Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-11-2008, 12:01 PM
 
Location: Philly, Philly
932 posts, read 1,677,712 times
Reputation: 332

Advertisements

In light of recent posts that have come up, I wanted to posts some facts about welfare. There are a lot of people perpetuating these myths so here's to you.

It's kind of long but never hesitate to educate yourself. And rebuttles are definitely appreciated.

According to the American Psychological Association:Welfare to Work: Myths

Myth: Poverty Results From a Lack of Responsibility

Fact: Poverty Results From Low Wages

Welfare programs have been our country's response to poverty, and everyone agrees that those programs have not solved the problem. Jared Bernstein (1996) of the Economic Policy Institute identifies wage decline as the crucial economic factor that has had the largest impact on poverty rates in the 1980s and 1990s. While hourly rates of pay have fallen for the majority of the workforce since the late 1970s, by far the largest losses have been for the lowest paid workers. According to Bernstein (1996), between 1979 and 1989, the male worker, for example, at the 10th percentile (meaning 90 percent of the male workforce earns more) saw his hourly wage decline 13 percent, and since 1989 he lost another 6 percent. For women workers at the 10th percentile, the decline over the 1980s was 18 percent. The low-wage female worker gained slightly since 1989, but by 1995, her hourly wage rate was $4.84, down from $5.82 in 1979 (all dollars are in 1995 inflation-adjusted terms).

Myth: A Huge Chunk of My Tax Dollars Supports Welfare Recipients

Fact: Welfare Costs 1 Percent of the Federal Budget

Widespread misperception about the extent of welfare exacerbate the problems of poverty. The actual cost of welfare programs-about 1 percent of the federal budget and 2 percent of state budgets (McLaughlin, 1997)-is proportionally less than generally believed. During the 104th Congress, more than 93 percent of the budget reductions in welfare entitlements came from programs for low-income people (Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 1996). Ironically, middle-class and wealthy Americans also receive "welfare" in the form of tax deductions for home mortgages, corporate and farm subsidies, capital gains tax limits, Social Security, Medicare, and a multitude of other tax benefits. Yet these types of assistance carry no stigma and are rarely considered "welfare" (Goodgame, 1993). Anti-welfare sentiment appears to be related to attitudes about class and widely shared and socially sanctioned stereotypes about the poor. Racism also fuels negative attitudes toward welfare programs (Quadagno, 1994).

Myth: People on Welfare Become Permanently Dependent on the Support

Fact: Movement off Welfare Rolls Is Frequent

A prevalent welfare myth is that women who received AFDC became permanently dependent on public assistance. Analyses indicate that 56 percent of AFDC support ended within 12 months, 70 percent within 24 months, and almost 85 percent within 4 years (Staff of House Committee on Ways and Means, 1996). These exit rates clearly contradict the widespread myth that AFDC recipients wanted to remain on public assistance or that welfare dependency was permanent. Unfortunately, return rates were also high, with 45 percent of ex-recipients returning to AFDC within 1 year. Persons who were likely to use AFDC longer than the average time had less than 12 years of education, no recent work experience, were never married, had a child below age 3 or had three or more children, were Latina or African American, and were under age 24 (Staff of House Committee on Ways and Means, 1996). These risk factors illustrate the importance of structural barriers, such as inadequate child care, racism, and lack of education.

Myth: Most Welfare Recipients Are African American Women

Fact: Most Welfare Recipients Are Children-Most Women on Welfare Are White

Children, not women, are the largest group of people receiving public assistance. Less than 5 million of the 14 million public assistance recipients are adults, and 90 percent of those adults are women (U.S. Bureau of Census, 1995). The majority of the recipients are White (38 percent), followed by 37 percent African Americans, and 25 percent other minority groups (Latinos, Native Americans, and Asian Americans) (McLaughlin, 1997). However, African Americans are disproportionately represented on public assistance because they are only 12 percent of the population (O'Hare, Pollard, Mann, & Kent, 1991).

Myth: Welfare Encourages Out-of- Wedlock Births and Large Families

Fact: The Average Welfare Family Is No Bigger Than the Average Nonwelfare Family

The belief that single women are promiscuous and have large families to receive increased benefits has no basis in extant research, and single-parent families are not only a phenomenon of the poor (McFate, 1995). In fact, the average family size of welfare recipients has decreased from four in 1969 to 2.8 in 1994 (Staff of House Committee on Ways and Means, 1996). In 1994, 43 percent of welfare families consisted of one child, and 30 percent consisted of two children. Thus, the average welfare family is no larger than the average nonrecipient's family, and despite considerable public concern that welfare encourages out-of-wedlock births, a growing body of empirical evidence indicates that welfare benefits are not a significant incentive for childbearing (Wilcox, Robbennolt, O'Keeffe, & Pynchon, 1997).

Myth: Welfare Families Use Their Benefits to Fund Extravagance

Fact: Welfare Families Live Far Below the Poverty Line

The belief that welfare provides a disincentive to work by providing a well-paying "free ride" that enables recipients, stereotyped as "Cadillac queens," to purchase extravagant items with their benefits is another myth. In reality, recipients live considerably below the poverty threshold. Despite increased program spending, the average monthly family benefit, measured in 1995 dollars, fell from $713 in 1970 to $377 in 1995, a 47 percent drop. In 26 states, AFDC benefits alone fell 64 percent short of the 1996 poverty guidelines, and the addition of food stamps only reduced this gap to 35 percent (Staff of House Committee on Ways and Means, 1996).

Last edited by LoveMiiorHateMii; 08-11-2008 at 12:19 PM.. Reason: found something interesting to point out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-11-2008, 12:11 PM
 
Location: Boise
2,008 posts, read 3,327,483 times
Reputation: 735
Bout time someone made some sense of all this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2008, 12:15 PM
 
Location: Philly, Philly
932 posts, read 1,677,712 times
Reputation: 332
Quote:
Originally Posted by cleatis View Post
Bout time someone made some sense of all this.
Thanks cleatis. It is getting out of hand these days for people not to know what they are talking about...just what they see on tv. TV is not reality people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2008, 12:16 PM
 
3,150 posts, read 8,718,851 times
Reputation: 897
I must not talk or hang out with real people... they must all be mythical.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2008, 12:17 PM
 
Location: Stanwood, Washington
658 posts, read 831,291 times
Reputation: 172
Thank you for your version of the facts, but not factual. Try posting numbers from the states you claim only give 2% to welfare. Start with California!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2008, 12:19 PM
 
3,150 posts, read 8,718,851 times
Reputation: 897
Quote:
Originally Posted by LoveMiiorHateMii View Post
Thanks cleatis. It is getting out of hand these days for people not to know what they are talking about...just what they see on tv. TV is not reality people.
Hmmm... I don't need a TV to make my conclusions... I frequent tax-payers apartments that my friends live in... again of course if they are indeed real humans and not mythical.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2008, 12:20 PM
 
Location: Pennsylvania, USA
5,224 posts, read 5,013,113 times
Reputation: 908
excellent information.. thank you
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2008, 12:22 PM
 
3,150 posts, read 8,718,851 times
Reputation: 897
Quote:
Originally Posted by TristansMommy View Post
excellent information.. thank you
Take it with a grain of salt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2008, 12:22 PM
 
Location: Philly, Philly
932 posts, read 1,677,712 times
Reputation: 332
No not my version but the APA's. It takes someone who is intelligent enough to come back with some facts that say what I have posted is not correct. When either one of you do so then we can have a debate, but feelings are not facts. Sorry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-11-2008, 12:24 PM
 
Location: Philly, Philly
932 posts, read 1,677,712 times
Reputation: 332
Quote:
Originally Posted by JTraik View Post
Hmmm... I don't need a TV to make my conclusions... I frequent tax-payers apartments that my friends live in... again of course if they are indeed real humans and not mythical.
Ok and...how does that make you an expert again? Please explain. Just because your friends live like that does not mean that all of welfare recipients do. In fact some welfare recipents are elderly so really what does that make them?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top