Summit Charter West School in Orlando, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 62.

2332 N HIAWASSEE RD
Orlando, FL 32818

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Lake Eola Charter School (6.4 miles):

98
Ventura Elementary School (12.0 miles):

69
Summit Charter West School:

62
Wicklow Elementary School (18.0 miles):

60
Orange Center Elementary School (5.0 miles):

55
Legacy Middle School (15.8 miles):

46
Riverside Elementary School (5.4 miles):

35
Meadowbrook Middle School (1.7 miles):

20
Summit Charter West School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Orange County:

44
Orlando:

42
Summit Charter West School:

62

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (407) 293-5604 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 48
School number: 83
School type: Elementary
District Name: ORANGE
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 6
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (407) 293-5265
Principal: Steve Palmer
Regular charter school.
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 3
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 39
Senate District: 19

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

86%
State average from 24 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

87%
State average from 24 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

97%
State average from 24 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

72%
State average from 24 schools:

54%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 24 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

79%
State average from 24 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

61%
State average from 24 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

79%
State average from 24 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

631
State average from 24 schools:

548
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 24 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: N

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

40%
State average from 24 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
Here:

36%
State average from 24 schools:

40%
Region: 4

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 666 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 666 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 188
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 653
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 633

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 652
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 632
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 430 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 430 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 117
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 424
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 413

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 423
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 412
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 111 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 111 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 268 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 268 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 79
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 261
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 256

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 261
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 256
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 90 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 90 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

86%
State average from 24 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

82%
State average from 23 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

100%
State average from 23 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

67%
State average from 23 schools:

55%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 23 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

79%
State average from 23 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

70%
State average from 24 schools:

65%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 23 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

624
State average from 23 schools:

557
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 23 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: N

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

38%
State average from 23 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

37%
State average from 23 schools:

40%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 628 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 628 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 174
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 605
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 581

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 605
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 581
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 395 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 395 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 107
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 382
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 363

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 382
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 363
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 85 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 85 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 93 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 93 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 86
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 86
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 241 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 241 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 65
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 232
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 222

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 232
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 222
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 75
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 75
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

81%
State average from 21 schools:

68%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

80%
State average from 21 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

99%
State average from 21 schools:

81%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

59%
State average from 21 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 21 schools:

62%
Making Math Gains
Here:

80%
State average from 21 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

73%
State average from 21 schools:

60%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

76%
State average from 21 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

617
State average from 21 schools:

530
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 21 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

33%
State average from 21 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

35%
State average from 21 schools:

41%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 588 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 588 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 167
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 570
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 552

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 570
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 552
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 380 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 380 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 118
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 370
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 355

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 370
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 355
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 88 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 88 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 86
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 86
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 81 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 81 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 75
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 75
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 191 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 191 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 184
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 182

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 184
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 182
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 95 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 95 (94%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 79 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 79 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

9%
State average from 17 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

82%
State average from 17 schools:

82%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

53%
State average from 17 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

39%
State average from 17 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

84%
State average from 17 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

267
State average from 17 schools:

419
Percent Tested
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

96%
State average from 17 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: F

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

78%
State average from 18 schools:

46%
Minority Rate
Here:

88%
State average from 17 schools:

40%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 160 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 159 (95%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 49
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 132
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 133
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 130 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 129 (95%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 42
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 110
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 111
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 123 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 123 (97%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 34
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 101
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 102
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 122 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 121 (94%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 35
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 100
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 101
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

1233
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

27%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

40%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

15%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

58%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1477
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

17%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

42%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

17%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

60%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

17
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1552
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

293
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

23%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

19%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

61%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

10
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1843
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

33%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

13%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

81%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

16
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1956
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

345
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

34%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

18%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

85%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2015
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

337
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

36%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

77%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

19
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

8
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

28%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

49%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

21%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

1%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

24%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

8
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

346
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

44%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

16%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

67%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

10
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1235
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

22%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

16%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

47%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

4
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1438
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

26%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

44%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

11%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

56%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1516
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

32%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

40%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

19%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

6%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

28%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1827
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

346
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

10%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

33%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

11%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

82%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1915
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

337
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

29%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

18%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

79%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

7
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1991
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

345
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

2%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

10%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

31%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

18%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

88%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1263
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1512
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 09
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1592
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1848
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1937
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

342
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1992
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

298
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1250
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1387
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

1525
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

1817
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

343
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1894
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1982
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

342
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 111
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 66%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 176
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

5
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 23%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 23%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 100%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1248
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1478
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1560
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1842
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1906
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1973
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1215
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

282
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1385
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1565
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

1758
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

330
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1901
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1990
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

344
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

126
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

616
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

46
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

85
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

636
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

55
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

9
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

91
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

660
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

66
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

218
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

686
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

76
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

197
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

701
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

82
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

14
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

173
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

708
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

81
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 88
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

255
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 28%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 55%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 171
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

343
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 74%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

5
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 20%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 11%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 98%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

798
State average:

1342
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

217
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 85%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1114
State average from 1873 schools:

1629
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

214
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 86%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 1
Percent Matched to 2006: 81%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

1092
State average:

1632
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

988
State average:

1532
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 104

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1233
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

225
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 81%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 81%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1261
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1023
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 238

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1310
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

222
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 82%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1255
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1212
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 43

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

1443
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

217
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 80%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 100%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1443
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1388
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 55

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

219
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 90%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

776
State average:

1413
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

187
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1: 92%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 1
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1215
State average from 1872 schools:

1647
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

237
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 86%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1204
State average:

1649
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1072
State average:

1519
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 133

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1260
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

214
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 89%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 81%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

1269
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1156
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 113

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1349
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

197
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 94%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1316
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1201
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 115

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1509
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

223
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 80%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 100%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1509
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1381
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 128

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 12
Mean Scale Score
Here:

572
State average from 1891 schools:

633
Median NPR: 13
Literary (max 18): 7
Informational (max 18): 7
Functional (max 18): 7
Initial Understanding (max 12): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 8
Critical Analysis (max 12): 5
Strategies (max 10): 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 21
Mean Scale Score
Here:

605
State average from 1870 schools:

667
Median NPR: 17
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 6
Functional (max 18): 6
Initial Understanding (max 12): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 9
Critical Analysis (max 12): 4
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 25
Mean Scale Score
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

619
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 18
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 7
Initial Understanding (max 12): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 9
Critical Analysis (max 12): 5
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 16
Mean Scale Score
Here:

621
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 16
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 5
Functional (max 18): 6
Initial Understanding (max 12): 4
Interpretation (max 20): 8
Critical Analysis (max 12): 5
Strategies (max 10): 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 12
Mean Scale Score
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

557
State average from 1891 schools:

632
Median NPR: 11
Number Sense (max 14): 6
Operations (max 11): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 2
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 21
Mean Scale Score
Here:

598
State average from 1870 schools:

663
Median NPR: 15
Number Sense (max 12): 5
Operations (max 12): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 1
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 2
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 25
Mean Scale Score
Here:

619
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 17
Number Sense (max 10): 3
Operations (max 12): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 2
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 16
Mean Scale Score
SUMMIT CHARTER WEST:

632
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 21
Number Sense (max 9): 2
Operations (max 9): 2
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 7
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Orlando, FL
  5. Summit Charter West School in Orlando, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.