Ben Sheppard Annex School in Hialeah, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 63.


Hialeah, FL 33016

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Imagine Charter At Weston School (17.9 miles):

98
Boulevard Heights Elementary School (10.6 miles):

79
Biscayne Elementary School (12.8 miles):

65
Ben Sheppard Annex School:

63
Collins Elementary School (15.9 miles):

54
Frank Crawford Martink-8 Center School (17.8 miles):

42
Country Club Middle School (15.2 miles):

30
Carol City Middle School (5.6 miles):

9
Ben Sheppard Annex School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Miami-Dade County:

45
Hialeah:

48
Ben Sheppard Annex School:

63

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (305) 822-7108 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 5031
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 5 TO 6
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 827-8821
Principal: Kathleen P Caballero

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 92%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 88%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 93%

Meeting High Standards in Science: 61%

Making Reading Gains : 80%

Making Math Gains: 82%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading : 83%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math: 83%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns): 662

Percent Tested: 100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: N

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 71%

Minority Rate: 91%

Region: 5

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

8%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
BEN SHEPPARD ANNEX:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 89%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 88%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 98%

Meeting High Standards in Science: 57%

Making Reading Gains : 69%

Making Math Gains: 64%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading : 71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math: 73%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns): 609

Percent Tested: 100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: N

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 61%

Minority Rate: 87%

Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 88%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 95%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 96%

Meeting High Standards in Science: 47%

Making Reading Gains : 72%

Making Math Gains: 81%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading : 74%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math: 83%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns): 636

Percent Tested: 100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 54%

Minority Rate: 85%


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25 (89%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24 (86%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1514
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

4%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

55%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

91%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

20
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1812
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

359
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
BEN SHEPPARD ANNEX:

4%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

2%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

38%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

27%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

94%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

22
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1741
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
BEN SHEPPARD ANNEX:

5%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

12%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

36%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

83%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

11
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
BEN SHEPPARD ANNEX:

1839
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
BEN SHEPPARD ANNEX:

9%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

28%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

15%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

81%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

15
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

36%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
BEN SHEPPARD ANNEX:

43%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

12%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

57%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

11
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

9
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1544
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
BEN SHEPPARD ANNEX:

353
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

6%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

42%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

21%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

87%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1679
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

351
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

4%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
BEN SHEPPARD ANNEX:

33%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

38%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

21%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

92%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
BEN SHEPPARD ANNEX:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1696
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

33%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

74%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
BEN SHEPPARD ANNEX:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1855
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

352
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
BEN SHEPPARD ANNEX:

34%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

28%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

17%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
BEN SHEPPARD ANNEX:

79%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1573
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

345
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1714
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

342
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 02%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 04%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1728
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1757
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1489
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
BEN SHEPPARD ANNEX:

341
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1650
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

344
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 96%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1741
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

348
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1720
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 50
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
BEN SHEPPARD ANNEX:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 68%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 96%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1575
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

345
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1662
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 20
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
BEN SHEPPARD ANNEX:

1728
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1868
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
BEN SHEPPARD ANNEX:

340
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

346
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1583
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
BEN SHEPPARD ANNEX:

361
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 96%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1676
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

350
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1818
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

365
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 9
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1754
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

50
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

650
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
BEN SHEPPARD ANNEX:

75
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
BEN SHEPPARD ANNEX:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
BEN SHEPPARD ANNEX:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

48
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

656
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

72
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
BEN SHEPPARD ANNEX:

9
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

34
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

675
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

79
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
BEN SHEPPARD ANNEX:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
BEN SHEPPARD ANNEX:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

51
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

685
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
BEN SHEPPARD ANNEX:

74
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 47
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

347
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 68%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 94%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 14
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 60%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 96%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Hialeah, FL
  5. Ben Sheppard Annex School in Hialeah, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.