Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > South Dakota
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-13-2008, 09:38 AM
 
464 posts, read 1,358,550 times
Reputation: 175

Advertisements

Not sure if this is too controversial to discuss on here. If so, our buddy can delete it.
But what do you think about #11? Are you voting Yes or No?
I'm voting no. I just can't accept the Government getting more and more control in this "free" country. I wouldn't have one myself, but I think it should be a decision between the woman, her family, or her doctor. Not Government officials.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-13-2008, 10:37 AM
 
Location: Twin Cities, Minnesota
3,941 posts, read 14,746,029 times
Reputation: 2287
I consider myself a pretty open person and I don't include religion in politics, but I am going to vote YES. I think abortion is murder, I also think the death penalty is murder (we've discussed this before), and I believe gay marriage should be allowed by the state and if a Church won't allow it that is up to them and their doctrine and it must be respected.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2008, 10:58 AM
 
464 posts, read 1,358,550 times
Reputation: 175
I agree on gay marriage. I think if a couple wants to get married, they should be able to do so at the courthouse, or by anyone that doesn't find it religiously wrong. It is a contract, it should be considered a legal binding contract. Not all marriage happens, to be recognized by they eyes of God.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2008, 11:30 AM
 
56 posts, read 151,485 times
Reputation: 80
A friend of mine had a really good point: No matter what side you're on (he said) we're probably the closest to truly taking the state's temperature on how it feels about abortion, as a whole.

I guess, if you do enough initiatives, you get it "right" eventually.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2008, 12:54 PM
 
955 posts, read 3,655,119 times
Reputation: 638
No
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2008, 02:19 PM
 
Location: Alamogordo, NM
259 posts, read 852,785 times
Reputation: 263
Abortion should not be used as a form of birth control.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2008, 04:05 PM
 
Location: So. Dak.
13,495 posts, read 37,519,062 times
Reputation: 15205
I dunno. I'm still thinking about it. Wasn't it four years ago that we voted on it? The national news did say that the country would be watching to see how this vote turns out.

Where I'm torn is that I have NO idea when life actually starts. Maybe at conception, maybe not. I honestly don't know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2008, 04:19 PM
 
27,955 posts, read 39,914,964 times
Reputation: 26197
We voted on this two years ago. It was a close margin that time. The way it was written 2 years ago allowed for no exceptions.

This time around it allows for exceptions.

Personally I think abortion is murder.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2008, 04:34 PM
 
Location: South Dakota
733 posts, read 4,662,289 times
Reputation: 721
No on 11. Read the measure and see if the exceptions REALLY are exceptions. In the larger context, I'd vote no even if the exceptions were not as draconian as they appear. The decision is uniquely individual and between a woman, a man, and their personal religious beliefs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2008, 05:52 PM
 
2,398 posts, read 5,421,995 times
Reputation: 1562
I'll be voting No on 11. Just my opinion/belief...each to their own.

Even if this did pass, it faces the Supreme Court and multiple hurdles... Plus a lot of court costs and such.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > South Dakota
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:18 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top