Quote:
Originally Posted by Where2now22
First MMA does not have enough black athletes...who I feel are superior athletes. If there is a black guy and white guy fighting, I always pick the black guy. For me, this is biggest key to the matchups.
Secondly, MMA fighters have demonstrated on a constant basis to have glass jaws. If an MMA fighter can get passed the punches then I think a good wrestler could cause some issue for a boxer.
So if the division champions were matched up across each sport, I feel boxers would win "at least" 60% of matches. Super middleweight division and up, Boxers would win easily. Lighter divisions, I would give the edge to MMA fighters...but I am still pointing to the lack of black MMA fighters to give boxers a punchers chance.
|
Following that logic, Jon Jones and D Johnson , both "Black" champs in the UFC would rely on punching power to win , which we all know is not the case. Secondly, MMA participation by Black males is up there with any other group. Why we don't see more Blacks in tournaments is due to Blacks making up a smaller percentage of overall population. So, that might throw the theory of physical dominance of one group over the other straight out the window.
Boxers winning at least 60% of matches. Nope. We saw only very recently at UFC 196, as two dominant strikers lost their titles to more superior ground game experts.
All this talk of seeing a Black man having the edge over say a White or Hispanic guy has been disproved by results we see in Strikeforce and the UFC. Pretty even all told. No real advantage of one over the other.