Three Oaks Elementary School in Fort Myers, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 47.

19600 CYPRESS VIEW DR
Fort Myers, FL 33912

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
New School (13.3 miles):

93
Lee County High Technical Center Central School (13.5 miles):

71
Orangewood Elementary School (11.3 miles):

60
Poinciana Elementary School (19.0 miles):

56
Bayshore Elementary School (18.0 miles):

49
Three Oaks Elementary School:

47
Veterans Memorial Elementary School (10.8 miles):

40
Lehigh Elementary School (14.8 miles):

26
Three Oaks Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Lee County:

49
Fort Myers:

44
Three Oaks Elementary School:

47

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (239) 267-8020 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 36
School number: 741
School type: Elementary
District Name: LEE
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (239) 267-9559
Principal: Vicki Parks
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 14
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 75
Senate District: 27
School Web Address: www.leeschools.net/schools/oak

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

50%
State average from 963 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

53%
State average from 963 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

82%
State average from 963 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

29%
State average from 962 schools:

53%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 963 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

59%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

61%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

456
State average from 963 schools:

543
Percent Tested
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 963 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: C

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 119999: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

95%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

95%
State average from 963 schools:

47%
Region: 5

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 421 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 421 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 108
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 372
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 364

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 372
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 364
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 211 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 211 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 65
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 191
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 188

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 191
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 188
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 166 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 166 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 144
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 139

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 144
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 139
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 404 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 404 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 102
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 356
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 348

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 356
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 348
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 251 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 251 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 73
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 222
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 218

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 222
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 218
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 77 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 77 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

47%
State average from 959 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

51%
State average from 959 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

89%
State average from 959 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

31%
State average from 959 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

55%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

57%
State average from 959 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

55%
State average from 959 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

63%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

448
State average from 959 schools:

560
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 959 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

95%
State average from 959 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

97%
State average from 959 schools:

46%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 293 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 293 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 85
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 264
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 260

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 264
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 261
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 194 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 194 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 52
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 180
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 176

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 180
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 177
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 84 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 84 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 70
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 70

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 70
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 70
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 277 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 277 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 80
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 248
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 244

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 248
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 245
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 176 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 176 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 51
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 155
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 153

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 155
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 154
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

58%
State average from 954 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

61%
State average from 954 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

91%
State average from 954 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

41%
State average from 954 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 954 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 954 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

67%
State average from 954 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

61%
State average from 954 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

500
State average from 954 schools:

544
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 954 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: B

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

93%
State average from 954 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

95%
State average from 954 schools:

45%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 279 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 279 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 72
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 246
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 232

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 247
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 237
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 173 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 173 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 158
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 150

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 158
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 152
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 77 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 77 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 62

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 261 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 261 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 69
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 229
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 215

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 230
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 220
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 156 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 156 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 139
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 130

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 140
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 133
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

84%
State average from 862 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

83%
State average from 862 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

79%
State average from 862 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

45%
State average from 862 schools:

43%
Making Reading Gains
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

72%
State average from 862 schools:

70%
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
Making Math Gains
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

78%
State average from 862 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

53%
State average from 862 schools:

66%
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

81%
State average from 862 schools:

68%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

575
State average from 862 schools:

539
Percent Tested
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 862 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

31%
State average from 865 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

36%
State average from 865 schools:

56%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 414 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 412 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 132
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 400
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 398
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 267 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 267 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 79
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 259
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 259
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 91 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 89 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 86
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 120 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 118 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 111
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 109
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

81%
State average from 848 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

75%
State average from 848 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

78%
State average from 848 schools:

79%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 848 schools:

62%
Making Math Gains
Here:

77%
State average from 848 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

56%
State average from 848 schools:

61%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

427
State average from 848 schools:

413
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 848 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

32%
State average from 848 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

39%
State average from 848 schools:

55%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 440 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 441 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 126
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 431
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 432
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 277 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 278 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 84

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 274
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 275
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 94 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 94 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 91
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 91
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 119 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 119 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 33

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 114
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 114
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 56 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 56 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 54

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 54
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 68
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 68
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

76%
State average from 834 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

66%
State average from 834 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

69%
State average from 834 schools:

79%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 834 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 834 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

67%
State average from 834 schools:

60%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

420
State average from 834 schools:

412
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 834 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

33%
State average from 834 schools:

60%
Minority Rate
Here:

38%
State average from 832 schools:

54%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1041
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

257
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

48%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

21%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

24%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

7%
State average:

32%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

31%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1415
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

31%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

15%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

53%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1443
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

273
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

33%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

30%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

44%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

2
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

13
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

1
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

278
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

45%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

32%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

17%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

4%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

23%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

6
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1253
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

290
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

23%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

15%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

53%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1413
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

290
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

23%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

27%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

13%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

4%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

50%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1516
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

33%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

21%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

11%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

3%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

36%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

5
State average:

7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1091
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

266
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1373
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 04
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 08
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1455
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1238
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1417
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1535
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 89
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 2
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 54%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 82%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1148
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1338
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

278
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1460
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1283
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1384
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1546
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

99
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

609
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

40
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

10
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

84
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

628
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

48
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

10
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

90
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

647
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

54
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 79
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

306
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 65%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 48%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 91%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1413
State average:

1342
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1630
State average from 1875 schools:

1542
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

313
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1637
State average:

1546
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1430
State average:

1397
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 207

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1675
State average from 1873 schools:

1629
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1670
State average:

1632
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1609
State average:

1532
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 61

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

314
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1469
State average:

1413
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

337
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1593
State average from 1874 schools:

1525
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1611
State average:

1528
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1440
State average:

1414
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 171

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1729
State average from 1872 schools:

1647
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

346
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1729
State average:

1649
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1582
State average:

1519
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 147

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 142
Mean Scale Score
Here:

643
State average from 1891 schools:

633
Median NPR: 69
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 136
Mean Scale Score
Here:

645
State average from 1874 schools:

642
Median NPR: 64
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 130
Mean Scale Score
Here:

669
State average from 1870 schools:

667
Median NPR: 74
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 144
Mean Scale Score
Here:

638
State average from 1891 schools:

632
Median NPR: 73
Number Sense (max 14): 11
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 136
Mean Scale Score
THREE OAKS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

671
State average from 1874 schools:

652
Median NPR: 86
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 10
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 126
Mean Scale Score
Here:

678
State average from 1870 schools:

663
Median NPR: 83
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 137
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

300
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 59%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 46%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 76%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 61%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Fort Myers, FL
  5. Three Oaks Elementary School in Fort Myers, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.