Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness > Diet and Weight Loss
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-31-2012, 12:46 PM
 
4,947 posts, read 10,826,829 times
Reputation: 8577

Advertisements

I know they were talking about putting labels on foods similar to this:
"One can of cola = one hour's run"

Are they ever going to make this idea a law?
It's GOTTA help make better food choices.
Anybody have any more info??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-31-2012, 12:50 PM
 
19,922 posts, read 11,056,069 times
Reputation: 27395
Quote:
Originally Posted by StaggerLee22 View Post
I know they were talking about putting labels on foods similar to this: "One can of cola = one hour's run"

Are they ever going to make this idea a law? It's GOTTA help make better food choices. Anybody have any more info??
Those kinds of labels really cannot be very accurate. An hour's run for you and and hour's run for me might be two different things based on our respective ages, genders, current weights and our running speeds. It's a nice thought, and an understanding of the physical activity required to balance the particular food would be a good thing, but I wouldn't count on the accuracy of any labels.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2012, 02:40 PM
 
Location: In a house
13,250 posts, read 42,830,544 times
Reputation: 20198
An hour's run is useless information for a quadriplegic, who might take offense, have his lawyer contact some random disability rights organization, and file a class action suit against the company (or worse - the government) for daring to discriminate and/or demonstrate bias against the disabled.

Also, if you're too lazy to look this stuff up yourself, then you're probably not going to benefit from the information anyway
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2012, 05:12 PM
 
4,947 posts, read 10,826,829 times
Reputation: 8577
I hadn't thought about it the way you two did.
Good points.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2012, 05:58 PM
 
10,746 posts, read 26,072,353 times
Reputation: 16033
You really think some fattie is going to rethink eating that pack of oreos because they see that info on them?

Damn..the package already tells you how many calories are in the one serving. How many calories come from fat. How many grams of fat. What the hell else do you want???? Packages that excerise for you??

I've got a fattie in my office who thinks he's eating healthy by eating these veggie straws....they are 50% fat. Yup...healthy.

offending ppl aside ( and it's a great point) ppl are going to eat what they want no matter what.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2012, 06:04 PM
 
Location: In a house
13,250 posts, read 42,830,544 times
Reputation: 20198
I don't know why you have to generalize like that Kim, and refer to anyone who might benefit from the information as a "fattie". OR why people who are eating oreos are "fatties". Or why people who might be interested in knowing how much energy one has to expend to burn off the consumption of a particular object, a "fattie".

I'm not sure why you feel you have to use the term at all. People who are health-conscious, regardless of their current weight, -could- use the information. Some of them might even appreciate the information.

My point, was that the information is readily available online, or in various paperback books, and that it would be pretty impossible to appropriately label things with exercise options, without causing offense to one or another special interest group.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2012, 08:56 PM
 
6,762 posts, read 11,643,586 times
Reputation: 3028
Quote:
Originally Posted by StaggerLee22 View Post
Are they ever going to make this idea a law?
It's GOTTA help make better food choices.
That's what people were screaming when they were trying to make it law that packaged food must contain a nutrition label with calories, carbs, proteins, and fats. They finally got the labels on all packaged food, and now anyone can spin their can of soda around and see that it has 38 grams of sugar. Wanna guess how many people actually look? Out of those that look, wanna guess how many actually care?

We see how well that worked out....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-31-2012, 09:05 PM
 
4,947 posts, read 10,826,829 times
Reputation: 8577
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kim in FL View Post
offending ppl aside... .
You sure are offensive.
Needlessly offensive. Why not just use the word overweight??
Calling somebody a 'fattie' is just wrong.
Grow up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2012, 07:05 AM
 
10,746 posts, read 26,072,353 times
Reputation: 16033
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnonChick View Post
I don't know why you have to generalize like that Kim, and refer to anyone who might benefit from the information as a "fattie". OR why people who are eating oreos are "fatties". Or why people who might be interested in knowing how much energy one has to expend to burn off the consumption of a particular object, a "fattie".

I'm not sure why you feel you have to use the term at all. People who are health-conscious, regardless of their current weight, -could- use the information. Some of them might even appreciate the information.

My point, was that the information is readily available online, or in various paperback books, and that it would be pretty impossible to appropriately label things with exercise options, without causing offense to one or another special interest group.
Oh, that's right...it's not their fault their fat...it's society.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2012, 07:07 AM
 
10,746 posts, read 26,072,353 times
Reputation: 16033
Quote:
Originally Posted by StaggerLee22 View Post
You sure are offensive.
Needlessly offensive. Why not just use the word overweight??
Calling somebody a 'fattie' is just wrong.
Grow up.

Your entitled to your opinion. Thank you for expressing it.

And the fattie I was referring to isn't overweight, he's 450 lbs.

So now the truth is offensive? You don't think he knows he's livin large? Really? Truth hurts, but it's not offensive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Health and Wellness > Diet and Weight Loss

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top