William S. Maxey Elementary School in Winter Garden, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 26.

1100 EAST MAPLE STREET
Winter Garden, FL 34787

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Lake Eola Charter School (11.7 miles):

98
Altamonte Elementary School (14.5 miles):

69
Fern Creek Elementary School (12.7 miles):

59
Rock Springs Elementary School (11.5 miles):

53
Zellwood Elementary School (12.2 miles):

46
English Estates Elementary School (15.1 miles):

36
Hidden Oaks Elementary School (19.4 miles):

26
William S. Maxey Elementary School:

26
William S. Maxey Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Orange County:

44
Winter Garden:

52
William S. Maxey Elementary:

26

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (407) 877-5020 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 48
School number: 1321
School type: Elementary
District Name: ORANGE
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 5
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (407) 877-2580
Principal: Belinda Davis
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 8
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 38
Senate District: 9

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

48%
State average from 734 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

56%
State average from 734 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

60%
State average from 734 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

18%
State average from 733 schools:

53%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

62%
State average from 734 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

51%
State average from 733 schools:

67%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

53%
State average from 734 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

55%
State average from 734 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

403
State average from 734 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 733 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: D

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 119999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 734 schools:

57%
Minority Rate
Here:

100%
State average from 735 schools:

46%
Region: 5

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 105 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 105 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 96

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 96
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 92 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 92 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 86
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 86

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 86
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 86
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 103 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 103 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
WILLIAM S. MAXEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 94
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 94
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

32%
State average from 735 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

48%
State average from 734 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

91%
State average from 734 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
WILLIAM S. MAXEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

13%
State average from 734 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
WILLIAM S. MAXEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

44%
State average from 734 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

57%
State average from 735 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

47%
State average from 735 schools:

65%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

73%
State average from 734 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

405
State average from 734 schools:

557
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 734 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 734 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 734 schools:

45%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 139 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 138 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 132
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 131

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 132
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 130
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 122 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 121 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 116
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 115

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 116
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 114
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 138 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 138 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 131
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 130

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 132
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 130
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

44%
State average from 711 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

54%
State average from 711 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

84%
State average from 711 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

16%
State average from 711 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
WILLIAM S. MAXEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

43%
State average from 711 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

49%
State average from 711 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

53%
State average from 711 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

67%
State average from 711 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

410
State average from 711 schools:

544
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 711 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

96%
State average from 711 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 711 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 157 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 157 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 135
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 135

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 135
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 135
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 130 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 130 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 110
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 110

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 110
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 110
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 152 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 152 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 130
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 130

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 130
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 130
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

71%
State average from 652 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

70%
State average from 652 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

83%
State average from 652 schools:

83%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

8%
State average from 650 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 652 schools:

72%
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
Making Math Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 652 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

53%
State average from 652 schools:

67%
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

70%
State average from 652 schools:

69%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

478
State average from 652 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 652 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

76%
State average from 655 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
Here:

84%
State average from 655 schools:

55%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 126 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 126 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

100%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 119
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 119
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
WILLIAM S. MAXEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 103 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 103 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 97
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 97
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

73%
State average from 643 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
WILLIAM S. MAXEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

79%
State average from 643 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

84%
State average from 643 schools:

81%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 643 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

83%
State average from 643 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

67%
State average from 643 schools:

61%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

451
State average from 643 schools:

420
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 643 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

82%
State average from 644 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

80%
State average from 644 schools:

54%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 126 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 124 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 44
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 113
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 112
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 26

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 60
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 60
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 103 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 101 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
WILLIAM S. MAXEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 37

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 91
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 90
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
WILLIAM S. MAXEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

66%
State average from 631 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
WILLIAM S. MAXEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

61%
State average from 631 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

78%
State average from 631 schools:

80%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 631 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 631 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

60%
State average from 631 schools:

60%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

406
State average from 631 schools:

417
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 631 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

88%
State average from 631 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

82%
State average from 631 schools:

52%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1122
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

38%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

44%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1388
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
WILLIAM S. MAXEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

287
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

25%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

7%
State average:

29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

46%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
WILLIAM S. MAXEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1389
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

263
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

57%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

5%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

22%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
WILLIAM S. MAXEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

38%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

2
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
WILLIAM S. MAXEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

261
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

59%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

27%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

11%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

14%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

7
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

6
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1310
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

50%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

13%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

65%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1420
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

21%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
WILLIAM S. MAXEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

29%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
WILLIAM S. MAXEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

11%
State average:

26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
WILLIAM S. MAXEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

50%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
WILLIAM S. MAXEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
WILLIAM S. MAXEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1539
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

30%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

35%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

24%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

35%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1005
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

251
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1390
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 03%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 04
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 08
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1408
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
WILLIAM S. MAXEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1250
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1456
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1506
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 39
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 51%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 87%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1239
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

290
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1345
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

279
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1341
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

255
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

268
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1384
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1410
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1517
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

46
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

614
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
WILLIAM S. MAXEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

45
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
WILLIAM S. MAXEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

48
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
WILLIAM S. MAXEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

629
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
WILLIAM S. MAXEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

49
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
WILLIAM S. MAXEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

12
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
WILLIAM S. MAXEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

8
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
WILLIAM S. MAXEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

13
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

65
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

637
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

44
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
WILLIAM S. MAXEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
WILLIAM S. MAXEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 45
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
WILLIAM S. MAXEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

298
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 64%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 47%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 87%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1319
State average:

1342
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
WILLIAM S. MAXEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1602
State average from 1875 schools:

1542
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

313
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1604
State average:

1546
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1461
State average:

1397
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 143

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
WILLIAM S. MAXEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1531
State average from 1873 schools:

1629
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1528
State average:

1632
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1478
State average:

1532
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 50

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1385
State average:

1413
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1527
State average from 1874 schools:

1525
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1541
State average:

1528
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
WILLIAM S. MAXEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1479
State average:

1414
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 61

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1644
State average from 1872 schools:

1647
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1646
State average:

1649
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
WILLIAM S. MAXEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1496
State average:

1519
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 150

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 53
Mean Scale Score
WILLIAM S. MAXEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

629
State average from 1891 schools:

633
Median NPR: 58
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 33
Mean Scale Score
Here:

645
State average from 1874 schools:

642
Median NPR: 63
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 42
Mean Scale Score
Here:

659
State average from 1870 schools:

667
Median NPR: 65
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 53
Mean Scale Score
Here:

619
State average from 1891 schools:

632
Median NPR: 59
Number Sense (max 14): 10
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 33
Mean Scale Score
Here:

658
State average from 1874 schools:

652
Median NPR: 79
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 42
Mean Scale Score
Here:

653
State average from 1870 schools:

663
Median NPR: 66
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 33
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

322
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 70%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 48%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 97%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 85%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Winter Garden, FL
  5. William S. Maxey Elementary School in Winter Garden, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.