Richmond Charter Academy School in Richmond, CA
(06-08 • Public • Regular School)
City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in California) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 58
- Address
- 1450 Marina Way S.
Richmond, CA 94804
- Telephone
- (510) 235-2465
(make sure to verify first before calling)
- Website
- http://www.amethodschools.org
- City-data.com school rating
- 58
- Students
- 231
- Classroom Teachers (FTE)
- 8.0
- National School Lunch
Program (NSLP) Status - No
- Free lunch eligible students
- 145
- Reduced-price lunch
eligible students - 55
- School district
- West Contra Costa Unified
- Charter school
- Yes
- Title I status
- Title I schoolwide school
- Magnet School Indicator
- No
- Shared Time Indicator
- Missing
- Adult education offered
- No
No street view available for this location
Ratings
This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
Richmond Charter Academy School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:California: | 46 |
Contra Costa County: | 53 |
Richmond: | 27 |
Richmond Charter Academy School: | 58 |
Students & Teachers
Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 231
Enrollment in 2015: 215
Enrollment in 2014: 186
Enrollment in 2013: 90
Richmond Charter Academy School - Historical enrollment
Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
Grade | G06 | G07 | G08 | Total |
---|
All students | 57 | 86 | 88 | 231 |
Female students | 36 | 47 | 42 | 125 |
Male students | 21 | 39 | 46 | 106 |
Asian students | - | 7 | 3 | 10 |
Hispanic students | 54 | 76 | 83 | 213 |
Black students | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
White students | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
Enrollment by grade:
6th grade enrollment: 57
7th grade enrollment: 86
8th grade enrollment: 88
Richmond Charter Academy School - Historical enrollment by grade
Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
Female enrollment: 125 (54.1%)School: | 54.1% |
California: | 49.4% |
Male enrollment: 106 (45.9%)
Richmond Charter Academy School - Historical enrollment by gender
Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
Asian enrollment: 10 (4.3%)
Hispanic enrollment: 213 (92.2%)Richmond Charter Academy School: | 92.2% |
State: | 46.0% |
Black enrollment: 4 (1.7%)
White enrollment: 4 (1.7%)School: | 1.7% |
California: | 28.3% |
Richmond Charter Academy School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity
Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 10,111 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 200 (86.6%)
Free lunch eligible students: 145 (62.8%)School: | 62.8% |
California: | 52.8% |
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 55 (23.8%)
Richmond Charter Academy School - Lunch Program Eligibility
Teachers and support:
(State average from 12,394 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 8
Student/Teacher RatioRichmond Charter Academy School: | 28.9 |
State: | 22.8 |
Richmond Charter Academy School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio
Statewide Student Assessments
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments:
(State average from 10,463 schools)
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments (SB) is one of the online summative assessments - part of California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System.
The summative assessments are comprehensive, end-of-year assessments of grade-level learning that measure progress toward college and career readiness. Each test in English language arts/literacy (ELA) and mathematics is comprised of two parts: (1) a computer-adaptive test and (2) a performance task, administered within a selected testing window available at 66 percent of the instructional year for grades three through eight, and grade eleven.
The summative assessments are aligned with the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) for ELA and mathematics. The tests capitalize on the strengths of computer adaptive testing efficient and precise measurement across the full range of achievement and timely turnaround of results.
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All39%
- Males32%
- Females45%
- Hispanic34%
ELA students tested: 244
ELA students with scores: 244
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 39% |
State: | 49% |
Standard Not Met:
23.4%Standard Nearly Met:
37.7%Standard Met:
30.7%Standard Exceeded:
8.2%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2503.0, Students tested: 89, Standard Not Met: 25.8%, Nearly Met: 41.6%, Met: 24.7%, Exceeded: 7.9%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2517.6, Students tested: 63, Standard Not Met: 34.9%, Nearly Met: 33.3%, Met: 27.0%, Exceeded: 4.8%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2569.8, Students tested: 92, Standard Not Met: 13.0%, Nearly Met: 37.0%, Met: 39.1%, Exceeded: 10.9%)Richmond Charter Academy School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All40%
- Males42%
- Females39%
- Hispanic39%
Math students tested: 244
Math students with scores: 244
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 40% |
State: | 38% |
Standard Not Met:
25.4%Standard Nearly Met:
34.4%Standard Met:
27.1%Standard Exceeded:
13.1%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2512.2, Students tested: 89, Standard Not Met: 25.8%, Nearly Met: 47.2%, Met: 21.4%, Exceeded: 5.6%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2503.7, Students tested: 63, Standard Not Met: 39.7%, Nearly Met: 36.5%, Met: 20.6%, Exceeded: 3.2%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2601.7, Students tested: 92, Standard Not Met: 15.2%, Nearly Met: 20.6%, Met: 37.0%, Exceeded: 27.2%)Richmond Charter Academy School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All49%
- Males47%
- Females51%
- Hispanic47%
ELA students tested: 223
ELA students with scores: 223
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 49% |
California: | 48% |
Standard Not Met:
19.0%Standard Nearly Met:
31.0%Standard Met:
37.0%Standard Exceeded:
12.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2495.9, Students tested: 55, Standard Not Met: 27.0%, Nearly Met: 44.0%, Met: 24.0%, Exceeded: 5.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2562.0, Students tested: 83, Standard Not Met: 17.0%, Nearly Met: 28.0%, Met: 40.0%, Exceeded: 16.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2575.4, Students tested: 85, Standard Not Met: 16.0%, Nearly Met: 27.0%, Met: 44.0%, Exceeded: 13.0%)Richmond Charter Academy School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All40%
- Males45%
- Females36%
- Hispanic39%
Math students tested: 223
Math students with scores: 223
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 40% |
State: | 37% |
Standard Not Met:
30.0%Standard Nearly Met:
30.0%Standard Met:
23.0%Standard Exceeded:
17.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2473.8, Students tested: 55, Standard Not Met: 42.0%, Nearly Met: 40.0%, Met: 13.0%, Exceeded: 5.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2548.5, Students tested: 83, Standard Not Met: 24.0%, Nearly Met: 31.0%, Met: 29.0%, Exceeded: 16.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2563.6, Students tested: 85, Standard Not Met: 29.0%, Nearly Met: 21.0%, Met: 24.0%, Exceeded: 26.0%)Richmond Charter Academy School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All47%
- Males46%
- Females49%
- Hispanic43%
ELA students tested: 209
ELA students with scores: 207
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 47% |
California: | 44% |
Standard Not Met:
18.0%Standard Nearly Met:
34.0%Standard Met:
38.0%Standard Exceeded:
9.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2513.7, Students tested: 59, Standard Not Met: 25.0%, Nearly Met: 41.0%, Met: 22.0%, Exceeded: 12.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2551.6, Students tested: 84, Standard Not Met: 21.0%, Nearly Met: 23.0%, Met: 46.0%, Exceeded: 10.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2569.5, Students tested: 66, Standard Not Met: 9.0%, Nearly Met: 42.0%, Met: 42.0%, Exceeded: 6.0%)Richmond Charter Academy School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All44%
- Males50%
- Females38%
- Hispanic40%
Math students tested: 209
Math students with scores: 206
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 44% |
California: | 34% |
Standard Not Met:
24.0%Standard Nearly Met:
32.0%Standard Met:
27.0%Standard Exceeded:
17.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2508.6, Students tested: 59, Standard Not Met: 41.0%, Nearly Met: 31.0%, Met: 12.0%, Exceeded: 16.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2550.8, Students tested: 84, Standard Not Met: 20.0%, Nearly Met: 35.0%, Met: 29.0%, Exceeded: 16.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2596.7, Students tested: 66, Standard Not Met: 15.0%, Nearly Met: 27.0%, Met: 36.0%, Exceeded: 21.0%)Richmond Charter Academy School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Paper-based CAASPP:
(State average from 9,784 schools)
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System includes paper-based tests:
California Standards Tests (CSTs) - The CSTs for science in grades five, eight, and ten are administered only to students in California public schools. All questions are multiple-choice. These tests were developed specifically to assess students' knowledge of the California content standards in science.
CST Science students tested: 85
CST Science students with scores: 85
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 65% |
California: | 54% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
9.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
7.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
19.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
25.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
40.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 379.2, Students tested: 85, Far Below Basic: 9.0%, Below Basic: 7.0%, Basic: 19.0%, Proficient: 25.0%, Advanced: 40.0%) CST Science students tested: 66
CST Science students with scores: 66
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 77% |
State: | 56% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
0.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
3.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
20.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
29.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
48.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 408.9, Students tested: 66, Far Below Basic: 0.0%, Below Basic: 3.0%, Basic: 20.0%, Proficient: 29.0%, Advanced: 48.0%) CST Science students tested: 42
CST Science students with scores: 42
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 67% |
California: | 60% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
-1.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
5.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
29.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
26.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
40.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 390.5, Students tested: 42, Far Below Basic: -1.0%, Below Basic: 5.0%, Basic: 29.0%, Proficient: 26.0%, Advanced: 40.0%) The Physical Fitness Test:
The Physical Fitness Test (PFT) for students in California schools is the FITNESSGRAM. The main goal of the test is to help students in starting life-long habits of regular physical activity.
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 63, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 46.0%, Needs Improvement: 44.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 9.6%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 63, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 42.9%, Needs Improvement: 31.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 25.4%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 63, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 84.1%, Needs Improvement: 15.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 63, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 85.7%, Needs Improvement: 14.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 63, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 90.5%, Needs Improvement: 9.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 63, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 61.9%, Needs Improvement: 38.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 82, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 54.9%, Needs Improvement: 22.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 23.1%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 82, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 52.4%, Needs Improvement: 17.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 30.5%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 82, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 65.9%, Needs Improvement: 34.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 82, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 86.6%, Needs Improvement: 13.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 82, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 76.8%, Needs Improvement: 23.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 82, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 65.9%, Needs Improvement: 34.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 84, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 61.9%, Needs Improvement: 23.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 14.3%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 84, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 51.2%, Needs Improvement: 23.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 25.0%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 84, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 98.8%, Needs Improvement: 1.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 84, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 100.0%, Needs Improvement: 0.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 84, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 94.0%, Needs Improvement: 6.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 84, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 82.1%, Needs Improvement: 17.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 85, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 85.9%, Needs Improvement: 3.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 10.6%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 85, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 55.3%, Needs Improvement: 24.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 20.0%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 85, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 100.0%, Needs Improvement: 0.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 85, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 87.1%, Needs Improvement: 12.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 85, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 71.8%, Needs Improvement: 28.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 85, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 75.3%, Needs Improvement: 24.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 57, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 57.9%, Needs Improvement: 10.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 31.6%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 57, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 49.1%, Needs Improvement: 14.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 36.9%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 57, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 93.0%, Needs Improvement: 7.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 57, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 91.2%, Needs Improvement: 8.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 57, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 100.0%, Needs Improvement: 0.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 57, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 68.4%, Needs Improvement: 31.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
California English Language Development Test:
(State average from 9,932 schools)
Students in kindergarten through grade twelve whose home language is not English are required by law to take an English skills test. In California, the test is called the California English Language Development Test (CELDT).
Richmond Charter Academy School - students who met CELDT criterion (all grades)
All Grades:Student Count: 95
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 57
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 60.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 50
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 25
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 50.0% |
State: | 39.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 566.6 |
California: | 532.4 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 549.1 |
California: | 518.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 520.5 |
California: | 518.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 559.8 |
California: | 522.0 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 31
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 21
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 68.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 611.0 |
State: | 547.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 575.3 |
California: | 534.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 531.4 |
State: | 529.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 578.0 |
State: | 530.2 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 14
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 11
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 79.0% |
California: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 647.9 |
California: | 556.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 595.2 |
California: | 547.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 522.5 |
State: | 536.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 593.2 |
California: | 537.0 |
All Grades:Student Count: 98
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 66
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 67.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 30
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 7
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 23.0% |
State: | 41.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 563.9 |
State: | 536.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 529.0 |
State: | 523.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 510.9 |
State: | 520.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 548.9 |
State: | 524.6 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 33
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 27
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 82.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 629.0 |
California: | 550.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 599.0 |
State: | 536.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 548.3 |
California: | 530.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 600.0 |
State: | 532.1 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 35
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 32
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 91.0% |
California: | 49.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 642.6 |
California: | 562.4 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 618.6 |
California: | 552.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 577.3 |
State: | 539.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 595.3 |
State: | 541.2 |
All Grades:Student Count: 81
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 51
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 63.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 20
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 10
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 50.0% |
State: | 38.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 586.2 |
California: | 535.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 548.7 |
California: | 521.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 539.6 |
State: | 519.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 540.4 |
California: | 522.6 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 30
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 16
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 53.0% |
California: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 599.0 |
State: | 551.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 584.4 |
California: | 538.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 491.4 |
California: | 532.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 573.7 |
State: | 532.1 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 31
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 25
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 81.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 628.0 |
California: | 562.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 614.7 |
State: | 552.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 575.1 |
State: | 543.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 595.4 |
State: | 541.5 |
All Grades:Student Count: 73
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 54
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 74.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 20
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 14
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 70.0% |
California: | 40.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 582.7 |
California: | 538.0 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 542.1 |
State: | 525.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 535.4 |
California: | 522.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 574.0 |
California: | 526.2 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 37
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 26
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 70.0% |
State: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 595.5 |
State: | 549.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 566.9 |
State: | 538.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 546.7 |
California: | 533.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 587.1 |
State: | 535.2 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 16
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 14
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 88.0% |
California: | 49.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 657.5 |
California: | 564.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 632.4 |
California: | 554.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 554.6 |
State: | 545.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 597.6 |
State: | 545.9 |
All Grades:Student Count: 36
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 18
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 50.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 15
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 5
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 33.0% |
California: | 39.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 537.2 |
California: | 538.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 558.3 |
State: | 525.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 505.6 |
California: | 530.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 552.4 |
State: | 530.3 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 21
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 13
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 62.0% |
State: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 588.9 |
State: | 557.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 583.2 |
California: | 539.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 506.3 |
State: | 543.2 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 584.0 |
State: | 540.4 |
Accountability
Adequate Yearly Progress:
(State average from 9,846 schools)
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) - Accountability system mandated by federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Statistics are based on test results of the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program, the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE), and the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA).
Richmond Charter Academy School - Adequate Yearly Progress status
ELA Participation RateRichmond Charter Academy School: | 100.0% |
State: | 96.3% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 205 out of 205 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 199 out of 199 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 139 out of 139 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 14 out of 14 enrolled)
Math Participation RateHere: | 100.0% |
California: | 96.1% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 205 out of 205 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 9 out of 9 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 199 out of 199 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 139 out of 139 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 14 out of 14 enrolled)
Met all AYP Criteria: Yes
Number of AYP criteria met: 9
Number of AYP criteria possible: 9
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)Attendance rate (calculated by using average daily attendance data) : 99
Met Attendance rate Target: Yes
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
ELA Participation RateHere: | 99.0% |
California: | 95.2% |
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED99
- LEP98
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 193 out of 195 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 181 out of 183 enrolled)
- English Learners: 98% (tested 113 out of 115 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 11 out of 11 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveSchool: | 47.3% |
California: | 42.6% |
ELA Proficient or Above
- Hispanic46
- SED44
- LEP27
- With Disabilities9
- Hispanic: 46% (88 out of 193 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 44% (80 out of 181 valid scores)
- English Learners: 27% (30 out of 113 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 9% (1 out of 11 valid scores)
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Math Participation RateSchool: | 99.0% |
California: | 94.9% |
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic98
- Asian100
- Filipino100
- Black100
- White100
- SED98
- LEP98
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 98% (tested 192 out of 195 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
- Filipino: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 2 out of 2 enrolled)
- White: 100% (tested 4 out of 4 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 98% (tested 180 out of 183 enrolled)
- English Learners: 98% (tested 113 out of 115 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 11 out of 11 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: Yes
- English Learners: Yes
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveRichmond Charter Academy School: | 44.2% |
State: | 33.3% |
Math Proficient or Above
- Hispanic44
- SED39
- LEP23
- With Disabilities9
- Hispanic: 44% (84 out of 192 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 39% (71 out of 180 valid scores)
- English Learners: 23% (26 out of 113 valid scores)
- Students with Disabilities: 9% (1 out of 11 valid scores)
Met all AYP Criteria: No
Number of AYP criteria met: 3
Number of AYP criteria possible: 5
(Note: The criteria includes only the participation rate and additional indicators.)
ELA met overall: No
Met ELA Participation Rate: Yes
Met ELA Percent Proficient or Above: No
ELA Percent Proficient Target: 89.2%
ELA Participation Rate
- Hispanic99
- Asian100
- Black100
- SED99
- LEP97
- With Disabilities84
- Hispanic: 99% (tested 75 out of 76 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 8 out of 8 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 99% (tested 81 out of 82 enrolled)
- English Learners: 97% (tested 32 out of 33 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 84% (tested 5 out of 6 enrolled)
Percent of ELA students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 48.2% |
California: | 55.7% |
- Hispanic: 50% (37 out of 74 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 46% (37 out of 80 valid scores)
- English Learners: 13% (4 out of 32 valid scores)
Math met overall: No
Met Math Participation Rate: Yes
Met Math Percent Proficient or Above: No
Math Percent Proficient Target: 89.5%
Math Participation Rate
- Hispanic100
- Asian100
- Black100
- SED100
- LEP100
- With Disabilities100
- Hispanic: 100% (tested 76 out of 76 enrolled)
- Asian: 100% (tested 1 out of 1 enrolled)
- Black: 100% (tested 8 out of 8 enrolled)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 100% (tested 82 out of 82 enrolled)
- English Learners: 100% (tested 33 out of 33 enrolled)
- Students with Disabilities: 100% (tested 6 out of 6 enrolled)
Percent of Math students scoring Proficient or AboveHere: | 54.8% |
California: | 59.6% |
- Hispanic: 57% (43 out of 75 valid scores)
- Socioeconomic Disadvantaged: 53% (43 out of 81 valid scores)
- English Learners: 36% (12 out of 33 valid scores)
Comments
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: