Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Now this is one hell of a story I just came across and thought it was worthy to post. I actually feel sorry for this guy who got drug into this by the lesbians. This will be a major court case to follow because if the state of Kansas does win, then this will spook future males from donating their sperm to lesbian couples or regular couples who can't conceive out of fear they might be forced to pay child support one day if the couple splits.........like these lesbians did.
A lot of men who become fathers from a one night stand feel they have no more obligation than a sperm donor too, but they are held accountable. My question is why the lesbian couple didn't go through proper channels and a clinic. If they didn't use a clinic they must have gotten that baby the way heterosexual women do, the old fashioned way. No different than any other case where a man gets a woman pregnant, and his desire to be a parent is immaterial to his obligation to support the child.
If the lesbian couple broke up why doesn't the state go after the noncustodial (former) partner? Or is this a clever way couples can avoid support obligations?
Now this is one hell of a story I just came across and thought it was worthy to post. I actually feel sorry for this guy who got drug into this by the lesbians. This will be a major court case to follow because if the state of Kansas does win, then this will spook future males from donating their sperm to lesbian couples or regular couples who can't conceive out of fear they might be forced to pay child support one day if the couple splits.........like these lesbians did.
One of them must've applied for support from the state. Dang, next time they need to go to the sperm bank; then they won't be able to find the sperm donor.
If the lesbian couple broke up why doesn't the state go after the noncustodial (former) partner? Or is this a clever way couples can avoid support obligations?
My guess is that Kansas does not recognize homosexual unions. So as far as the law is concerned the biological mom is the mother and the bio dad is the dad. The state has an interest in insuring that kids do not become a burden on taxpayers so hence the aggressive measures to make the man that fathered this child take responsibility, financially at least.
If the lesbian couple broke up why doesn't the state go after the noncustodial (former) partner? Or is this a clever way couples can avoid support obligations?
My guess is that Kansas does not recognize homosexual unions. So as far as the law is concerned the biological mom is the mother and the bio dad is the dad. The state has an interest in insuring that kids do not become a burden on taxpayers so hence the aggressive measures to make the man that fathered this child take responsibility, financially at least.
I think you hit the nail on the head.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
must've...
