Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-30-2023, 06:01 PM
 
13,005 posts, read 18,896,239 times
Reputation: 9251

Advertisements

These days more airports have rail transit connections. Mostly rapid transit, but some light or commuter rail. I have noticed most riders are airport employees or frequent flying business travelers. Probably vacationers have too much baggage and, having splurged on a trip, don't mind doing so on getting to the airport. Another thing is that many transit agencies have higher fares at the airport stations. Perhaps they know that many who board there are from out of town, so they will get milked! Your thoughts?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-30-2023, 07:04 PM
 
Location: Seattle WA, USA
5,699 posts, read 4,920,492 times
Reputation: 4942
I don’t know how to measure who exactly is using the airport rail station, but your assessment sounds about right. But just for the fun of it, I looked up how Link light rail SeaTac station yearly boardings compared to the number of passengers in the airport and got the following;

SeaTac Airport (2022): 45,964,321
SeaTac Station (2022): 1,668,901

So that’s a ratio of 3.63%

* SEA generates more than 151,400 jobs (87,300 direct jobs), so there is like 10 times as many boardings as there are people employed by the airport, so it’s definitely not just employees riding the light rail.

I wonder which city has the best ratio? Hubs will probably be lower down the list since many of the people are only using the airport for a connecting flight.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2023, 07:49 AM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,551 posts, read 81,085,957 times
Reputation: 57744
The problem with the light rail to Seatac is that it's very limited in reach. Unless one lives along the north/south route between Northgate in Seattle and Angle Lake just south of the airport, it requires driving or a bus to the nearest station along that route. The biggest percentage of travelers through Seatac are from the eastside, where light rail is still years away except for Bellevue and Redmond, possibly opening next year. If you have ever tried to park at the airport, or even at one of the off-site parking companies with shuttles, it's pretty obvious that most people drive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-31-2023, 12:20 PM
 
Location: Seattle WA, USA
5,699 posts, read 4,920,492 times
Reputation: 4942
Quote:
Originally Posted by grega94 View Post
I don’t know how to measure who exactly is using the airport rail station, but your assessment sounds about right. But just for the fun of it, I looked up how Link light rail SeaTac station yearly boardings compared to the number of passengers in the airport and got the following;

SeaTac Airport (2022): 45,964,321
SeaTac Station (2022): 1,668,901

So that’s a ratio of 3.63%

* SEA generates more than 151,400 jobs (87,300 direct jobs), so there is like 10 times as many boardings as there are people employed by the airport, so it’s definitely not just employees riding the light rail.

I wonder which city has the best ratio? Hubs will probably be lower down the list since many of the people are only using the airport for a connecting flight.
Oh wait I just realized that I didn’t account for unique trips for the employees for the whole year, if I multiply 87,300 by 260 work days and then by another 2 for trip back home, that’s 45,396,000, so that’s still like 3% of the work force.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2023, 05:01 AM
 
446 posts, read 249,417 times
Reputation: 277
Quote:
Originally Posted by pvande55 View Post
[M]any transit agencies have higher fares at the airport stations. Perhaps they know that many who board there are from out of town, so they will get milked! Your thoughts?
Here's one of mine. Are the higher fares aimed at keeping the riffraff out of airports as well (or instead)?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2023, 03:43 AM
 
13,005 posts, read 18,896,239 times
Reputation: 9251
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boothwynman View Post
Here's one of mine. Are the higher fares aimed at keeping the riffraff out of airports as well (or instead)?
Possible. I never thought of that one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2023, 08:30 AM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,551 posts, read 81,085,957 times
Reputation: 57744
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boothwynman View Post
Here's one of mine. Are the higher fares aimed at keeping the riffraff out of airports as well (or instead)?
That wouldn't help in Seattle, where there has not been any fare enforcement. Even people with the Orca card don't bother tapping it, they just get on and ride free. Currently only 55% of riders pay. Supposedly, next week they are going to start enforcing it. . .we'll see if that happens.


https://www.redfin.com/HI/Pahoa/12-1...home/188439348

https://www.theurbanist.org/2023/11/...g-november-15/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-09-2023, 01:37 PM
 
Location: Land of the Free
6,709 posts, read 6,711,443 times
Reputation: 7552
Problem is time. It takes 35-45 mins for the journey plus wait time plus walking time to/from station when going downtown. I almost always Uber after landing at SeaTac.

In Phoenix I use the airtrain to get to a light rail station, and then Waymo from there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2023, 12:46 PM
 
Location: Germantown, Philadelphia
14,147 posts, read 9,038,713 times
Reputation: 10491
Quote:
Originally Posted by pvande55 View Post
These days more airports have rail transit connections. Mostly rapid transit, but some light or commuter rail. I have noticed most riders are airport employees or frequent flying business travelers. Probably vacationers have too much baggage and, having splurged on a trip, don't mind doing so on getting to the airport. Another thing is that many transit agencies have higher fares at the airport stations. Perhaps they know that many who board there are from out of town, so they will get milked! Your thoughts?
Philadelphia is one of the cities where airport service is provided by regional rail trains. (The same company that built Philly's newest Regional Rail car fleet also built the cars that run on Denver's A-Line regional rail line to Denver International Airport.)

And the Regional Rail fares to PHL are priced to soak the visitors. Regional Rail fares increase with distance traveled from Center City; there are four fare zones plus the Center City zone. The airport stations would otherwise lie in the first fare zone — it's at the southern tip of the city proper — but Airport Line riders pay Zone 4 fares to get to the airport from Center City.

Whenever I've ridden it, it seems to carry a mix of airline personnel and single individuals or twosomes carrying a carry-on bag, a single suitcase or a suitcase and a carry-on. I'm also speculating that most of these actual travelers live in this area and are either starting or ending their trip elsewhere. I strongly suspect that the out-of-towners either are being picked up by friends or relatives or will catch a cab or an Uber into the city. But maybe some of them do take the train, which runs at 30-minute headways throughout the service day. The trip from the airport takes 15 minutes to reach 30th Street Station, 20 to reach Suburban, and 25 to reach Jefferson Station.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-11-2023, 01:52 PM
 
Location: Was Midvalley Oregon; Now Eastside Seattle area
13,060 posts, read 7,493,946 times
Reputation: 9787
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemlock140 View Post
The problem with the light rail to Seatac is that it's very limited in reach. Unless one lives along the north/south route between Northgate in Seattle and Angle Lake just south of the airport, it requires driving or a bus to the nearest station along that route. The biggest percentage of travelers through Seatac are from the eastside, where light rail is still years away except for Bellevue and Redmond, possibly opening next year. If you have ever tried to park at the airport, or even at one of the off-site parking companies with shuttles, it's pretty obvious that most people drive.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemlock140 View Post
That wouldn't help in Seattle, where there has not been any fare enforcement. Even people with the Orca card don't bother tapping it, they just get on and ride free. Currently only 55% of riders pay. Supposedly, next week they are going to start enforcing it. . .we'll see if that happens.


https://www.redfin.com/HI/Pahoa/12-1...home/188439348

https://www.theurbanist.org/2023/11/...g-november-15/
SeaTac is at one end of long haul flights: to Europe, to Asia, to USA's East Coast. This means that many flights leave/arrive early AM or late PM where public transportation may not be as attractive.

Tapping on/off LINK. We often forget to do so because we do a bus/LINK combination where we will always tap in on a bus as part of the trip. Tapping in on LINK from a bus is a way that Soundtransit can track our allowed travel time (2.5 hours/fare), but get no further fare from us.

Living in Redmond's Flats, gives us the multiple opportunities to do an Express (ST545, ST542) bus to a LINK station.

Not sure how the LINK at Redmond will affect us. Slated time get from Redmond to ID is 40minutes + 40 minutes from ID to SEATAC. Current time on 545x to ID is 40-50 minutes dependent on downtown traffic. A slight time savings is using 542x Redmond to Huskey Statium Link to SEATAC, however the 542x doesn't run often on weekends, evenings, and weekdays' non peak hours.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Urban Planning

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top