City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
35.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Hubert O. Sibley Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida: | 45 |
Miami-Dade County: | 45 |
Miami: | 44 |
Hubert O. Sibley Elementary: | 35 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (305) 953-3737 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 5141
School type: Elementary
District Name: DADE
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 6
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 953-5447
Principal: Michael J Charlot
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Year 4 in Need of Improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 17
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 108
Senate District: 33
School Web Address: http://hubertosibley.dadeschools.net
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 64% |
State average from 68 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 63% |
State average from 68 schools: | 79% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 84% |
State average from 68 schools: | 86% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 38% |
State average from 68 schools: | 55% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 59% |
State average from 68 schools: | 64% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 55% |
State average from 68 schools: | 67% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 50% |
State average from 68 schools: | 59% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 58% |
State average from 68 schools: | 65% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 471 |
State average from 68 schools: | 549 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 68 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: C
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: D
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: N
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 95% |
State average from 68 schools: | 57% |
Minority RateHere: | 99% |
State average from 68 schools: | 46% |
Region: 5
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 414 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 415 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 87
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 60% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 387
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 382
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 61% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 388
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 383
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 351 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 351 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 93% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 75
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 62% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 328
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 323
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 61% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 328
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 323
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 396 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 397 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 86
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 61% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 369
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 364
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 62% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 370
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 365
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 109 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 109 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 90% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 55% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 93
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 61% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 93
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 64% |
State average from 68 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 63% |
State average from 68 schools: | 78% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 90% |
State average from 68 schools: | 90% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 51% |
State average from 68 schools: | 51% |
Making Reading Gains HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 72% |
State average from 68 schools: | 68% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 70% |
State average from 68 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 71% |
State average from 68 schools: | 65% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 68% |
State average from 68 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 549 |
State average from 68 schools: | 561 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 68 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: D
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: N
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 91% |
State average from 68 schools: | 54% |
Minority RateHere: | 99% |
State average from 68 schools: | 46% |
Region: 5
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 481 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 481 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 109
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 60% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 451
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 443
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 59% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 451
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 445
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 401 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 401 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 83
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 62% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 376
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 370
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 60% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 376
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 371
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 74 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 74 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 54% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 67
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 58% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 431 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 431 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 102
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 60% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 406
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 400
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 60% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 406
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 402
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 146 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 146 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 90% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 51% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 131
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 130
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 50% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 131
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 130
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 55% |
State average from 65 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 50% |
State average from 65 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 83% |
State average from 65 schools: | 84% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 16% |
State average from 65 schools: | 47% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 58% |
State average from 65 schools: | 64% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 48% |
State average from 65 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 59% |
State average from 65 schools: | 59% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 49% |
State average from 65 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 418 |
State average from 65 schools: | 536 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 65 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: NO
Grade in 2008: D
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 89% |
State average from 65 schools: | 52% |
Minority RateHere: | 99% |
State average from 65 schools: | 46% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 513 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 513 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 130
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 52% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 492
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 477
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 47% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 492
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 478
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 439 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 439 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 111
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 53% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 419
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 406
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 47% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 418
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 406
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 67
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 70
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 443 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 443 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 117
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 53% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 425
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 411
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 49% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 425
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 412
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 139 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 139 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 90% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 46% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 130
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 45% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 131
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 122
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 82% |
State average from 60 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 78% |
State average from 60 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 93% |
State average from 60 schools: | 84% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 56% |
State average from 60 schools: | 46% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 79% |
State average from 60 schools: | 69% |
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math GainsHere: | 69% |
State average from 60 schools: | 65% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 69% |
State average from 60 schools: | 66% |
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 54% |
State average from 60 schools: | 65% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsHere: | 580 |
State average from 60 schools: | 538 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 60 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: B
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 13% |
State average from 60 schools: | 55% |
Minority RateHere: | 81% |
State average from 60 schools: | 55% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 457 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 457 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 100% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 147
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 79% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 451
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 75% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 451
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 100 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 100 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 85% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 98
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 82% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 98
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 89 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 89 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 82% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 64% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 233 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 233 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 100% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 77
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 76% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 230
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 75% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 230
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 82% |
State average from 61 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 76% |
State average from 61 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 76% |
State average from 61 schools: | 83% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 66% |
State average from 61 schools: | 64% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 66% |
State average from 61 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 65% |
State average from 61 schools: | 64% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere: | 431 |
State average from 61 schools: | 421 |
Percent TestedHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 100% |
State average from 61 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: N
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 13% |
State average from 61 schools: | 55% |
Minority RateHere: | 80% |
State average from 61 schools: | 54% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 495 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 495 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 144
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 79% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 487
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 74% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 487
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 111 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 111 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 93% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 40
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 79% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 106
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 83% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 106
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 99 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 99 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 84% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 31
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 73% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 99
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 63% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 99
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 236 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 236 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 95% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 58
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 79% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 234
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 73% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 234
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 91% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 67% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 60
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 65% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 60
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 72% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 47
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 72% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 48% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 40
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 55% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 81% |
State average from 59 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 76% |
State average from 59 schools: | 66% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 85% |
State average from 59 schools: | 85% |
Making Reading GainsHere: | 72% |
State average from 59 schools: | 66% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 68% |
State average from 59 schools: | 67% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere: | 69% |
State average from 59 schools: | 62% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere: | 451 |
State average from 59 schools: | 418 |
Percent TestedHere: | 99% |
State average from 59 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: N
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 15% |
State average from 59 schools: | 56% |
Minority RateHere: | 76% |
State average from 59 schools: | 54% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1270 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 295 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 24% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 14% |
State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 39% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 19% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 3% |
State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 61% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1489 |
State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 304 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 25% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 15% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 40% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 18% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 60% |
State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 5 |
State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1496 |
State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 283 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 29% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 17% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 29% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 23% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 54% |
State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1591 |
State average: | 1716 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 290 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 23% |
State average: | 19% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 21% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 36% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 16% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 5HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 3% |
State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 56% |
State average: | 65% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 294 |
State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 33% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 36% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 22% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 31% |
State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1434 |
State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 329 |
State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 10% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 37% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 31% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 11% |
State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 79% |
State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 4 |
State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1510 |
State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 312 |
State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 14% |
State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 28% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 25% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 27% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 6% |
State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 58% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 6 |
State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 6 |
State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1588 |
State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 316 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 19% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 37% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 26% |
State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 12% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 44% |
State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1645 |
State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 303 |
State average: | 315 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 35% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 15% |
State average: | 20% |
% in each Achievement Level 3HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 25% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 18% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 49% |
State average: | 55% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1174 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 279 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1531 |
State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 311 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 04%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1576 |
State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 297 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1623 |
State average: | 1707 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 295 |
State average: | 310 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 306 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1373 |
State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 316 |
State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1559 |
State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 324 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1581 |
State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 314 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1637 |
State average: | 1679 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 301 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 111
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Unscore - Combined: 2
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1215 |
State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 286 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1473 |
State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 301 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1437 |
State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 272 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1633 |
State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 297 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 268 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1336 |
State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 308 |
State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1461 |
State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 301 |
State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1498 |
State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 297 |
State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1561 |
State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 284 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 137 |
State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 615 |
State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Informational (max 18)HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 12 |
State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 11 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 638 |
State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Informational (max 18)HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 11 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 131 |
State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 647 |
State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Median NPRHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 54 |
State average: | 71 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 12 |
State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 8 |
State average: | 9 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 116 |
State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale ScoreHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 663 |
State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Functional (max 18)HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 12 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 133
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 293 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 62%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 51%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 83%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1451 |
State average: | 1342 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 325 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1655 |
State average from 1875 schools: | 1542 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 332 |
State average: | 313 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 97%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1664 |
State average: | 1546 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1504 |
State average: | 1397 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 159
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1762 |
State average from 1873 schools: | 1629 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 330 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1768 |
State average: | 1632 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1663 |
State average: | 1532 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 105
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 328 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1516 |
State average: | 1413 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 347 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1611 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 1525 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 335 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 97%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1618 |
State average: | 1528 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1479 |
State average: | 1414 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 139
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1730 |
State average from 1872 schools: | 1647 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 346 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007HUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1736 |
State average: | 1649 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1655 |
State average: | 1519 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 80
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 153
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 642 |
State average from 1891 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR: 69
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 148
Mean Scale ScoreHUBERT O. SIBLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 657 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 642 |
Median NPR: 73
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 154
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 686 |
State average from 1870 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR: 85
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 154
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 643 |
State average from 1891 schools: | 632 |
Median NPR: 76
Number Sense (max 14): 11
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 9
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 148
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 665 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 652 |
Median NPR: 83
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 154
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 681 |
State average from 1870 schools: | 663 |
Median NPR: 84
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 147
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 324 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 77%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 93%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 82%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Miami, FL
- Hubert O. Sibley Elementary School in Miami, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: