River Springs Middle School in Orange City, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 29.

900 W OHIO AVE
Orange City, FL 32763

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Indian Trails Middle School (17.6 miles):

82
Deland Middle School (4.5 miles):

67
Lyman High School (17.6 miles):

56
South Seminole Middle School (19.3 miles):

44
Southwestern Middle School (4.7 miles):

36
River Springs Middle School:

29
Hopper Center School (9.9 miles):

18
John Polk Alternative School (12.7 miles):

2
River Springs Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Volusia County:

42
Orange City:

29
River Springs Middle School:

29

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (386) 456-5346 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 64
School number: 7741
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: VOLUSIA
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (386) 456-5355
Principal: John Atkinson
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Title 1 school not in need of improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 7
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 26
Senate District: 20
School Web Address: http://sweagles.dadeschools.net/

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

74%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

67%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

92%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

45%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

68%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

553
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

49%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

30%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 2

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1230 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1229 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 364
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1165
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1116

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1167
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1114
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 865 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 865 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 257
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 825
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 794

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 827
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 795
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 215 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 214 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 66
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 201
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 192

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 201
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 189
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 597 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 597 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 175
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 552
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 525

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 554
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 524
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 178 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 178 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 167
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 160

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 167
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 159
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

70%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

63%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

84%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

46%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

66%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

67%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

61%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

522
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

42%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

27%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1176 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1176 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 364
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1122
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1078

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1119
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1073
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 866 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 866 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 285
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 843
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 812

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 843
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 811
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 174 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 174 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 157
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 150

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 154
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 146
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 490 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 490 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 145
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 455
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 434

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 453
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 430
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 203 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 203 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 73

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 189
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 182

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 189
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 181
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

44%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

72%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

88%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

28%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

56%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

78%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

55%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

75%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

506
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

51%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

92%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1518 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1517 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 721
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1464
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1385

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1462
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1381
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 134 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 133 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 63
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 132
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 123

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 131
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 122
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1328 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1328 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 634
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1277
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1212

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1276
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1208
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 820 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 819 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 398
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 775
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 723

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 773
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 722
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 253 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 252 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 118
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 223
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 186

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 222
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 183
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 240 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 241 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 112
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 235
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 217

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 235
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 212
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

40%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

62%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

80%
State average from 539 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

34%
State average from 538 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

52%
State average from 539 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 539 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

54%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

66%
State average from 539 schools:

67%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

457
State average from 539 schools:

523
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 539 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

46%
State average from 541 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

91%
State average from 542 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1606 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1582 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 786
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1533
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1514
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 134 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 134 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 72
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 132
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 132
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1417 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1393 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 689
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1348
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1329
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 814 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 802 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 340
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 765
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 755
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 268 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 264 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 104
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 232
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 230
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 253 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 241 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 115
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 240
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 229
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

42%
State average from 526 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

66%
State average from 526 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

86%
State average from 526 schools:

89%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 526 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 526 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

60%
State average from 526 schools:

72%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

387
State average from 526 schools:

425
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 526 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

48%
State average from 525 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

91%
State average from 526 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1681 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1661 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 795
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1603
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1581
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 143 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 141 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 69

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 139
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 138
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 31

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1484 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1467 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 700

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1411
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1391
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 847 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 835 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 351

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 802
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 790
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 278 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 274 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 119

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 242
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 238
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 282 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 276 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 134

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 276
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 269
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

34%
State average from 505 schools:

59%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

63%
State average from 505 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

84%
State average from 506 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

49%
State average from 505 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 505 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

49%
State average from 505 schools:

66%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

350
State average from 506 schools:

397
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 506 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: No%

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

42%
State average from 506 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

90%
State average from 506 schools:

50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1755
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

18%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

26%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

71%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1845
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

26%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

71%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1898
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

30%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

39%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

15%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

56%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1909
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

20%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

36%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

30%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

10%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

43%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1983
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

62%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

28%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

32%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

19%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

13%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

40%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

21%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

38%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

41%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

25%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

39%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

5%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

36%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1733
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

21%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

21%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

59%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1784
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

25%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

23%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

16%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

52%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1910
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

43%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

70%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1943
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

40%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

22%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

68%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2022
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

89%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

36%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

79%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1752
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1810
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1872
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1943
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1964
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1685
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1774
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1878
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1942
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1992
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 83%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 375
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 77%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 850
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 2
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 74%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1896
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1931
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

301
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1924
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1986
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 81%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

790
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

695
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

63
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

697
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

707
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

65
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

14
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 724
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

301
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 54%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 81%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
RIVER SPRINGS MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1862
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1885
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1814
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 71

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1908
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 12
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1935
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1884
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 52

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1891
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1902
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1858
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 43

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1953
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 72%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1963
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1920
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 43

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 802
Mean Scale Score
Here:

689
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 57
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 823
Mean Scale Score
Here:

690
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 48
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 802
Mean Scale Score
Here:

703
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 65
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 8
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 824
Mean Scale Score
Here:

706
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 56
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 792
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

281
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 40%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 73%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 57%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Orange City, FL
  5. River Springs Middle School in Orange City, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.