Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-08-2012, 01:42 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
10,078 posts, read 15,865,506 times
Reputation: 4049

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by kidphilly View Post
Would agree Baltimore is definately urban, some others are Detroit, Pittsburgh, Cleveland etc.
Agreed.

The seven I wrote were just the most urban in my opinion and in my experiences.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-08-2012, 02:36 PM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,114 posts, read 34,747,185 times
Reputation: 15093
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDAllstar View Post
How come nobody considers Baltimore urban? Does decay or under investment in the form of retail etc. take away from urbanity? I would think it takes away from amenities but Baltimore is still one of the densest built cities in the nation at least when it comes to the built environment. It's an interesting subject because I never see anybody list it on these kind of lists. I have often wondered why.
Who says it's not urban? I think it's often overlooked because it doesn't offer the things some people want (coffeshops, yogurt shops, cupcake shops, Asian fusion restaurants and lotsa lotsa bars!!!).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2012, 02:37 PM
 
422 posts, read 816,438 times
Reputation: 301
This is the type of thread that if your city wasn't mentioned (e.g. baltimore, cleveland, detroit, seattle, etc), you should send pics and battle it out. We are all visual. Some of us actually haven't been to the next tier of urban places. Pictures would justify reasoning that they should be included in the discussion. I agree with the Top 7:

NY, Chicago, LA, Philadelphia, SF, Boston and DC
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2012, 02:38 PM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,114 posts, read 34,747,185 times
Reputation: 15093
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slyman11 View Post
Because its small. Cant speak for anyone else but its more impressive when 'urban' cities hold their form for a vast area, having a huge population is just that much better.
But it's larger than DC, San Francisco and Boston.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2012, 02:46 PM
 
Location: Cumberland County, NJ
8,632 posts, read 13,006,897 times
Reputation: 5766
My List in order:

1. New York City
2. Philadelphia
3. Boston
4. Baltimore
5. San Francisco
6. Chicago
7. Washington DC
8. Los Angeles
9. Cleveland
10. Pittsburgh
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2012, 03:34 PM
 
Location: Pasadena, CA
10,078 posts, read 15,865,506 times
Reputation: 4049
Quote:
Originally Posted by BajanYankee View Post
But it's larger than DC, San Francisco and Boston.
Honestly the only reason I didn't put it in is because I have never been there. It's probably just about as urban as Boston and DC - maybe being so close to DC knocks it down a peg in my mind

Just saw Gwilly's list, I agree with the cities on there, but definitely not the order. Baltimore #4? Boston #3? Chicago #6?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2012, 03:46 PM
 
Location: Center City
7,529 posts, read 10,265,606 times
Reputation: 11023
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dream Chaser View Post
What are the US most urban cities.
Here is the definition of urban:

ur·ban adjective
1. of, pertaining to, or designating a city or town
2. living in a city
3. characteristic of or accustomed to cities

Urban | Define Urban at Dictionary.com

Given that, please tell me which cities are not urban.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2012, 03:55 PM
 
Location: Crooklyn, New York
32,114 posts, read 34,747,185 times
Reputation: 15093
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slyman11 View Post
Yes the population of the cities are similar but their construct is different. Baltimore has about 25 more miles of land area than the district does. Plus when you factor in the former areas of DC proper like Arlington and Alexandria it would put DC at 100 miles and a population of 1 million. These areas formerly were apart of the district but were taken back by Virginia at a time when DC was seeing its worst days. Their areas are different sizes Baltimore is about 3 million to DC's 6 million in similar land area although these days its hard to define which areas each city has an influence on.
Both DC and Baltimore are largely rowhouse cities (their denser neighborhoods anyway). Baltimore, as the larger city, has more of them. And if you add Arlington and Alexandria into the mix, DC technically becomes less urban, not more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2012, 04:04 PM
 
Location: Cumberland County, NJ
8,632 posts, read 13,006,897 times
Reputation: 5766
Quote:
Originally Posted by munchitup View Post
Just saw Gwilly's list, I agree with the cities on there, but definitely not the order. Baltimore #4? Boston #3? Chicago #6?
I know I was going to take some heat for putting Baltimore that high on the list but I think its right up there with Boston and Philly and I do feel that one can make a strong case that Baltimore can be more urban than Chicago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-08-2012, 04:14 PM
 
Location: London, U.K.
886 posts, read 1,564,909 times
Reputation: 828
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwillyfromphilly View Post
I know I was going to take some heat for putting Baltimore that high on the list but I think its right up there with Boston and Philly and I do feel that one can make a strong case that Baltimore can be more urban than Chicago.
Have you ever been to Chicago?

Serious question. LOL because if you have then you wouldn't be arguing Baltimore above Chicago

I agree with munchitup those are the 5 most urban cities once you remove D.C. and LA. D.C. isn't there yet and LA feels very suburban imo

Last edited by BLAXTOR; 05-08-2012 at 04:36 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top