Sw Fl Addiction Services-The Vince Smith Center School in Ft. Myers, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 5.

2450 PRINCE ST
Ft. Myers, FL 33916

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
City Of Cape Coral Charter High School (11.0 miles):

79
Richard Milburn Academy School (1.8 miles):

64
Estero High School (15.0 miles):

57
Buckingham Excep. Student Center School (8.8 miles):

50
Life Institute For Education Academy School (2.0 miles):

40
Mariner Middle School (9.6 miles):

28
Advantage Academy Of Lee County School (0.7 miles):

11
Sw Fl Addiction Services-The Vince Smith Center School:

5
Sw Fl Addiction Services-The Vince Smith Center School rating compared to average state and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Ft. Myers:

32
This School:

5

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (239) 338-2306 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 36
School number: 682
School type: Senior High
District Name: LEE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (239) 338-2383
Principal: Herman Williams
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
School Web Address: www.leeschools.net/schools/djj/vince.htm

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

39%
State average from 133 schools:

66%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

39%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

91%
State average from 133 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

22%
State average from 133 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER:

59%
State average from 133 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 132 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 133 schools:

57%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

67%
State average from 133 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

443
State average from 133 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 132 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: C

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER:

96%
State average from 137 schools:

57%
Minority Rate
Here:

93%
State average from 137 schools:

53%
Region: 4

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 564 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 554 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 163
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 469
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 444

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 471
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 446
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 351 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 351 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 101
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 292
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 280

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 295
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 281
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 138 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 131 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 104

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 104
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 543 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 534 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 154
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 452
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 429

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 454
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 430
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 68 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (91%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 133 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 132 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 110
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 103

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 110
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

32%
State average from 141 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER:

39%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

88%
State average from 139 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

25%
State average from 133 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

55%
State average from 133 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 136 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

70%
State average from 133 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER:

65%
State average from 133 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

439
State average from 133 schools:

540
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 134 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

95%
State average from 132 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
Here:

92%
State average from 139 schools:

52%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 644 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 646 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 240
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 552
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 532

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 554
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 533
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 414 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 414 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 157
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 363
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 355

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 365
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 356
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 145 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 148 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 49
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 116
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 108

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 117
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 109
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 609 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 611 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 229
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 523
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 503

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 523
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 503
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 68 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 144 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 143 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 55
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 120
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 118

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 119
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 116
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

36%
State average from 124 schools:

66%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

35%
State average from 124 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

90%
State average from 125 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

17%
State average from 122 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER:

58%
State average from 122 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

61%
State average from 122 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

67%
State average from 122 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

73%
State average from 122 schools:

70%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

437
State average from 122 schools:

535
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 124 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

91%
State average from 126 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

91%
State average from 125 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 691 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 690 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 195
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 617
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 575

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 615
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 575
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 439 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 439 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 122
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 391
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 372

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 390
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 371
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 153 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 151 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 137
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 119

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 136
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 119
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 631 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 630 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 176
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 565
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 527

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 563
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 527
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 99 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 98 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 146 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 145 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 130
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 124

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 128
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 122
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1577
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER:

273
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

41%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

6%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER:

35%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1646
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER:

271
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

47%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER:

24%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

20%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

9%
State average:

19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

29%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1448
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

264
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1587
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER:

1482
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1662
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1464
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

267
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1555
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

269
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1521
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER:

275
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1675
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

278
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

229
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER:

643
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

37
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

247
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

661
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER:

48
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
SW FL ADDICTION SERVICES-THE VINCE SMITH CENTER:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

1
State average:

192

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

5
State average:

273

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

5
State average:

237

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 6

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Ft. Myers, FL
  5. Sw Fl Addiction Services-The Vince Smith Center School in Ft. Myers, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.