All Cities Nevada Forum Nevada Tonopah, NV Tonopah High School in Tonopah, Nevada (NV)
Tonopah High School in Tonopah, Nevada (NV)
City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Nevada) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
42 .
Address:
Principal: Alvin Eiseman
Phone Number (Verify before using): (775) 482-3698
Fax Number (Verify before using): (775) 482-3935
Website: tonopah-hs.nye.k12.nv.us
Title I School: No
AYP School Designation: Watch
Special Programs: Class-Size Reduction: No
Tonopah High School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings: Nevada:
43Nye County:
33Tonopah:
36Tonopah High School:
42
Adequate Yearly Progress English Language Arts School English Language Arts AYP Designation: Adequate
Participation All Students:
100.0%White:
100.0%
Percent Proficient All Students:
67.6%White:
66.7%
Math School Math AYP Designation: Adequate
Participation All Students:
100.0%White:
100.0%
Percent Proficient White:
86.7%All Students:
86.5%
Average Daily Attendance School Average Daily Attendance AYP Designation: Watch
Pacific Islander:
94.3%Individual Education Plan Students:
93.8%American Indian:
93.7%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
91.3%Limited English Proficiency Students:
83.1%
Discuss this school with others on our active
Nevada Forum
Iowa Tests of Educational Development Language Detailed Students Results Percent of Tonopah High School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 37 32.4% 33.4% 27.0% 26.5% 24.3% 22.8% 16.2% 17.2% Male 24 25.0% 40.9% 29.2% 25.9% 25.0% 19.7% 20.8% 13.5% Female 13 46.2% 25.8% 23.1% 27.2% 23.1% 26.1% 7.7% 21.0% White 30 36.7% 23.4% 23.3% 25.3% 23.3% 27.2% 16.7% 24.0% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 40 22.9% 33.9% 25.7% 26.0% 31.4% 22.4% 20.0% 17.7% Male 15 23.1% 47.2% 46.2% 28.1% 23.1% 16.5% 7.7% 8.2% Female 25 22.7% 26.1% 13.6% 26.5% 36.4% 25.5% 27.3% 21.9% White 35 26.7% 24.7% 16.7% 24.6% 33.3% 26.5% 23.3% 24.1% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 42 26.3% 33.9% 34.2% 26.1% 18.4% 22.2% 21.1% 17.7% Male 20 35.0% 41.3% 30.0% 25.4% 20.0% 19.3% 15.0% 13.9% Female 22 16.7% 26.3% 38.9% 26.8% 16.7% 25.2% 27.8% 21.6% White 32 25.0% 24.5% 35.7% 25.6% 17.9% 26.3% 21.4% 23.6% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 13 25.0% 48.4% 41.7% 28.3% 25.0% 15.9% 8.3% 7.4% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 47 28.9% 34.5% 26.7% 25.5% 24.4% 21.8% 20.0% 18.2% Male 31 31.0% 42.4% 24.1% 25.0% 24.1% 18.7% 20.7% 13.9% Female 16 25.0% 26.3% 31.3% 26.1% 25.0% 25.0% 18.8% 22.6% White 40 23.1% 24.9% 28.2% 25.1% 28.2% 25.7% 20.5% 24.3% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 10 55.6% 50.0% 33.3% 27.9% 11.1% 15.7% 0.0% 6.4% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 39 25.6% 33.9% 23.1% 24.7% 25.6% 24.5% 25.6% 16.9% Male 21 28.6% 41.7% 28.6% 24.7% 19.0% 20.8% 23.8% 12.8% Female 18 22.2% 25.7% 16.7% 24.7% 33.3% 28.4% 27.8% 21.2% White 33 21.2% 24.9% 24.2% 23.6% 24.2% 29.0% 30.3% 22.5% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Educational Development Mathematics Detailed Students Results Percent of Tonopah High School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 37 21.6% 35.8% 35.1% 26.0% 29.7% 21.4% 13.5% 16.8% Male 24 12.5% 37.2% 37.5% 23.2% 29.2% 20.9% 20.8% 18.7% Female 13 38.5% 34.3% 30.8% 28.9% 30.8% 22.1% 0.0% 14.8% White 30 20.0% 25.2% 36.7% 24.7% 26.7% 26.1% 16.7% 24.1% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 40 28.6% 34.6% 28.6% 25.9% 20.0% 21.7% 22.9% 17.9% Male 15 23.1% 47.2% 30.8% 28.2% 23.1% 16.9% 23.1% 7.7% Female 25 31.8% 33.1% 27.3% 28.0% 18.2% 22.7% 22.7% 16.3% White 35 26.7% 24.9% 23.3% 24.2% 23.3% 26.1% 26.7% 24.8% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 42 22.9% 34.4% 31.4% 26.4% 25.7% 21.6% 20.0% 17.6% Male 20 22.2% 35.9% 33.3% 23.6% 22.2% 20.7% 22.2% 19.8% Female 22 23.5% 32.8% 29.4% 29.3% 29.4% 22.5% 17.6% 15.4% White 32 15.4% 24.7% 34.6% 25.0% 26.9% 25.9% 23.1% 24.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 13 27.3% 47.9% 45.5% 28.7% 0.0% 16.4% 27.3% 7.0% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 47 27.3% 35.2% 34.1% 26.5% 13.6% 21.0% 25.0% 17.3% Male 31 25.0% 37.5% 32.1% 23.8% 14.3% 19.6% 28.6% 19.1% Female 16 31.3% 32.7% 37.5% 29.3% 12.5% 22.4% 18.8% 15.5% White 40 23.7% 25.4% 31.6% 25.4% 15.8% 25.3% 28.9% 23.8% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 10 62.5% 48.9% 25.0% 28.8% 12.5% 15.4% 0.0% 6.8% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 39 23.1% 36.5% 25.6% 24.9% 25.6% 20.6% 25.6% 18.0% Male 21 23.8% 39.2% 9.5% 22.3% 33.3% 19.1% 33.3% 19.4% Female 18 22.2% 33.6% 44.4% 27.7% 16.7% 22.1% 16.7% 16.6% White 33 24.2% 27.2% 24.2% 24.0% 21.2% 24.7% 30.3% 24.1% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Educational Development Reading Detailed Students Results Percent of Tonopah High School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 37 24.3% 31.7% 32.4% 27.3% 29.7% 21.6% 13.5% 19.5% Male 24 12.5% 34.2% 33.3% 25.8% 37.5% 20.7% 16.7% 19.3% Female 13 46.2% 29.1% 30.8% 28.8% 15.4% 22.4% 7.7% 19.7% White 30 26.7% 18.0% 23.3% 25.2% 33.3% 27.2% 16.7% 29.6% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 40 14.3% 32.3% 28.6% 26.6% 34.3% 21.2% 22.9% 19.9% Male 15 15.4% 50.3% 38.5% 27.8% 23.1% 14.2% 23.1% 7.7% Female 25 13.6% 29.9% 22.7% 27.6% 40.9% 22.2% 22.7% 20.3% White 35 13.3% 19.4% 26.7% 24.8% 33.3% 26.4% 26.7% 29.4% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 42 22.0% 32.9% 26.8% 26.4% 29.3% 21.4% 22.0% 19.3% Male 20 25.0% 35.1% 20.0% 25.1% 25.0% 20.1% 30.0% 19.6% Female 22 19.0% 30.5% 33.3% 27.7% 33.3% 22.7% 14.3% 19.1% White 32 22.6% 19.2% 22.6% 25.9% 32.3% 26.5% 22.6% 28.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 13 15.4% 50.4% 38.5% 28.0% 30.8% 14.0% 15.4% 7.6% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 47 28.9% 33.4% 20.0% 25.9% 33.3% 21.1% 17.8% 19.6% Male 31 31.0% 36.7% 17.2% 24.5% 27.6% 19.9% 24.1% 18.9% Female 16 25.0% 30.0% 25.0% 27.3% 43.8% 22.4% 6.3% 20.3% White 40 23.1% 20.4% 17.9% 24.6% 38.5% 26.5% 20.5% 28.5% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 10 55.6% 52.1% 11.1% 27.8% 11.1% 12.8% 22.2% 7.3% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 39 15.4% 35.2% 35.9% 24.3% 20.5% 21.2% 28.2% 19.3% Male 21 14.3% 38.5% 33.3% 23.2% 23.8% 19.7% 28.6% 18.6% Female 18 16.7% 31.6% 38.9% 25.6% 16.7% 22.7% 27.8% 20.1% White 33 18.2% 23.2% 33.3% 23.4% 18.2% 26.1% 30.3% 27.3% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Educational Development Science Detailed Students Results Percent of Tonopah High School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 37 23.3% 33.0% 30.0% 26.9% 33.3% 22.7% 13.3% 17.4% Male 24 19.0% 35.5% 23.8% 26.6% 38.1% 20.7% 19.0% 17.2% Female 13 33.3% 30.3% 44.4% 27.2% 22.2% 24.8% 0.0% 17.7% White 30 29.2% 22.8% 25.0% 24.1% 29.2% 26.8% 16.7% 26.3% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 40 17.1% 33.6% 31.4% 26.4% 37.1% 21.8% 14.3% 18.2% Male 15 15.4% 45.8% 38.5% 30.0% 23.1% 17.1% 23.1% 7.1% Female 25 18.2% 31.3% 27.3% 26.5% 45.5% 24.0% 9.1% 18.3% White 35 20.0% 23.7% 26.7% 23.9% 36.7% 25.8% 16.7% 26.6% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 42 33.3% 32.7% 22.2% 26.2% 16.7% 22.7% 27.8% 18.3% Male 20 30.0% 35.3% 20.0% 25.8% 20.0% 20.4% 30.0% 18.6% Female 22 37.5% 30.1% 25.0% 26.7% 12.5% 25.2% 25.0% 18.1% White 32 28.6% 23.4% 25.0% 24.1% 14.3% 26.3% 32.1% 26.2% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 13 45.5% 45.2% 18.2% 29.6% 9.1% 17.6% 27.3% 7.7% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 47 26.7% 33.3% 26.7% 26.1% 24.4% 22.4% 22.2% 18.2% Male 31 27.6% 36.9% 27.6% 25.2% 24.1% 20.0% 20.7% 17.9% Female 16 25.0% 29.5% 25.0% 27.1% 25.0% 24.8% 25.0% 18.6% White 40 23.1% 23.8% 28.2% 23.7% 23.1% 26.3% 25.6% 26.1% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 10 55.6% 45.3% 22.2% 30.3% 22.2% 17.2% 0.0% 7.3% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 39 28.2% 35.1% 28.2% 25.3% 23.1% 22.9% 20.5% 16.7% Male 21 28.6% 38.8% 33.3% 24.9% 28.6% 20.3% 9.5% 16.0% Female 18 27.8% 31.3% 22.2% 25.7% 16.7% 25.5% 33.3% 17.5% White 33 24.2% 26.4% 27.3% 23.5% 24.2% 26.7% 24.2% 23.4% Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
High School Proficiency Examination Mathematics Grade 11 Students Tested: 38
Tonopah High School:
100.0%Nevada:
99.0%
Studets Results in 2010/2011
Approaches Standard This School:
31.6%State:
26.3%
Meets Standard This School:
55.3%State:
54.4%
Exceeds Standard This School:
10.5%State:
18.2%
Tonopah High School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
This School : State :
Detailed Students Results Percent of Tonopah High School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 38 -5.5% 1.3% 2.6% 1.1% 31.6% 26.3% 55.3% 54.4% 10.5% 18.2% Male 18 -10.2% 1.0% 0.0% 1.2% 38.9% 26.6% 44.4% 52.9% 16.7% 19.4% Female 20 -1.3% 1.7% 5.0% 1.0% 25.0% 26.1% 65.0% 56.0% 5.0% 17.0% White 31 -6.8% 11.6% 3.2% 0.5% 32.3% 16.6% 51.6% 57.7% 12.9% 25.2% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 12 -29.6% -9.7% 8.3% 1.5% 50.0% 36.9% 33.3% 51.5% 8.3% 10.1% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 44 -16.8% 0.6% 2.3% 2.7% 43.2% 25.4% 45.5% 54.5% 9.1% 17.4% Male 27 -26.9% 1.5% 3.7% 3.3% 51.9% 23.9% 37.0% 53.8% 7.4% 19.1% Female 17 -0.7% -0.4% 0.0% 2.2% 29.4% 26.9% 58.8% 55.2% 11.8% 15.7% White 37 -11.8% 11.0% 2.7% 1.5% 37.8% 16.1% 48.6% 58.4% 10.8% 23.9% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 13 -25.1% -11.1% 0.0% 4.4% 53.8% 35.5% 46.2% 50.8% 0.0% 9.4% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 28 15.9% 8.6% 0.0% 3.8% 22.2% 25.7% 55.6% 51.4% 22.2% 19.0% Male 18 15.9% 10.4% 0.0% 4.1% 22.2% 23.6% 55.6% 51.1% 22.2% 21.1% Female 10 15.9% 6.8% 0.0% 3.5% 22.2% 27.8% 55.6% 51.7% 22.2% 17.0% White 22 9.6% 17.7% 0.0% 2.3% 28.6% 18.1% 47.6% 54.2% 23.8% 25.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 10 27.0% -4.4% 0.0% 6.6% 11.1% 35.9% 77.8% 48.0% 11.1% 9.5% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 35 12.4% 9.7% 2.9% 4.3% 22.9% 24.1% 68.6% 52.9% 5.7% 18.6% Male 16 19.4% 11.9% 6.3% 4.4% 12.5% 21.8% 81.3% 53.0% 0.0% 20.8% Female 19 6.6% 7.4% 0.0% 4.3% 31.6% 26.4% 57.9% 52.9% 10.5% 16.4% White 29 14.0% 19.5% 3.4% 2.5% 20.7% 16.1% 69.0% 56.9% 6.9% 24.5% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 37 2.2% 11.8% 6.1% 4.0% 39.4% 32.0% 42.4% 47.4% 12.1% 16.7% Male 18 7.7% 15.6% 6.7% 4.4% 33.3% 27.7% 46.7% 48.2% 13.3% 19.7% Female 19 -2.3% 8.0% 5.6% 3.6% 44.4% 36.1% 38.9% 46.5% 11.1% 13.8% White 26 3.7% 22.1% 4.0% 2.2% 40.0% 23.4% 40.0% 52.5% 16.0% 21.9% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
High School Proficiency Examination Mathematics Grades 10 & 11 Detailed Students Results Percent of Tonopah High School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 41 8.7% 19.8% 0.0% 4.4% 39.0% 23.5% 43.9% 58.0% 17.1% 14.1% Male 26 20.8% 22.7% 0.0% 5.0% 26.9% 20.1% 50.0% 58.3% 23.1% 16.6% Female 15 -12.3% 17.0% 0.0% 3.8% 60.0% 26.9% 33.3% 57.7% 6.7% 11.6% White 35 7.7% 29.1% 0.0% 2.4% 40.0% 16.2% 45.7% 63.3% 14.3% 18.1% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 12 -2.3% 3.1% 0.0% 8.7% 50.0% 35.8% 50.0% 49.3% 0.0% 6.1% Select school year: 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 27 25.5% 11.2% 7.4% 10.1% 14.8% 26.4% 70.4% 50.0% 7.4% 13.5% Male 19 31.9% 12.0% 5.3% 11.1% 10.5% 24.6% 78.9% 49.2% 5.3% 15.1% White 23 30.3% 23.5% 4.3% 5.7% 13.0% 18.5% 73.9% 57.1% 8.7% 18.7% Select school year: 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 40 17.2% 14.9% 0.0% 0.0% 40.0% 42.3% 60.0% 57.7% 0.0% 0.0% Male 22 25.4% 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 31.8% 40.5% 68.2% 59.5% 0.0% 0.0% Female 18 7.2% 12.9% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 44.3% 50.0% 55.7% 0.0% 0.0% White 33 23.9% 26.3% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 30.9% 66.7% 69.1% 0.0% 0.0% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 12 7.2% -1.8% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 59.0% 50.0% 41.0% 0.0% 0.0% Select school year: 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
High School Proficiency Examination Reading Grade 11 Students Tested: 38
Tonopah High School:
100.0%Nevada:
99.4%
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Developing This School:
2.6%Nevada:
0.6%
Approaches Standard This School:
2.6%Nevada:
5.0%
Meets Standard This School:
42.1%State:
47.2%
Exceeds Standard This School:
52.6%Nevada:
47.2%
Tonopah High School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective All Students This School:
8.0%State:
7.7%
Male This School:
7.8%Nevada:
6.1%
Female This School:
8.3%Nevada:
9.4%
White This School:
6.9%Nevada:
10.7%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
Detailed Students Results Percent of Tonopah High School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 38 8.0% 7.7% 2.6% 0.6% 2.6% 5.0% 42.1% 47.2% 52.6% 47.2% Male 18 7.8% 6.1% 0.0% 0.8% 5.6% 6.4% 38.9% 48.6% 55.6% 44.2% Female 20 8.3% 9.4% 5.0% 0.5% 0.0% 3.4% 45.0% 45.7% 50.0% 50.4% White 31 6.9% 10.7% 3.2% 0.4% 3.2% 2.2% 38.7% 36.2% 54.8% 61.2% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 12 -3.4% 4.5% 8.3% 0.9% 8.3% 7.9% 50.0% 57.3% 33.3% 33.9% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 44 8.6% 7.3% 0.0% 0.6% 4.7% 5.4% 60.5% 44.5% 34.9% 49.5% Male 27 5.6% 6.0% 0.0% 0.9% 7.7% 6.4% 65.4% 45.1% 26.9% 47.6% Female 17 13.3% 8.6% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 4.3% 52.9% 44.0% 47.1% 51.3% White 37 7.7% 10.3% 0.0% 0.4% 5.6% 2.6% 58.3% 33.9% 36.1% 63.1% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 13 13.3% 3.2% 0.0% 1.0% 0.0% 9.1% 83.3% 55.3% 16.7% 34.6% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 28 17.7% 11.3% 0.0% 1.2% 0.0% 5.1% 51.9% 41.4% 48.1% 52.2% Male 18 17.7% 9.8% 0.0% 1.7% 0.0% 6.2% 50.0% 42.4% 50.0% 49.7% Female 10 17.7% 12.8% 0.0% 0.8% 0.0% 4.2% 55.6% 40.4% 44.4% 54.7% White 22 17.7% 13.9% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 3.0% 47.6% 32.0% 52.4% 64.2% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 10 17.7% 6.5% 0.0% 2.2% 0.0% 9.0% 66.7% 53.0% 33.3% 35.8% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 35 12.0% 11.0% 2.9% 1.6% 2.9% 5.1% 37.1% 46.2% 57.1% 47.1% Male 16 11.4% 10.0% 6.3% 1.8% 0.0% 5.8% 37.5% 47.4% 56.3% 44.9% Female 19 12.4% 12.1% 0.0% 1.3% 5.3% 4.3% 36.8% 45.1% 57.9% 49.3% White 29 10.8% 14.4% 3.4% 0.8% 3.4% 2.5% 24.1% 37.4% 69.0% 59.4% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 37 13.3% 13.0% 2.9% 1.7% 5.9% 7.4% 44.1% 42.4% 47.1% 48.5% Male 18 9.6% 11.9% 6.3% 2.2% 6.3% 8.0% 43.8% 43.6% 43.8% 46.2% Female 19 16.5% 14.0% 0.0% 1.3% 5.6% 6.8% 44.4% 41.3% 50.0% 50.7% White 26 17.8% 17.2% 0.0% 1.0% 4.3% 3.9% 43.5% 35.0% 52.2% 60.1% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
High School Proficiency Examination Reading Grades 10 & 11 Detailed Students Results Percent of Tonopah High School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 41 14.8% 11.9% 0.0% 1.8% 7.3% 8.5% 61.0% 46.3% 31.7% 43.5% Male 26 18.3% 10.2% 0.0% 2.4% 3.8% 9.4% 57.7% 46.2% 38.5% 41.9% Female 15 8.8% 13.5% 0.0% 1.1% 13.3% 7.5% 66.7% 46.3% 20.0% 45.1% White 35 16.4% 16.6% 0.0% 1.0% 5.7% 4.6% 62.9% 40.0% 31.4% 54.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 12 5.4% 2.4% 0.0% 3.8% 16.7% 16.0% 58.3% 56.7% 25.0% 23.6% Select school year: 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 27 3.6% 4.9% 0.0% 5.1% 18.5% 12.1% 40.7% 42.3% 40.7% 40.5% Male 19 6.3% 2.2% 0.0% 6.5% 15.8% 13.3% 42.1% 41.8% 42.1% 38.3% White 23 9.1% 12.8% 0.0% 2.5% 13.0% 6.8% 43.5% 37.4% 43.5% 53.3% Select school year: 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 40 1.5% 3.7% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 22.8% 75.0% 77.2% 0.0% 0.0% Male 22 -0.8% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 27.3% 26.0% 72.7% 74.0% 0.0% 0.0% Female 18 4.3% 6.9% 0.0% 0.0% 22.2% 19.6% 77.8% 80.4% 0.0% 0.0% White 33 5.3% 12.6% 0.0% 0.0% 21.2% 13.9% 78.8% 86.1% 0.0% 0.0% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 12 -15.2% -10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 41.7% 36.5% 58.3% 63.6% 0.0% 0.0% Select school year: 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
High School Proficiency Examination Science Grade 11
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Developing This School:
10.5%State:
8.7%
Approaches Standard This School:
31.6%State:
20.3%
Meets Standard This School:
55.3%State:
64.3%
Tonopah High School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective
All Students
Here : State :
Male
Here : Nevada :
Female
This School : Nevada :
White
This School : Nevada :
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
Here : State :
Detailed Students Results Percent of Tonopah High School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 38 -28.8% -15.7% 10.5% 8.7% 31.6% 20.3% 55.3% 64.3% 2.6% 6.8% Male 18 -20.0% -13.6% 16.7% 9.2% 16.7% 17.7% 61.1% 64.1% 5.6% 9.1% Female 20 -36.7% -17.8% 5.0% 8.1% 45.0% 23.0% 50.0% 64.5% 0.0% 4.4% White 31 -28.6% -2.5% 6.5% 3.8% 35.5% 12.0% 54.8% 73.4% 3.2% 10.9% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 12 -53.4% -27.7% 33.3% 13.4% 33.3% 27.6% 33.3% 55.9% 0.0% 3.1% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 44 -12.9% -8.3% 4.8% 6.8% 21.4% 14.8% 64.3% 61.6% 9.5% 16.8% Male 27 -17.5% -6.0% 3.8% 7.1% 26.9% 12.1% 61.5% 59.0% 7.7% 21.7% Female 17 -5.4% -10.7% 6.3% 6.4% 12.5% 17.6% 68.8% 64.2% 12.5% 11.9% White 37 -12.4% 2.5% 5.7% 2.9% 20.0% 7.9% 62.9% 64.3% 11.4% 24.9% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 13 -14.0% -19.7% 9.1% 11.5% 18.2% 21.5% 72.7% 58.3% 0.0% 8.7% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 28 -8.3% -6.6% 3.7% 7.5% 22.2% 16.8% 59.3% 59.8% 14.8% 15.9% Male 18 -10.1% -3.5% 0.0% 7.5% 27.8% 13.6% 50.0% 58.0% 22.2% 20.9% Female 10 -4.6% -9.7% 11.1% 7.6% 11.1% 19.8% 77.8% 61.6% 0.0% 11.0% White 22 -6.1% 3.6% 4.8% 3.8% 19.0% 10.2% 57.1% 63.2% 19.0% 22.8% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 10 -15.7% -20.9% 11.1% 13.3% 22.2% 25.2% 66.7% 54.2% 0.0% 7.3% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009
High School Proficiency Examination Writing Grade 11 Students Tested: 38
This School:
100.0%State:
97.8%
Studets Results in 2010/2011
Exceeds Standard This School:
5.3%Nevada:
2.3%
Tonopah High School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective
All Students
Here : Nevada :
Male
Here : Nevada :
Female
This School : Nevada :
White
This School : Nevada :
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
Here : Nevada :
Detailed Students Results Percent of Tonopah High School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 38 -13.0% -8.0% 0.0% 1.2% 26.3% 20.1% 68.4% 76.4% 5.3% 2.3% Male 18 -20.0% -13.7% 0.0% 1.9% 33.3% 25.2% 55.6% 71.2% 11.1% 1.8% Female 20 -6.7% -2.1% 0.0% 0.6% 20.0% 14.9% 80.0% 81.8% 0.0% 2.8% White 31 -12.5% 0.9% 0.0% 0.6% 25.8% 11.8% 71.0% 84.1% 3.2% 3.4% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 12 -28.4% -17.5% 0.0% 2.0% 41.7% 28.9% 58.3% 68.3% 0.0% 0.8% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 44 -3.0% -1.5% 2.3% 1.8% 14.0% 13.0% 83.7% 82.3% 0.0% 2.9% Male 27 -9.8% -5.9% 3.8% 2.4% 19.2% 16.8% 76.9% 78.7% 0.0% 2.1% Female 17 7.4% 2.9% 0.0% 1.3% 5.9% 9.1% 94.1% 85.9% 0.0% 3.7% White 37 2.2% 4.7% 2.8% 1.3% 8.3% 7.4% 88.9% 87.3% 0.0% 4.1% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 13 -9.8% -9.6% 0.0% 2.8% 23.1% 20.2% 76.9% 76.0% 0.0% 1.1% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 28 10.3% 5.1% 0.0% 0.9% 7.4% 11.7% 92.6% 83.1% 0.0% 4.4% Male 18 6.6% 1.2% 0.0% 1.3% 11.1% 15.1% 88.9% 80.3% 0.0% 3.3% White 22 12.9% 10.2% 0.0% 0.4% 4.8% 7.0% 95.2% 86.9% 0.0% 5.6% Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 10 6.6% -3.2% 0.0% 1.6% 11.1% 19.3% 88.9% 77.2% 0.0% 1.9% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 35 6.2% 5.3% 2.9% 3.0% 8.6% 9.5% 88.6% 81.4% 0.0% 6.2% Male 16 5.2% 2.1% 6.3% 3.6% 6.3% 11.9% 87.5% 79.9% 0.0% 4.5% Female 19 7.1% 8.4% 0.0% 2.3% 10.5% 7.0% 89.5% 82.9% 0.0% 7.9% White 29 7.3% 10.4% 3.4% 2.1% 6.9% 5.2% 89.7% 84.3% 0.0% 8.4% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 37 19.2% 13.1% 0.0% 0.9% 2.9% 8.0% 77.1% 80.7% 20.0% 10.4% Male 18 15.9% 10.8% 0.0% 1.2% 6.3% 10.1% 75.0% 80.8% 18.8% 7.9% Female 19 22.1% 15.4% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 6.0% 78.9% 80.5% 21.1% 12.7% White 26 18.1% 17.5% 0.0% 0.5% 4.0% 4.1% 84.0% 82.6% 12.0% 12.8% Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
All Cities Nevada Forum Nevada Tonopah, NV Tonopah High School in Tonopah, Nevada (NV)
-5.5%
1.3%
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: