Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Parenting > Adoption
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-31-2015, 03:27 PM
 
Location: Honolulu/DMV Area/NYC
30,633 posts, read 18,222,068 times
Reputation: 34509

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by lenora View Post
Is it asking too much for politicians to stay out of these matters?

Update:

'Baby Veronica' birth father freed after surrendering - chicagotribune.com
Why should she have? She was legally allowed (and, I argue, obligated based on her oath of office) to do what she did.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-31-2015, 03:36 PM
 
Location: Honolulu/DMV Area/NYC
30,633 posts, read 18,222,068 times
Reputation: 34509
While well-intended, I have a huge problem with how ICWA has been implemented and believe that it clearly violates equal protection principles inherent in the 5th Amendment. Similarly, I believe that state carbon copies of ICWA violate the 14th Amendment. The reason? Its simple. Tribal membership in EVERY federally-recognized Indian tribe is based on descent to an Indian by blood or by other blood/racial basis (i.e. Freedmen membership in the Cherokee Nation and Seminole Nation). Note, this is not to say that every tribe has a set blood quantum (they don't), but even those tribes that enroll based on lineal descent only require that a lineal descendant be an Indian by blood. That is a clear race classification (yes, its political in that it goes to tribal membership, but its politics mixed with race, just as Jim Crow laws were, even if ICWA and Jim Crow were designed to meet far different goals) that is subject to strict scrutiny. Under no honest strict scrutiny analysis can many of the ICWA provisions (especially heightened burdens of proof for termination of parental rights and placement preferences) stand; there is no compelling governmental interest to discriminate in such a way. Hopefully, the courts don't dodge the issue this year (there are several lawsuits which were recently filed regarding the constitutionality of the ICWA and new ICWA regulations).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2015, 10:11 PM
 
Location: Chapel Hill, N.C.
36,499 posts, read 54,078,069 times
Reputation: 47919
Baby Veronica's father Dusten Brown welcomes baby son | Daily Mail Online
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Parenting > Adoption
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top