Bear Lakes Middle School in West Palm Beach, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 18.

3505 SHENANDOAH BLVD
West Palm Beach, FL 33409

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Bak Middle Of The Arts School (1.7 miles):

94
Highridge Family Center School (2.5 miles):

63
Village Academy On The Art & Sara Jo Kobacker Campus School (19.3 miles):

55
S. D. Spady Elementary School (18.5 miles):

46
Watson B. Duncan Middle School (7.9 miles):

36
Carver Middle School (19.0 miles):

27
Lake Worth Community Middle School (7.4 miles):

19
Bear Lakes Middle School:

18
Bear Lakes Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Palm Beach County:

45
West Palm Beach:

47
Bear Lakes Middle School:

18

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (561) 615-7700 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 50
School number: 1981
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: PALM BEACH
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (561) 615-7756
Principal: Anthony Lockhart
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 23
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 88
Senate District: 25
School Web Address: www.edline.net/pages/Bear_Lakes_Middle_School

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

52%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

52%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

92%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

27%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

73%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

69%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

75%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

505
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: B

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

84%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

76%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 4

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 826 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 827 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 305
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 743
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 702

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 743
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 702
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 198 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 198 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 64
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 185
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 180

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 184
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 180
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 219 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 219 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 79
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 202
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 193

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 202
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 192
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 360 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 361 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 151
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 312
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 289

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 313
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 290
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 692 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 693 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 254
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 622
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 588

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 622
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 588
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 141 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 141 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 114

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 115
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 114
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 109 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 110 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 49
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 97
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 97
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

48%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

45%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

98%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

20%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

62%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

68%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

69%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

469
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

77%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

74%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1130 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1127 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 357
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1013
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 935

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1012
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 931
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 293 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 293 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 107
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 273
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 254

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 272
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 250
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 311 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 310 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 111
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 274
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 249

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 274
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 249
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 471 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 469 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 127
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 415
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 388

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 415
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 387
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 872 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 871 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 272
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 784
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 729

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 784
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 727
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 186 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 186 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 153
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 147

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 154
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 147
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 153 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 151 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 55
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 112

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 128
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 112
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

47%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

46%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

96%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

20%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

72%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

70%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

476
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

79%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

76%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1158 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1156 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 309
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1035
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 947

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1036
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 946
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 281 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 281 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 72
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 261
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 241

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 262
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 241
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 317 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 316 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 83
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 274
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 236

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 274
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 237
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 517 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 516 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 143
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 465
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 436

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 465
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 435
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 909 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 907 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 240
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 819
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 744

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 820
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 744
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 191 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 190 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 167
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 147

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 167
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 146
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 161 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 161 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 142
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 122

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 141
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 122
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

44%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

46%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

85%
State average from 539 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

26%
State average from 538 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

57%
State average from 539 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 539 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

73%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

70%
State average from 539 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

466
State average from 539 schools:

523
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 539 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

75%
State average from 541 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

90%
State average from 542 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 841 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 841 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 258
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 758
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 760
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 78 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 78 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 562 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 562 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 173
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 515
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 519
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 142 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 142 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 128
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 636 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 636 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 177
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 576
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 577
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 104 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 104 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 140 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 140 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 124
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 124
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

43%
State average from 526 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

44%
State average from 526 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

84%
State average from 526 schools:

89%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 526 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 526 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

77%
State average from 526 schools:

72%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

383
State average from 526 schools:

425
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 526 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

69%
State average from 525 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

90%
State average from 526 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 957 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 957 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 325
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 873
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 872
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 92 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 92 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 28

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 87

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 87
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 652 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 652 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 239
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 606
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 606
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 163 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 163 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 46
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 137
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 136
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 674 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 674 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 196
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 605
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 604
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 112 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 112 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 27

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 103
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 102
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 182 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 182 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 58
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 160
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 159
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

38%
State average from 505 schools:

59%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

50%
State average from 505 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

74%
State average from 506 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

56%
State average from 505 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 505 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

68%
State average from 505 schools:

66%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

354
State average from 506 schools:

397
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 506 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

73%
State average from 506 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

86%
State average from 506 schools:

50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1663
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

23%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

19%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

58%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1729
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

25%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

18%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

52%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1784
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

31%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

32%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

7%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

37%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

39%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

36%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

20%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

2%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

24%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

7
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1666
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

25%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

27%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

16%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

48%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1742
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

29%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

12%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

47%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1819
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

26%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

30%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

33%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

10%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

45%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1582
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1675
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1778
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

266
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1579
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1701
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1824
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 399
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 94%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1565
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1647
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

286
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1778
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1564
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1715
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1819
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

384
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

657
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

50
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

426
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

667
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

54
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

351
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

675
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

53
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 340
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

282
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 44%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 88%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1515
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1514
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1441
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 74

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1699
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 84%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1713
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1591
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 122

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1740
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

279
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1738
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1639
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 99

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

268
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1528
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 83%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1531
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1512
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 19

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1763
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 84%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1774
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1595
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 179

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1814
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1814
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1710
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 104

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 304
Mean Scale Score
Here:

653
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 47
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 240
Mean Scale Score
Here:

666
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 53
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 264
Mean Scale Score
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

672
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 50
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 305
Mean Scale Score
Here:

650
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 46
Number Sense (max 10): 5
Operations (max 12): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 240
Mean Scale Score
Here:

683
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 67
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 263
Mean Scale Score
BEAR LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:

690
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 63
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 265
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

245
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 17%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 77%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 57%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. West Palm Beach, FL
  5. Bear Lakes Middle School in West Palm Beach, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.