Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-28-2020, 05:52 PM
 
Location: Østenfor sol og vestenfor måne
17,916 posts, read 24,376,919 times
Reputation: 39038

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by columbusboy8 View Post
If you have a problem with "white collar," you must be a Democrat. Just like many blacks don't like blacks who can afford "white collar" houses! Those blacks are often deemed to be "too white" by fellow, less successful, blacks.

I believe this because columbusboy8 is widely known as an authority on what Blacks think.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-29-2020, 05:16 AM
 
8,302 posts, read 5,715,625 times
Reputation: 7557
Quote:
Originally Posted by ABQConvict View Post
I believe this because columbusboy8 is widely known as an authority on what Blacks think.
They must have deleted that post right after you quoted them, because I can no longer see it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2020, 01:58 AM
 
808 posts, read 543,518 times
Reputation: 2291
Quote:
Originally Posted by NOLA101 View Post
The new housing makes overall housing more affordable by adding to the supply and decreasing demand on the existing housing.
Only if the new housing is not replacing the older housing. Tearing down a duplex with two $1200/mo 2-bedroom units and replacing them with 8 $2500/mo 1-bedroom units does nothing to lowing housing costs.


You need to replace a 10 unit 3-story apartment buiding with $2000/mo rents with a 20-story, 200 unit buiding. That keeps the low-cost housing intact, while increasing the stock of new housing.


Or, put 10-story apartment buidlings on top of shopping malls, near transit centers.


No, the reason they are tearing down the low-cost housing is because trillions of dollars of American real estate was purchased by these billionaire and sovereign wealth funds after the 2008 debacle (and now the small, independent commercial properties, as well) and they want to maximize their return. They have enough political clout and campaign donation money to make sure the planning departments go along with their greedy plans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-24-2020, 01:13 PM
 
Location: Grosse Ile Michigan
30,708 posts, read 79,857,385 times
Reputation: 39453
Profit. A high end house costs only a little more to build but sells for a lot more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2020, 09:41 AM
 
Location: Youngstown, Oh.
5,510 posts, read 9,501,346 times
Reputation: 5627
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldjensens View Post
Profit. A high end house costs only a little more to build but sells for a lot more.
This reminds me of the last house my grandma lived in. It was a cute little one-bedroom house built in the early 50s. It seemed to have about the same level of quality as my aunt and uncle's 3 bedroom ranch that was built in 1953.

I think there is an underserved segment of the new house market today. It seems that, if you want to buy/build a new house today, your choices are to buy something over 2000 s.f., buy a manufactured home (a.k.a. house trailer), or buy one of those "tiny houses."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-25-2020, 04:04 PM
 
Location: Beautiful Rhode Island
9,300 posts, read 14,919,650 times
Reputation: 10394
Quote:
Originally Posted by iLoveFashion View Post
If more dense housing is supposed to be built to lower prices than why are builders only building for the higher up folks?


I figured this would be mainly a NYC thing but it’s a trend across the nation.
There's no profit in dense low priced housing- that's why the gov't has to subsidize it.

Also because most people across the US want their own house (outside of those who like apts in crowded cities).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2020, 04:29 AM
 
Location: The Triad
34,098 posts, read 83,032,310 times
Reputation: 43671
Quote:
Originally Posted by iLoveFashion View Post
...why are builders only building for the higher up folks?
Because "white collar" earns enough to pay enough to make it all work
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2020, 06:46 AM
 
5,183 posts, read 3,100,236 times
Reputation: 11059
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrRational View Post
Because "white collar" earns enough to pay enough to make it all work
Exactly, the new white collar buyers are typically government (local/state/fed) “servants” with family earnings in the six figures. This pandemic has had little affect on them in terms of income or access to credit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2020, 08:27 AM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,585 posts, read 81,279,384 times
Reputation: 57826
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimAZ View Post
Exactly, the new white collar buyers are typically government (local/state/fed) “servants” with family earnings in the six figures. This pandemic has had little affect on them in terms of income or access to credit.
That's true, and also, the pandemic has more people wanting to get out of the crowded apartments and into a house, or at least a townhome. This means even less motivation for builders to consider lower income housing. The good news for the renter is that big city apartment rent will start to come down, with so many future vacancies as people leave for the suburbs (already happening in San Francisco).


https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/...1-15644663.php
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-27-2020, 08:41 AM
 
Location: The Triad
34,098 posts, read 83,032,310 times
Reputation: 43671
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimAZ View Post
...the new white collar buyers are typically government (local/state/fed) “servants”
with family earnings in the six figures.
While I'm sure these people ALSO exist within the group... it's hardly limited to public employees.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top