Young Mens Academy For Academic And Civic Development At Miami Douglas Macarthur North Senior High School in Hialeah, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 0.

13835 NW 97TH AVE
Hialeah, FL 33018

Show street view No street view available for this location

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (305) 826-1989 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 7254
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 4 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 558-8347
Principal: Marion L Rogers
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Year 1 in Need of Improvement
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 25
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 102
Senate District: 40
School Web Address: http://macarthurnorth.dadeschools.net/

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 103 (85%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 105 (87%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 61

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (85%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 81 (86%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 94 (86%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 96 (88%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28 (80%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28 (80%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 139 (82%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 135 (80%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR NORTH SENIOR HIGH:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 106 (82%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 104 (81%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (83%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28 (78%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 113 (81%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 108 (78%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (72%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (70%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 111 (71%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 108 (70%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR NORTH SENIOR HIGH:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (72%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 83 (71%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27 (69%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24 (63%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 98 (70%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 97 (69%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28 (57%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26 (53%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (82%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (78%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

8%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (85%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 63 (80%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (80%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (76%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

4%
State average from 3 schools:

20%
Meeting High Standards in Math
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR NORTH SENIOR HIGH:

16%
State average from 3 schools:

33%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

81%
State average from 3 schools:

77%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

29%
State average from 3 schools:

42%
Making Math Gains
Here:

44%
State average from 3 schools:

52%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

37%
State average from 3 schools:

45%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR NORTH SENIOR HIGH:

211
State average from 3 schools:

269
Percent Tested
Here:

73%
State average from 3 schools:

89%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: NO

Grade in 2006: P

Grade in 2005: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

69%
State average from 3 schools:

65%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 3 schools:

96%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 106 (75%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 108 (78%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 32
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 70
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 63
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 94 (76%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 96 (79%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 32
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 64
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 59
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (74%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (76%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 49
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 43
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23 (62%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25 (68%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 2%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 10%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 57%

Making Reading Gains: 27%

Making Math Gains: 44%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading: 30%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns: 170

Percent Tested: 55%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: No%

Grade in 2005: F

Grade in 2004: S

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 59%

Minority Rate: 97%


Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1234
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

225
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

82%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

6%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

12%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR NORTH SENIOR HIGH:

12%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

8
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1423
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

244
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR NORTH SENIOR HIGH:

59%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

26%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

15%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

15%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR NORTH SENIOR HIGH:

1607
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

251
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

60%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR NORTH SENIOR HIGH:

26%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

14%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

14%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1576
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR NORTH SENIOR HIGH:

248
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

82%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

9%
State average:

26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR NORTH SENIOR HIGH:

9%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR NORTH SENIOR HIGH:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR NORTH SENIOR HIGH:

7
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1427
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

208
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

9%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

91%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 3
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR NORTH SENIOR HIGH:

9%
State average:

17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

9%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

8
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

218
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR NORTH SENIOR HIGH:

85%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

6%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

6%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

5
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

4
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1285
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

220
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

73%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

27%
State average:

20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1452
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

222
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

65%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

26%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

9%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

9%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1718
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

52%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR NORTH SENIOR HIGH:

29%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

19%
State average:

38%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

19%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1680
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

230
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

77%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

9%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

14%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

1
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR NORTH SENIOR HIGH:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1713
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

257
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

18%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR NORTH SENIOR HIGH:

45%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

45%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

9%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

9%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR NORTH SENIOR HIGH:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR NORTH SENIOR HIGH:

4
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1141
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

209
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 65%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1395
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

238
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR NORTH SENIOR HIGH:

1584
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

247
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 68%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1678
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 68%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1552
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

231
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 90%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

210
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 86%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1139
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

186
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 90%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 1
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR NORTH SENIOR HIGH:

1531
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

242
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1647
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

257
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1743
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

249
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 34
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 53%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 14
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 29%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1199
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

219
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 80%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1367
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

233
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR NORTH SENIOR HIGH:

1504
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

230
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 80%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1632
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

259
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1390
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

201
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 89%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

213
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1196
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

199
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 82%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1539
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

244
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1622
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

251
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 65%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1776
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

259
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1646
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR NORTH SENIOR HIGH:

241
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

8
State average:

190

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

18
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

625
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR NORTH SENIOR HIGH:

18
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR NORTH SENIOR HIGH:

5
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR NORTH SENIOR HIGH:

13
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

631
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

16
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR NORTH SENIOR HIGH:

4
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

8
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

15
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

656
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

25
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR NORTH SENIOR HIGH:

9
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

20
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

625
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

5
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

5
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

4
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

6
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 25
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

186
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 92%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 4%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 6
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 32%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 24
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

208
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 13%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 25%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1565
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

246
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 71%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1550
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1534
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 16

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1496
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

220
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 93%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 75%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1498
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1541
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -44

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

228
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 90%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR NORTH SENIOR HIGH:

1700
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

236
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 62%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR NORTH SENIOR HIGH:

1729
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1667
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 62

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1649
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

241
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 77%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1653
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
YOUNG MENS ACADEMY FOR ACADEMIC AND CIVIC DEVELOPMENT AT MIAMI DOUGLAS MACARTHUR NORTH SENIOR HIGH:

1692
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -39

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 32
Mean Scale Score
Here:

639
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 14
Literary (max 18): 8
Informational (max 18): 6
Functional (max 18): 8
Initial Understanding (max 10): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 9
Critical Analysis (max 14): 5
Strategies (max 10): 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 27
Mean Scale Score
Here:

660
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 21
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 7
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 10): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 10
Critical Analysis (max 14): 7
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 29
Mean Scale Score
Here:

663
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 26
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 25
Mean Scale Score
Here:

684
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 29
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 33
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

205
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 9%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

2
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 36%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 12%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Hialeah, FL
  5. Young Mens Academy For Academic And Civic Development At Miami Douglas Macarthur North Senior High School in Hialeah, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.