Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
the U.S. Supreme Court has told Texas to halt the implementation of its controversial immigration law that gives state officials the power to arrest and deport migrants. The Texas law had been set to take effect this coming Saturday, reports the Associated Press, thanks to a Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decision that reversed a lower court judge's opinion blocking the law. The order issued by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito pushes back the start date of the Texas law to March 13 for the moment. The delay is intended to give the Supreme Court more time to consider whether they'll let Texas enforce its own immigration policies.
I know what they should do, allow it. Maybe they are holding off to see if Biden will do HIS job and get it done, but we all know that won't happen. Maybe they were waiting to hear his great plan in his SOTU speech which was nothing more than political campaigning while he was "high" enough to actually speak for more than 30 minutes.
The 10th Amendment gives TX the right to fend off the invasion, and it would only make sense that if allowed to protect their borders, they would turn around and put the invaders out of the country rather than house, feed them, provide medical care, etc.
Biden should be impeached over not protecting our borders, thus endangering our citizens and taking on a bunch of mooches that will live on welfare and break the bank!
the U.S. Supreme Court has told Texas to halt the implementation of its controversial immigration law that gives state officials the power to arrest and deport migrants. The Texas law had been set to take effect this coming Saturday, reports the Associated Press, thanks to a Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decision that reversed a lower court judge's opinion blocking the law. The order issued by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito pushes back the start date of the Texas law to March 13 for the moment. The delay is intended to give the Supreme Court more time to consider whether they'll let Texas enforce its own immigration policies.
In regard to the Fifth Circuit's ruling halting the implementation of SB 4, Judge David Ezra lied when suggesting immigration is an exclusive federal matter in his ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION:
“Several factors warrant an injunction. First, the Supremacy Clause and Supreme Court precedent affirm that states may not exercise immigration enforcement power except as authorized by the federal government.”
In response to the concern about the “Supremacy Clause” [Article 6], let us always keep in mind what it actually states: “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof. . .” Self-evidently, federal laws not made in pursuance of our Constitution – and that would include, e.g., the Tenth Amendment, Section 4 of Article 4, and the qualifying condition of Section 10 of Article 1 – would not be Supreme, but a subversion, and in violation of our Constitution!
And with regard to the fabricated and lying assertion that “… states may not exercise immigration enforcement power except as authorized by the federal government…”, that lie is quickly refuted in New York v. Miln, 36 U.S. 102 (1837) – involving a New York law adopted to prevent the entry of an unwanted influx of foreign nationals into the state and to protect itself from an onslaught of unwanted “foreign paupers” and avoid “. . . the consequent danger of her citizens being subjected to a heavy charge in the maintenance of those who are poor” as stated in Miln, which upheld the law.
The ugly truth is, the Biden Administration is orchestrating and supervising a planned invasion of the United States and is filling our States with millions upon millions of poverty-stricken, poorly educated, low-skilled, diseased, disabled, criminal, and unvetted terrorist foreign nationals, who are then, as planned, taking over State inner city emergency care rooms, public schools and public housing, and draining scarce state resources meant for American Citizens.
And we can predict these illegal entrant foreign nationals will most certainly begin to riot and cause mayhem if their economic, social, and political wants are not met and attended to, even though doing so leaves our own citizens destitute and turned into taxpaying citizen slaves . . . there to finance the invasion orchestrated by the Biden Administration.
This invasion at our southern border is being perpetuated and orchestrated, not only by the Biden Administration, but by a number of traitorous judges who are intentionally ignoring and subverting the text of our Constitution and its documented legislative intent, which gives context to its text.
And with reference to immigration and its regulation, immigration is a subject matter which may lawfully, and constitutionally, be acted upon by our federal and individual state governments, each acting within their own sphere of constitutionally assigned powers as enumerated in our federal Constitution.
What will our Supreme Court do? Good question since our Supreme Court has already confirmed a state has not only a right to protect its borders, but a duty to do so as explained in Miln.
.
Comparing Edwards v California to New York v. Miln
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcp123
Edwards v California?
Just curious. Was there a reason for you posting that case?
Did your read the opinions?
Were foreign nationals the subject of the California statute making it a misdemeanor for anyone knowingly to bring or assist in bringing into the State an "indigent person"?
Were the persons involved in the case moving from state to state, or being transported from a foreign country into the United States?
.
Last edited by johnwk1; 04-08-2024 at 07:34 AM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Judge David Ezra lied in his order granting an injunction on Texas' SB 4 law
