The Phoenix Program School in Naples, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 1.

3706 ESTEY AVE
Naples, FL 34104

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Tommie Barfield Elementary School (14.4 miles):

89
Barron Collier High School (5.3 miles):

78
North Naples Middle School (10.9 miles):

68
Gulfview Middle School (2.3 miles):

62
Oakridge Middle School (9.6 miles):

55
Golden Gate Middle School (4.3 miles):

50
Lely High School (4.6 miles):

38
The Phoenix Program School:

1
Naples Area Teenage Parenting School (4.2 miles):

1
The Phoenix Program School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Collier County:

49
Naples:

50
The Phoenix Program School:

1

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (239) 377-1100 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 11
School number: 9015
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: COLLIER
Grade range: GRADES 4 TO 12
School's status regarding neglected and delinquent criteria: Neglected, Non-residential
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (239) 377-1101
Principal: William Spano
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 14
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 76
Senate District: 37

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 56 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 56 (92%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (93%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (86%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (85%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (85%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (83%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (88%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (89%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 10

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 22
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 22
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29 (88%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28 (88%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1757
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

46%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

8%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
THE PHOENIX PROGRAM:

8%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

23%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1658
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

250
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

5%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

65%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

35%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

10
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

254
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

62%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

8%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
THE PHOENIX PROGRAM:

7
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
THE PHOENIX PROGRAM:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

43%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

21%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

7%
State average:

5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

29%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
THE PHOENIX PROGRAM:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
THE PHOENIX PROGRAM:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1802
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

31%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

38%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1903
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
THE PHOENIX PROGRAM:

303
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

80%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

55%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

10%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

65%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1641
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

259
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
THE PHOENIX PROGRAM:

1607
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

241
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 82%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

239
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

270
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1713
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
THE PHOENIX PROGRAM:

274
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1900
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 19
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 37%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 15
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 47%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
THE PHOENIX PROGRAM:

3
State average:

201

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

8
State average:

192

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
THE PHOENIX PROGRAM:

3
State average:

273

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

7
State average:

237

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 10
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

281
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 30%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 30%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 30%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1583
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

246
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 50%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1546
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1538
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 9

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1765
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 79%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1770
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1733
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 36

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1728
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

263
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 9
Percent Matched to 2006: 72%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1707
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1720
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -13

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

224
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1717
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 54%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1726
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1512
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 214

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1791
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

263
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 76%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1839
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1815
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 23

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
THE PHOENIX PROGRAM:

1915
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1926
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1891
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 35

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 15
Mean Scale Score
THE PHOENIX PROGRAM:

643
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 24
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 10): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 9
Critical Analysis (max 14): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 29
Mean Scale Score
Here:

666
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 34
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 14): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 16
Mean Scale Score
THE PHOENIX PROGRAM:

673
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 31
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 15
Mean Scale Score
Here:

676
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 48
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 28
Mean Scale Score
Here:

684
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 47
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 16
Mean Scale Score
Here:

694
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 42
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 15
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

182
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 87%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 13%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 7
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

2
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 27%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 13%

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 14
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

237
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 7%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 43%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 50%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 43%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Naples, FL
  5. The Phoenix Program School in Naples, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.