Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-20-2011, 01:55 PM
 
Location: NYC
7,301 posts, read 13,521,960 times
Reputation: 3714

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by A2DAC1985 View Post
GIVEN THAT:

Every single person in the city moves to a suburban area/lifestyle

OR

Every single person in the suburbs moves into a city;


Which scenario would be the most sustainable and beneficial to everyone?.
This is the OP.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-20-2011, 01:56 PM
 
Location: Philaburbia
41,967 posts, read 75,229,826 times
Reputation: 66939
Quote:
Originally Posted by HandsUpThumbsDown View Post
This is the OP.
You mean we don't get to use our imagination after all?

Dang ...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2011, 02:06 PM
 
Location: NYC
7,301 posts, read 13,521,960 times
Reputation: 3714
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohiogirl81 View Post
You mean we don't get to use our imagination after all?

Dang ...
Actually this thread has turned out to be quite imaginitive.

The idea of holsteins and heifers plummeting from the "range" atop soviet-style fishtank towers onto dense, walkable streets without any auto traffic is one of the most entertaining ideas we've ever come up with in this forum.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2011, 02:10 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,810,305 times
Reputation: 35920
You know, something I noticed when HUTD bolded it; this proposal is just for single people. If you're married, you're exempt! What about kids? Divorcess? Widows and widowers?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2011, 02:15 PM
 
8,673 posts, read 17,289,625 times
Reputation: 4685
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ohiogirl81 View Post
Or, you could look at any small town that was settled and developed before World War II, and the answer is ... not always. I've lived in a half dozen small Midwestern towns -- that's what being a newspaper reporter will do to you over the years -- and none had public transit, except maybe one or two taxis. Why would they? You can walk from one end of town to the other in less than =30 minutes.

The downtowns did indeed have mixed-use buildings. I can think of only one that had an honest-to-goodness town square, and that was in northeastern Ohio, whose small towns are very New England-y. Otherwise, the parks were all tucked away in residential neighborhoods, or on the outskirts of downtown.

Walkable neighborhoods, yes, but strictly residential, with an occasional pocket of neighborhood businesses in the larger towns, usually along the main drag.

Even in the 19th century people wanted their living and commercial areas to be separate.
A walkable, self-contained neighborhood doesn't need public transit to cross--any more than it needs automobiles to cross. Both are redundant on the strictly neighborhood scale of a few blocks--walking distance. Transit systems are used to get to other neighborhoods--or other cities--like steam railroads, interurbans, streetcars, and yes, bus systems using roads built for cars and trucks.

And were those decisions about residential vs. commercial location based on some desire to separate uses, or out of a desire to consolidate retail locations on the common town square, which was typically the heart of the town's transportation network? Again, most of my experience is with western towns, but generally the train station became the de facto center of town--if a town existed before the train arrived, the train either went downtown or the new train station moved downtown to its proximity.

Were these "strictly residential" neighborhoods always so? Traditional neighborhoods had corner stores on every block, generally with the owners living in adjacent or upstairs quarters. Often these corner stores have been demolished and replaced with newer buildings, or their former retail identity has been masked or supplanted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2011, 02:22 PM
 
Location: NYC
7,301 posts, read 13,521,960 times
Reputation: 3714
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
You know, something I noticed when HUTD bolded it; this proposal is just for single people. If you're married, you're exempt! What about kids? Divorcess? Widows and widowers?
it's ok because we all know that from reading this forum that cities are only for single people and suburbs are for everyone else.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2011, 02:27 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,810,305 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by HandsUpThumbsDown View Post
it's ok because we all know that from reading this forum that cities are only for single people and suburbs are for everyone else.
True, but. . . WHAT ABOUT THE KIDS?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2011, 02:28 PM
 
Location: NYC
7,301 posts, read 13,521,960 times
Reputation: 3714
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
True, but. . . WHAT ABOUT THE KIDS?
We can't have kids roaming the streets if there are heifers and cultivated tunas falling from the sky!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2011, 02:32 PM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,810,305 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by wburg View Post
A walkable, self-contained neighborhood doesn't need public transit to cross--any more than it needs automobiles to cross. Both are redundant on the strictly neighborhood scale of a few blocks--walking distance. Transit systems are used to get to other neighborhoods--or other cities--like steam railroads, interurbans, streetcars, and yes, bus systems using roads built for cars and trucks.

And were those decisions about residential vs. commercial location based on some desire to separate uses, or out of a desire to consolidate retail locations on the common town square, which was typically the heart of the town's transportation network? Again, most of my experience is with western towns, but generally the train station became the de facto center of town--if a town existed before the train arrived, the train either went downtown or the new train station moved downtown to its proximity.

Were these "strictly residential" neighborhoods always so? Traditional neighborhoods had corner stores on every block, generally with the owners living in adjacent or upstairs quarters. Often these corner stores have been demolished and replaced with newer buildings, or their former retail identity has been masked or supplanted.
These "town square" type towns, such as New England and NE Ohio farm towns, are not the only small town model. Some have a main drag along a highway, and not much else commercial. Some have a "Main Street" with perhaps a grocery store, a hardware store, and a coffee shop and not much else. I have lived in and traveled through many an Illiniois farm town set up in these ways. Often, the grain elevator was the "main event" in town. People went into a larger city, e.g. Champaign, Danville, Decatur, etc for doctors, clothing, and many other needs. Sometimes, there are a bunch of little towns in a general area, and, as in my experience in the mill towns of Pennsylvania, one or two might have a nice shopping area; the others, not so much.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-20-2011, 02:33 PM
 
Location: Philaburbia
41,967 posts, read 75,229,826 times
Reputation: 66939
Quote:
Originally Posted by HandsUpThumbsDown View Post
The idea of holsteins and heifers plummeting from the "range" atop soviet-style fishtank towers onto dense, walkable streets without any auto traffic is one of the most entertaining ideas we've ever come up with in this forum.
It sounds even better when you put it all in one sentence! But you forgot the high rise structures for the amber waves of grain. Parking garages for your Wheaties, if you will.

Wow, think of the energy expenditures. We better have a whole lotta city dwellers ferried out to the nuke plants.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top