Silver River Mentoring And Instruction School in Ocala, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 1.

2500 SE 44TH COURT
Ocala, FL 34471

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Villages Charter Middle School (16.8 miles):

88
Marion Technical Institute School (3.0 miles):

76
West Port High School (10.8 miles):

66
Lake Weir High School (8.9 miles):

55
Fort King Middle School (3.2 miles):

42
Lake Weir Middle School (11.1 miles):

31
Infinity /Marion County School (4.6 miles):

10
Silver River Mentoring And Instruction School:

1
Kingsbury Academy School (8.8 miles):

0
Silver River Mentoring And Instruction School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Marion County:

48
Ocala:

52
This School:

1

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (352) 694-0191 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 42
School number: 9618
School type: Senior High
District Name: MARION
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 12
School's status regarding neglected and delinquent criteria: Delinquent, Non-residential
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (352) 694-0195
Principal: Mike Nebesnyk
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 6
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 24
Senate District: 7

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 132 (76%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 136 (80%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 49
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (85%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (86%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
SILVER RIVER MENTORING AND INSTRUCTION:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (69%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (74%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 119 (77%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 121 (80%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 60

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 62
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 71 (71%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (74%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
SILVER RIVER MENTORING AND INSTRUCTION:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (73%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (77%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25 (66%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26 (72%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (72%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 63 (75%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (77%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 63 (79%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (76%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (78%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20 (79%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23 (80%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (76%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (78%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 101 (86%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 97 (84%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
SILVER RIVER MENTORING AND INSTRUCTION:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (86%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (87%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (84%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (81%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (80%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 100 (79%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 97 (78%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 30
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 57
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 53
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (88%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (89%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (74%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (71%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (81%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 63 (79%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 37
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
SILVER RIVER MENTORING AND INSTRUCTION:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 34
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1354
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

247
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

77%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

15%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

15%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

8
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1566
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

56%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

13%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

6%
State average:

23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

19%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
SILVER RIVER MENTORING AND INSTRUCTION:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1620
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

254
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

62%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

12%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

1%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
SILVER RIVER MENTORING AND INSTRUCTION:

13%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
SILVER RIVER MENTORING AND INSTRUCTION:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
SILVER RIVER MENTORING AND INSTRUCTION:

4
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1761
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SILVER RIVER MENTORING AND INSTRUCTION:

282
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

42%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

37%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

16%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

21%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

9
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
SILVER RIVER MENTORING AND INSTRUCTION:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1819
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

280
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

47%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

47%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
SILVER RIVER MENTORING AND INSTRUCTION:

37%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

16%
State average:

17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

16%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

241
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

69%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

6%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

6%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
SILVER RIVER MENTORING AND INSTRUCTION:

6
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

5
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1456
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

259
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

73%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

13%
State average:

29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

13%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
SILVER RIVER MENTORING AND INSTRUCTION:

4
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1480
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

229
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

81%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
SILVER RIVER MENTORING AND INSTRUCTION:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1702
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

51%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

17%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

1%
State average:

17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

18%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
SILVER RIVER MENTORING AND INSTRUCTION:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1846
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

279
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

24%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

10%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

48%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
SILVER RIVER MENTORING AND INSTRUCTION:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1887
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

62%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

23%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

35%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
SILVER RIVER MENTORING AND INSTRUCTION:

31%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

12%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

42%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1437
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SILVER RIVER MENTORING AND INSTRUCTION:

246
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1776
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1676
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
SILVER RIVER MENTORING AND INSTRUCTION:

1637
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

247
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

226
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 84%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1559
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

249
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1796
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1786
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

261
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1818
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 12
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 50%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 16
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 31%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1782
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1525
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

226
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 93%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
SILVER RIVER MENTORING AND INSTRUCTION:

1797
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1759
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

268
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

2
State average:

192

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
SILVER RIVER MENTORING AND INSTRUCTION:

32
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
SILVER RIVER MENTORING AND INSTRUCTION:

665
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
SILVER RIVER MENTORING AND INSTRUCTION:

33
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
SILVER RIVER MENTORING AND INSTRUCTION:

4
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

35
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

665
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

25
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
SILVER RIVER MENTORING AND INSTRUCTION:

9
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 39
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

222
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 8%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 6
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 44%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Ocala, FL
  5. Silver River Mentoring And Instruction School in Ocala, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.