City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
23.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Indian Ridge School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida: | 45 |
Palm Beach County: | 45 |
Lake Worth: | 48 |
Indian Ridge School: | 23 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (561) 681-0001 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 50
School number: 2411
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: PALM BEACH
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (561) 681-0023
Principal: Sherri Kelty
The main educational program offered at the school: Special Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 23
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 89
Senate District: 29
School Web Address: www.palmbeach.k12.fl.us/indianridge
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingINDIAN RIDGE SCHOOL: | 20% |
State average from 36 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 55% |
State average from 37 schools: | 76% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 77% |
State average from 37 schools: | 87% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 26% |
State average from 37 schools: | 56% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 34% |
State average from 37 schools: | 62% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 64% |
State average from 37 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 36% |
State average from 37 schools: | 60% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathINDIAN RIDGE SCHOOL: | 65% |
State average from 37 schools: | 67% |
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)INDIAN RIDGE SCHOOL: | 377 |
State average from 37 schools: | 547 |
Percent TestedHere: | 93% |
State average from 37 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: Pending
Grade in 2009: D
Grade in 2008: F
Grade in 2007: F
Grade in 2006: D
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: D
Grade in 2002: D
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 53% |
State average from 37 schools: | 41% |
Minority RateINDIAN RIDGE SCHOOL: | 72% |
State average from 37 schools: | 44% |
Region: 2
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 74% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 78% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 80% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 79% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 74% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 78% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 23% |
State average from 36 schools: | 71% |
Meeting High Standards in MathINDIAN RIDGE SCHOOL: | 53% |
State average from 36 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 76% |
State average from 36 schools: | 87% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 34% |
State average from 36 schools: | 52% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 37% |
State average from 36 schools: | 64% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 70% |
State average from 36 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 39% |
State average from 36 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 69% |
State average from 36 schools: | 66% |
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 401 |
State average from 36 schools: | 548 |
Percent TestedHere: | 95% |
State average from 36 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: D
Grade in 2008: F
Grade in 2007: F
Grade in 2006: D
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: D
Grade in 2002: D
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 46% |
State average from 36 schools: | 39% |
Minority RateHere: | 73% |
State average from 36 schools: | 42% |
Region: 2
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 75 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 75 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 85% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 64% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 63% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 70% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 67% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 75 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 75 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 64% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 63% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 27% |
State average from 36 schools: | 67% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 56% |
State average from 36 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingINDIAN RIDGE SCHOOL: | 70% |
State average from 36 schools: | 81% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 30% |
State average from 36 schools: | 45% |
Making Reading Gains INDIAN RIDGE SCHOOL: | 42% |
State average from 36 schools: | 63% |
Making Math GainsINDIAN RIDGE SCHOOL: | 61% |
State average from 36 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 44% |
State average from 36 schools: | 61% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 57% |
State average from 36 schools: | 69% |
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 387 |
State average from 36 schools: | 528 |
Percent TestedHere: | 94% |
State average from 36 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: F
Grade in 2007: F
Grade in 2006: D
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: D
Grade in 2002: D
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 41% |
State average from 36 schools: | 41% |
Minority RateHere: | 71% |
State average from 36 schools: | 45% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 68 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 76% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 75% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 63% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 76% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 65% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 68 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 75% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 63% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 65% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 67% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientINDIAN RIDGE SCHOOL: | 67% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 63% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 61% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 67% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 67% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 56 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 63% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 16
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 41% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 39
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 32% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 41
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 56 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 41% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 39
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 32% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 41
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1976 |
State average: | 1922 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 322 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 14% |
State average: | 25% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 50% |
State average: | 30% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 21% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5INDIAN RIDGE SCHOOL: | 14% |
State average: | 7% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 36% |
State average: | 45% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1844 |
State average: | 1925 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 279 |
State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 21% |
State average: | 17% |
% in each Achievement Level 2INDIAN RIDGE SCHOOL: | 21% |
State average: | 22% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 36% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 21% |
State average: | 21% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 57% |
State average: | 61% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1713 |
State average: | 1864 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500INDIAN RIDGE SCHOOL: | 274 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 243 |
State average: | 299 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 60%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1755 |
State average: | 1876 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 285 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 15
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 3 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 60%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 27%
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1586 |
State average: | 1775 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 275 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1450 |
State average: | 1801 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 222 |
State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of StudentsINDIAN RIDGE SCHOOL: | 3 |
State average: | 97 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of StudentsINDIAN RIDGE SCHOOL: | 3 |
State average: | 190 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of StudentsINDIAN RIDGE SCHOOL: | 9 |
State average: | 192 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 3
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 7
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 3
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 4
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 4
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 6
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 4
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 5
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 3
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Lake Worth, FL
- Indian Ridge School in Lake Worth, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: