The Florida Center For Child And Family Development School in Sarasota, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 37.

4620 17TH ST
Sarasota, FL 34235

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Tatum Ridge Elementary School (4.0 miles):

91
Gulf Coast Marine Institute School (13.6 miles):

76
B.D. Gullett Elementary School (7.9 miles):

60
Florine J Abel Elementary School (6.3 miles):

49
Tuttle Elementary School (2.3 miles):

44
The Florida Center For Child And Family Development School:

37
H. S. Moody Elementary School (11.7 miles):

33
Children's Haven School (2.0 miles):

23
The Florida Center For Child And Family Development School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Sarasota County:

48
Sarasota:

43
This School:

37

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (941) 371-8820 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 58
School number: 1324
School type: Elementary
District Name: SARASOTA
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (941) 377-3194
Principal: Sara Cloud
The main educational program offered at the school: Special Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 13
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 69
Senate District: 21
School Web Address: www.thefloridacenter.org

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

66%
State average from 33 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

65%
State average from 33 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

93%
State average from 33 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

47%
State average from 33 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 33 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

72%
State average from 33 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

68%
State average from 33 schools:

60%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

74%
State average from 33 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

553
State average from 33 schools:

528
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 33 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

57%
State average from 33 schools:

64%
Minority Rate
Here:

53%
State average from 33 schools:

54%
Region: 4

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1389 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1386 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 424
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1266
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1221

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1266
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1221
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 649 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 649 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 207
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 617
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 601

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 617
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 600
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 330 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 329 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 101
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 294
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 282

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 294
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 282
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 303 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 301 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 85
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 255
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 243

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 255
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 244
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 787 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 784 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 226
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 698
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 672

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 698
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 672
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 152 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 152 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 114
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 109

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 110
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 176 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 175 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 48
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 151
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 144

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 151
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 145
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

65%
State average from 33 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

63%
State average from 33 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

99%
State average from 33 schools:

90%
Meeting High Standards in Science
THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT:

46%
State average from 33 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 33 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 33 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

69%
State average from 33 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

64%
State average from 33 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

541
State average from 33 schools:

526
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 33 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

52%
State average from 33 schools:

61%
Minority Rate
Here:

59%
State average from 33 schools:

53%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1521 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1516 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 447
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1402
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1331

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1399
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1320
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 624 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 622 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 190
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 579
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 553

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 577
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 548
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 313 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 312 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 94
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 281
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 265

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 280
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 261
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 435 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 433 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 118
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 399
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 385

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 399
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 383
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 785 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 782 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 217
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 703
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 673

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 703
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 665
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 174 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 172 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 153
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 145

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 152
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 141
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 198 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 196 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 49
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 174
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 164

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 171
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 156
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

60%
State average from 33 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

61%
State average from 33 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

98%
State average from 33 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

38%
State average from 33 schools:

45%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

62%
State average from 33 schools:

62%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 33 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

62%
State average from 33 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 33 schools:

73%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

520
State average from 33 schools:

535
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 33 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

49%
State average from 33 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

58%
State average from 33 schools:

54%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1475 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1475 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 477
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1381
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1279

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1371
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1267
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 631 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 631 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 213
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 598
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 569

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 593
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 562
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 331 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 331 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 107
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 305
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 274

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 301
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 271
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 394 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 394 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 124
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 369
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 339

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 368
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 337
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 704 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 704 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 229
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 646
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 588

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 641
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 582
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 173 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 173 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 156
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 155
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 136
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 194 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 194 (94%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 64
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 172
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 147

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 167
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 141
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

55%
State average from 7 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

59%
State average from 7 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT:

91%
State average from 7 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

39%
State average from 7 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 7 schools:

67%
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
Making Math Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 7 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

65%
State average from 7 schools:

62%
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

66%
State average from 7 schools:

68%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

503
State average from 7 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 7 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

45%
State average from 7 schools:

48%
Minority Rate
Here:

54%
State average from 7 schools:

64%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1482 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1478 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 467
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1342
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1344
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 668 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 665 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 207
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 610
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 614
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 307 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 306 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 97
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 265
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 264
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 390 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 389 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 121
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 354
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 352
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 667 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 663 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 198
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 582
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 581
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 198 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 198 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 57
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 179
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 179
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 193 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 188 (94%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 57
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 162
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 162
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

57%
State average from 7 schools:

65%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

59%
State average from 7 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT:

90%
State average from 7 schools:

82%
Making Reading Gains
THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT:

61%
State average from 7 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 7 schools:

73%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

68%
State average from 7 schools:

62%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

404
State average from 7 schools:

415
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 7 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

46%
State average from 7 schools:

48%
Minority Rate
Here:

51%
State average from 7 schools:

64%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1375 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1373 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 369
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1242
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1245
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 667 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 668 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 187

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 610
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 613
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 227 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 226 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 61
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 200
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 199
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 367 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 365 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 88
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 329
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 331
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 9

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 33

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 624 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 622 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 158
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 553
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 556
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 202 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 200 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 44
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 175
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 178
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 186 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 186 (97%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 40
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 162
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 163
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

52%
State average from 8 schools:

55%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

59%
State average from 8 schools:

58%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

92%
State average from 8 schools:

78%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

57%
State average from 8 schools:

58%
Making Math Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 8 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT:

63%
State average from 8 schools:

55%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

393
State average from 8 schools:

371
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 8 schools:

96%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

49%
State average from 8 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

48%
State average from 8 schools:

65%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT:

1703
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

29%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT:

64%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT:

1785
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT:

17%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

22%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

66%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1877
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

32%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

15%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

50%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

27%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

32%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

7%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

42%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1684
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

25%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

17%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

53%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1801
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

19%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT:

39%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

17%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

61%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1896
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT:

14%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

17%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

63%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT:

1713
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT:

1741
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1868
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1691
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT:

1788
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1874
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 479
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

5
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 16%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 96%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1654
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT:

301
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1757
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1841
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT:

301
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT:

1665
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1799
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1875
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

486
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

669
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

62
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

476
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

684
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

69
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT:

12
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

495
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

686
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

63
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

3
State average:

273

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

1
State average:

237

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 495
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

320
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 68%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

5
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 19%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 96%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1653
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1660
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1583
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 77

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1715
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1722
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1643
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 79

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1818
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1825
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1735
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 89

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1635
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1650
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1615
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 35

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1764
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1779
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1656
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 123

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1872
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1875
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1781
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 94

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 461
Mean Scale Score
Here:

672
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 65
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 485
Mean Scale Score
Here:

675
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 61
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 498
Mean Scale Score
THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT:

690
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 67
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 461
Mean Scale Score
Here:

666
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 61
Number Sense (max 10): 5
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 484
Mean Scale Score
THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT:

683
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 68
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 497
Mean Scale Score
THE FLORIDA CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT:

702
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 73
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 498
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

281
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 38%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 89%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 75%

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Sarasota, FL
  5. The Florida Center For Child And Family Development School in Sarasota, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.