City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
84.
Other nearby schools ratings:
N Dade Center For Modern Language School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida: | 45 |
Broward County: | 47 |
Miami Gardens: | 36 |
N Dade Center For Modern Language: | 84 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (305) 625-3885 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 5131
School type: Elementary
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 1 TO 5
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 625-6069
Magnet School.
Principal: Maria Castaigne
School Web Address: http://northdadecenterfor.dadeschools.net/
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingN DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE: | 85% |
State average from 3 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 81% |
State average from 3 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 94% |
State average from 3 schools: | 90% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 67% |
State average from 3 schools: | 56% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 76% |
State average from 3 schools: | 66% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 73% |
State average from 3 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE: | 62% |
State average from 3 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 66% |
State average from 3 schools: | 71% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 604 |
State average from 3 schools: | 569 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 3 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 65% |
State average from 3 schools: | 50% |
Minority RateHere: | 96% |
State average from 3 schools: | 77% |
Region: 5
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 260 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 260 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 92
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientN DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE: | 85% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 259
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 251
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 81% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 259
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 251
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 128 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 128 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 80% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 128
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 120
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 75% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 128
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 120
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 116 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 116 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 89% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 115
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 86% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 115
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 167 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 167 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 84% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 166
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 159
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 81% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 166
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 159
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 88% |
State average from 3 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 88% |
State average from 3 schools: | 76% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 96% |
State average from 3 schools: | 92% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 82% |
State average from 3 schools: | 58% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 79% |
State average from 3 schools: | 65% |
Making Math GainsN DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE: | 77% |
State average from 3 schools: | 75% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 75% |
State average from 3 schools: | 65% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 72% |
State average from 3 schools: | 71% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 657 |
State average from 3 schools: | 576 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 3 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 61% |
State average from 3 schools: | 44% |
Minority RateN DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE: | 95% |
State average from 3 schools: | 77% |
Region: 5
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 266 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 266 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 94
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 88% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 266
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 261
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 88% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 266
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 261
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 115 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 115 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 86% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 111
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 83% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 111
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 121 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 121 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 88% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 89% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 161 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 161 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 61
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 83% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 161
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 160
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 86% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 161
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 160
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingN DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE: | 84% |
State average from 3 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 87% |
State average from 3 schools: | 76% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 90% |
State average from 3 schools: | 84% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceN DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE: | 61% |
State average from 3 schools: | 49% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 72% |
State average from 3 schools: | 71% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 80% |
State average from 3 schools: | 80% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 59% |
State average from 3 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathN DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE: | 80% |
State average from 3 schools: | 83% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 613 |
State average from 3 schools: | 586 |
Percent TestedN DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE: | 99% |
State average from 3 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 59% |
State average from 3 schools: | 41% |
Minority RateHere: | 95% |
State average from 3 schools: | 77% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 285 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 285 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 90
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 84% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 284
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 280
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientN DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE: | 87% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 284
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 280
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 124 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 124 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 79% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 124
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 84% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 124
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 130 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 130 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 88% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 128
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 89% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 128
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 173 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 173 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 59
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 84% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 173
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 170
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 87% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 173
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 170
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading: 88%
Meeting High Standards in Math: 85%
Meeting High Standards in Writing: 96%
Meeting High Standards in Science: 63%
Making Reading Gains: 75%
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math Gains: 59%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading: 75%
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math: 72%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns: 613
Percent Tested: 100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 51%
Minority Rate: 94%
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 311 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 311 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 99% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 113
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 88% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 311
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 85% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 311
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 124 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 124 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 98% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 84% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 124
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 75% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 124
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 147 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 147 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 100% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 90% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 147
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 91% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 147
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 163 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 163 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientN DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE: | 100% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 86% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 163
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 85% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 163
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading: 90%
Meeting High Standards in Math: 90%
Meeting High Standards in Writing: 96%
Making Reading Gains: 69%
Making Math Gains: 70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading: 65%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns: 480
Percent Tested: 100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 53%
Minority Rate: 94%
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 329 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 329 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 99% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 120
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 90% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 322
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 90% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 322
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 135 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 135 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 100% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 53
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 84% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 135
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 86% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 135
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 142 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 142 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientN DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE: | 98% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 54
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 93% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 136
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 93% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 136
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 158 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 158 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 100% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 51
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 153
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 153
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading: 90%
Meeting High Standards in Math: 87%
Meeting High Standards in Writing: 95%
Making Reading Gains: 77%
Making Math Gains: 67%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading: 74%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns: 490
Percent Tested: 100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 55%
Minority Rate: 92%
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1552 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 341 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 29% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 50% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 90% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1707 |
State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 341 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE: | 9% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 32% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 35% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 16% |
State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 84% |
State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreN DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE: | 1777 |
State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 333 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 11% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 27% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 42% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveN DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE: | 82% |
State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE: | 2 |
State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 343 |
State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE: | 4% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 29% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 44% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 18% |
State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE: | 5% |
State average: | 4% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 67% |
State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE: | 11 |
State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE: | 8 |
State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreN DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE: | 1563 |
State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 357 |
State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 2N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE: | 10% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 28% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 49% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 14% |
State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 90% |
State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1666 |
State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 348 |
State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 15% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 31% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 34% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5Here: | 19% |
State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 84% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1795 |
State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 360 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 27% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 20% |
State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 39% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 72% |
State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE: | 8 |
State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1508 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 334 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1701 |
State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 340 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 03%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 07%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1862 |
State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 348 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 353 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1570 |
State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 358 |
State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1656 |
State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 346 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreN DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE: | 1893 |
State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 381 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 32%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 9
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 11
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 9
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 94
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 96%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1499 |
State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 333 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1708 |
State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 341 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 21
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1770 |
State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE: | 332 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 331 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1513 |
State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 346 |
State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1707 |
State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 357 |
State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1821 |
State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 365 |
State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 648 |
State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of StudentsN DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE: | 89 |
State average: | 97 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 667 |
State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE: | 11 |
State average: | 10 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE: | 9 |
State average: | 8 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreN DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE: | 682 |
State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Median NPRN DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE: | 83 |
State average: | 71 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 90
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 328 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 76%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1501 |
State average: | 1342 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 333 |
State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1694 |
State average from 1875 schools: | 1542 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 339 |
State average: | 313 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 96%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1700 |
State average: | 1546 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1560 |
State average: | 1397 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 139
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1787 |
State average from 1873 schools: | 1629 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 335 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 100%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1787 |
State average: | 1632 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1719 |
State average: | 1532 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 68
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 334 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreN DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE: | 1599 |
State average: | 1413 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 365 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000N DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE: | 1578 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 1525 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 328 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 96%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1586 |
State average: | 1528 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1554 |
State average: | 1414 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 31
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000Here: | 1774 |
State average from 1872 schools: | 1647 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 355 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 8
Percent Matched to 2006: 100%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here: | 1774 |
State average: | 1649 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here: | 1666 |
State average: | 1519 |
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 108
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 88
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 655 |
State average from 1891 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR: 78
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 15
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 113
Mean Scale ScoreN DADE CENTER FOR MODERN LANGUAGE: | 657 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 642 |
Median NPR: 73
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 111
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 695 |
State average from 1870 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR: 90
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 15
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 12): 11
Interpretation (max 20): 17
Critical Analysis (max 12): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 88
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 658 |
State average from 1891 schools: | 632 |
Median NPR: 84
Number Sense (max 14): 12
Operations (max 11): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 9
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 113
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 662 |
State average from 1874 schools: | 652 |
Median NPR: 82
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 111
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 684 |
State average from 1870 schools: | 663 |
Median NPR: 87
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 113
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 345 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 85%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 14
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 96%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 88%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Miami Gardens, FL
- N Dade Center For Modern Language School in Miami Gardens, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: