Rosenwald Center School in Altamonte Springs, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 60.

1096 MERRITT ST
Altamonte Springs, FL 32701

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

Lake Eola Charter School (8.8 miles):	98
Lake Mary High School (4.7 miles):	68
Wicklow Elementary School (8.4 miles):	60
Rosenwald Center School:	60
Rock Springs Elementary School (10.1 miles):	53
Lawton Chiles Elementary School (11.0 miles):	44
La-Amistad School (3.9 miles):	34
Ridgewood Park Elementary School (8.9 miles):	20

Rosenwald Center School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
Seminole County:	56
Altamonte Springs:	61
Rosenwald Center School:	60

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (407) 746-3250 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 59
School number: 311
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: SEMINOLE
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (407) 746-3279
Principal: Cathy Loyd
The main educational program offered at the school: Special Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 7
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 37
Senate District: 22
School Web Address: http://www.scps.k12.fl.us/schools/schoolinfopage.cfm?schoolnumber=0311

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	96%
State average from 59 schools:	76%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	96%
State average from 59 schools:	78%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	92%
State average from 59 schools:	85%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	79%
State average from 59 schools:	54%

Making Reading Gains

ROSENWALD CENTER:	77%
State average from 59 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

ROSENWALD CENTER:	66%
State average from 59 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	76%
State average from 59 schools:	62%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	88%
State average from 59 schools:	69%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	670
State average from 59 schools:	560

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 59 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 119999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	31%
State average from 59 schools:	54%

Minority Rate

Here:	12%
State average from 59 schools:	46%

Region: 1

Title I: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (94%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	34%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	28%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

ROSENWALD CENTER:	26%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	28%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	26%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	28%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	26%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	95%
State average from 58 schools:	76%

Meeting High Standards in Math

ROSENWALD CENTER:	95%
State average from 58 schools:	77%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	94%
State average from 58 schools:	88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	82%
State average from 58 schools:	50%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	76%
State average from 58 schools:	69%

Making Math Gains

Here:	76%
State average from 58 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	80%
State average from 58 schools:	66%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	76%
State average from 58 schools:	68%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	674
State average from 58 schools:	564

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 59 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

ROSENWALD CENTER:	31%
State average from 59 schools:	51%

Minority Rate

ROSENWALD CENTER:	11%
State average from 59 schools:	46%

Region: 1

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (93%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	64%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	18%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	33%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	18%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	33%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	18%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	33%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	96%
State average from 59 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	94%
State average from 59 schools:	75%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	90%
State average from 59 schools:	83%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	74%
State average from 59 schools:	47%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	82%
State average from 59 schools:	65%

Making Math Gains

Here:	72%
State average from 59 schools:	70%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

ROSENWALD CENTER:	85%
State average from 59 schools:	60%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	73%
State average from 59 schools:	68%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	666
State average from 59 schools:	541

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 59 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	25%
State average from 59 schools:	47%

Minority Rate

Here:	14%
State average from 59 schools:	46%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (93%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	48%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	26%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	22%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	26%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	22%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	26%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	22%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

ROSENWALD CENTER:	71%
State average from 25 schools:	61%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	66%
State average from 25 schools:	61%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	91%
State average from 25 schools:	81%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	47%
State average from 25 schools:	42%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	75%
State average from 25 schools:	59%

Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded

Making Math Gains

Here:	65%
State average from 25 schools:	65%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	70%
State average from 25 schools:	57%

% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	71%
State average from 25 schools:	66%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns

Here:	556
State average from 25 schools:	493

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 25 schools:	97%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	75%
State average from 25 schools:	55%

Minority Rate

Here:	71%
State average from 25 schools:	44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 219 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 220 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	95%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 57
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	63%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 197
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	58%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 198
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 112 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 113 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	46%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	35%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 169 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 170 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	95%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	57%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 148
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	52%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 149
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	37%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	21%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

ROSENWALD CENTER:	67%
State average from 23 schools:	61%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	53%
State average from 23 schools:	61%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	68%
State average from 23 schools:	83%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	51%
State average from 23 schools:	59%

Making Math Gains

Here:	52%
State average from 23 schools:	67%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	58%
State average from 23 schools:	59%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	349
State average from 23 schools:	391

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 23 schools:	97%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	79%
State average from 24 schools:	53%

Minority Rate

ROSENWALD CENTER:	67%
State average from 24 schools:	44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 225 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 224 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 58
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	58%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 208
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	49%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 208
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 76 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 76 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 17

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 71
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	76%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 71
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 106 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 106 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 26

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	39%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 97
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	26%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 97
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 165 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 164 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 46
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	51%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 152
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	39%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 152
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 56 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 56 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	36%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 56
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	41%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 56
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	74%
State average from 24 schools:	55%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	67%
State average from 24 schools:	56%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	73%
State average from 24 schools:	79%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	54%
State average from 24 schools:	56%

Making Math Gains

Here:	55%
State average from 24 schools:	63%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	45%
State average from 24 schools:	54%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	368
State average from 24 schools:	363

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 24 schools:	95%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: No%

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	76%
State average from 24 schools:	54%

Minority Rate

Here:	66%
State average from 24 schools:	41%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1626
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	354
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	5%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

ROSENWALD CENTER:	3%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

ROSENWALD CENTER:	23%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	47%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	22%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	92%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	20
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

ROSENWALD CENTER:	5
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1837
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	363
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	4%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	2%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	22%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	44%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	29%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	95%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	23
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	10
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1804
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

ROSENWALD CENTER:	338
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	2%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	11%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	31%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	41%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	16%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

ROSENWALD CENTER:	87%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

ROSENWALD CENTER:	17
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	11
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1918
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	349
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	5%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	10%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	28%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	35%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	22%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

ROSENWALD CENTER:	85%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	16
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1990
State average:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	352
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	4%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	11%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	27%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	37%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	20%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	85%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	19
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1516
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

ROSENWALD CENTER:	232
State average:	308

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	78%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

ROSENWALD CENTER:	11%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

ROSENWALD CENTER:	11%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	22%
State average:	52%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	2
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	10
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1754
State average:	1922

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	281
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	50%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	21%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	14%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	14%
State average:	12%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	29%
State average:	45%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	9
State average:	11

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	5
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	356
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

ROSENWALD CENTER:	3%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	23%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	42%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	19%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	13%
State average:	4%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	74%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

ROSENWALD CENTER:	11
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	10
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	10
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	245
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	65%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	18%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	18%
State average:	31%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	18%
State average:	41%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	6
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	4
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	6
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	5
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1674
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	381
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	4%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	16%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	48%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	32%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	96%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

ROSENWALD CENTER:	10
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

ROSENWALD CENTER:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1759
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	369
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	2%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

ROSENWALD CENTER:	4%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	28%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	41%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	25%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

ROSENWALD CENTER:	94%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	9
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1804
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	362
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	1%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	11%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	28%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	45%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

ROSENWALD CENTER:	15%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	88%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

ROSENWALD CENTER:	8
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	8
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	8
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1865
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	354
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	9%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	12%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	28%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	27%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	25%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	79%
State average:	55%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

ROSENWALD CENTER:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

ROSENWALD CENTER:	1948
State average:	1786

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	346
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	5%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	11%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	33%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	31%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	20%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	84%
State average:	57%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	7
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1645
State average:	1892

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	257
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	56%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	22%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	11%
State average:	38%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	6%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	6%
State average:	10%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	22%
State average:	64%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

ROSENWALD CENTER:	4
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

ROSENWALD CENTER:	3
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1750
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	251
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	40%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	47%
State average:	22%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	13%
State average:	21%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	13%
State average:	61%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	3
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

ROSENWALD CENTER:	2
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	3
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	2
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1649
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	357
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 20
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1760
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

ROSENWALD CENTER:	350
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 02%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 08%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

ROSENWALD CENTER:	1841
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	344
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1907
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	347
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1988
State average:	1800

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	351
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

ROSENWALD CENTER:	1540
State average:	1864

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	237
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1735
State average:	1907

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	277
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

ROSENWALD CENTER:	1641
State average:	1921

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	247
State average:	299

Percent Passing: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	357
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	204
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 80%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1684
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	383
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 37%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1742
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	366
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1816
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	364
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

ROSENWALD CENTER:	1850
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	351
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1964
State average:	1799

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	349
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1611
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	248
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1777
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	259
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

ROSENWALD CENTER:	1846
State average:	1972

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	290
State average:	321

Percent Passing: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 142

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 11%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 93%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 16

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	3
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 38%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 13

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	3
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 23%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1585
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	347
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 95%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1821
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	360
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 95%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 22
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1861
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	348
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1896
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

ROSENWALD CENTER:	345
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1992
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	352
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1625
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	255
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1702
State average:	1894

Mean Scale Score 100-500

ROSENWALD CENTER:	271
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 65%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	353
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	236
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1581
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	361
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 96%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1746
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	366
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1831
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	367
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 9
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1840
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	349
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1967
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	350
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1595
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

ROSENWALD CENTER:	244
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1753
State average:	1915

Mean Scale Score 100-500

ROSENWALD CENTER:	252
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

ROSENWALD CENTER:	135
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

Here:	657
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

Here:	80
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

ROSENWALD CENTER:	15
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

ROSENWALD CENTER:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

ROSENWALD CENTER:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	17
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

ROSENWALD CENTER:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	132
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

Here:	674
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

ROSENWALD CENTER:	84
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

ROSENWALD CENTER:	16
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	11
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

ROSENWALD CENTER:	132
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

Here:	689
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

Here:	87
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

ROSENWALD CENTER:	15
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

ROSENWALD CENTER:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	384
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

ROSENWALD CENTER:	699
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

Here:	84
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

ROSENWALD CENTER:	9
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	17
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

ROSENWALD CENTER:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

ROSENWALD CENTER:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	358
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

Here:	714
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

Here:	88
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	11
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	11
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	21
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

Here:	645
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

Here:	25
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

ROSENWALD CENTER:	9
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

Here:	8
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	10
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	5
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	9
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

ROSENWALD CENTER:	7
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

ROSENWALD CENTER:	5
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	17
State average:	273

Mean Scale Score

ROSENWALD CENTER:	662
State average from 2275 schools:	694

Median NPR

Here:	31
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	9
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

ROSENWALD CENTER:	8
State average:	11

Functional (max 18)

Here:	9
State average:	11

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	5
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	11
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	4
State average:	5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	8
State average:	237

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 132

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	355
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 87%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 14

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 89%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 12

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	210
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 83%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 8%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	3
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 42%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 11

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	173
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 91%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 9%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	2
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1298
State average:	1342

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	300
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1434
State average from 1875 schools:	1542

Mean Scale Score 100-500

ROSENWALD CENTER:	294
State average:	313

% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1405
State average:	1546

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1287
State average:	1397

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 118

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

ROSENWALD CENTER:	1611
State average from 1873 schools:	1629

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	303
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1599
State average:	1632

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1504
State average:	1532

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 94

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

ROSENWALD CENTER:	303
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1375
State average:	1413

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

ROSENWALD CENTER:	1439
State average from 1874 schools:	1525

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	296
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1425
State average:	1528

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

ROSENWALD CENTER:	1307
State average:	1414

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 118

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1607
State average from 1872 schools:	1647

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	320
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

ROSENWALD CENTER:	1610
State average:	1649

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1433
State average:	1519

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 178

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 86

Mean Scale Score

ROSENWALD CENTER:	624
State average from 1891 schools:	633

Median NPR: 53
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 61

Mean Scale Score

ROSENWALD CENTER:	633
State average from 1874 schools:	642

Median NPR: 53
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 72

Mean Scale Score

Here:	666
State average from 1870 schools:	667

Median NPR: 71
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 86

Mean Scale Score

Here:	619
State average from 1891 schools:	632

Median NPR: 59
Number Sense (max 14): 10
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 61

Mean Scale Score

Here:	639
State average from 1874 schools:	652

Median NPR: 66
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 72

Mean Scale Score

Here:	653
State average from 1870 schools:	663

Median NPR: 66
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 60

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

ROSENWALD CENTER:	294
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 47%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

ROSENWALD CENTER:	3
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 88%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 68%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AL	AZ	CA	CO	CT	DE	FL
GA	HI	IA	ID	IL	IN	KS
LA	MA	MD	MI	MN	MO	NC
NE	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	TN	TX	UT
VA	WA	WI	WV

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY