Carver Middle School in Delray Beach, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 27.

101 BARWICK RD
Delray Beach, FL 33445

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

Bak Middle Of The Arts School (20.0 miles):	94
Odyssey Middle School (4.1 miles):	65
Jeaga Middle School (19.0 miles):	52
Tradewinds Middle School (9.9 miles):	40
Pompano Charter Middle School (13.1 miles):	31
Carver Middle School:	27
Indian Ridge School (9.9 miles):	23
Indian Ridge School (17.3 miles):	8

Carver Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
Palm Beach County:	45
Delray Beach:	40
Carver Middle School:	27

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (561) 638-2100 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 50
School number: 2041
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: PALM BEACH
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (561) 638-2181
Principal: Lena Roundtree
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 19
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 86
Senate District: 30
School Web Address: www.edline.net/pages/Carver_Middle_School

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	60%
State average from 613 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	60%
State average from 612 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	91%
State average from 613 schools:	88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	35%
State average from 612 schools:	51%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	62%
State average from 613 schools:	64%

Making Math Gains

Here:	68%
State average from 612 schools:	70%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	60%
State average from 613 schools:	62%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	70%
State average from 613 schools:	68%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	506
State average from 613 schools:	545

Percent Tested

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	100%
State average from 613 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: B

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	72%
State average from 614 schools:	56%

Minority Rate

Here:	87%
State average from 614 schools:	49%

Region: 5

Title I: YES

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 942 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 940 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 308
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	52%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 879
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 852

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	53%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 877
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 848
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 127 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 127 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 49
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 110

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 110
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 641 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 639 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 196
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	43%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 599
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 587

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	42%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 597
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 583
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 113 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 113 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	55%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 105

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 105
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 676 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 674 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 212
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	45%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 625
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 611

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	46%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 623
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 609
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 195 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 194 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	24%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 170
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 168

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	25%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 169
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 163
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 142 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 142 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 51
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	17%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 137
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 132

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	18%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 136
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 132
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	57%
State average from 613 schools:	70%

Meeting High Standards in Math

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	57%
State average from 613 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	94%
State average from 613 schools:	92%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	40%
State average from 613 schools:	49%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	63%
State average from 613 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	67%
State average from 613 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	74%
State average from 613 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	71%
State average from 613 schools:	67%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	523
State average from 613 schools:	553

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 613 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: B

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	70%
State average from 613 schools:	52%

Minority Rate

Here:	88%
State average from 613 schools:	48%

Region: 5

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 911 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 913 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 312
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	49%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 852
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 822

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	48%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 851
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 820
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 111 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 112 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	80%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 101
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	80%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 102
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 93
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 631 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 632 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 211
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	39%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 593
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 575

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	37%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 591
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 572
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 104 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 104 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 97
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 95
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 97
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 95
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 637 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 638 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 202
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	42%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 594
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 575

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	41%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 592
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 572
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 185 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 187 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	71%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 49
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	20%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 158
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 157

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	16%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 158
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 156
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 151 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 151 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	23%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 144
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 135

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	15%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 143
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 134
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	57%
State average from 603 schools:	69%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	58%
State average from 603 schools:	70%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	97%
State average from 603 schools:	88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	40%
State average from 602 schools:	46%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	65%
State average from 602 schools:	65%

Making Math Gains

Here:	71%
State average from 602 schools:	71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	69%
State average from 602 schools:	64%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	73%
State average from 602 schools:	69%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	530
State average from 602 schools:	543

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 604 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	62%
State average from 605 schools:	49%

Minority Rate

Here:	86%
State average from 605 schools:	48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 926 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 927 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 279
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 867
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 799

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	48%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 867
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 800
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 133 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 134 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 53
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 126
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 119

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 127
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 120
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 619 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 619 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 188
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	36%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 574
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 524

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	36%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 573
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 523
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 112 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 112 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	50%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 100

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	56%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 100
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 577 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 577 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 151
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	39%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 534
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 484

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	38%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 533
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 484
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 216 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 216 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	70%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	13%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 188
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 150

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	19%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 187
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 149
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 143 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 143 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	18%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 137
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 130

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	15%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 137
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 131
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	50%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	51%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	90%
State average from 539 schools:	91%

Meeting High Standards in Science

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	36%
State average from 538 schools:	44%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	56%
State average from 539 schools:	61%

Making Math Gains

Here:	66%
State average from 539 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	64%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	61%
State average from 539 schools:	67%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	474
State average from 539 schools:	523

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 539 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	59%
State average from 541 schools:	49%

Minority Rate

Here:	84%
State average from 542 schools:	53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1015 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1015 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	95%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 365
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	44%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 961
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	45%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 957
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 158 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 158 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	100%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 149
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 149
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 655 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 655 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 237
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	32%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 621
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	33%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 617
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 130 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 130 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 49
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	45%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	45%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 600 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 600 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 197
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	38%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 570
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	37%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 566
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 190 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 190 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	74%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	14%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 173
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	12%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 172
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 131 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 131 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	16%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 125
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	13%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	50%
State average from 526 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	48%
State average from 526 schools:	63%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	84%
State average from 526 schools:	89%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	65%
State average from 526 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	67%
State average from 526 schools:	71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	74%
State average from 526 schools:	72%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	388
State average from 526 schools:	425

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 526 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	56%
State average from 525 schools:	50%

Minority Rate

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	84%
State average from 526 schools:	52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1148 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1147 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 411
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	42%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1096
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	41%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1096
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 181 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 181 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	97%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 70

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	79%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 174
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	81%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 174
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 752 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 751 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 264
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	30%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 723
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	28%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 723
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 150 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 150 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 58
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	51%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 138
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	45%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 138
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 655 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 654 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 188
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	33%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 624
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	31%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 624
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 237 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 236 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	76%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 62
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	17%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 222
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	15%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 222
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 171 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 171 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	77%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 61
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	13%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 165
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	12%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 165
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	47%
State average from 505 schools:	59%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	48%
State average from 505 schools:	60%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	76%
State average from 506 schools:	83%

Making Reading Gains

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	60%
State average from 505 schools:	61%

Making Math Gains

Here:	64%
State average from 505 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	71%
State average from 505 schools:	66%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	366
State average from 506 schools:	397

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 506 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	62%
State average from 506 schools:	51%

Minority Rate

Here:	83%
State average from 506 schools:	50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1230
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	288
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	24%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	29%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	29%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	15%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	47%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	15
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1466
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	300
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	23%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	18%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	34%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	25%
State average:	29%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	58%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	18
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1568
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	295
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	15%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	26%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	32%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	26%
State average:	28%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	58%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	3
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	14
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	10
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1386
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	253
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	64%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	9%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	27%
State average:	31%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	27%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	3
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	9
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1579
State average:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	273
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	60%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	4%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	24%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	12%
State average:	23%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	36%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	13
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1652
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	261
State average:	308

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	48%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	30%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	22%
State average:	33%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	22%
State average:	52%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	3
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	12
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1650
State average:	1922

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	262
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	63%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	21%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	16%
State average:	26%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	16%
State average:	45%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	7
State average:	11

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	5
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1732
State average:	1938

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	264
State average:	302

Percent Passing

Here:	20%
State average:	56%

% in each Achievement Level 1

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	80%
State average:	35%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	10%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	10%
State average:	17%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	10%
State average:	37%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	13
State average:	15

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	5
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	298
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	35%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	29%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	29%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	6%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	35%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	9
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	7
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	259
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	42%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	42%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	15%
State average:	31%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	15%
State average:	41%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	7
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	5
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	6
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1372
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	15%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 2

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	20%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	33%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	25%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	7%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	65%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1499
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	310
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	17%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	22%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	35%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	18%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	8%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	62%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1671
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	333
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	11%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	29%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	31%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	25%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	5%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	60%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	6
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1569
State average:	1786

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	252
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	60%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	20%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	16%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	4%
State average:	19%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	20%
State average:	57%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	3
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	3
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	3
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1742
State average:	1892

Mean Scale Score 100-500

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	282
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	37%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	30%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	33%
State average:	38%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	33%
State average:	64%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	3
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1797
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	265
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	47%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	26%
State average:	22%

% in each Achievement Level 3

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	21%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	5%
State average:	21%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	26%
State average:	61%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	2
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	3
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	3
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1902
State average:	1995

Mean Scale Score 100-500

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	303
State average:	326

Percent Passing

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	60%
State average:	80%

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	30%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	10%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	60%
State average:	28%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	60%
State average:	69%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	3
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	3
State average:	5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1224
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	287
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1516
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	309
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 03%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1520
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	287
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1509
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	275
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1590
State average:	1800

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	275
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1807
State average:	1864

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	293
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1659
State average:	1907

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	263
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1597
State average:	1921

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	239
State average:	299

Percent Passing: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	288
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	262
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1359
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	313
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1563
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	325
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1574
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	313
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1329
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	230
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1673
State average:	1799

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	277
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1784
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	292
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1741
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	248
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1890
State average:	1972

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	300
State average:	321

Percent Passing: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 72

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 51%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 85%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 14

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 57%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 13

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	3
State average from 27 schools:	59

Unscore - Combined: 8
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 38%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1277
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	296
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1416
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	291
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1458
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	276
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1549
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	268
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1802
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	292
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1648
State average:	1894

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	261
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	285
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	286
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1441
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	331
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1484
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	306
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1579
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	314
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1542
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	245
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1744
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	282
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1731
State average:	1915

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	245
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	78
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

Here:	621
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

Here:	51
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	12
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	14
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	79
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

Here:	638
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

Here:	57
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	14
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	7
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	94
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	651
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

Here:	58
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	12
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	5
State average:	190

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	21
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	635
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

Here:	26
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

Here:	10
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	7
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	8
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	9
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	6
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	4
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	19
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

Here:	657
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

Here:	37
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	10
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

Here:	10
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	10
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	6
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	10
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Number of Students

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	21
State average:	273

Mean Scale Score

Here:	658
State average from 2275 schools:	694

Median NPR

Here:	27
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	9
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	8
State average:	11

Functional (max 18)

Here:	8
State average:	11

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	5
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	10
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	7
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	4
State average:	5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	8
State average:	237

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 76

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	275
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 41%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 75%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 14

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	267
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 29%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 50%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 93%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1601
State average from 878 schools:	1661

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	291
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1619
State average:	1663

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1563
State average:	1592

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 55

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1695
State average from 808 schools:	1746

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	295
State average:	305

% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1711
State average:	1743

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1622
State average:	1668

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 88

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1760
State average from 819 schools:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	283
State average:	294

% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1773
State average:	1807

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1701
State average:	1738

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 72

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	277
State average:	290

% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1579
State average from 873 schools:	1641

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	288
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1602
State average:	1645

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1605
State average:	1620

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -2

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1735
State average from 804 schools:	1777

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	293
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1748
State average:	1774

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1605
State average:	1645

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 143

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1825
State average from 815 schools:	1851

Mean Scale Score 100-500

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	303
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1835
State average:	1845

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1745
State average:	1755

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 90

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 323

Mean Scale Score

CARVER MIDDLE SCHOOL:	664
State average from 874 schools:	671

Median NPR: 57
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 301

Mean Scale Score

Here:	672
State average from 796 schools:	675

Median NPR: 59
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 380

Mean Scale Score

Here:	679
State average from 810 schools:	685

Median NPR: 57
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 322

Mean Scale Score

Here:	660
State average from 874 schools:	669

Median NPR: 55
Number Sense (max 10): 5
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 300

Mean Scale Score

Here:	682
State average from 796 schools:	685

Median NPR: 66
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 380

Mean Scale Score

Here:	695
State average from 810 schools:	698

Median NPR: 66
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 377

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	266
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 34%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 82%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 69%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AL	AZ	CA	CO	CT	DE	FL
GA	HI	IA	ID	IL	IN	KS
LA	MA	MD	MI	MN	MO	NC
NE	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	TN	TX	UT
VA	WA	WI	WV

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY