Caloosa Middle School in Cape Coral, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 72.

610 S DEL PRADO BLVD
Cape Coral, FL 33990

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

The Sanibel School (17.6 miles):	88
Caloosa Middle School:	72
Riverdale High School (14.2 miles):	62
Cape Coral Charter School (2.0 miles):	53
Diplomat Middle School (2.9 miles):	48
Paul Laurence Dunbar Middle School (8.3 miles):	35
Six Mile Charter Academy School (4.9 miles):	23
Sw Fl Addiction Services-The Vince Smith Center School (5.5 miles):	5

Caloosa Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
Lee County:	49
Cape Coral:	57
Caloosa Middle School:	72

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (239) 574-3232 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 36
School number: 572
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: LEE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (239) 574-2660
Principal: Brian Mangan
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 14
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 74
Senate District: 37
School Web Address: www.leeschools.net/schools.com

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	93%
State average from 613 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Math

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	98%
State average from 612 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	92%
State average from 613 schools:	88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	94%
State average from 612 schools:	51%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	77%
State average from 613 schools:	64%

Making Math Gains

Here:	83%
State average from 612 schools:	70%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	69%
State average from 613 schools:	62%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	96%
State average from 613 schools:	68%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	702
State average from 613 schools:	545

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 613 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	55%
State average from 614 schools:	56%

Minority Rate

Here:	61%
State average from 614 schools:	49%

Region: 5

Title I: YES

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 289 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 289 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 91
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 277
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 269
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 277
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 269
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 118 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 118 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 108
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 108
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 135 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 135 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 127

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 127
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 156 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 156 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 149
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 144

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 149
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 144
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 77 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 77 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 72
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 72
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 72
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	93%
State average from 613 schools:	70%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	91%
State average from 613 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	94%
State average from 613 schools:	92%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	82%
State average from 613 schools:	49%

Making Reading Gains

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	83%
State average from 613 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	72%
State average from 613 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	78%
State average from 613 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	75%
State average from 613 schools:	67%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	668
State average from 613 schools:	553

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 613 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	55%
State average from 613 schools:	52%

Minority Rate

Here:	62%
State average from 613 schools:	48%

Region: 5

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 303 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 303 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 99
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 298
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 293

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 298
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 293
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 119 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 119 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 117
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 113

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 117
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 113
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 138 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 138 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 135
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 135

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	78%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 135
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 135
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 165 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 165 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 162
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 161

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	76%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 162
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 161
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 97 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 97 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	76%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 93

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	71%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 93
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 93
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	65%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	52%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	92%
State average from 603 schools:	69%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	91%
State average from 603 schools:	70%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	89%
State average from 603 schools:	88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	78%
State average from 602 schools:	46%

Making Reading Gains

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	73%
State average from 602 schools:	65%

Making Math Gains

Here:	70%
State average from 602 schools:	71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	58%
State average from 602 schools:	64%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	56%
State average from 602 schools:	69%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	607
State average from 602 schools:	543

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 604 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	56%
State average from 605 schools:	49%

Minority Rate

Here:	62%
State average from 605 schools:	48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 314 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 314 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 101
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	81%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 304
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 300

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	80%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 304
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 300
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 123 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 123 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 119

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 119
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 144 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 144 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	74%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 140
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	73%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 140
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 168 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 168 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	73%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 160
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 158

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	70%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 160
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 158
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 91 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 91 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	58%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 86

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	55%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 86
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	36%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	40%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	70%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	73%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	97%
State average from 539 schools:	91%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	43%
State average from 538 schools:	44%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	60%
State average from 539 schools:	61%

Making Math Gains

Here:	72%
State average from 539 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	62%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	65%
State average from 539 schools:	67%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns

Here:	542
State average from 539 schools:	523

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 539 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	39%
State average from 541 schools:	49%

Minority Rate

Here:	35%
State average from 542 schools:	53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1071 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1070 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	96%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 395
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	65%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1041
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1042
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 686 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 686 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	97%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 259
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 676
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	73%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 677
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 84 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 83 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	97%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 232 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 232 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	96%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 77
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	59%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 220
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	55%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 221
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 418 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 418 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 151
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	57%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 398
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	58%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 400
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 68 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 68 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 142 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 142 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	76%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	37%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 138
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	36%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 138
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	74%
State average from 526 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	73%
State average from 526 schools:	63%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	96%
State average from 526 schools:	89%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	69%
State average from 526 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	78%
State average from 526 schools:	71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	75%
State average from 526 schools:	72%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	465
State average from 526 schools:	425

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 526 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	39%
State average from 525 schools:	50%

Minority Rate

Here:	32%
State average from 526 schools:	52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1111 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1111 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	96%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 369
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1073
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	66%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1073
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 754 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 754 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	96%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 244

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	71%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 734
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	71%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 734
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	55%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 60

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	37%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 60
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 218 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 218 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 78

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	55%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 206
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	53%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 206
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 30

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 434 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 434 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 139

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	57%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 411
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	55%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 411
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 26

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	29%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 62

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	32%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 62
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 139 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 139 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	78%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 50
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	27%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 133
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	20%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 133
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	70%
State average from 505 schools:	59%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	64%
State average from 505 schools:	60%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	93%
State average from 506 schools:	83%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	62%
State average from 505 schools:	61%

Making Math Gains

Here:	70%
State average from 505 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	67%
State average from 505 schools:	66%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	426
State average from 506 schools:	397

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 506 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	45%
State average from 506 schools:	51%

Minority Rate

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	33%
State average from 506 schools:	50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1568
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	344
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	4%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	12%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	19%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	50%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	15%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	84%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	19
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	5
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1777
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	353
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	6%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	4%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	22%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	47%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	20%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	89%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	22
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	10
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1887
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	352
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	3%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	6%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	24%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	39%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	28%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	91%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	18
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	12
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1782
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	324
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	11%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	11%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	40%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	28%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	10%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	78%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	15
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1867
State average:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	328
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	8%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	16%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	41%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	24%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	11%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	76%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1922
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	317
State average:	308

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	11%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 2

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	27%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	44%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	14%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	3%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	62%
State average:	52%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	7
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	371
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	10%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	43%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	31%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	15%
State average:	4%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	89%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	12
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	9
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	10
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	11
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	19%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	31%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	40%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	9%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	49%
State average:	41%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	9
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1647
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	375
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	1%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	4%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	27%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	37%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	31%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	95%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1752
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	368
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	2%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	5%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	28%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	36%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	29%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	93%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1879
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	378
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	1%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	2%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	18%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	46%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	33%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	97%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	11
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	8
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	10
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	8
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	9
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1734
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	324
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	18%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	21%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	34%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	21%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 5

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	7%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	62%
State average:	55%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	6
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1827
State average:	1786

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	13%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	20%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	37%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	23%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 5

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	6%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	66%
State average:	57%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1940
State average:	1892

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	332
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	6%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	16%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	42%
State average:	38%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	24%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 5

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	11%
State average:	10%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	78%
State average:	64%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1518
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	336
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1830
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	362
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 2: 01%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 99%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1809
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	338
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1753
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	319
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1832
State average:	1800

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	322
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1963
State average:	1864

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	326
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	346
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	318
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1578
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	360
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1767
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	371
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1779
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	356
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1700
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1832
State average:	1799

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	317
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1941
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	332
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 98

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 10%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 92%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 278

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	5
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 17%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 13%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 95%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1535
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	339
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1673
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	335
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 20
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1770
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	331
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1721
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	313
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1831
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	321
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1931
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	319
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	338
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	319
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1607
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	366
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 37%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1639
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	342
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1756
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	351
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1713
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	319
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1855
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	322
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1953
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	335
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	108
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	649
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	74
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	106
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

Here:	662
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

Here:	77
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	10
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	105
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

Here:	680
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

Here:	82
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	272
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

Here:	675
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

Here:	67
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	299
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

Here:	691
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

Here:	74
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	293
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

Here:	697
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

Here:	73
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	13
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	11
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 103

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	333
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 75%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 84%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 295

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	337
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 75%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	5
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 14%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 12%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 96%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1741
State average from 878 schools:	1661

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	317
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1737
State average:	1663

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1671
State average:	1592

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 66

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1843
State average from 808 schools:	1746

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	324
State average:	305

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1849
State average:	1743

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1793
State average:	1668

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 56

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1879
State average from 819 schools:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	309
State average:	294

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1891
State average:	1807

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1824
State average:	1738

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 66

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	305
State average:	290

% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1704
State average from 873 schools:	1641

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	317
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1706
State average:	1645

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1695
State average:	1620

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 11

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1872
State average from 804 schools:	1777

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	327
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1876
State average:	1774

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1767
State average:	1645

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 109

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1914
State average from 815 schools:	1851

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	325
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1928
State average:	1845

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1837
State average:	1755

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 91

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 337

Mean Scale Score

Here:	678
State average from 874 schools:	671

Median NPR: 70
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 326

Mean Scale Score

Here:	685
State average from 796 schools:	675

Median NPR: 71
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 399

Mean Scale Score

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	694
State average from 810 schools:	685

Median NPR: 71
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 336

Mean Scale Score

Here:	676
State average from 874 schools:	669

Median NPR: 70
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 326

Mean Scale Score

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	698
State average from 796 schools:	685

Median NPR: 78
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 399

Mean Scale Score

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	710
State average from 810 schools:	698

Median NPR: 78
Number Sense (max 9): 7
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 399

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	315
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 57%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

CALOOSA MIDDLE SCHOOL:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 93%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 84%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AL	AZ	CA	CO	CT	DE	FL
GA	HI	IA	ID	IL	IN	KS
LA	MA	MD	MI	MN	MO	NC
NE	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	TN	TX	UT
VA	WA	WI	WV

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY