Twin Lakes Elementary School in Tampa, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 33.

8507 N HABANA AVE
Tampa, FL 33614

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Tarpon Springs Fundamental Ele School (17.8 miles):

97
Nelson Elementary School (19.2 miles):

73
Safety Harbor Elementary School (12.8 miles):

62
Sandy Lane Elementary School (18.2 miles):

51
Pizzo Elementary School (5.4 miles):

41
Twin Lakes Elementary School:

33
Belleair Elementary School (19.1 miles):

30
Athenian Academy School (17.4 miles):

18
Twin Lakes Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Hillsborough County:

42
Tampa:

41
Twin Lakes Elementary School:

33

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (813) 975-7380 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 29
School number: 4561
School type: Elementary
District Name: HILLSBOROUGH
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 5
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (813) 631-4153
Principal: Holly Saia
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 11
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 47
Senate District: 12

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

66%
State average from 734 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

65%
State average from 734 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

84%
State average from 734 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

40%
State average from 733 schools:

53%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 734 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 733 schools:

67%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

64%
State average from 734 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

57%
State average from 734 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

510
State average from 734 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 733 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: B

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 119999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

84%
State average from 734 schools:

57%
Minority Rate
Here:

86%
State average from 735 schools:

46%
Region: 4

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 306 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 306 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 104
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 272
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 261

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 273
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 264
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 182 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 182 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 161
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 152

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 162
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 155
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 265 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 265 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 86
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 232
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 222

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 232
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 224
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 113 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 113 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 77

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 79
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 735 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

66%
State average from 734 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

87%
State average from 734 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

41%
State average from 734 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 734 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 735 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

68%
State average from 735 schools:

65%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

59%
State average from 734 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

516
State average from 734 schools:

557
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 734 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

81%
State average from 734 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
Here:

86%
State average from 734 schools:

45%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 308 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 308 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 101
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 271
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 258

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 271
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 260
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 186 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 186 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 61
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 163
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 155

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 163
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 156
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 245 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 245 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 86
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 217
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 207

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 217
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 209
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 96 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 96 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 74
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 56 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 56 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

66%
State average from 711 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

63%
State average from 711 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

59%
State average from 711 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

41%
State average from 711 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 711 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

57%
State average from 711 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

75%
State average from 711 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

65%
State average from 711 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

494
State average from 711 schools:

544
Percent Tested
TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 711 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

77%
State average from 711 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

81%
State average from 711 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 296 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 296 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 75
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 271
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 259

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 273
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 259
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 163 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 163 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 147
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 140

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 148
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 139
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 223 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 223 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 199
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 191

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 201
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 191
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 83 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 75
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

68%
State average from 652 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

66%
State average from 652 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

79%
State average from 652 schools:

83%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

49%
State average from 650 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

81%
State average from 652 schools:

72%
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math Gains
Here:

77%
State average from 652 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

70%
State average from 652 schools:

67%
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

78%
State average from 652 schools:

69%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

568
State average from 652 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 652 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

77%
State average from 655 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
Here:

79%
State average from 655 schools:

55%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 278 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 277 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 84
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 261
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 260
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 146 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 145 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 135
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 134
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 216 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 215 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 64
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 201
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 200
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 82 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 75
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

67%
State average from 643 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

59%
State average from 643 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

71%
State average from 643 schools:

81%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 643 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

77%
State average from 643 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

60%
State average from 643 schools:

61%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

394
State average from 643 schools:

420
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 643 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

81%
State average from 644 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

80%
State average from 644 schools:

54%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 431 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 430 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 141
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 405
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 405
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 88 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 88 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 31

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 86
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 86
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 60

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 60
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 230 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 230 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 74

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 214
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 214
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 357 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 356 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 118

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 334
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 334
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 143 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 143 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 51

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 133
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 133
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 48

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 48
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

74%
State average from 631 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

62%
State average from 631 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

85%
State average from 631 schools:

80%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

79%
State average from 631 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

76%
State average from 631 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

80%
State average from 631 schools:

60%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

456
State average from 631 schools:

417
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 631 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

79%
State average from 631 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

78%
State average from 631 schools:

52%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1146
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

37%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

16%
State average:

32%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

49%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1490
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

29%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

15%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

52%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1513
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

28%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

13%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

22%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

5%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

58%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

1
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

290
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

32%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

35%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

22%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

9%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

32%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

8
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1254
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

290
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

28%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

15%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

53%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1511
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

19%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

22%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

63%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1602
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

22%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

24%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

23%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

53%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1210
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1490
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 09%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 09
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1558
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1349
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1478
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1604
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 108
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 2
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 81%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1272
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1479
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1580
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1359
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1448
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

298
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1607
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

128
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

618
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

48
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

81
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

637
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

57
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

88
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

661
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

67
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 79
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

272
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 41%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 62%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1299
State average:

1342
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1425
State average from 1875 schools:

1542
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

313
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 74%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1447
State average:

1546
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1316
State average:

1397
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 131

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1657
State average from 1873 schools:

1629
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1664
State average:

1632
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1485
State average:

1532
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 179

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1354
State average:

1413
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1462
State average from 1874 schools:

1525
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 74%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1498
State average:

1528
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1297
State average:

1414
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 200

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1687
State average from 1872 schools:

1647
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

337
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1690
State average:

1649
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1514
State average:

1519
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 176

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 91
Mean Scale Score
Here:

626
State average from 1891 schools:

633
Median NPR: 55
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 94
Mean Scale Score
Here:

631
State average from 1874 schools:

642
Median NPR: 51
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 81
Mean Scale Score
TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

671
State average from 1870 schools:

667
Median NPR: 75
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 91
Mean Scale Score
Here:

628
State average from 1891 schools:

632
Median NPR: 65
Number Sense (max 14): 10
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 93
Mean Scale Score
Here:

640
State average from 1874 schools:

652
Median NPR: 67
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 81
Mean Scale Score
Here:

667
State average from 1870 schools:

663
Median NPR: 76
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 91
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
TWIN LAKES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

279
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 47%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 49%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 77%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 57%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Tampa, FL
  5. Twin Lakes Elementary School in Tampa, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.