asian93
- Filipino63
- Black15
- White32
- SED26
- LEP26
- With Disabilities16
- Hispanic: 27% (299 out of 1,105 valid scores)
- Asian: 93% (14 out of 15 valid scores)
- Filipino: 63% (24 out of 38 valid scores)
- Black: 15% (2 out of 13 valid scores)
- White: 32% (7 out of 22 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 26% (272 out of 1,036 valid scores)
- English Learners: 26% (209 out of 820 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 16% (21 out of 131 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 12
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 78.4%
ELA Participation RateR.J. Frank Academy Of Marine Science & Engineering School: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,124 out of 1,126 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 14 out of 14 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 38 out of 38 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 10 out of 10 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 25 out of 25 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,036 out of 1,038 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 745 out of 746 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 120 out of 121 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveR.J. Frank Academy Of Marine Science & Engineering School: | 44.1% |
California: | 57.4% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic42
- Asian85
- Filipino73
- White65
- SED40
- LEP30
- With Disabilities23
- Hispanic: 42% (448 out of 1,074 valid scores)
- Asian: 85% (11 out of 13 valid scores)
- Filipino: 73% (27 out of 37 valid scores)
- White: 65% (15 out of 23 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 40% (398 out of 989 valid scores)
- English Learners: 30% (215 out of 713 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 23% (26 out of 113 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 79%
Math Participation RateSchool: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.1% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,124 out of 1,126 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 14 out of 14 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 38 out of 38 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 10 out of 10 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 25 out of 25 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 3 out of 3 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,036 out of 1,038 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 745 out of 746 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 121 out of 121 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveR.J. Frank Academy Of Marine Science & Engineering School: | 30.5% |
State: | 59.9% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic28
- Asian54
- Filipino73
- White35
- SED28
- LEP23
- With Disabilities18
- Hispanic: 28% (305 out of 1,073 valid scores)
- Asian: 54% (7 out of 13 valid scores)
- Filipino: 73% (27 out of 37 valid scores)
- White: 35% (8 out of 23 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 28% (276 out of 988 valid scores)
- English Learners: 23% (161 out of 712 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 18% (20 out of 113 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 16
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 67.6%
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,085 out of 1,086 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 19 out of 19 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 44 out of 44 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 18 out of 18 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,049 out of 1,050 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 725 out of 726 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 127 out of 127 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic38
- Asian68
- Filipino76
- White59
- SED38
- LEP24
- With Disabilities27
- Hispanic: 38% (393 out of 1,044 valid scores)
- Asian: 68% (13 out of 19 valid scores)
- Filipino: 76% (32 out of 42 valid scores)
- White: 59% (10 out of 17 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 38% (387 out of 1,017 valid scores)
- English Learners: 24% (166 out of 702 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 27% (33 out of 123 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 68.5%
Math Participation RateHere: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.0% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,085 out of 1,086 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 19 out of 19 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 44 out of 44 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 18 out of 18 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,049 out of 1,050 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 725 out of 726 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 127 out of 127 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic30
- Asian74
- Filipino60
- White41
- SED30
- LEP21
- With Disabilities20
- Hispanic: 30% (312 out of 1,044 valid scores)
- Asian: 74% (14 out of 19 valid scores)
- Filipino: 60% (25 out of 42 valid scores)
- White: 41% (7 out of 17 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 30% (304 out of 1,017 valid scores)
- English Learners: 21% (149 out of 702 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 20% (24 out of 123 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 11
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 56.8%
ELA Participation RateR.J. Frank Academy Of Marine Science & Engineering School: | 100.0% |
State: | 98.2% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,057 out of 1,057 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 19 out of 19 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 52 out of 52 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 8 out of 8 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 20 out of 20 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 891 out of 891 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 840 out of 840 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 128 out of 128 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 34.5% |
California: | 53.7% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic31
- Asian74
- Filipino69
- White67
- SED30
- LEP26
- With Disabilities15
- Hispanic: 31% (309 out of 994 valid scores)
- Asian: 74% (14 out of 19 valid scores)
- Filipino: 69% (33 out of 48 valid scores)
- White: 67% (12 out of 18 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 30% (257 out of 850 valid scores)
- English Learners: 26% (209 out of 800 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 15% (19 out of 126 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 58%
Math Participation RateR.J. Frank Academy Of Marine Science & Engineering School: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.1% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,057 out of 1,057 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 19 out of 19 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 52 out of 52 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 8 out of 8 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 20 out of 20 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 891 out of 891 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 840 out of 840 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 128 out of 128 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 26.2% |
California: | 57.1% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic24
- Asian74
- Filipino40
- White61
- SED25
- LEP21
- With Disabilities12
- Hispanic: 24% (238 out of 994 valid scores)
- Asian: 74% (14 out of 19 valid scores)
- Filipino: 40% (19 out of 48 valid scores)
- White: 61% (11 out of 18 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 25% (208 out of 850 valid scores)
- English Learners: 21% (170 out of 800 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 12% (15 out of 126 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 12
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 46%
ELA Participation RateSchool: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White96
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,060 out of 1,061 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 17 out of 17 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 49 out of 49 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 13 out of 13 enrolled)
- White: 96% (tested 20 out of 21 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 940 out of 942 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 710 out of 711 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 114 out of 114 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 32.8% |
California: | 52.4% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic29
- Asian88
- Filipino82
- Black27
- White61
- SED28
- LEP19
- With Disabilities20
- Hispanic: 29% (290 out of 996 valid scores)
- Asian: 88% (14 out of 16 valid scores)
- Filipino: 82% (37 out of 45 valid scores)
- Black: 27% (3 out of 11 valid scores)
- White: 61% (11 out of 18 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 28% (248 out of 893 valid scores)
- English Learners: 19% (128 out of 678 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 20% (22 out of 108 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 47.5%
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White96
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,060 out of 1,061 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 17 out of 17 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 49 out of 49 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 13 out of 13 enrolled)
- White: 96% (tested 20 out of 21 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 940 out of 942 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 710 out of 711 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 114 out of 114 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveR.J. Frank Academy Of Marine Science & Engineering School: | 27.3% |
State: | 55.6% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic25
- Asian81
- Filipino53
- Black36
- White50
- SED25
- LEP19
- With Disabilities9
- Hispanic: 25% (245 out of 996 valid scores)
- Asian: 81% (13 out of 16 valid scores)
- Filipino: 53% (24 out of 45 valid scores)
- Black: 36% (4 out of 11 valid scores)
- White: 50% (9 out of 18 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 25% (221 out of 893 valid scores)
- English Learners: 19% (131 out of 678 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 9% (10 out of 108 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 14
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 35.2%
ELA Participation RateR.J. Frank Academy Of Marine Science & Engineering School: | 100.0% |
State: | 98.1% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,082 out of 1,083 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 13 out of 13 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 44 out of 44 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 10 out of 10 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 11 out of 11 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 891 out of 892 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 703 out of 704 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 118 out of 118 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic30
- Asian85
- Filipino70
- White73
- SED30
- LEP19
- With Disabilities6
- Hispanic: 30% (302 out of 1,017 valid scores)
- Asian: 85% (11 out of 13 valid scores)
- Filipino: 70% (30 out of 43 valid scores)
- White: 73% (8 out of 11 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 30% (247 out of 830 valid scores)
- English Learners: 19% (130 out of 673 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 6% (7 out of 112 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 37%
Math Participation RateHere: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.0% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,082 out of 1,083 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 13 out of 13 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 44 out of 44 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 10 out of 10 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 11 out of 11 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 891 out of 892 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 703 out of 704 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 118 out of 118 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 21.2% |
California: | 52.3% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic19
- Asian85
- Filipino61
- White36
- SED18
- LEP13
- With Disabilities6
- Hispanic: 19% (188 out of 1,017 valid scores)
- Asian: 85% (11 out of 13 valid scores)
- Filipino: 61% (26 out of 43 valid scores)
- White: 36% (4 out of 11 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 18% (152 out of 830 valid scores)
- English Learners: 13% (87 out of 673 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 6% (7 out of 112 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 12
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation RateHere: | 100.0% |
California: | 97.8% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,078 out of 1,078 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 20 out of 20 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 48 out of 48 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 12 out of 12 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 18 out of 18 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 984 out of 984 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 779 out of 779 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 126 out of 126 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveR.J. Frank Academy Of Marine Science & Engineering School: | 26.0% |
California: | 46.4% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic23
- Asian74
- Filipino69
- Black42
- White64
- SED22
- LEP20
- With Disabilities9
- Hispanic: 23% (233 out of 1,035 valid scores)
- Asian: 74% (14 out of 19 valid scores)
- Filipino: 69% (33 out of 48 valid scores)
- Black: 42% (5 out of 12 valid scores)
- White: 64% (9 out of 14 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 22% (205 out of 944 valid scores)
- English Learners: 20% (156 out of 768 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 9% (11 out of 122 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation RateHere: | 100.0% |
California: | 97.9% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,078 out of 1,078 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 20 out of 20 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 48 out of 48 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 12 out of 12 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 18 out of 18 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 984 out of 984 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 779 out of 779 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 126 out of 126 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic15
- Asian58
- Filipino40
- Black25
- White50
- SED15
- LEP14
- With Disabilities7
- Hispanic: 15% (156 out of 1,035 valid scores)
- Asian: 58% (11 out of 19 valid scores)
- Filipino: 40% (19 out of 48 valid scores)
- Black: 25% (3 out of 12 valid scores)
- White: 50% (7 out of 14 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 15% (138 out of 944 valid scores)
- English Learners: 14% (105 out of 768 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 7% (8 out of 122 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 12
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation RateSchool: | 100.0% |
California: | 97.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,142 out of 1,144 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 14 out of 14 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 56 out of 56 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 12 out of 12 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 25 out of 25 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,028 out of 1,030 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 827 out of 829 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 136 out of 136 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic23
- Asian69
- Filipino66
- Black42
- White56
- SED22
- LEP20
- With Disabilities6
- Hispanic: 23% (245 out of 1,075 valid scores)
- Asian: 69% (9 out of 13 valid scores)
- Filipino: 66% (36 out of 55 valid scores)
- Black: 42% (5 out of 12 valid scores)
- White: 56% (14 out of 25 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 22% (211 out of 964 valid scores)
- English Learners: 20% (160 out of 796 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 6% (8 out of 134 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation RateR.J. Frank Academy Of Marine Science & Engineering School: | 100.0% |
State: | 97.5% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,141 out of 1,144 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 14 out of 14 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 56 out of 56 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 12 out of 12 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 25 out of 25 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,028 out of 1,030 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 827 out of 829 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 136 out of 136 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Asian46
- Filipino53
- Black42
- White36
- SED16
- LEP15
- With Disabilities8
- Asian: 46% (6 out of 13 valid scores)
- Filipino: 53% (29 out of 55 valid scores)
- Black: 42% (5 out of 12 valid scores)
- White: 36% (9 out of 25 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 16% (156 out of 964 valid scores)
- English Learners: 15% (119 out of 796 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 8% (10 out of 134 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 12
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation RateSchool: | 100.0% |
California: | 99.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,199 out of 1,199 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 15 out of 15 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 33 out of 33 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 14 out of 14 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 38 out of 38 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,091 out of 1,091 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 850 out of 850 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 122 out of 122 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic22
- Asian58
- Filipino67
- Black27
- White57
- SED21
- LEP19
- With Disabilities8
- Hispanic: 22% (257 out of 1,161 valid scores)
- Asian: 58% (7 out of 12 valid scores)
- Filipino: 67% (22 out of 33 valid scores)
- Black: 27% (3 out of 11 valid scores)
- White: 57% (20 out of 35 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 21% (222 out of 1,053 valid scores)
- English Learners: 19% (161 out of 839 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 8% (10 out of 121 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation RateHere: | 100.0% |
California: | 99.2% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 1,199 out of 1,199 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 15 out of 15 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 33 out of 33 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 14 out of 14 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 38 out of 38 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 1,091 out of 1,091 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 850 out of 850 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 122 out of 122 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveR.J. Frank Academy Of Marine Science & Engineering School: | 15.0% |
State: | 49.3% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic13
- Asian58
- Filipino55
- White40
- SED12
- LEP13
- With Disabilities6
- Hispanic: 13% (149 out of 1,161 valid scores)
- Asian: 58% (7 out of 12 valid scores)
- Filipino: 55% (18 out of 33 valid scores)
- White: 40% (14 out of 35 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 12% (131 out of 1,053 valid scores)
- English Learners: 13% (105 out of 839 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 6% (7 out of 121 valid scores)
Health & Safety
Offenses:
(State average from 5,445 schools)
An incident refers to a specific criminal act involving one or more victims and offenders. For example, if two students are robbed without a weapon, at the same time and place, this is classified as two robbery victimizations but only one robbery without a weapon incident
A weapon is any instrument or object used with the intent to threaten, injure, or kill. This includes look-alikes if they are used to threaten others.
Firearm or explosive device refers to any weapon that is designed to (or may readily be converted to) expel a projectile by the action of an explosive. This includes guns, bombs, grenades, mines, rockets, missiles, pipe bombs, or similar devices designed to explode and capable of causing bodily harm or property damage
Physical attack or fight refers to an actual and intentional touching or striking of another person against his/her will, or the intentional causing of bodily harm to an individual. Physical attack or fight does not include rape.
A threat refers to an act where there was no physical contact between the offender and victim but the victim felt that physical harm could have occurred based on verbal or nonverbal communication by the offender. This includes nonverbal threats (e.g., brandishing a weapon), and verbal threats of physical harm which are made in person. Threats made over the telephone or threatening letters are excluded.
At least one incident at this school that involved a shooting: No
Any of this school's students, faculty, or staff died as a result of a homicide committed at this school: No
Incidents of physical attack or fight without a weapon: 112
Incidents of threats of physical attack without a weapon: 1
Incidents of possession of a firearm or explosive device: 14
Total incidents per 1,000 studentsHere: | 102.7 |
California: | 60.8 |
Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
(State average from 8,737 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.
Chronic Student Absenteeism
- Hispanic112
- White4
- LEP46
- IDEA16
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 116 (male: 70, female: 46)
- Hispanic: 112 (male: 68, female: 44)
- White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 46 (male: 35, female: 11)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 16 (male: 11, female: 5)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 studentsSchool: | 93.8 |
California: | 172.7 |
Suspensions:
(State average from 1,406 schools)
Out-of-school suspension - For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
- For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision. School days missed due to out-of-school suspension
- Hispanic188
- Black6
- LEP115
- IDEA30
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 194 (male: 163, female: 31)
- Hispanic: 188 (male: 159, female: 29)
- Black: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 115 (male: 98, female: 17)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 30 (male: 25, female: 5)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 163
Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 43 (male: 38, female: 5)
- Hispanic: 43 (male: 38, female: 5)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 19 (male: 17, female: 2)
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 46 (male: 38, female: 8)
- Hispanic: 46 (male: 38, female: 8)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 22 (male: 20, female: 2)
Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 33 (male: 26, female: 7)
- Hispanic: 31 (male: 26, female: 5)
- Black: 2 (all female)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 22 (male: 17, female: 5)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students with disabilities): 31
Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students with disabilities)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Section 504 only): 19
Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Section 504 only)
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 5 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Students with disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 9 (male: 7, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Black: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 66 (male: 43, female: 23)
- Hispanic: 64 (male: 41, female: 23)
- Asian: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 17 (all male)
Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 63 (male: 46, female: 17)
- Hispanic: 61 (male: 44, female: 17)
- Black: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 26 (all male)
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 2 (all male)
Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Students with disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 8 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 5
Comments
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: