William Sheppard Middle School in San Jose, CA
(06-08 • Public • Regular School)
City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in California) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 29
- Address
- 480 Rough and Ready Rd.
San Jose, CA 95133
- Telephone
- (408) 928-8800
(make sure to verify first before calling)
- City-data.com school rating
- 29
- Students
- 677
- Classroom Teachers (FTE)
- 31.5
- National School Lunch
Program (NSLP) Status - Yes, under Provision 2
- Free lunch eligible students
- 459
- Reduced-price lunch
eligible students - 110
- School district
- Alum Rock Union Elementary
- Charter school
- No
- Title I status
- Title I targeted assistance eligible school-No program
- Magnet School Indicator
- No
- Shared Time Indicator
- Missing
- Adult education offered
- No
No street view available for this location
Ratings
This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
William Sheppard Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:California: | 46 |
Santa Clara County: | 64 |
San Jose: | 55 |
William Sheppard Middle School: | 29 |
Students & Teachers
Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 677
Enrollment in 2015: 718
Enrollment in 2014: 711
Enrollment in 2013: 738
Enrollment in 2012: 751
Enrollment in 2011: 778
Enrollment in 2010: 558
Enrollment in 2009: 646
Enrollment in 2008: 627
Enrollment in 2007: 636
Enrollment in 2006: 572
Enrollment in 2005: 632
Enrollment in 2004: 681
Enrollment in 2003: 675
Enrollment in 2002: 695
Enrollment in 2001: 750
Enrollment in 2000: 779
Enrollment in 1999: 863
William Sheppard Middle School - Historical enrollment
Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
Grade | G06 | G07 | G08 | Total |
---|
All students | 187 | 246 | 244 | 677 |
Female students | 91 | 125 | 118 | 334 |
Male students | 96 | 121 | 126 | 343 |
American Indian/Alaska Native students | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Asian students | 91 | 92 | 113 | 296 |
Hispanic students | 86 | 137 | 118 | 341 |
Black students | 3 | 6 | 4 | 13 |
White students | 1 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander students | 5 | 5 | 4 | 14 |
Two or More Races students | - | 1 | - | 1 |
Enrollment by grade:
6th grade enrollment: 187
7th grade enrollment: 246
8th grade enrollment: 244
William Sheppard Middle School - Historical enrollment by grade
Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
Female enrollment: 334 (49.3%)Here: | 49.3% |
California: | 49.4% |
Male enrollment: 343 (50.7%)William Sheppard Middle School: | 50.7% |
State: | 49.6% |
William Sheppard Middle School - Historical enrollment by gender
Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 12,430 schools)
American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 3 (0.4%)
Asian enrollment: 296 (43.7%)Here: | 43.7% |
California: | 9.4% |
Hispanic enrollment: 341 (50.4%)William Sheppard Middle School: | 50.4% |
California: | 46.0% |
Black enrollment: 13 (1.9%)William Sheppard Middle School: | 1.9% |
California: | 6.1% |
White enrollment: 9 (1.3%)
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander enrollment: 14 (2.1%)
Two or More Races enrollment: 1 (0.1%)William Sheppard Middle School: | 0.1% |
California: | 4.5% |
William Sheppard Middle School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity
Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 10,111 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 569 (84.0%)School: | 84.0% |
California: | 61.2% |
Free lunch eligible students: 459 (67.8%)
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 110 (16.2%)Here: | 16.2% |
California: | 8.6% |
William Sheppard Middle School - Lunch Program Eligibility
Teachers and support:
(State average from 12,394 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 31.5
Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 2
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 10
William Sheppard Middle School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio
School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds:
$2,174,301- Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 26.2 (Salary Expenditures: $2,174,301)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 0.5 (Salary Expenditures: $18,541)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 5.9 (Salary Expenditures: $308,634)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $235,488)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds:
$198,491Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,:
$2,736,964- Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 0.5 (Salary Expenditures: $18,541)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 5.9 (Salary Expenditures: $308,634)
- Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $235,488)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds:
$198,579 Limited English Proficiency:
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs
- Hispanic109
- Asian58
- Black2
- IDEA64
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 169 (male: 102, female: 67)
- Hispanic: 109 (male: 65, female: 44)
- Asian: 58 (male: 35, female: 23)
- Black: 2 (all male)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 64 (male: 47, female: 17)
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 118 (male: 66, female: 52)
- Hispanic: 85 (male: 44, female: 41)
- Asian: 31 (male: 20, female: 11)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 2 (all male)
Students with disabilities:
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.
Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA
- Hispanic71
- Asian20
- Black4
- LEP68
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 95 (male: 66, female: 29)
- Hispanic: 71 (male: 46, female: 25)
- Asian: 20 (male: 16, female: 4)
- Black: 4 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 68 (male: 49, female: 19)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
Retention:
(State average from 234 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in 6th grade: 2 (all female)
Percent of 6th grade students retained
Gifted and Talented:
(State average from 5,551 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment
- Hispanic4
- Asian19
- White2
- LEP25
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 25 (male: 18, female: 7)
- Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Asian: 19 (male: 14, female: 5)
- White: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 25 (male: 17, female: 8)
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 studentsWilliam Sheppard Middle School: | 36.9 |
State: | 84.3 |
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment
- Hispanic22
- Asian43
- Native Hawaiian2
- White4
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 71 (male: 32, female: 39)
- Hispanic: 22 (male: 11, female: 11)
- Asian: 43 (male: 17, female: 26)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 2 (all male)
- White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Statewide Student Assessments
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments:
(State average from 10,463 schools)
Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments (SB) is one of the online summative assessments - part of California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System.
The summative assessments are comprehensive, end-of-year assessments of grade-level learning that measure progress toward college and career readiness. Each test in English language arts/literacy (ELA) and mathematics is comprised of two parts: (1) a computer-adaptive test and (2) a performance task, administered within a selected testing window available at 66 percent of the instructional year for grades three through eight, and grade eleven.
The summative assessments are aligned with the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) for ELA and mathematics. The tests capitalize on the strengths of computer adaptive testing efficient and precise measurement across the full range of achievement and timely turnaround of results.
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All41%
- Males30%
- Females52%
- Asian58%
- Filipino56%
- Hispanic25%
ELA students tested: 602
ELA students with scores: 602
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 41% |
California: | 49% |
Standard Not Met:
32.4%Standard Nearly Met:
26.7%Standard Met:
29.2%Standard Exceeded:
11.6%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2490.7, Students tested: 190, Standard Not Met: 35.8%, Nearly Met: 32.6%, Met: 20.5%, Exceeded: 11.1%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2530.8, Students tested: 182, Standard Not Met: 30.2%, Nearly Met: 22.0%, Met: 35.7%, Exceeded: 12.1%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2544.8, Students tested: 230, Standard Not Met: 31.3%, Nearly Met: 25.6%, Met: 31.3%, Exceeded: 11.7%)William Sheppard Middle School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All28%
- Males26%
- Females30%
- Asian47%
- Filipino30%
- Hispanic12%
Math students tested: 612
Math students with scores: 612
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 28% |
State: | 38% |
Standard Not Met:
49.8%Standard Nearly Met:
21.9%Standard Met:
15.8%Standard Exceeded:
12.4%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2461.5, Students tested: 194, Standard Not Met: 54.6%, Nearly Met: 22.2%, Met: 13.9%, Exceeded: 9.3%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2506.8, Students tested: 186, Standard Not Met: 41.9%, Nearly Met: 21.0%, Met: 21.5%, Exceeded: 15.6%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2508.8, Students tested: 232, Standard Not Met: 52.2%, Nearly Met: 22.4%, Met: 12.9%, Exceeded: 12.5%)William Sheppard Middle School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All40%
- Males32%
- Females49%
- Asian56%
- Filipino53%
- Hispanic25%
- Native Hawaiian45%
ELA students tested: 647
ELA students with scores: 647
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 40% |
State: | 48% |
Standard Not Met:
34.0%Standard Nearly Met:
26.0%Standard Met:
28.0%Standard Exceeded:
13.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2502.8, Students tested: 179, Standard Not Met: 33.0%, Nearly Met: 25.0%, Met: 29.0%, Exceeded: 13.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2518.3, Students tested: 228, Standard Not Met: 35.0%, Nearly Met: 29.0%, Met: 26.0%, Exceeded: 10.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2547.9, Students tested: 240, Standard Not Met: 33.0%, Nearly Met: 25.0%, Met: 28.0%, Exceeded: 14.0%)William Sheppard Middle School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All29%
- Males27%
- Females31%
- Asian50%
- Filipino14%
- Hispanic12%
- Native Hawaiian27%
Math students tested: 653
Math students with scores: 651
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 29% |
California: | 37% |
Standard Not Met:
46.0%Standard Nearly Met:
26.0%Standard Met:
14.0%Standard Exceeded:
14.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2496.7, Students tested: 181, Standard Not Met: 41.0%, Nearly Met: 26.0%, Met: 16.0%, Exceeded: 18.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2498.0, Students tested: 231, Standard Not Met: 43.0%, Nearly Met: 29.0%, Met: 17.0%, Exceeded: 11.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2513.8, Students tested: 241, Standard Not Met: 52.0%, Nearly Met: 22.0%, Met: 11.0%, Exceeded: 15.0%)William Sheppard Middle School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
ELA Standard Met and Above
- All28%
- Males20%
- Females36%
- Black7%
- Asian49%
- Filipino30%
- Hispanic15%
ELA students tested: 697
ELA students with scores: 692
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 28% |
California: | 44% |
Standard Not Met:
42.0%Standard Nearly Met:
30.0%Standard Met:
22.0%Standard Exceeded:
6.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2484.1, Students tested: 243, Standard Not Met: 37.0%, Nearly Met: 31.0%, Met: 24.0%, Exceeded: 8.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2500.8, Students tested: 237, Standard Not Met: 45.0%, Nearly Met: 27.0%, Met: 20.0%, Exceeded: 8.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2500.1, Students tested: 217, Standard Not Met: 45.0%, Nearly Met: 33.0%, Met: 21.0%, Exceeded: 1.0%)William Sheppard Middle School - ELA Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
Math Standard Met and Above
- All19%
- Males17%
- Females22%
- Asian42%
- Filipino9%
- Hispanic7%
Math students tested: 700
Math students with scores: 696
Percentage Standard Met and Above: | 19% |
California: | 34% |
Standard Not Met:
52.0%Standard Nearly Met:
28.0%Standard Met:
11.0%Standard Exceeded:
8.0%All Grades:
6th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2478.7, Students tested: 244, Standard Not Met: 47.0%, Nearly Met: 28.0%, Met: 16.0%, Exceeded: 9.0%)7th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2500.0, Students tested: 237, Standard Not Met: 45.0%, Nearly Met: 31.0%, Met: 13.0%, Exceeded: 11.0%)8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 2467.6, Students tested: 219, Standard Not Met: 67.0%, Nearly Met: 25.0%, Met: 4.0%, Exceeded: 3.0%)William Sheppard Middle School - Math Area Achievement Levels (all grades)
California Alternate Assessments:
(State average from 1,579 schools)
The new California Alternate Assessments (CAAs) are based on alternate achievement standards-called the Core Content Connectors-and linked to the Common Core State Standards. The CAAs are online tests for students with an individualized education program (IEP) that designates the use of an alternate assessment to measure student progress on alternate achievement standards. This alternate assessment is part of the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System and replaces the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) for English language arts and mathematics.
ELA students tested: 14
ELA students with scores: 14
Percentage Level 3: | 7% |
California: | 15% |
Level 1:
42.9% The student showed limited understanding of core concepts.Level 2:
50.0% The student showed foundational understanding of core concepts. Level 3:
7.1% The student showed understanding of core concepts.All Grades:
Math students tested: 14
Math students with scores: 14
Percentage Level 3: | 0% |
State: | 6% |
Level 1:
71.4% The student showed limited understanding of core concepts.Level 2:
28.6% The student showed foundational understanding of core concepts. Level 3:
0.0% The student showed understanding of core concepts.All Grades:
ELA students tested: 12
ELA students with scores: 12
Percentage Level 3: | 0% |
California: | 11% |
Level 1:
33.0% The student showed limited understanding of core concepts.Level 2:
67.0% The student showed foundational understanding of core concepts. Level 3:
0.0% The student showed understanding of core concepts.All Grades:
Math students tested: 11
Math students with scores: 11
Percentage Level 3: | 0% |
State: | 5% |
Level 1:
73.0% The student showed limited understanding of core concepts.Level 2:
27.0% The student showed foundational understanding of core concepts. Level 3:
0.0% The student showed understanding of core concepts.All Grades:
Paper-based CAASPP:
(State average from 9,784 schools)
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) System includes paper-based tests:
California Standards Tests (CSTs) - The CSTs for science in grades five, eight, and ten are administered only to students in California public schools. All questions are multiple-choice. These tests were developed specifically to assess students' knowledge of the California content standards in science.
California Modified Assessment (CMA) - The CMA for science was administered to eligible students in grades five, eight, and ten. The CMA is a standards-based test for students with an individualized education program who meet the eligibility criteria adopted by the State Board of Education. The Elementary and Secondary Education Act called for a range of assessments appropriate to students' abilities. The CMA provides an appropriate assessment for a small percentage of students allowing them to demonstrate their knowledge of skills in the California academic content standards for science.
CST Science students tested: 213
CST Science students with scores: 212
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 60% |
State: | 54% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
8.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
15.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
17.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
24.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
36.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 374.9, Students tested: 213, Far Below Basic: 8.0%, Below Basic: 15.0%, Basic: 17.0%, Proficient: 24.0%, Advanced: 36.0%)
CMA Science students tested: 27
CMA Science students with scores: 27
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 33% |
California: | 38% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
8.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
37.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
22.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
30.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
4.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 324.0, Students tested: 27, Far Below Basic: 8.0%, Below Basic: 37.0%, Basic: 22.0%, Proficient: 30.0%, Advanced: 4.0%) CST Science students tested: 203
CST Science students with scores: 203
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 41% |
California: | 56% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
11.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
15.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
33.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
23.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
18.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 342.7, Students tested: 203, Far Below Basic: 11.0%, Below Basic: 15.0%, Basic: 33.0%, Proficient: 23.0%, Advanced: 18.0%)11.0%
15.0%
33.0%
23.0%
18.0%
CMA Science students tested: 15
CMA Science students with scores: 15
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 7% |
California: | 38% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
26.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
27.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
40.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
7.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
0.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 296.8, Students tested: 15, Far Below Basic: 26.0%, Below Basic: 27.0%, Basic: 40.0%, Proficient: 7.0%, Advanced: 0.0%) CST Science students tested: 215
CST Science students with scores: 215
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 59% |
California: | 60% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
10.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
10.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
21.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
33.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
27.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 362.8, Students tested: 215, Far Below Basic: 10.0%, Below Basic: 10.0%, Basic: 21.0%, Proficient: 33.0%, Advanced: 27.0%)10.0%
10.0%
21.0%
33.0%
27.0%
CMA Science students tested: 16
CMA Science students with scores: 15
Percentage At Or Above Proficient: | 27% |
State: | 39% |
Percentage Far Below Basic:
19.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Below Basic:
27.0% Students demonstrate little or a flawed understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.Percentage Basic:
27.0% Students demonstrate a partial and rudimentary understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Proficient:
27.0% Students demonstrate a competent and adequate understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment. Percentage Advanced:
0.0% Students demonstrate a comprehensive and complex understanding of the knowledge and skills measured by this assessment.8th Grade:
(Mean Scale Score: 304.6, Students tested: 16, Far Below Basic: 19.0%, Below Basic: 27.0%, Basic: 27.0%, Proficient: 27.0%, Advanced: 0.0%) The Physical Fitness Test:
The Physical Fitness Test (PFT) for students in California schools is the FITNESSGRAM. The main goal of the test is to help students in starting life-long habits of regular physical activity.
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 190, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 71.1%, Needs Improvement: 18.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 10.5%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 190, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 58.4%, Needs Improvement: 18.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 22.7%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 190, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 83.2%, Needs Improvement: 16.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 190, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 95.3%, Needs Improvement: 4.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 190, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 68.4%, Needs Improvement: 31.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 190, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 73.7%, Needs Improvement: 26.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 234, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 57.3%, Needs Improvement: 32.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 10.6%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 234, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 61.1%, Needs Improvement: 15.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 23.9%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 234, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 82.9%, Needs Improvement: 17.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 234, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 95.7%, Needs Improvement: 4.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 234, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 67.9%, Needs Improvement: 32.1%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 234, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 74.4%, Needs Improvement: 25.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 237, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 57.0%, Needs Improvement: 27.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 15.2%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 237, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 57.4%, Needs Improvement: 20.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 22.3%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 237, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 83.5%, Needs Improvement: 16.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 237, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 96.2%, Needs Improvement: 3.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 237, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 79.7%, Needs Improvement: 20.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 237, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 79.3%, Needs Improvement: 20.7%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 228, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 51.8%, Needs Improvement: 36.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 12.2%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 228, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 48.7%, Needs Improvement: 21.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 29.4%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 228, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 84.6%, Needs Improvement: 15.4%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 228, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 97.4%, Needs Improvement: 2.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 228, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 73.7%, Needs Improvement: 26.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 228, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 70.2%, Needs Improvement: 29.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 237, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 58.2%, Needs Improvement: 30.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 11.8%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 237, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 54.9%, Needs Improvement: 11.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 34.1%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 237, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 91.1%, Needs Improvement: 8.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 237, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 96.2%, Needs Improvement: 3.8%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 237, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 75.5%, Needs Improvement: 24.5%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 237, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 76.8%, Needs Improvement: 23.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Aerobic Capacity:7th grade:
(Students tested: 254, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 61.0%, Needs Improvement: 22.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 17.0%)
Body Composition:7th grade:
(Students tested: 254, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 52.8%, Needs Improvement: 10.6%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 36.6%)
Abdominal Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 254, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 92.1%, Needs Improvement: 7.9%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Trunk Extension Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 254, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 93.7%, Needs Improvement: 6.3%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Upper Body Strength:7th grade:
(Students tested: 254, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 85.8%, Needs Improvement: 14.2%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
Flexibility:7th grade:
(Students tested: 254, Needs Improvement - High Risk: 78.0%, Needs Improvement: 22.0%, Healthy Fitness Zone: 0.0%)
California English Language Development Test:
(State average from 9,932 schools)
Students in kindergarten through grade twelve whose home language is not English are required by law to take an English skills test. In California, the test is called the California English Language Development Test (CELDT).
William Sheppard Middle School - students who met CELDT criterion (all grades)
All Grades:Student Count: 135
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 41
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 30.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 48
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 16
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 33.0% |
State: | 39.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 542.4 |
State: | 532.4 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 515.8 |
State: | 518.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 516.1 |
State: | 518.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 515.5 |
California: | 522.0 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 42
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 10
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 24.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 478.8 |
State: | 547.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 500.4 |
State: | 534.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 477.9 |
California: | 529.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 476.5 |
California: | 530.2 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 45
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 15
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 33.0% |
California: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 513.4 |
California: | 556.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 531.0 |
State: | 547.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 496.0 |
California: | 536.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 503.4 |
California: | 537.0 |
All Grades:Student Count: 175
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 69
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 39.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 52
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 22
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 42.0% |
State: | 41.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 541.7 |
State: | 536.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 521.8 |
California: | 523.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 490.5 |
State: | 520.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 511.0 |
State: | 524.6 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 58
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 22
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 38.0% |
California: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 547.8 |
State: | 550.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 534.9 |
State: | 536.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 498.9 |
State: | 530.6 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 534.6 |
State: | 532.1 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 65
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 25
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 38.0% |
California: | 49.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 554.3 |
California: | 562.4 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 554.4 |
California: | 552.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 516.9 |
State: | 539.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 539.0 |
California: | 541.2 |
All Grades:Student Count: 180
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 62
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 34.0% |
California: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 62
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 16
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 26.0% |
California: | 38.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 522.8 |
California: | 535.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 500.9 |
State: | 521.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 502.1 |
State: | 519.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 510.0 |
State: | 522.6 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 68
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 24
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 35.0% |
State: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 526.5 |
California: | 551.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 526.1 |
State: | 538.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 526.1 |
State: | 532.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 521.9 |
State: | 532.1 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 50
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 22
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 44.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 556.2 |
California: | 562.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 548.1 |
State: | 552.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 562.1 |
State: | 543.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 537.6 |
California: | 541.5 |
All Grades:Student Count: 187
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 69
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 37.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 73
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 23
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 32.0% |
California: | 40.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 517.8 |
State: | 538.0 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 515.8 |
California: | 525.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 514.5 |
State: | 522.1 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 510.6 |
California: | 526.2 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 62
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 24
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 39.0% |
California: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 521.0 |
California: | 549.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 520.1 |
California: | 538.6 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 516.5 |
California: | 533.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 503.7 |
State: | 535.2 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 52
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 22
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 42.0% |
State: | 49.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 517.4 |
California: | 564.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 530.9 |
California: | 554.9 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 523.8 |
State: | 545.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 502.1 |
California: | 545.9 |
All Grades:Student Count: 203
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 79
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 39.0% |
State: | 34.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 69
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 21
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 30.0% |
California: | 39.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 542.5 |
California: | 538.5 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 519.2 |
State: | 525.5 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 519.7 |
State: | 530.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 519.0 |
State: | 530.3 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 55
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 22
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 40.0% |
California: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 542.8 |
California: | 557.3 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 540.8 |
State: | 539.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 515.9 |
California: | 543.2 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 526.9 |
State: | 540.4 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 79
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 36
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 46.0% |
California: | 47.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 553.4 |
California: | 570.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 539.2 |
California: | 552.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 553.9 |
State: | 551.9 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 527.4 |
California: | 548.6 |
All Grades:Student Count: 228
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 111
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 49.0% |
State: | 35.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 73
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 33
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 45.0% |
California: | 44.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 539.6 |
California: | 551.6 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 526.6 |
California: | 532.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 519.0 |
California: | 532.5 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 500.8 |
California: | 534.7 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 72
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 37
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 51.0% |
State: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 562.8 |
State: | 566.1 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 541.8 |
California: | 544.7 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 537.9 |
California: | 543.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 533.9 |
State: | 545.1 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 83
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 41
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 49.0% |
California: | 50.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 557.3 |
California: | 579.2 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 551.7 |
California: | 558.4 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 552.2 |
State: | 553.4 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 534.7 |
State: | 555.6 |
All Grades:Student Count: 260
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 113
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 43.0% |
State: | 31.0% |
Grade 6:Student Count: 86
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 29
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 34.0% |
State: | 40.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 551.6 |
California: | 546.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 515.0 |
California: | 529.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 513.7 |
State: | 533.3 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 527.1 |
California: | 525.3 |
Grade 7:Student Count: 80
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 42
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 53.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 572.0 |
State: | 559.8 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 554.3 |
State: | 542.0 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 541.7 |
California: | 548.8 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 536.4 |
State: | 534.4 |
Grade 8:Student Count: 94
Number of students who met CELDT criterion: 42
Students who met CELDT criterion: | 45.0% |
State: | 48.0% |
Listening Mean Scale Score: | 565.7 |
State: | 570.7 |
Reading Mean Scale Score: | 565.7 |
State: | 557.2 |
Speaking Mean Scale Score: | 538.5 |
California: | 562.0 |
Writing Mean Scale Score: | 545.1 |
State: | 544.1 |
Accountability
Adequate Yearly Progress:
(State average from 9,846 schools)
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) - Accountability system mandated by federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Statistics are based on test results of the Standardized Testing and Reporting (STAR) Program, the California High School Exit Examination (CAHSEE), and the California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA).
Health & Safety
Referrals and Arrests:
(State average from 2,295 schools)
Referral to law enforcement is an action by which a student is reported to any law enforcement agency or official, including a school police unit, for an incident that occurs on school grounds, during school-related events, or while taking school transportation, regardless of whether official action is taken. Citations, tickets, court referrals, and school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.
School-related arrest refers to an arrest of a student for any activity conducted on school grounds, during off-campus school activities (including while taking school transportation), or due to a referral by any school official. All school-related arrests are considered referrals to law enforcement.
Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official: 4 (all male)
Students without disabilities who were referred to a law enforcement agency or official per 1,000 studentsWilliam Sheppard Middle School: | 5.9 |
California: | 27.2 |
Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
(State average from 8,737 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.
Chronic Student Absenteeism
- Hispanic28
- American Indian2
- Asian4
- Native Hawaiian4
- Black7
- LEP13
- IDEA16
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 45 (male: 14, female: 31)
- Hispanic: 28 (male: 8, female: 20)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all female)
- Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Black: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 16 (male: 8, female: 8)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 studentsSchool: | 66.5 |
California: | 172.7 |
Chronic Student Absenteeism
- Hispanic43
- Asian7
- Black4
- White4
- LEP13
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 58 (male: 32, female: 26)
- Hispanic: 43 (male: 23, female: 20)
- Asian: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 13 (male: 5, female: 8)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Suspensions:
(State average from 1,406 schools)
Out-of-school suspension - For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
- For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision. School days missed due to out-of-school suspension
- Hispanic57
- Asian2
- Black1
- Multirace5
- LEP13
- IDEA25
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 65 (male: 25, female: 40)
- Hispanic: 57 (male: 18, female: 39)
- Asian: 2 (male: 1, female: 1)
- Black: 1 (all male)
- Two or More Races: 5 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 13 (male: 7, female: 6)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 25 (male: 15, female: 10)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 20
Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)William Sheppard Middle School: | 29.5 |
State: | 84.8 |
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 5 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension
- Hispanic7
- Asian4
- Black2
- LEP2
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 13 (male: 6, female: 7)
- Hispanic: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
- Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Black: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)
Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students with disabilities): 18
Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students with disabilities)School: | 26.6 |
California: | 28.1 |
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Students with disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Two or More Races: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension
- Hispanic4
- American Indian2
- Asian2
- LEP2
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 8 (male: 6, female: 2)
- Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
- Asian: 2 (all male)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension
- Hispanic10
- Asian2
- Black2
- LEP4
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 14 (male: 10, female: 4)
- Hispanic: 10 (male: 8, female: 2)
- Asian: 2 (all male)
- Black: 2 (all female)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 4 (all male)
Classes & Courses
Algebra I:
(State average from 1,382 schools)
Algebra I is a (college-preparatory) course that includes the study of properties and operations of the real number system; evaluating rational algebraic expressions; solving and graphing first degree equations and inequalities; translating word problems into equations; operations with and factoring of polynomials; and solving simple quadratic equations. Algebra I is a foundation course leading to higher-level mathematics courses, including Geometry and Algebra II.
Number of Algebra I classes: 11
7-8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I
- Hispanic133
- American Indian2
- Asian64
- Native Hawaiian4
- Black4
- White2
- LEP43
7-8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I: 209 (male: 112, female: 97)
- Hispanic: 133 (male: 68, female: 65)
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 2 (all male)
- Asian: 64 (male: 38, female: 26)
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- White: 2 (all female)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 43 (male: 23, female: 20)
7-8th grade studenst who passed Algebra I
- Hispanic128
- Asian65
- Black4
- LEP32
7-8th grade studenst who passed Algebra I: 197 (male: 107, female: 90)
- Hispanic: 128 (male: 67, female: 61)
- Asian: 65 (male: 40, female: 25)
- Black: 4 (all female)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 32 (male: 19, female: 13)
Percent of 7-8th grade students who passedWilliam Sheppard Middle School: | 94.3% |
California: | 83.6% |
Number of Algebra I classes: 11
7-8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I
- Hispanic46
- Asian52
- Native Hawaiian2
- Black4
- White4
- Multirace2
- LEP28
- IDEA2
7-8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I: 110
- Hispanic: 46
- Asian: 52
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 2
- Black: 4
- White: 4
- Two or More Races: 2
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 28
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2
7-8th grade studenst who passed Algebra I
- Hispanic47
- American Indian2
- Asian53
- Native Hawaiian2
- Black4
- White2
- Multirace2
- LEP29
- IDEA2
7-8th grade studenst who passed Algebra I: 104
- Hispanic: 47
- American Indian / Alaska Native: 2
- Asian: 53
- Native Hawaiian / Pacific Islander: 2
- Black: 4
- White: 2
- Two or More Races: 2
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 29
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2
Percent of 7-8th grade students who passed
Comments
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: