Winter Haven Pace School in Winter Haven, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 0.

1201 1ST ST S
Winter Haven, FL 33880


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (863) 534-0966 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 53
School number: 9004
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: POLK
Principal: Diane Callaway
The function/setting of the school: Hospital
The main educational program offered at the school: Special Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 12
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 66
Senate District: 17
School Web Address: http://www.okee.k12.fl.us/index.html

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15 (83%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16 (89%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19 (77%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19 (75%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1712
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

257
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

9%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

82%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
WINTER HAVEN PACE:

18%
State average:

18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

1
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

2
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
WINTER HAVEN PACE:

221
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 94%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

1
State average:

201

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

2
State average:

192

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

4
State average:

273

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

8
State average:

237

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1366
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

196
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 90%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 4
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1331
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1412
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -82

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1629
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

237
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 1
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1590
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1685
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -95

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 1
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 11
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

218
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 82%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 18%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
WINTER HAVEN PACE:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 55%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 9%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.