All of those things mentioned and asymmetry in the relationship of user to provider as well as any entity that captures your email to carpet bomb the end user at will.
The provider and those corporate entities should be required have a level of engagement option of what the end user wants to not allow a digital blank slate to throw unwanted 'stuff' at you endlessly because (To Them) it is essentially no cost. A good digital email policy would be to ask the end user how often they would like to be notified of deals through emails. Does any company do this?
Excerpt from old post on internet issue:
As someone who once trained on tech based products I find the continued improvement in some realms great and others a pain mostly due to the business models monetization methods.
For example, the internet (even with ad blocker apps) has become more and more cumbersome and cluttered with no concern for the end user mostly because of the way it is monetized for maximum revenue generation. Spammers proliferate because they make the service providers money too.
The tech companies make money from both sides of the equation [like the financiers and armaments manufacturers do in wars with no real allegiance- but I digress]. Lots of extraneous 'stuff' is thrown at the user which they have to avoid or pay the provider to lessen the 'stuff' thrown at the them, or conveniently designed to deceive user to click purposefully or inadvertently to generate traffic counts.
The 'highway' hardware manufacturers like it because it requires more and more capacity with little concern for the overall user experience, since, hey, "we're making money on clicks and traffic counts".
Imagine how roads would be if the measure of success is increasing motor vehicle counts driven over the roadway based upon discouraging the vehicle from making its way as efficiently as possible, and rather to stop and start at every rest area to tempt and delay the 'driver' and use the opportunity to try selling stuff other than what the driver wants to purchase and continue on his/her way?
Or positioning road signs and traffic engineering the roads to cause accidents to enable insurance companies and service repair facilities to proliferate?
[clicking on stuff you did not intend to because they placed the 'ad' right next to the scroll arrow, or have the article you wanted to read conveniently shift, or temporarily disappear so some visual pollution can assault the user, with mandatory ad plays, or mini audio video windows embedded playing some stuff, etc...]
So here are some more random thoughts about what could be done. Again these are just conceptual ideas, some of which may exist to some degree which I am unaware of as it is not my area of expertise.
How about the equivalent of a license to participate on the highway that is earned by having to regularly pass a remedial "Rules of Engagement test online? A one time minimal flat fee.
Sort of like a drivers license being needed for legally using a motor vehicle? This "Rules of Engagement" memorandum of understanding would be signed and time stamped by all participants on regular intervals (or some remedial time threshold) for the privilege of use. Internet accessibility would be free only if you agree to the "Rules of Engagement" and considered a common good toward open communication and free enterprise.
The rules would be more stringent on the corporate entities based on the ethical concept of ordinary care and extraordinary care. Basically, the corporate entity engaging in internet usage for profit would have greater onus on extraordinary care to not violate rules of engagement to the larger community which they serve. Whereas, an individual would be held to ordinary care.
I'm envisioning something akin to this scenario: if a user gets something unwanted from said corporate entity pursuing a business activity they get 'tagged' via some universally applied IP with a keystroke combination that is only enabled via captcha security type method to prevent vindictive individuals or other competitors from making the corp attain high violation counts.
Security measures should be designed to protect the individual identity over a corporate entity as I agree anonymity of individual is paramount.
On some websites I have noticed more and more companies you get prompted first to provide your name and information, in order to proceed to get (IMO) what oftentimes should be considered generic standard information.
The logic would be:
a) As a corporation selling a product or service the corp is required to give the individual information first.
b) Then if individual finds your product of interest they can voluntarily contact the company for further information.
The thought being the company is filed to do business and should be required by the state or whatever government entity to provide that information to the public without capturing every person who may wander onto their website seeking information on the company.
Another would be a security feature that 'trolls' for fraud, deceptive behaviors and any such activity, which then continuously blocks them until they reach a threshold, whereby the perpetrator / violator creates a self inflicted digital 'blockade' (solitary confinement) due to repetitive violations of the rules of engagement.
Effectively nullifying their ability to use the tool in the future. i.e. their 'internet drivers license' is suspended / revoked with various levels of violations with fines and then outright ban from using the tool as a method of business.
Basically, what I'm conceptually talking about is take away the incentive for the fraudsters / spoofsters clogging up the digital highway and diminish the annoying types and forms of advertising from proliferating. Some form of electronic do not call type policy with strong teeth to penalize the violators. If need be the Vardan Kushnir treatment
https://www.cnet.com/culture/russian-spammer-murdered/
Hope this made sense - don't know if it can done with the internet infrastructure as it currently exists.
Some of these suggestions on relationship between providers /corporate entities and end user may be best addressed if internet infrastructure is deemed a utility and apply a sort of trust busting of the digital realm for the 21st century.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
