City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 59.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
3815 CURTIS BLVD
Port St John, FL 32927
Port St John, FL 32927
Campus Charter School rating compared to average state and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| Port St John: | 59 |
| Campus Charter School: | 59 |
1
Kerrie Byrnes
Feb 21, 2012 @ 3:15 pm
How do I get information on how to have my child attend?
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 5
School number: 6506
School type: Elementary
District Name: BREVARD
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 6
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (321) 633-8234
Principal: Trisha Leitem
Regular charter school.
School Web Address: http://www.campuscharterschool.com
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 24 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 24 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 24 schools: | 84% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 24 schools: | 54% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 24 schools: | 64% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 24 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 24 schools: | 58% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 24 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 544 |
| State average from 24 schools: | 548 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 100% |
| State average from 24 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 51% |
| State average from 24 schools: | 53% |
Minority Rate
Region: 3| Here: | 26% |
| State average from 24 schools: | 40% |
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 48% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 81% |
| State average from 24 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 50% |
| State average from 23 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 23 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 23 schools: | 55% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 23 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains
| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 33% |
| State average from 23 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 24 schools: | 65% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 33% |
| State average from 23 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 475 |
| State average from 23 schools: | 557 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 23 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: NO
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 37% |
| State average from 23 schools: | 52% |
Minority Rate
Region: 3| Here: | 18% |
| State average from 23 schools: | 40% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 42% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 43% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 21 schools: | 68% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 21 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 21 schools: | 81% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 21 schools: | 49% |
Making Reading Gains
| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 81% |
| State average from 21 schools: | 62% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 21 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 21 schools: | 60% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 61% |
| State average from 21 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 598 |
| State average from 21 schools: | 530 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 21 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 46% |
| State average from 21 schools: | 49% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 21% |
| State average from 21 schools: | 41% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 85% |
| State average from 18 schools: | 78% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 18 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 18 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 72% |
| State average from 18 schools: | 53% |
Making Reading Gains
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 86% |
| State average from 18 schools: | 74% |
Making Math Gains
| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 54% |
| State average from 18 schools: | 63% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 18 schools: | 71% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 18 schools: | 63% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
| Here: | 591 |
| State average from 18 schools: | 553 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 100% |
| State average from 18 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 18 schools: | 49% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 19% |
| State average from 18 schools: | 38% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 17 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 16 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 17 schools: | 82% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 17 schools: | 64% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 17 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 59% |
| State average from 17 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 403 |
| State average from 17 schools: | 419 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 17 schools: | 99% |
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 18 schools: | 46% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 19% |
| State average from 17 schools: | 40% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (98%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (98%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 16 schools: | 78% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 65% |
| State average from 16 schools: | 68% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 16 schools: | 83% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 16 schools: | 68% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 16 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 16 schools: | 60% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 432 |
| State average from 16 schools: | 422 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 16 schools: | 100% |
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: S
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 54% |
| State average from 16 schools: | 43% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 17% |
| State average from 16 schools: | 35% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1302 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 300 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 9% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 32% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 55% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 17 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1518 |
| State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 309 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 38% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 54% |
| State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 18 |
| State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1608 |
| State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 303 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 50% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 67% |
| State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 3 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 15 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 324 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 58% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 67% |
| State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1261 |
| State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 292 |
| State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 45% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 31% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 55% |
| State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1411 |
| State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 290 |
| State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 54% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 8% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1574 |
| State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 313 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 28% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 42% |
| State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 7 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1337 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 306 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1421 |
| State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%| Here: | 292 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 08
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 1225 |
| State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 284 |
| State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1318 |
| State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 268 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 11
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 9%| Here: | 3 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 45%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1229 |
| State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%| Here: | 288 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1777 |
| State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%| Here: | 353 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 21
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1719 |
| State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%| Here: | 322 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%| Here: | 330 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1440 |
| State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%| Here: | 330 |
| State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1607 |
| State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%| Here: | 335 |
| State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 53%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1695 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 339 |
| State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 21 |
| State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 617 |
| State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 47 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 7 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 15 |
| State average: | 97 |
Mean Scale Score
| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 658 |
| State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Median NPR
| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 74 |
| State average: | 69 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 10 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 681 |
| State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 83 |
| State average: | 71 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 16 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 190 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 15
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 27%| Here: | 288 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 27%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 33%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 7%| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 3 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 47%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1458 |
| State average: | 1342 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%| Here: | 326 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1598 |
| State average from 1875 schools: | 1542 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%| Here: | 322 |
| State average: | 313 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1572 |
| State average: | 1546 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 228| Here: | 1343 |
| State average: | 1397 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1940 |
| State average from 878 schools: | 1661 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%| Here: | 353 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 38%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1949 |
| State average: | 1663 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 169| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 1780 |
| State average: | 1592 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 1473 |
| State average: | 1413 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%| Here: | 337 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1603 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 1525 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%| Here: | 334 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1571 |
| State average: | 1528 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 205| Here: | 1366 |
| State average: | 1414 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1759 |
| State average from 873 schools: | 1641 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%| Here: | 330 |
| State average: | 302 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 1771 |
| State average: | 1645 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 31| Here: | 1740 |
| State average: | 1620 |
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 26
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 63| Here: | 635 |
| State average from 1891 schools: | 633 |
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 22
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 61| Here: | 643 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 642 |
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 9
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 16
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 78| Here: | 688 |
| State average from 874 schools: | 671 |
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 26
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 74| Here: | 638 |
| State average from 1891 schools: | 632 |
Number Sense (max 14): 11
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 21
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 79| Here: | 657 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 652 |
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 9
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 16
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 78| CAMPUS CHARTER SCHOOL: | 689 |
| State average from 874 schools: | 669 |
Number Sense (max 10): 7
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 23
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 17%| Here: | 305 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 52%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 14
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 9%| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 65%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 52%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.