Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-06-2011, 03:32 PM
 
51 posts, read 132,375 times
Reputation: 54

Advertisements

Due to last week's storm, we have several high branches half-broken and hanging over the neighbor's yard. One branch has broken and is lying on top of the roof of one of neighbor's outhouses.

Who normally bears the repair costs (branch on outhouse roof)? Who bears the clean-up non-repair costs (branches on top of neighbor's yard that could break and fall)? Are they typically shared?

Thanks in advance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-06-2011, 04:10 PM
 
19,128 posts, read 25,336,687 times
Reputation: 25434
Quote:
Originally Posted by CTC2 View Post
Due to last week's storm, we have several high branches half-broken and hanging over the neighbor's yard. One branch has broken and is lying on top of the roof of one of neighbor's outhouses.

Who normally bears the repair costs (branch on outhouse roof)? Who bears the clean-up non-repair costs (branches on top of neighbor's yard that could break and fall)? Are they typically shared?

Thanks in advance.

If you have an apple tree, any apples that grow on branches overhanging your neighbor's yard are rightfully his property.
Under the same legal principle, branches from your tree that fall onto his property become his problem.

If he didn't want any part of your tree overhanging his property, he could have trimmed them. Since he didn't, he now gets to deal with the fallout.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2011, 05:03 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
2,257 posts, read 5,188,948 times
Reputation: 1877
Quote:
Originally Posted by Retriever View Post
Under the same legal principle, branches from your tree that fall onto his property become his problem.
really?!! i didn't know that. thanks to OP for the post and Retriever for the information.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2011, 08:36 PM
 
1,787 posts, read 5,748,440 times
Reputation: 1301
If the branches cause damage to the neighbor's house, the neighbor might have to go through their insurance company for repairs (that's what my insurance company told me).

If my branches fell on my neighbor's yard or building(s), I would clean it up. I don't think you would be too happy, if your neighbor had tree branches all over your yard and said it's your problem.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2011, 08:09 AM
 
Location: Randolph, NJ
4,073 posts, read 8,981,886 times
Reputation: 3262
Quote:
Originally Posted by timneh5 View Post
If the branches cause damage to the neighbor's house, the neighbor might have to go through their insurance company for repairs (that's what my insurance company told me).

If my branches fell on my neighbor's yard or building(s), I would clean it up. I don't think you would be too happy, if your neighbor had tree branches all over your yard and said it's your problem.

There's the law... and then there is doing what is needed to maintain good neighbors.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2011, 10:00 AM
 
1,787 posts, read 5,748,440 times
Reputation: 1301
Quote:
Originally Posted by HalfFull View Post
There's the law... and then there is doing what is needed to maintain good neighbors.
This is worth more than you know!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2011, 06:10 PM
 
51 posts, read 132,375 times
Reputation: 54
Thanks to all for the replies.

Here's a follow-up question:

So, it seems that legally, taking care of the fallen branches should be the neighbor's responsibility in this case. However, if one of the branches falls and causes personal damage in neighbor's yard, who's responsible for the ensuing liability claim: neighbor's insurance or mine?

Not a real situation, just hypothetical - trying to understand the law here.

Thanks again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-10-2011, 06:21 PM
 
19,128 posts, read 25,336,687 times
Reputation: 25434
Quote:
Originally Posted by CTC2 View Post
Thanks to all for the replies.

So, it seems that legally, taking care of the fallen branches should be the neighbor's responsibility in this case. However, if one of the branches falls and causes personal damage in neighbor's yard, who's responsible for the ensuing liability claim: neighbor's insurance or mine?
If your neighbor informs you (in writing) that your tree presents a hazard to his property, and it later falls and causes damage to his property, then you are responsible because you did not remediate this hazard that he made you aware of.

However, since--in the vast majority of cases--people do not notify you ahead of time that your tree constitutes a hazard, when it falls it is considered to be an Act of God for which you are not responsible. In this type of case, his Homeowner's Insurance policy is his recourse for reimbursement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2011, 06:08 AM
 
Location: Central, NJ
2,731 posts, read 6,119,535 times
Reputation: 4110
Quote:
Originally Posted by Retriever View Post
If your neighbor informs you (in writing) that your tree presents a hazard to his property, and it later falls and causes damage to his property, then you are responsible because you did not remediate this hazard that he made you aware of.

However, since--in the vast majority of cases--people do not notify you ahead of time that your tree constitutes a hazard, when it falls it is considered to be an Act of God for which you are not responsible. In this type of case, his Homeowner's Insurance policy is his recourse for reimbursement.
I believe this is only true if the tree is dead or damaged. I don't think a neighbor can look at your healthy tree and decide that it presents a danger to their home. This knowledge comes mostly from watching The People's Court so look into it more! But really it makes sense - my neighbor doesn't like one of my trees but there is nothing wrong with it. In a tornado, sure it could hit part of their house. But just saying that it "could" present a hazard should not put me on the hook for having it taken down.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2011, 08:20 AM
 
Location: Piscataway
279 posts, read 1,086,939 times
Reputation: 92
If we are talking about a county tree growing between the sidewalk and street, then if that tree branch falls you bet the county is not going to do jack except clean up the debris....so any damage to cars parked under that tree is not their fault......same should hold for the neighbor. An unforseeable act of God.....that is what insurance is for.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > New Jersey
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top