Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Military Life and Issues
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-18-2021, 10:38 AM
 
Location: Texas Hill Country
23,652 posts, read 13,987,571 times
Reputation: 18856

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by john3232 View Post
........Never thought to ask what it was like living in a sub. Couldn't get past the horror of drowning.
Of the various ways to go.......

Thresher, they were pulverized/incinerated in a blink of an eye when the hull failed (implosion).

Scorpion and INS Dakar, they probably drowned but it was probably a very quick drowning. There's an interesting question or two or three. In a sudden violent flooding of an compartment, does the shock of the water hitting you knock you out? Does it pulverize you like dropping hand grenades on a swimmer? If one is still alive when something sinking rams into the ocean floor, is it the sudden deacceleration that kills you instead?

ARA San Juan sounds like it imploded, a quick death......maybe. While the submarine was found in many pieces on the ocean floor, indicating an implosion break up, there is always that question of what happened before it reached crush depth.

Generally, find a submarine intact on the bottom can be indicative that when it got to crush depth, it was already flooded; find it crushed or shredded, then it probably was filled with "air" when it reached crushed depth.

One thing to keep in mind with at least diesel electric submarines is that if they are in a death dive, they are only a few seconds of the travel time of the length of the hull to reach their crush depth.

Chinese Romeo (Ming) 361 asphyxiated while the Kursk was explosion, flash fire, carbon dioxide and monoxide poisoning and if that didn't get them, there was always hypothermia waiting.

Carbon dioxide poisoning is also what killed the divers in the lockout chamber of the Johnson Sea Link accident in 1973
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnson_Sea_Link_accident They were, however, also looking at hypothermia and decompression sickness.

K-219 (the Yankee boat off the east coast) had some crew killed by explosion, toxic gas, and asphyxiation.

K-278, the Soviet Mike boat, was mostly by hypothermia, drowning on the surface, results of the fire, and decompression. https://nationalinterest.org/blog/bu...-onboard-49892

Lots of fates out there.

Last edited by TamaraSavannah; 03-18-2021 at 10:48 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-18-2021, 11:38 AM
 
Location: Forests of Maine
37,464 posts, read 61,388,499 times
Reputation: 30414
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waymarker View Post
But if designers did away with the conning tower I'd have thought the periscope and radar masts could be housed in the hull and made telescopic so they could be extended waaay above the surface, but what do i know?
Our periscopes and radar masts are made to be separate compartments they can each withstand sea-pressure at terrifying depths. For them to be telescoping they would likely fill with water.



Quote:
Originally Posted by twinkletwinkle22 View Post
I had a friend join the Navy out of high school and he was assigned to subs, don't remember if he requested that or how he ended up there. After his 4 years were up he switched to Coast Guard and was a lifer there. He commented on lack of space on subs probably because he was 6'.
There is an amount of screening we all go through.

For those volunteers over 6 foot tall, when they arrive at Sub School, each week they will be asked to spend a day touring a couple of the boats down at the piers.

If they still wish to volunteer after spending a few days touring various boats, then they are welcome to do so.



Quote:
Originally Posted by john3232 View Post
I had an acquaintance who died a few years back that often wore a navy jacket from WWII. He was 17 when he joined the navy and worked in the control room of the sub. during the war. I don't recall what his job was but he would often rotate. He was never with one sub for very long. Four times he said the sub he'd just been in was sunk shortly his transfer.
From what you wrote, if I had to guess I would guess that your friend was either a FireControl Tech [FTG], or a QuarterMaster [QM].

FTGs work on a system that takes target data [distance, heading, speed] from sonar and/or the periscope, or ESM and manipulates that data into a 'FireControl solution' [meaning all the data a torpedo needs so that when it is launched it may properly introduce itself to the target]. That is fed it into a torpedo. We normally like to keep a FireControl solution programmed into every torpedo just in case.

For every surface target vessel that comes within 100 miles of a sub, there should be a firecontrol solution already programmed into a torpedo, waiting.

QMs also spend most of their careers in the Control Room. They are busy charting our position and trying to keep us safe from running into seamounts and other obstacles. Driving full speed into a seamount is a bad thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2021, 04:09 PM
 
Location: Columbia SC
14,249 posts, read 14,737,232 times
Reputation: 22189
I was in the Submarine Service from 1961 to 1965 on diesel boats. The last diesel boats were built in the mid-50s thus nuclear powered was what all the new boats were. I was on SS-365, USS Hardhead attached to SubDevGrpII (Submarine Development Group 2) based in New London. The USS Thresher SSN-593 was one of our boats. I had several friends that went down with her.

While in Sub School, we would go out on day cruises (including multi diving and surfacing) in Long Island Sound on various diesel boats. We would rotate from compartment to compartment. One thing the instructors looked for was how were students handling the whole experience as in were any abnormally nervous, sweating, etc. The next day any student with issues was called away and dismissed from Sub School.

We also did a 100 free ascend in the diving tower. Some refused to do it. Some panicked while doing it. They were gone the next day.

I rode a few nuclear boats (USS Tullibee SSN597 and USS Skipjack SSN585) but only for a few days each as part of an proficiency team evaluations. Never as a crew member.

When I see You Tube, Videos, etc. of modern subs, the first thing I think is wow, look at all the space and fresh water (showers and clean clothes), etc. they have. Luxurious living. No hydraulic oil or diesel food leaking on to their food.........LOL

The routine of a Boomer will kill me. I want excitement. Different things, different places, etc.

Contrary to popular belief. There were no physical size restrictions on sub sailors. Performance, not size mattered. At that age I was 6ft tall and 220 lbs. There were bigger and taller guys on boats than I was.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2021, 06:40 PM
 
749 posts, read 580,342 times
Reputation: 1170
You guys certainly know a lot about subs. I know nothing. I don't suppose subs take tourists on board? A breach of security? I would pay for a ticket.

So you work 7 days a week? No days off? And you don't miss females?
What happens if a man makes mistakes or doesn't remember things? Or does not have the strength
for the job?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2021, 08:57 AM
 
Location: The Commonwealth of Virginia
1,386 posts, read 999,709 times
Reputation: 2151
Speaking as a surface guy, I'm curious about the difference in space between an attack boat and a boomer. Boomers are much bigger, so I've heard that makes a difference when it comes to livable space. Is that the case? Is there a lot more space on a boomer? Are you still hot-racking on a boomer?

--
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2021, 10:35 AM
 
Location: Forests of Maine
37,464 posts, read 61,388,499 times
Reputation: 30414
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill790 View Post
Speaking as a surface guy, I'm curious about the difference in space between an attack boat and a boomer. Boomers are much bigger, so I've heard that makes a difference when it comes to livable space. Is that the case? Is there a lot more space on a boomer?
Yes. The difference is huge.




Quote:
... Are you still hot-racking on a boomer?
--
The Navy has a lot of inspection teams.

ORSE - to ensure that the Engineering department of a nuclear-powered vessel is operating their reactor(s) in a safe manner.

DASO- certification in a Demonstration and Shakedown Operation

FOT - test launches of FBM ballistic missiles.

INSURV, etc, ...

When one of these teams of 20+ men come aboard they bring with them a list of evolutions they wish to observe our crew perform. Those teams will be assigned birthing, that was previously occupied by crewmen. That is what causes hot racking on boomers.

We have sufficient birthing for the crew and officers. Shortages occur when we host a lot of guests.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2021, 11:45 AM
 
Location: England
239 posts, read 134,115 times
Reputation: 76
Just an idea to combat feelings of claustrophobia in a sub-
Perhaps every bunk could have a small tablet-sized screen attached to the wall so that the occupant could hit a few buttons to display a map of where they are in the world, their depth, speed, route, the sea temperature and the surface weather and local time of the day etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2021, 11:57 AM
 
Location: England
239 posts, read 134,115 times
Reputation: 76
incidentally should we think twice before buying a beachfront property?
I mean, enemy subs could easily sneak up to within a mile or two and spy on us with their periscopes, or even worse send a terror squad ashore to upset us real bad..

Iranian Kilo
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2021, 12:24 PM
 
Location: Forests of Maine
37,464 posts, read 61,388,499 times
Reputation: 30414
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waymarker View Post
Just an idea to combat feelings of claustrophobia in a sub-
Perhaps every bunk could have a small tablet-sized screen attached to the wall so that the occupant could hit a few buttons to display a map of where they are in the world, their depth, speed, route, the sea temperature and the surface weather and local time of the day etc.
On many boats the bunks are wired with a 'Sunstrand' system. Twelve channels of audio and a headphone jack. The ICmen maintain a cabinet loaded with 12-hour reel-to-reel tapes that auto-reverse when they reach the end of a reel. Once those tape machines are loaded they can play continuously for 100 days.

The crew are invited to bring any music they have and the ICmen will gladly transfer that music onto the tape reels.

On one of my first patrols the music that the crew donated was all Frank Zappa. That was a mistake. Nothing but Zappa on all channels, all the time for 100+ days.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2021, 01:00 PM
 
Location: Forests of Maine
37,464 posts, read 61,388,499 times
Reputation: 30414
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waymarker View Post
incidentally should we think twice before buying a beachfront property?
I mean, enemy subs could easily sneak up to within a mile or two and spy on us with their periscopes, or even worse send a terror squad ashore to upset us real bad..
All this talk about Fast-attacks and Boomers, but nobody wants to talk about the other types of submersible vessels the US Navy has.

'Deep submergence' vessels
[ DSV-1 Trieste II, DSV-2 Alvin, DSV-3 Turtle, DSV-4 Sea Cliff, DSV-5 Nemo ], Sea Labs 1, 2, 3, and 4, NR-1

USS Parche (SSN-683) and USS Jimmy Carter (SSN-23) were both 'spy' boats. Modified to sit on the bottom on top of an inter-continental communications cable, to splice into that cable, and to decrypt messages.

USS Kamehameha (SSBN-642) and USS James K. Polk (SSBN-645) were both boomers later converted to troop transports, redesigned reactor coolant systems allow these boats to settle down into river silt and mud, to park in position awaiting their teams to launch and return.

Another interesting vessel is the USS FLIP. It does 'research' on the oceans.

I have also known a few submariners whose careers had them rotating between boomers and TAG-S ships.
USNS Pathfinder (T-AGS-60)
USNS Sumner (T-AGS-61)
USNS Bowditch (T-AGS-62)
USNS Henson (T-AGS-63)
USNS Bruce C. Heezen (T-AGS-64)
USNS Mary Sears (T-AGS-65)
USNS Maury (T-AGS-66)

They did most of the detailed mapping of the ocean floors, and the mapping of gravity anomalies that subs use to navigate by. It was men on TAG-S ships who originally located the wreck of the Titanic and allowed our subs to use it as a navigational landmark, in the 1970s.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Military Life and Issues

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top