Thompson Middle School in Murrietta, CA
(06-08 • Public • Regular School)
City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in California) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 70
- Address
- 24040 Hayes Ave.
Murrietta, CA 92562
- Telephone
- (951) 696-1410
(make sure to verify first before calling)
- Website
- http://www.murrieta.k12.ca.us/thompson
- City-data.com school rating
- 70
- Students
- 1,649
- Classroom Teachers (FTE)
- 57.0
- National School Lunch
Program (NSLP) Status - No
- Free lunch eligible students
- 338
- Reduced-price lunch
eligible students - 114
- School district
- Murrieta Valley Unified
- Charter school
- No
- Title I status
- Not a Title I school
- Magnet School Indicator
- No
- Shared Time Indicator
- Missing
- Adult education offered
- No
No street view available for this location
Ratings
This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
Thompson Middle School rating compared to average state and city schools ratings:California: | 46 |
Murrietta: | 63 |
Thompson Middle School: | 70 |
Students & Teachers
Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 1,649
Enrollment in 2015: 1,665
Enrollment in 2014: 1,746
Enrollment in 2013: 1,768
Enrollment in 2012: 1,751
Enrollment in 2011: 1,727
Enrollment in 2010: 1,774
Enrollment in 2009: 1,727
Enrollment in 2008: 1,614
Enrollment in 2007: 1,791
Enrollment in 2006: 1,752
Enrollment in 2005: 1,663
Enrollment in 2004: 1,559
Enrollment in 2003: 1,635
Enrollment in 2002: 1,654
Enrollment in 2001: 1,256
Enrollment in 2000: 874
Enrollment in 1999: 741
Thompson Middle School - Historical enrollment
Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
Grade | G06 | G07 | G08 | Total |
---|
All students | 512 | 572 | 565 | 1,649 |
Female students | 243 | 283 | 266 | 792 |
Male students | 269 | 289 | 299 | 857 |
American Indian/Alaska Native students | 2 | 5 | 2 | 9 |
Asian students | 20 | 29 | 31 | 80 |
Hispanic students | 154 | 168 | 181 | 503 |
Black students | 21 | 13 | 21 | 55 |
White students | 282 | 324 | 304 | 910 |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander students | 2 | 5 | 7 | 14 |
Two or More Races students | 31 | 28 | 19 | 78 |
Enrollment by grade:
6th grade enrollment: 512
7th grade enrollment: 572
8th grade enrollment: 565
Thompson Middle School - Historical enrollment by grade
Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
Female enrollment: 792 (48.0%)
Male enrollment: 857 (52.0%)
Thompson Middle School - Historical enrollment by gender
Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 9 (0.5%)
Asian enrollment: 80 (4.9%)
Hispanic enrollment: 503 (30.5%)Thompson Middle School: | 30.5% |
California: | 46.0% |
Black enrollment: 55 (3.3%)
White enrollment: 910 (55.2%)
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander enrollment: 14 (0.8%)
Two or More Races enrollment: 78 (4.7%)
Thompson Middle School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity
Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 10,111 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 452 (27.4%)
Free lunch eligible students: 338 (20.5%)School: | 20.5% |
California: | 52.8% |
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 114 (6.9%)
Thompson Middle School - Lunch Program Eligibility
Teachers and support:
(State average from 12,394 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 57
Number of FTE school counselors: 3
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 54.4
Number of FTE sworn law enforcement officers: 0.5
Number of FTE security guards: 3.7
Number of FTE nurses: 0.8
Number of FTE psychologists: 1
Thompson Middle School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio
School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds:
$6,180,140- Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 53 (Salary Expenditures: $4,841,673)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 11.3 (Salary Expenditures: $606,865)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 7.2 (Salary Expenditures: $552,889)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds:
$120,942Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,:
$1,799,408- Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $5,527,965
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 18.3 (Salary Expenditures: $639,654)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 11.3 (Salary Expenditures: $606,865)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 7.2 (Salary Expenditures: $552,889)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds:
$121,958 Limited English Proficiency:
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs
- Hispanic37
- Asian10
- White4
- IDEA10
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 51 (male: 27, female: 24)
- Hispanic: 37 (male: 20, female: 17)
- Asian: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
- White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs
- Hispanic31
- Asian4
- Native Hawaiian2
- White4
- Multirace2
- IDEA7
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 43 (male: 34, female: 9)
- Hispanic: 31 (male: 26, female: 5)
- Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 2 (all male)
- White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
Students with disabilities:
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.
Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA
- Hispanic62
- Asian4
- Black7
- White80
- Multirace8
- LEP8
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 161 (male: 112, female: 49)
- Hispanic: 62 (male: 43, female: 19)
- Asian: 4 (all female)
- Black: 7 (all male)
- White: 80 (male: 58, female: 22)
- Two or More Races: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504
- Hispanic7
- Asian2
- Black2
- White10
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 21 (male: 13, female: 8)
- Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Asian: 2 (all female)
- Black: 2 (all female)
- White: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
Students with disabilities served under IDEA
- Hispanic50
- Asian4
- Black4
- White68
- Multirace4
- LEP4
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 130 (male: 90, female: 40)
- Hispanic: 50 (male: 37, female: 13)
- Asian: 4 (all male)
- Black: 4 (all female)
- White: 68 (male: 49, female: 19)
- Two or More Races: 4 (all female)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (all male)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 11 (male: 9, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 2 (all male)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 2 (all male)
- White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
Statewide Student Assessments
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments:
(State average from 10,463 schools)
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments (SB) is one of the online summative assessments - part of California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System.
The summative assessments are comprehensive, end-of-year assessments of grade-level learning that measure progress toward college and career readiness. Each test in English language arts/literacy (ELA) and mathematics is comprised of two parts: (1) a computer-adaptive test and (2) a performance task, administered within a selected testing window available at 66 percent of the instructional year for grades three through eight, and grade eleven.
The summative assessments are aligned with the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) for ELA and mathematics. The tests capitalize on the strengths of computer adaptive testing efficient and precise measurement across the full range of achievement and timely turnaround of results.
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All58%
- Males50%
- Females66%
- Black32%
- Asian46%
- Hispanic41%
- White52%
- Multirace33%
ELA students tested: 1,665
ELA students with scores: 1,664
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 58% |
State: | 49% |
Standard Not Met:
15.9%Standard Nearly Met:
26.4%Standard Met:
39.4%Standard Exceeded:
18.3%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2538.0, Students tested: 575, Standard Not Met: 19.2%, Nearly Met: 26.1%, Met: 34.0%, Exceeded: 20.7%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2571.8, Students tested: 519, Standard Not Met: 14.3%, Nearly Met: 23.9%, Met: 42.4%, Exceeded: 19.5%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2579.8, Students tested: 571, Standard Not Met: 14.0%, Nearly Met: 29.1%, Met: 42.0%, Exceeded: 14.9%)Thompson Middle School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All46%
- Males45%
- Females47%
- Black26%
- Asian69%
- Hispanic33%
- White35%
- Multirace22%
Math students tested: 1,663
Math students with scores: 1,662
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 46% |
State: | 38% |
Standard Not Met:
23.5%Standard Nearly Met:
30.8%Standard Met:
23.3%Standard Exceeded:
22.4%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2533.4, Students tested: 574, Standard Not Met: 23.9%, Nearly Met: 32.9%, Met: 23.3%, Exceeded: 19.9%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2568.9, Students tested: 519, Standard Not Met: 19.3%, Nearly Met: 28.0%, Met: 27.6%, Exceeded: 25.1%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2566.8, Students tested: 570, Standard Not Met: 27.0%, Nearly Met: 31.1%, Met: 19.3%, Exceeded: 22.6%)Thompson Middle School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All60%
- Males50%
- Females71%
- Black37%
- Asian63%
- Hispanic45%
- White53%
- Multirace47%
ELA students tested: 1,563
ELA students with scores: 1,562
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 60% |
California: | 48% |
Standard Not Met:
15.0%Standard Nearly Met:
25.0%Standard Met:
42.0%Standard Exceeded:
18.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2548.0, Students tested: 511, Standard Not Met: 12.0%, Nearly Met: 25.0%, Met: 43.0%, Exceeded: 20.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2567.9, Students tested: 502, Standard Not Met: 15.0%, Nearly Met: 25.0%, Met: 42.0%, Exceeded: 17.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2575.9, Students tested: 550, Standard Not Met: 17.0%, Nearly Met: 25.0%, Met: 41.0%, Exceeded: 16.0%)Thompson Middle School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All46%
- Males45%
- Females47%
- Black22%
- Asian63%
- Hispanic27%
- White35%
- Multirace40%
Math students tested: 1,560
Math students with scores: 1,559
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 46% |
California: | 37% |
Standard Not Met:
23.0%Standard Nearly Met:
31.0%Standard Met:
25.0%Standard Exceeded:
21.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2536.3, Students tested: 510, Standard Not Met: 20.0%, Nearly Met: 33.0%, Met: 29.0%, Exceeded: 18.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2562.5, Students tested: 501, Standard Not Met: 19.0%, Nearly Met: 31.0%, Met: 26.0%, Exceeded: 23.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2559.1, Students tested: 549, Standard Not Met: 30.0%, Nearly Met: 28.0%, Met: 21.0%, Exceeded: 21.0%)Thompson Middle School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All57%
- Males48%
- Females66%
- Black32%
- Asian73%
- Hispanic39%
- White51%
- Multirace54%
ELA students tested: 1,585
ELA students with scores: 1,528
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 57% |
California: | 44% |
Standard Not Met:
15.0%Standard Nearly Met:
28.0%Standard Met:
42.0%Standard Exceeded:
15.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2534.4, Students tested: 527, Standard Not Met: 16.0%, Nearly Met: 31.0%, Met: 40.0%, Exceeded: 14.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2563.4, Students tested: 486, Standard Not Met: 16.0%, Nearly Met: 26.0%, Met: 43.0%, Exceeded: 15.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2580.4, Students tested: 572, Standard Not Met: 13.0%, Nearly Met: 27.0%, Met: 45.0%, Exceeded: 15.0%)Thompson Middle School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All40%
- Males39%
- Females41%
- Black19%
- Asian45%
- Hispanic23%
- White29%
- Multirace47%
Math students tested: 1,570
Math students with scores: 1,552
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 40% |
State: | 34% |
Standard Not Met:
27.0%Standard Nearly Met:
33.0%Standard Met:
23.0%Standard Exceeded:
17.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2533.5, Students tested: 521, Standard Not Met: 21.0%, Nearly Met: 36.0%, Met: 26.0%, Exceeded: 17.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2538.7, Students tested: 480, Standard Not Met: 28.0%, Nearly Met: 31.0%, Met: 26.0%, Exceeded: 15.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2550.3, Students tested: 569, Standard Not Met: 31.0%, Nearly Met: 31.0%, Met: 19.0%, Exceeded: 18.0%)Thompson Middle School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
California Alternate Assessments:
(State average from 1,579 schools)
The new California Alternate Assessments (CAAs) are based on alternate achievement standards-called the Core Content Connectors-and linked to the Common Core State Standards. The CAAs are online tests for students with an individualized education program (IEP) that designates the use of an alternate assessment to measure student progress on alternate achievement standards. This alternate assessment is part of the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System and replaces the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) for English language arts and mathematics.
ELA students tested: 11
ELA students with scores: 11
Percentage Level 3: | 9% |
California: | 15% |
Level 1:
72.7% The student showed limited understanding of core concepts.Level 2:
18.2% The student showed foundational understanding of core concepts. Level 3:
9.1% The student showed understanding of core concepts.All Grades:
Math students tested: 11
Math students with scores: 11
Percentage Level 3: | 9% |
California: | 6% |
Level 1:
72.7% The student showed limited understanding of core concepts.Level 2:
18.2% The student showed foundational understanding of core concepts. Level 3:
9.1% The student showed understanding of core concepts.All Grades:
Paper-based CAASPP:
(State average from 9,784 schools)
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System includes paper-based tests:
California Standards Tests (CSTs) - The CSTs for science in grades five, eight, and ten are administered only to students in California public schools. All questions are multiple-choice. These tests were developed specifically to assess students' knowledge of the California content standards in science.
California Modified Assessment (CMA) - The CMA for science was administered to eligible students in grades five, eight, and ten. The CMA is a standards-based test for students with an individualized education program who meet the eligibility criteria adopted by the State Board of Education. The Elementary and Secondary Education Act called for a range of assessments appropriate to students' abilities. The CMA provides an appropriate assessment for a small percentage of students allowing them to demonstrate their knowledge of skills in the California academic content standards for science.
CST Science students tested: 532
CST Science students with scores: 531
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 86% |
California: | 54% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
3.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
2.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
9.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
18.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
68.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 444.3, Students tested: 532, Far Below Basic: 3.0%, Below Basic: 2.0%, Basic: 9.0%, Proficient: 18.0%, Advanced: 68.0%)
CMA Science students tested: 17
CMA Science students with scores: 17
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 24% |
State: | 38% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
23.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
6.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
47.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
18.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
6.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 314.9, Students tested: 17, Far Below Basic: 23.0%, Below Basic: 6.0%, Basic: 47.0%, Proficient: 18.0%, Advanced: 6.0%) CST Science students tested: 565
CST Science students with scores: 565
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 88% |
California: | 56% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
2.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
2.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
8.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
20.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
68.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 446.9, Students tested: 565, Far Below Basic: 2.0%, Below Basic: 2.0%, Basic: 8.0%, Proficient: 20.0%, Advanced: 68.0%)
CMA Science students tested: 12
CMA Science students with scores: 12
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 25% |
California: | 38% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
8.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
25.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
42.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
17.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
8.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 323.8, Students tested: 12, Far Below Basic: 8.0%, Below Basic: 25.0%, Basic: 42.0%, Proficient: 17.0%, Advanced: 8.0%) CST Science students tested: 584
CST Science students with scores: 584
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 90% |
State: | 60% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
1.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
2.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
7.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
17.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
73.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 451.1, Students tested: 584, Far Below Basic: 1.0%, Below Basic: 2.0%, Basic: 7.0%, Proficient: 17.0%, Advanced: 73.0%)
CMA Science students tested: 15
CMA Science students with scores: 15
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 60% |
California: | 39% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
13.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
7.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
20.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
13.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
47.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 379.1, Students tested: 15, Far Below Basic: 13.0%, Below Basic: 7.0%, Basic: 20.0%, Proficient: 13.0%, Advanced: 47.0%) The Physical Fitness Test:
The Physical Fitness Test (PFT) for students in California schools is the FITNESSGRAM. The main goal of the test is to help students in starting life-long habits of regular physical activity.
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 510, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 81.2%, Needs Improvement: 13.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 5.7%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 510, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 76.5%, Needs Improvement: 12.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 10.8%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 510, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 98.2%, Needs Improvement: 1.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 510, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 97.1%, Needs Improvement: 2.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 510, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 74.5%, Needs Improvement: 25.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 510, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 79.2%, Needs Improvement: 20.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 556, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 83.6%, Needs Improvement: 8.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 7.9%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 556, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 77.9%, Needs Improvement: 10.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 11.3%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 556, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 97.5%, Needs Improvement: 2.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 556, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 98.9%, Needs Improvement: 1.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 556, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 71.4%, Needs Improvement: 28.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 556, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 77.7%, Needs Improvement: 22.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 525, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 74.3%, Needs Improvement: 19.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 6.3%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 525, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 71.2%, Needs Improvement: 18.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 10.5%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 525, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 94.7%, Needs Improvement: 5.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 525, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 98.1%, Needs Improvement: 1.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 525, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 70.1%, Needs Improvement: 29.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 525, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 81.5%, Needs Improvement: 18.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 574, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 73.9%, Needs Improvement: 17.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 9.0%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 574, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 69.2%, Needs Improvement: 17.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 13.4%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 574, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 96.7%, Needs Improvement: 3.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 574, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 98.8%, Needs Improvement: 1.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 574, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 88.0%, Needs Improvement: 12.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 574, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 82.1%, Needs Improvement: 17.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 608, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 74.3%, Needs Improvement: 16.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 9.1%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 608, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 63.3%, Needs Improvement: 14.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 21.9%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 608, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 95.6%, Needs Improvement: 4.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 608, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 97.2%, Needs Improvement: 2.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 608, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 84.0%, Needs Improvement: 16.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 608, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 80.1%, Needs Improvement: 19.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 558, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 73.5%, Needs Improvement: 19.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 7.0%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 558, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 66.8%, Needs Improvement: 12.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 21.2%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 558, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 95.0%, Needs Improvement: 5.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 558, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 97.3%, Needs Improvement: 2.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 558, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 91.6%, Needs Improvement: 8.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 558, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 74.6%, Needs Improvement: 25.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
California English Language Development Test:
(State average from 9,932 schools)
Students in kindergarten through grade twelve whose home language is not English are required by law to take an English skills test. In California, the test is called the California English Language Development Test (CELDT).
Thompson Middle School - students who met CELDT criterion (all grades)
All Grades:Student Count: 47
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 24
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 51.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 20
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 11
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 55.0% |
State: | 39.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 554.9 |
California: | 532.4 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 553.7 |
State: | 518.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 530.0 |
State: | 518.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 539.1 |
State: | 522.0 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 9
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 2
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 22.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 499.7 |
State: | 547.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 523.3 |
California: | 534.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 508.4 |
California: | 529.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 517.1 |
California: | 530.2 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 18
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 11
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 61.0% |
California: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 585.0 |
California: | 556.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 573.4 |
California: | 547.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 563.3 |
California: | 536.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 557.4 |
California: | 537.0 |
All Grades:Student Count: 65
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 36
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 55.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 17
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 8
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 47.0% |
State: | 41.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 528.2 |
California: | 536.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 536.1 |
State: | 523.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 496.5 |
State: | 520.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 536.2 |
State: | 524.6 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 26
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 15
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 58.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 570.4 |
State: | 550.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 562.2 |
State: | 536.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 514.3 |
State: | 530.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 549.0 |
State: | 532.1 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 22
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 13
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 59.0% |
California: | 49.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 587.6 |
State: | 562.4 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 582.3 |
State: | 552.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 525.0 |
State: | 539.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 553.3 |
State: | 541.2 |
All Grades:Student Count: 50
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 26
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 52.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 20
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 10
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 50.0% |
California: | 38.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 568.2 |
State: | 535.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 550.8 |
California: | 521.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 553.6 |
California: | 519.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 552.2 |
State: | 522.6 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 14
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 8
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 57.0% |
California: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 533.0 |
California: | 551.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 539.2 |
State: | 538.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 521.6 |
California: | 532.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 528.1 |
State: | 532.1 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 16
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 8
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 50.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 561.9 |
State: | 562.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 565.6 |
California: | 552.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 583.2 |
State: | 543.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 537.3 |
State: | 541.5 |
All Grades:Student Count: 40
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 19
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 48.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 15
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 6
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 40.0% |
State: | 40.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 532.3 |
State: | 538.0 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 532.5 |
California: | 525.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 498.3 |
State: | 522.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 526.4 |
California: | 526.2 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 14
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 5
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 36.0% |
California: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 507.9 |
State: | 549.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 494.3 |
California: | 538.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 489.3 |
California: | 533.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 497.1 |
California: | 535.2 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 11
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 8
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 73.0% |
State: | 49.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 601.5 |
California: | 564.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 596.8 |
California: | 554.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 565.2 |
California: | 545.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 576.9 |
California: | 545.9 |
All Grades:Student Count: 30
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 13
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 43.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 11
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 5
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 45.0% |
California: | 39.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 519.0 |
State: | 538.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 520.6 |
State: | 525.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 563.1 |
California: | 530.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 515.5 |
California: | 530.3 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 10
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 2
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 20.0% |
California: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 539.5 |
State: | 557.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 547.2 |
State: | 539.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 571.7 |
State: | 543.2 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 543.3 |
State: | 540.4 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 9
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 6
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 67.0% |
California: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 605.4 |
California: | 570.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 611.1 |
California: | 552.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 622.8 |
California: | 551.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 583.9 |
State: | 548.6 |
All Grades:Student Count: 31
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 13
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 42.0% |
California: | 35.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 10
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 4
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 40.0% |
California: | 44.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 526.8 |
State: | 551.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 538.1 |
California: | 532.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 490.8 |
California: | 532.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 509.2 |
California: | 534.7 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 12
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 7
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 58.0% |
State: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 559.3 |
California: | 566.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 553.5 |
State: | 544.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 534.5 |
State: | 543.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 546.5 |
California: | 545.1 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 9
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 2
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 22.0% |
State: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 511.1 |
State: | 579.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 519.0 |
State: | 558.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 491.1 |
California: | 553.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 516.0 |
State: | 555.6 |
All Grades:Student Count: 36
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 14
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 39.0% |
California: | 31.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 16
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 5
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 31.0% |
California: | 40.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 517.1 |
California: | 546.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 536.6 |
State: | 529.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 521.6 |
State: | 533.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 521.0 |
California: | 525.3 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 9
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 5
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 56.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 536.2 |
State: | 559.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 560.8 |
California: | 542.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 517.6 |
California: | 548.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 524.4 |
State: | 534.4 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 11
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 4
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 36.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 529.4 |
State: | 570.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 520.6 |
State: | 557.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 517.9 |
State: | 562.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 515.8 |
State: | 544.1 |
Accountability
Adequate Yearly Progress:
(State average from 9,846 schools)
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) - Accountability system mandated by federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Statistics are based on test results of the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program, the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE), and the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA).
Thompson Middle School - Adequate Yearly Progress status
ELA Participation RateThompson Middle School: | 95.0% |
California: | 96.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic95
- American Indian75
- Asian99
- Filipino97
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black97
- White94
- Multirace97
- SED95
- LEP96
- With Disabilities91
- Hispanic: 95% (tested 481 out of 504 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 75% (tested 6 out of 8 enrolled)
- Asian: 99% (tested 50 out of 51 enrolled)
- Filipino: 97% (tested 26 out of 27 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 13 out of 13 enrolled)
- Black: 97% (tested 53 out of 55 enrolled)
- White: 94% (tested 857 out of 910 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 97% (tested 76 out of 79 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 95% (tested 429 out of 450 enrolled)
- English Learners: 96% (tested 99 out of 103 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 91% (tested 180 out of 198 enrolled)
Math Participation RateHere: | 95.0% |
California: | 96.1% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic95
- American Indian75
- Asian99
- Filipino97
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black97
- White94
- Multirace95
- SED95
- LEP96
- With Disabilities90
- Hispanic: 95% (tested 479 out of 504 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 75% (tested 6 out of 8 enrolled)
- Asian: 99% (tested 50 out of 51 enrolled)
- Filipino: 97% (tested 26 out of 27 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 13 out of 13 enrolled)
- Black: 97% (tested 53 out of 55 enrolled)
- White: 94% (tested 857 out of 910 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 95% (tested 75 out of 79 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 95% (tested 429 out of 450 enrolled)
- English Learners: 96% (tested 99 out of 103 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 90% (tested 178 out of 198 enrolled)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 10
Number of AYP criteria possible: 11
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)Attendance rate (calculated by using average daily attendance data) : 96
Met Attendance rate Target: Yes
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
ELA Participation RateSchool: | 92.0% |
California: | 95.2% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic93
- American Indian88
- Asian94
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian94
- Black93
- White92
- Multirace90
- SED92
- LEP95
- With Disabilities85
- Hispanic: 93% (tested 465 out of 500 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 88% (tested 7 out of 8 enrolled)
- Asian: 94% (tested 54 out of 58 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 30 out of 30 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 94% (tested 14 out of 15 enrolled)
- Black: 93% (tested 52 out of 56 enrolled)
- White: 92% (tested 858 out of 936 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 90% (tested 54 out of 60 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 92% (tested 400 out of 435 enrolled)
- English Learners: 95% (tested 75 out of 79 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 85% (tested 166 out of 195 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: No
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 57.9% |
California: | 42.6% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic49
- Asian78
- Filipino57
- Native Hawaiian46
- Black43
- White62
- Multirace65
- SED45
- LEP19
- With Disabilities22
- Hispanic: 49% (219 out of 447 valid scores)
- Asian: 78% (38 out of 49 valid scores)
- Filipino: 57% (17 out of 30 valid scores)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 46% (6 out of 13 valid scores)
- Black: 43% (21 out of 49 valid scores)
- White: 62% (519 out of 832 valid scores)
- Two or More Races: 65% (33 out of 51 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 45% (168 out of 377 valid scores)
- English Learners: 19% (12 out of 65 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 22% (33 out of 153 valid scores)
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Math Participation RateSchool: | 94.0% |
California: | 94.9% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic95
- American Indian88
- Asian90
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian94
- Black99
- White93
- Multirace97
- SED94
- LEP98
- With Disabilities90
- Hispanic: 95% (tested 473 out of 500 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 88% (tested 7 out of 8 enrolled)
- Asian: 90% (tested 52 out of 58 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 30 out of 30 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 94% (tested 14 out of 15 enrolled)
- Black: 99% (tested 55 out of 56 enrolled)
- White: 93% (tested 870 out of 936 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 97% (tested 58 out of 60 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 94% (tested 408 out of 435 enrolled)
- English Learners: 98% (tested 77 out of 79 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 90% (tested 176 out of 195 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic29
- Asian60
- Filipino50
- Native Hawaiian46
- Black28
- White46
- Multirace52
- SED27
- LEP13
- With Disabilities15
- Hispanic: 29% (130 out of 456 valid scores)
- Asian: 60% (29 out of 48 valid scores)
- Filipino: 50% (15 out of 30 valid scores)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 46% (6 out of 13 valid scores)
- Black: 28% (14 out of 51 valid scores)
- White: 46% (387 out of 842 valid scores)
- Two or More Races: 52% (28 out of 54 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 27% (104 out of 385 valid scores)
- English Learners: 13% (9 out of 67 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 15% (24 out of 161 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 12
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 89.2%
ELA Participation RateThompson Middle School: | 100.0% |
State: | 98.2% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 511 out of 512 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 49 out of 49 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 39 out of 39 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 16 out of 16 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 73 out of 73 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 1,016 out of 1,016 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 65 out of 65 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 520 out of 521 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 76 out of 76 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 150 out of 150 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 70.2% |
California: | 55.7% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic60
- Asian84
- Filipino76
- Native Hawaiian53
- Black71
- White74
- Multirace79
- SED53
- LEP36
- With Disabilities49
- Hispanic: 60% (293 out of 490 valid scores)
- Asian: 84% (41 out of 49 valid scores)
- Filipino: 76% (29 out of 38 valid scores)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 53% (8 out of 15 valid scores)
- Black: 71% (47 out of 66 valid scores)
- White: 74% (725 out of 978 valid scores)
- Two or More Races: 79% (51 out of 65 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 53% (255 out of 484 valid scores)
- English Learners: 36% (26 out of 72 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 49% (68 out of 140 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 89.5%
Math Participation RateHere: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.2% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 511 out of 513 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 49 out of 49 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 39 out of 39 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 16 out of 16 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 73 out of 73 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 1,013 out of 1,015 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 65 out of 65 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 519 out of 520 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 76 out of 76 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 148 out of 150 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic56
- Asian76
- Filipino68
- Native Hawaiian47
- Black42
- White69
- Multirace66
- SED50
- LEP44
- With Disabilities48
- Hispanic: 56% (273 out of 491 valid scores)
- Asian: 76% (37 out of 49 valid scores)
- Filipino: 68% (26 out of 38 valid scores)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 47% (7 out of 15 valid scores)
- Black: 42% (28 out of 66 valid scores)
- White: 69% (672 out of 975 valid scores)
- Two or More Races: 66% (43 out of 65 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 50% (242 out of 483 valid scores)
- English Learners: 44% (32 out of 72 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 48% (67 out of 139 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 19
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: Yes
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 78.4%
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 511 out of 511 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 10 out of 10 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 57 out of 57 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 45 out of 45 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 10 out of 10 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 72 out of 72 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 978 out of 979 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 56 out of 56 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 445 out of 445 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 63 out of 63 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 149 out of 150 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 76.7% |
California: | 57.4% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic68
- Asian87
- Filipino87
- Black62
- White81
- Multirace85
- SED58
- LEP32
- With Disabilities51
- Hispanic: 68% (336 out of 491 valid scores)
- Asian: 87% (48 out of 55 valid scores)
- Filipino: 87% (34 out of 39 valid scores)
- Black: 62% (43 out of 69 valid scores)
- White: 81% (772 out of 955 valid scores)
- Two or More Races: 85% (45 out of 53 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 58% (248 out of 426 valid scores)
- English Learners: 32% (20 out of 62 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 51% (72 out of 141 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 79%
Math Participation RateThompson Middle School: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.1% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 511 out of 511 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 10 out of 10 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 57 out of 57 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 45 out of 45 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 10 out of 10 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 72 out of 72 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 976 out of 979 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 56 out of 56 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 445 out of 445 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 63 out of 63 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 149 out of 150 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveThompson Middle School: | 62.4% |
State: | 59.9% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic52
- Asian80
- Filipino69
- Black45
- White67
- Multirace76
- SED48
- LEP24
- With Disabilities45
- Hispanic: 52% (253 out of 491 valid scores)
- Asian: 80% (44 out of 55 valid scores)
- Filipino: 69% (27 out of 39 valid scores)
- Black: 45% (31 out of 69 valid scores)
- White: 67% (640 out of 953 valid scores)
- Two or More Races: 76% (40 out of 53 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 48% (205 out of 426 valid scores)
- English Learners: 24% (15 out of 62 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 45% (64 out of 141 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 15
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 67.6%
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 495 out of 497 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 16 out of 16 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 66 out of 66 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 45 out of 45 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 77 out of 77 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 979 out of 982 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 42 out of 42 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 371 out of 371 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 55 out of 55 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 168 out of 169 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic61
- American Indian56
- Asian86
- Filipino74
- Black60
- White75
- Multirace85
- SED54
- LEP32
- With Disabilities41
- Hispanic: 61% (288 out of 474 valid scores)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 56% (9 out of 16 valid scores)
- Asian: 86% (55 out of 64 valid scores)
- Filipino: 74% (32 out of 43 valid scores)
- Black: 60% (44 out of 73 valid scores)
- White: 75% (708 out of 941 valid scores)
- Two or More Races: 85% (28 out of 33 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 54% (194 out of 360 valid scores)
- English Learners: 32% (17 out of 53 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 41% (66 out of 162 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 68.5%
Math Participation RateHere: | 100.0% |
California: | 98.0% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace98
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 494 out of 497 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 16 out of 16 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 66 out of 66 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 45 out of 45 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 77 out of 77 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 978 out of 982 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 98% (tested 41 out of 42 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 371 out of 371 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 55 out of 55 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 168 out of 169 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveThompson Middle School: | 58.8% |
State: | 59.3% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic52
- American Indian56
- Asian80
- Filipino65
- Black44
- White62
- Multirace59
- SED46
- LEP42
- With Disabilities40
- Hispanic: 52% (244 out of 473 valid scores)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 56% (9 out of 16 valid scores)
- Asian: 80% (51 out of 64 valid scores)
- Filipino: 65% (28 out of 43 valid scores)
- Black: 44% (32 out of 73 valid scores)
- White: 62% (581 out of 940 valid scores)
- Two or More Races: 59% (19 out of 32 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 46% (166 out of 360 valid scores)
- English Learners: 42% (22 out of 53 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 40% (65 out of 162 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 19
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 56.8%
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian95
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 501 out of 501 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 95% (tested 16 out of 17 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 68 out of 68 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 55 out of 55 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 73 out of 73 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 1,005 out of 1,005 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 46 out of 46 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 395 out of 395 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 67 out of 67 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 172 out of 172 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveThompson Middle School: | 71.4% |
California: | 53.7% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic63
- American Indian63
- Asian77
- Filipino78
- Black49
- White77
- Multirace67
- SED54
- LEP32
- With Disabilities37
- Hispanic: 63% (295 out of 468 valid scores)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 63% (10 out of 16 valid scores)
- Asian: 77% (51 out of 66 valid scores)
- Filipino: 78% (42 out of 54 valid scores)
- Black: 49% (32 out of 66 valid scores)
- White: 77% (739 out of 964 valid scores)
- Two or More Races: 67% (28 out of 42 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 54% (204 out of 378 valid scores)
- English Learners: 32% (19 out of 59 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 37% (61 out of 165 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 58%
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian95
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- Multirace100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 500 out of 501 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 95% (tested 16 out of 17 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 68 out of 68 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 55 out of 55 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 73 out of 73 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 1,003 out of 1,005 enrolled)
- Two or More Races: 100% (tested 46 out of 46 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 394 out of 395 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 67 out of 67 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 170 out of 172 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic57
- American Indian50
- Asian77
- Filipino69
- Black42
- White65
- Multirace60
- SED48
- LEP41
- With Disabilities33
- Hispanic: 57% (264 out of 467 valid scores)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 50% (8 out of 16 valid scores)
- Asian: 77% (51 out of 66 valid scores)
- Filipino: 69% (37 out of 54 valid scores)
- Black: 42% (28 out of 66 valid scores)
- White: 65% (628 out of 962 valid scores)
- Two or More Races: 60% (25 out of 42 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 48% (180 out of 377 valid scores)
- English Learners: 41% (24 out of 59 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 33% (54 out of 163 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 19
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: Yes
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 46%
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino99
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 432 out of 433 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 59 out of 59 enrolled)
- Filipino: 99% (tested 67 out of 68 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 10 out of 10 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 84 out of 84 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 1,053 out of 1,055 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 244 out of 244 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 93 out of 93 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 161 out of 163 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveThompson Middle School: | 67.9% |
State: | 52.4% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic56
- Asian75
- Filipino79
- Black51
- White73
- SED52
- LEP36
- With Disabilities38
- Hispanic: 56% (228 out of 405 valid scores)
- Asian: 75% (43 out of 57 valid scores)
- Filipino: 79% (48 out of 61 valid scores)
- Black: 51% (37 out of 72 valid scores)
- White: 73% (741 out of 1,017 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 52% (121 out of 235 valid scores)
- English Learners: 36% (32 out of 89 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 38% (57 out of 150 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 47.5%
Math Participation RateThompson Middle School: | 99.0% |
California: | 98.2% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino98
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White99
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities98
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 431 out of 432 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 59 out of 59 enrolled)
- Filipino: 98% (tested 66 out of 68 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 10 out of 10 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 84 out of 84 enrolled)
- White: 99% (tested 1,049 out of 1,055 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 244 out of 244 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 93 out of 93 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 98% (tested 160 out of 163 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveThompson Middle School: | 54.9% |
State: | 55.6% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic44
- Asian75
- Filipino70
- Black43
- White58
- SED40
- LEP39
- With Disabilities31
- Hispanic: 44% (179 out of 404 valid scores)
- Asian: 75% (43 out of 57 valid scores)
- Filipino: 70% (42 out of 60 valid scores)
- Black: 43% (31 out of 72 valid scores)
- White: 58% (585 out of 1,017 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 40% (95 out of 235 valid scores)
- English Learners: 39% (35 out of 89 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 31% (47 out of 150 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 20
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 35.2%
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED99
- LEP100
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 402 out of 402 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 57 out of 57 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 59 out of 59 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 68 out of 68 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 1,106 out of 1,106 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 266 out of 268 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 93 out of 93 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 166 out of 168 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or Above
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic51
- Asian75
- Filipino73
- Black44
- White70
- SED45
- LEP35
- With Disabilities29
- Hispanic: 51% (191 out of 373 valid scores)
- Asian: 75% (42 out of 56 valid scores)
- Filipino: 73% (40 out of 55 valid scores)
- Black: 44% (28 out of 63 valid scores)
- White: 70% (751 out of 1,076 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 45% (116 out of 256 valid scores)
- English Learners: 35% (32 out of 91 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 29% (46 out of 159 valid scores)
Math met overall: Yes
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 37%
Math Participation RateThompson Middle School: | 100.0% |
State: | 98.0% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities98
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 401 out of 402 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 5 out of 5 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 57 out of 57 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 59 out of 59 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 68 out of 68 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 1,104 out of 1,106 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 267 out of 268 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 93 out of 93 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 98% (tested 164 out of 168 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic44
- Asian68
- Filipino56
- Black35
- White55
- SED40
- LEP37
- With Disabilities27
- Hispanic: 44% (163 out of 373 valid scores)
- Asian: 68% (38 out of 56 valid scores)
- Filipino: 56% (31 out of 55 valid scores)
- Black: 35% (22 out of 63 valid scores)
- White: 55% (590 out of 1,075 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 40% (102 out of 257 valid scores)
- English Learners: 37% (34 out of 91 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 27% (43 out of 159 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: Yes
Number of AYP criteria met: 21
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: Yes
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation RateThompson Middle School: | 99.0% |
California: | 97.8% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- American Indian100
- Asian99
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED99
- LEP96
- With Disabilities93
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 403 out of 407 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Asian: 99% (tested 55 out of 56 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 56 out of 56 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 8 out of 8 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 76 out of 76 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 1,147 out of 1,152 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 253 out of 256 enrolled)
- English Learners: 96% (tested 93 out of 97 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 93% (tested 131 out of 141 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 63.3% |
California: | 46.4% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic49
- Asian79
- Filipino69
- Black48
- White69
- SED39
- LEP25
- With Disabilities28
- Hispanic: 49% (188 out of 383 valid scores)
- Asian: 79% (41 out of 52 valid scores)
- Filipino: 69% (38 out of 55 valid scores)
- Black: 48% (34 out of 71 valid scores)
- White: 69% (760 out of 1,110 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 39% (94 out of 239 valid scores)
- English Learners: 25% (23 out of 91 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 28% (36 out of 129 valid scores)
Math met overall: Yes
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation RateThompson Middle School: | 100.0% |
California: | 97.9% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino99
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP99
- With Disabilities99
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 406 out of 407 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 56 out of 56 enrolled)
- Filipino: 99% (tested 55 out of 56 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 8 out of 8 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 76 out of 76 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 1,152 out of 1,152 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 255 out of 256 enrolled)
- English Learners: 99% (tested 96 out of 97 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 99% (tested 140 out of 141 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveThompson Middle School: | 51.6% |
State: | 50.5% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic39
- Asian76
- Filipino63
- Black38
- White55
- SED38
- LEP29
- With Disabilities21
- Hispanic: 39% (150 out of 386 valid scores)
- Asian: 76% (40 out of 53 valid scores)
- Filipino: 63% (34 out of 54 valid scores)
- Black: 38% (27 out of 71 valid scores)
- White: 55% (618 out of 1,115 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 38% (93 out of 242 valid scores)
- English Learners: 29% (27 out of 94 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 21% (29 out of 138 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: Yes
Number of AYP criteria met: 21
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: Yes
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation RateThompson Middle School: | 100.0% |
State: | 97.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 379 out of 379 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 8 out of 8 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 55 out of 55 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 67 out of 67 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 81 out of 81 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 1,146 out of 1,147 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 260 out of 261 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 97 out of 97 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 112 out of 112 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveThompson Middle School: | 64.3% |
State: | 45.9% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic47
- Asian71
- Filipino68
- Black63
- White70
- SED41
- LEP31
- With Disabilities29
- Hispanic: 47% (166 out of 355 valid scores)
- Asian: 71% (37 out of 52 valid scores)
- Filipino: 68% (43 out of 63 valid scores)
- Black: 63% (44 out of 70 valid scores)
- White: 70% (760 out of 1,094 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 41% (99 out of 243 valid scores)
- English Learners: 31% (28 out of 91 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 29% (30 out of 103 valid scores)
Math met overall: Yes
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation RateThompson Middle School: | 100.0% |
California: | 97.5% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 379 out of 379 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 8 out of 8 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 55 out of 55 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 67 out of 67 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 81 out of 81 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 1,143 out of 1,147 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 260 out of 261 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 97 out of 97 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 112 out of 112 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Asian73
- Filipino48
- Black43
- White59
- SED40
- LEP29
- With Disabilities20
- Asian: 73% (38 out of 52 valid scores)
- Filipino: 48% (30 out of 63 valid scores)
- Black: 43% (30 out of 70 valid scores)
- White: 59% (639 out of 1,093 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 40% (96 out of 243 valid scores)
- English Learners: 29% (26 out of 91 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 20% (21 out of 103 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: Yes
Number of AYP criteria met: 21
Number of AYP criteria possible: 21
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: Yes
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 24.4%
ELA Participation RateHere: | 100.0% |
California: | 99.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black99
- White100
- SED99
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 300 out of 300 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 10 out of 10 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 42 out of 42 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 65 out of 65 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Black: 99% (tested 90 out of 91 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 1,128 out of 1,130 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 188 out of 189 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 59 out of 59 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 119 out of 119 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 62.4% |
California: | 44.5% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic48
- Asian74
- Filipino70
- Black52
- White66
- SED41
- LEP20
- With Disabilities28
- Hispanic: 48% (130 out of 270 valid scores)
- Asian: 74% (28 out of 38 valid scores)
- Filipino: 70% (41 out of 59 valid scores)
- Black: 52% (44 out of 85 valid scores)
- White: 66% (717 out of 1,085 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 41% (70 out of 171 valid scores)
- English Learners: 20% (12 out of 59 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 28% (31 out of 111 valid scores)
Math met overall: Yes
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: Yes
Math Percent Proficient Target: 26.5%
Math Participation RateSchool: | 100.0% |
California: | 99.2% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- American Indian100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Native Hawaiian100
- Black99
- White99
- SED99
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 300 out of 300 enrolled)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 100% (tested 10 out of 10 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 42 out of 42 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 65 out of 65 enrolled)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Black: 99% (tested 90 out of 91 enrolled)
- White: 99% (tested 1,124 out of 1,130 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 187 out of 189 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 59 out of 59 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 119 out of 119 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- Students with Disabilities: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or Above
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic40
- Asian63
- Filipino54
- Black38
- White58
- SED35
- LEP31
- With Disabilities31
- Hispanic: 40% (107 out of 270 valid scores)
- Asian: 63% (24 out of 38 valid scores)
- Filipino: 54% (32 out of 59 valid scores)
- Black: 38% (32 out of 85 valid scores)
- White: 58% (628 out of 1,082 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 35% (59 out of 170 valid scores)
- English Learners: 31% (18 out of 59 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 31% (34 out of 111 valid scores)
Health & Safety
Referrals and Arrests:
(State average from 2,295 schools)
Referral to law enforcement is an action by which a student is reported to any law enforcement agency or official, including a school police unit, for an incident that occurs on school grounds, during school-related events, or while taking school transportation, regardless of whether official action is taken. Citations, tickets, court referrals, and school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.
School-related arrest refers to an arrest of a student for any activity conducted on school grounds, during off-campus school activities (including while taking school transportation), or due to a referral by any school official. All school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.
Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official: 17 (male: 15, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- White: 8 (all male)
- Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official per 1,000 studentsSchool: | 10.3 |
California: | 27.2 |
Students with disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Students with disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official per 1,000 students
Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
(State average from 8,737 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 51 (male: 27, female: 24)
- Hispanic: 37 (male: 20, female: 17)
- Asian: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
- White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 studentsThompson Middle School: | 30.9 |
State: | 172.7 |
Chronic Student Absenteeism
- Hispanic61
- Asian2
- Native Hawaiian2
- Black5
- White133
- Multirace10
- LEP5
- IDEA22
- 5042
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 213 (male: 119, female: 94)
- Hispanic: 61 (male: 35, female: 26)
- Asian: 2 (all male)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 2 (all female)
- Black: 5 (all female)
- White: 133 (male: 74, female: 59)
- Two or More Races: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 5 (all male)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 22 (male: 11, female: 11)
- Section 504: 2 (all male)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 studentsSchool: | 129.2 |
California: | 178.2 |
Restraint and Seclusion:
(State average from 741 schools)
Physical restraint refers to a personal restriction that immobilizes or reduces the ability of a student to move his or her torso, arms, legs, or head freely. The term physical restraint does not include a physical escort. Physical escort means a temporary touching or holding of the hand, wrist, arm, shoulder or back for the purpose of inducing a student who is acting out to walk to a safe location.
Total Number of students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint: 2 (all male)
Students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint per 1,000 students
Suspensions:
(State average from 1,406 schools)
Out-of-school suspension - For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
- For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension
- Hispanic54
- Asian10
- Black10
- White54
- Multirace27
- LEP1
- IDEA73
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 155 (male: 121, female: 34)
- Hispanic: 54 (male: 47, female: 7)
- Asian: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
- Black: 10 (all male)
- White: 54 (male: 49, female: 5)
- Two or More Races: 27 (male: 10, female: 17)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 1 (all male)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 73 (male: 61, female: 12)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 63
Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension
- Hispanic16
- Asian2
- Black2
- White13
- Multirace2
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 35 (male: 26, female: 9)
- Hispanic: 16 (male: 11, female: 5)
- Asian: 2 (all male)
- Black: 2 (all male)
- White: 13 (male: 11, female: 2)
- Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension
- Hispanic2
- Black2
- White4
- Multirace2
Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 2 (all male)
- Black: 2 (all male)
- White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students with disabilities): 66
Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students with disabilities)Thompson Middle School: | 40.0 |
State: | 28.1 |
Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension
- Hispanic7
- Black2
- White5
- Multirace2
- LEP2
Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 16 (male: 14, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Black: 2 (all male)
- White: 5 (all male)
- Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
Students with disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension
- Hispanic2
- Asian4
- Black2
- White8
- Multirace4
Students with disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 20 (male: 16, female: 4)
- Hispanic: 2 (all male)
- Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Black: 2 (all male)
- White: 8 (all male)
- Two or More Races: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension
- Hispanic13
- Black4
- White25
- Multirace2
- LEP2
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 44 (male: 35, female: 9)
- Hispanic: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
- Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- White: 25 (male: 23, female: 2)
- Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 14 (male: 12, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- White: 5 (all male)
- Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 14 (male: 10, female: 4)
- Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- White: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
Students with disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 4 (all male)
Classes & Courses
Algebra I:
(State average from 1,382 schools)
Algebra I is a (college-preparatory) course that includes the study of properties and operations of the real number system; evaluating rational algebraic expressions; solving and graphing first degree equations and inequalities; translating word problems into equations; operations with and factoring of polynomials; and solving simple quadratic equations. Algebra I is a foundation course leading to higher-level mathematics courses, including Geometry and Algebra II.
Number of Algebra I classes: 9
7-8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I
- Hispanic64
- Asian13
- Native Hawaiian2
- Black10
- White196
- Multirace13
- IDEA2
7-8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I: 298 (male: 150, female: 148)
- Hispanic: 64 (male: 20, female: 44)
- Asian: 13 (male: 5, female: 8)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 2 (all male)
- Black: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
- White: 196 (male: 110, female: 86)
- Two or More Races: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)
7-8th grade studenst who passed Algebra I
- Hispanic59
- Asian14
- Native Hawaiian4
- Black11
- White179
- Multirace11
7-8th grade studenst who passed Algebra I: 278 (male: 141, female: 137)
- Hispanic: 59 (male: 19, female: 40)
- Asian: 14 (male: 7, female: 7)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 4 (all male)
- Black: 11 (male: 4, female: 7)
- White: 179 (male: 100, female: 79)
- Two or More Races: 11 (male: 7, female: 4)
Percent of 7-8th grade students who passedHere: | 93.3% |
California: | 83.6% |
Number of Algebra I classes: 9
Geometry:
Geometry is a (college-preparatory) course that typically includes topics such as properties of plane and solid figures; deductive methods of reasoning and use of logic; geometry as an axiomatic system including the study of postulates, theorems, and formal proofs; concepts of congruence, similarity, parallelism, perpendicularity, and proportion; and rules of angle measurement in triangles.Geometry is considered a prerequisite for Algebra II.
8th grade students enrolled in Geometry: 56
Number of Geometry classes: 3
Student Enrollment in Geometry
- Hispanic10
- Asian7
- Black2
- White52
- Multirace10
Student Enrollment in Geometry: 81 (male: 44, female: 37)
- Hispanic: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
- Asian: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Black: 2 (all female)
- White: 52 (male: 26, female: 26)
- Two or More Races: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
Comments
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: