W. J. Woodham High School in Pensacola, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 16.

150 E BURGESS RD
Pensacola, FL 32503

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Gulf Breeze High School (10.7 miles):

81
Locklin Technical Center School (13.6 miles):

61
West Florida High /Technical School (2.6 miles):

47
E Seal Center School (7.5 miles):

36
Ruby J. Gainer Charter School (5.3 miles):

21
W. J. Woodham High School:

16
Escambia Charter School (6.5 miles):

9
Pace Program School (3.2 miles):

1
W. J. Woodham High School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Escambia County:

41
Pensacola:

42
W. J. Woodham High School:

16

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (850) 494-7140 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 17
School number: 851
School type: Senior High
District Name: ESCAMBIA
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (850) 494-7484
Principal: Michael Roberts
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 1
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 3
Senate District: 2
School Web Address: www.escambia.k12.fl.us

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

47%
State average from 451 schools:

62%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

60%
State average from 451 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

63%
State average from 452 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

29%
State average from 451 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

62%
State average from 452 schools:

58%
Making Math Gains
Here:

72%
State average from 449 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

67%
State average from 452 schools:

52%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

70%
State average from 452 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

470
State average from 452 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 450 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: C

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

90%
State average from 454 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

50%
State average from 454 schools:

47%
Region: 4

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 184 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 184 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 171
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 168

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 171
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 167
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 94 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 94 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 84

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 84
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 160 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 160 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 147
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 144

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 147
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 143
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

50%
State average from 443 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

46%
State average from 440 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

68%
State average from 443 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

35%
State average from 443 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

47%
State average from 441 schools:

59%
Making Math Gains
Here:

54%
State average from 442 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

57%
State average from 442 schools:

56%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

73%
State average from 441 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

430
State average from 441 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 448 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

89%
State average from 446 schools:

46%
Minority Rate
Here:

52%
State average from 451 schools:

45%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 175 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 174 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 55
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 161
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 157

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 160
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 157
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 90 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 90 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 81
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 79

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 81
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 80
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 148 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 147 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 134
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 130

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 133
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 130
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

56%
State average from 425 schools:

61%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

54%
State average from 425 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

81%
State average from 425 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

24%
State average from 425 schools:

45%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

56%
State average from 425 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 425 schools:

74%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

43%
State average from 425 schools:

55%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

70%
State average from 425 schools:

71%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

449
State average from 425 schools:

526
Percent Tested
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 425 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

87%
State average from 425 schools:

42%
Minority Rate
Here:

51%
State average from 425 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 157 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 157 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 141
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 141
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 81 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 81 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 70
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 70

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 70
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 70
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 132 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 132 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 117
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 115

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 117
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 115
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

29%
State average from 370 schools:

45%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

50%
State average from 370 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

88%
State average from 370 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

42%
State average from 370 schools:

41%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

41%
State average from 370 schools:

52%
Making Math Gains
Here:

62%
State average from 370 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

37%
State average from 370 schools:

49%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

59%
State average from 370 schools:

67%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

408
State average from 370 schools:

482
Percent Tested
Here:

96%
State average from 370 schools:

97%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

51%
State average from 372 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

58%
State average from 372 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 652 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 654 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 306
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 611
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 611
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 267 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 269 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 125
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 246
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 247
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 333 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 335 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 152
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 314
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 315
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 373 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 373 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 158
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 347
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 347
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 92 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 94 (93%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

27%
State average from 360 schools:

45%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

50%
State average from 361 schools:

68%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

92%
State average from 361 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

46%
State average from 361 schools:

53%
Making Math Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 361 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

49%
State average from 361 schools:

53%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

327
State average from 361 schools:

374
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 361 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: NO

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

50%
State average from 362 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

57%
State average from 362 schools:

47%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 736 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 729 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 314
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 683
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 678
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 310 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 305 (97%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 138

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 286
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 278
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 363 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 361 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 149

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 338
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 341
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 412 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 407 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 174

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 386
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 384
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 93 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 91 (96%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 30

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 78

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 80
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

28%
State average from 348 schools:

42%
Meeting High Standards in Math
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

57%
State average from 348 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

92%
State average from 348 schools:

84%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

41%
State average from 348 schools:

51%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 348 schools:

73%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

47%
State average from 348 schools:

53%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

336
State average from 348 schools:

371
Percent Tested
Here:

97%
State average from 348 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: No%

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

43%
State average from 347 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

53%
State average from 348 schools:

45%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

1154
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

36%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

19%
State average:

32%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

45%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1414
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

37%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

41%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1414
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

268
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

39%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

44%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1731
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

12%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

30%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

65%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1883
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

331
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

41%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

27%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

79%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1892
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

34%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

17%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

53%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

34%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

36%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

2%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

29%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

25%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

39%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

36%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1373
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

43%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

19%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

7%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

68%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1473
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

17%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

30%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

54%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1588
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

25%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

24%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

46%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1691
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

21%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

15%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

4%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

50%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

1837
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

23%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

40%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

20%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

4%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

64%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1895
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

6%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

47%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

17%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

1%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

65%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

1095
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

266
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1432
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 09
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

1459
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1718
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1812
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1890
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

292
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1267
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1441
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1574
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1701
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1809
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

1879
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 63
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 68%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 187
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 50%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 95%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1270
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1459
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

299
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1446
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

274
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1646
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1776
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1823
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1315
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1435
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1552
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1649
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1790
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1873
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

64
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

615
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

45
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

56
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

635
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

55
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

13
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

8
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

43
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

653
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

59
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

212
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

664
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

57
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

210
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

677
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

64
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

177
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

685
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

63
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 54
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

278
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 39%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 177
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

275
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 27%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 49%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 87%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1818
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 83%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1830
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1780
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 50

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1858
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 11
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1862
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1869
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -8

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 8

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1845
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

279
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 83%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1855
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1805
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 50

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1910
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 65%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1911
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1873
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 38

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 325
Mean Scale Score
Here:

694
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 61
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 315
Mean Scale Score
Here:

699
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 57
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 325
Mean Scale Score
W. J. WOODHAM HIGH SCHOOL:

702
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 64
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 8
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 315
Mean Scale Score
Here:

703
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 53
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 324
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

292
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 48%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 81%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 68%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Pensacola, FL
  5. W. J. Woodham High School in Pensacola, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.