9th Grade Male Enrollment: 5 10th Grade Male Enrollment: 4 12th Grade Male Enrollment: 3
White Enrollment (%): 100.0%
Here:
100.0%
State average from 3483 schools:
70.4%
Genders in Stockbridge Alternative High School
Grades in Stockbridge Alternative High School
2006 Student Enrollment: 21
Female Enrollment: 11 Male Enrollment: 10
Special Education Enrollment: 21
Special Education Female Enrollment: 11
Special Education Male Enrollment: 10
White Enrollment (%): 95.2%
Stockbridge Alternative High School:
95.2%
State average from 3572 schools:
70.3%
Multiracial Enrollment (%): 4.8%
Here:
4.8%
State average from 3572 schools:
1.2%
Genders in Stockbridge Alternative High School
Races in Stockbridge Alternative High School
2005 Student Enrollment: 22
Female Enrollment: 13 Male Enrollment: 9
Special Education Enrollment: 22
Special Education Female Enrollment: 13
Special Education Male Enrollment: 9
White Enrollment (%): 77.3%
Here:
77.3%
State average from 3644 schools:
70.9%
Hispanic Enrollment (%): 9.1%
This school:
9.1%
State average from 3644 schools:
4.6%
American Indian Enrollment (%): 9.1%
Here:
9.1%
State average from 3644 schools:
1.2%
Multiracial Enrollment (%): 4.55%
Here:
4.55%
State average from 3644 schools:
0.62%
Genders in Stockbridge Alternative High School
Races in Stockbridge Alternative High School
2004 Student Enrollment: 25
Female Enrollment: 15 Male Enrollment: 10
Special Education Enrollment: 25
Special Education Female Enrollment: 15
Special Education Male Enrollment: 10
White Enrollment (%): 96.0%
This school:
96.0%
State average from 3582 schools:
72.3%
Hispanic Enrollment (%): 4.0%
This school:
4.0%
State average from 3582 schools:
4.5%
Genders in Stockbridge Alternative High School
Races in Stockbridge Alternative High School
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Statistics:
Met Overall AYP: Yes
School Safety Practices:
Warning codes used to alert faculty of a critical incident: Yes Tactical evacuation route for students or entry routes for emergency support teams: Yes Off-site staging area for assembly and communication at the onset of critical incident: Yes Emergency communication tree or plan: Yes Facility blueprints and site plan on file with emergency support team: Yes Control access to site during school hours (doors locked or monitored): Yes Control access to grounds during school hours (gates locked or monitored): No Students required to pass through metal detectors each day: No Visitors required to pass through metal detectors: No Campus closed for most students during lunch: Yes Integrated home-land security in school practices into school safety plans: Yes Random sweeps for weapons: No Require clear book bags or ban book bags: No Require students to wear badges or picture IDs: No Require staff to wear badges or picture IDs: No Provide staff training in risk assessment: Yes Security cameras used to monitor the school: Yes Telephones provided in most classrooms: Yes Emergency button provided in lavatories: No In compliance with the state law that requires that a student who brings a firearm to school be expelled for one year: Yes In compliance with Elem. and Sec. Edu. Act (ESEA), that requires referral to juvenile delinquency system of any student who brings a firearm to school: Yes School wide training in positive behavioral support and interventions: Yes
School Safety Plans:
Safety plan exists - Shootings: Yes Safety plan exists - Riots: Yes Safety plan exists - Bomb scares or comparable threats (excluding fire): Yes Safety plan exists - Disaster planning (tornadoes, floods, chemical spill, etc.): Yes Safety plan exists - Hostages: Yes Safety plan exists - Lock down: Yes
School Prevention Programs:
Implemented a violence prevention curriculum: Yes Practiced behavior modification/intervention with students: Yes Provided group counseling (social work) or therapeutic activity for students: Yes Provided peer mentoring or coaching program: Yes Provided peer mediation (student court) in resolving conduct problems: Yes Provided conflict resolution training to staff and students: Yes Provided programs that promote a sense of social integration among students: Yes Established a hot line for students to report problems: No Provided training and assistance in classroom management to teachers: Yes Revised or reviewed school wide discipline policy: Yes Made architectural or environmental modifications to reduce crime or violence: No Used a paid law enforcement or security service: No Implemented a drug prevention service: Yes Conducted community service projects on prevention: No Implemented teacher/staff training on violence/drug prevention: Yes Conducted public/parent awareness activities on violence/drug prevention: No Offered after-school or before-school programs: No Provided alternative education programs: Yes Underwent curriculum acquisition or development: Yes Provided services for out-of-school youth (school-age): No Administered special one-time events (not included in the above mentioned programs): No Involved organizations in administering drug and violence-prevention services via joint service delivery (including referrals): No Involved organizations in administering drug and violence prevention services via teacher/staff training: No Involved organizations in administering drug and violence prevention services via public awareness activities: No Involved organizations in administering drug and violence prevention services via fund raising: No Allowed students to participate in the design, delivery or critiquing of a drug or violence prevention program: No Balanced and restorative justice conferencing (aka transformative conferencing): No
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: