Virtual High School Distance Education in Paradise, Nevada (NV) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Nevada) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 53.

Address:

3050 E. Flamingo Rd.
Paradise, NV 89121

Principal: Essington Wade
Phone Number (Verify before using): (702) 855-8435
Fax Number (Verify before using): (702) 855-8438
Website: ccsdde.net
Title I School: No
AYP School Designation: Adequate

Special Programs:
Class-Size Reduction: No

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

Advanced Technologies Academy (6.3 miles):	100
Lucille S. Rogers Elementary School (9.8 miles):	75
R. Guild Gray Elementary School (7.2 miles):	56
Virtual High School Distance Education:	53
East Career and Technical Academy (4.9 miles):	42
Berkeley L. Bunker Elementary School (9.5 miles):	30
John S. Park - Edison Elementary School (3.3 miles):	18
Ruben P. Diaz Elementary School (5.4 miles):	9

Virtual High School Distance Education rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Nevada:	43
Clark County:	41
Paradise:	23
Virtual High Distance Education:	53

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Adequate Yearly Progress

English Language Arts

School English Language Arts AYP Designation: Adequate

Participation

All Students:	97.4%
White:	96.3%

Percent Proficient

All Students:

84.8%

Math

School Math AYP Designation: Adequate

Participation

All Students:	100.0%
White:	100.0%

Percent Proficient

All Students:

90.9%

Average Daily Attendance

School Average Daily Attendance AYP Designation: Adequate

Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:	100.0%
Individual Education Plan Students:	96.6%

Discuss this school with others on our active Nevada Forum

Iowa Tests of Educational Development Language

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Virtual High School Distance Education Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Results
		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	24	12.5%	33.4%	29.2%	26.5%	37.5%	22.8%	20.8%	17.2%
Female	17	5.9%	25.8%	23.5%	27.2%	47.1%	26.1%	23.5%	21.0%
White	16	12.5%	23.4%	25.0%	25.3%	37.5%	27.2%	25.0%	24.0%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005

	Students Tested	Students Results
All Students	44	23.8%	33.9%	28.6%	26.0%	19.0%	22.4%	28.6%	17.7%
Male	16	37.5%	47.2%	25.0%	28.1%	12.5%	16.5%	25.0%	8.2%
Female	28	15.4%	26.1%	30.8%	26.5%	23.1%	25.5%	30.8%	21.9%
White	27	12.0%	24.7%	32.0%	24.6%	16.0%	26.5%	40.0%	24.1%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005

	Students Tested	Students Results
All Students	64	28.1%	33.9%	31.3%	26.1%	23.4%	22.2%	17.2%	17.7%
Male	24	41.7%	41.3%	25.0%	25.4%	12.5%	19.3%	20.8%	13.9%
Female	40	20.0%	26.3%	35.0%	26.8%	30.0%	25.2%	15.0%	21.6%
White	52	32.7%	24.5%	30.8%	25.6%	19.2%	26.3%	17.3%	23.6%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005

	Students Tested	Students Results
All Students	54	22.2%	34.5%	25.0%	25.5%	33.3%	21.8%	19.4%	18.2%
Male	24	29.4%	42.4%	35.3%	25.0%	23.5%	18.7%	11.8%	13.9%
Female	30	15.8%	26.3%	15.8%	26.1%	42.1%	25.0%	26.3%	22.6%
White	30	16.0%	24.9%	20.0%	25.1%	44.0%	25.7%	20.0%	24.3%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005

Iowa Tests of Educational Development Mathematics

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Virtual High School Distance Education Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Results
		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	24	29.2%	35.8%	29.2%	26.0%	29.2%	21.4%	12.5%	16.8%
Female	17	17.6%	34.3%	35.3%	28.9%	35.3%	22.1%	11.8%	14.8%
White	16	25.0%	25.2%	18.8%	24.7%	43.8%	26.1%	12.5%	24.1%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005

	Students Tested	Students Results
		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	44	31.0%	34.6%	31.0%	25.9%	28.6%	21.7%	9.5%	17.9%
Male	16	25.0%	47.2%	31.3%	28.2%	37.5%	16.9%	6.3%	7.7%
Female	28	34.6%	33.1%	30.8%	28.0%	23.1%	22.7%	11.5%	16.3%
White	27	24.0%	24.9%	28.0%	24.2%	36.0%	26.1%	12.0%	24.8%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005

	Students Tested	Students Results
		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	64	31.3%	34.4%	40.6%	26.4%	18.8%	21.6%	9.4%	17.6%
Male	24	29.2%	35.9%	37.5%	23.6%	20.8%	20.7%	12.5%	19.8%
Female	40	32.5%	32.8%	42.5%	29.3%	17.5%	22.5%	7.5%	15.4%
White	52	36.5%	24.7%	36.5%	25.0%	19.2%	25.9%	7.7%	24.4%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005

	Students Tested	Students Results
		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	54	26.8%	35.2%	31.7%	26.5%	29.3%	21.0%	12.2%	17.3%
Male	24	26.3%	37.5%	36.8%	23.8%	21.1%	19.6%	15.8%	19.1%
Female	30	27.3%	32.7%	27.3%	29.3%	36.4%	22.4%	9.1%	15.5%
White	30	21.4%	25.4%	32.1%	25.4%	35.7%	25.3%	10.7%	23.8%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005

Iowa Tests of Educational Development Reading

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Virtual High School Distance Education Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Results
		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	24	8.3%	31.7%	20.8%	27.3%	41.7%	21.6%	29.2%	19.5%
Female	17	11.8%	29.1%	23.5%	28.8%	35.3%	22.4%	29.4%	19.7%
White	16	0.0%	18.0%	25.0%	25.2%	37.5%	27.2%	37.5%	29.6%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005

	Students Tested	Students Results
All Students	44	19.0%	32.3%	21.4%	26.6%	31.0%	21.2%	28.6%	19.9%
Male	16	12.5%	50.3%	31.3%	27.8%	31.3%	14.2%	25.0%	7.7%
Female	28	23.1%	29.9%	15.4%	27.6%	30.8%	22.2%	30.8%	20.3%
White	27	24.0%	19.4%	4.0%	24.8%	36.0%	26.4%	36.0%	29.4%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005

	Students Tested	Students Results
All Students	64	23.8%	32.9%	17.5%	26.4%	38.1%	21.4%	20.6%	19.3%
Male	24	20.8%	35.1%	12.5%	25.1%	45.8%	20.1%	20.8%	19.6%
Female	40	25.6%	30.5%	20.5%	27.7%	33.3%	22.7%	20.5%	19.1%
White	52	25.5%	19.2%	17.6%	25.9%	37.3%	26.5%	19.6%	28.4%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005

	Students Tested	Students Results
All Students	54	22.2%	33.4%	16.7%	25.9%	30.6%	21.1%	30.6%	19.6%
Male	24	29.4%	36.7%	23.5%	24.5%	23.5%	19.9%	23.5%	18.9%
Female	30	15.8%	30.0%	10.5%	27.3%	36.8%	22.4%	36.8%	20.3%
White	30	20.0%	20.4%	12.0%	24.6%	32.0%	26.5%	36.0%	28.5%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005

Iowa Tests of Educational Development Science

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Virtual High School Distance Education Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Results
		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	24	21.7%	33.0%	34.8%	26.9%	30.4%	22.7%	13.0%	17.4%
Female	17	18.8%	30.3%	31.3%	27.2%	37.5%	24.8%	12.5%	17.7%
White	16	20.0%	22.8%	20.0%	24.1%	46.7%	26.8%	13.3%	26.3%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005

	Students Tested	Students Results
All Students	44	23.8%	33.6%	19.0%	26.4%	38.1%	21.8%	19.0%	18.2%
Male	16	43.8%	45.8%	6.3%	30.0%	31.3%	17.1%	18.8%	7.1%
Female	28	11.5%	31.3%	26.9%	26.5%	42.3%	24.0%	19.2%	18.3%
White	27	12.0%	23.7%	24.0%	23.9%	36.0%	25.8%	28.0%	26.6%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005

	Students Tested	Students Results
All Students	64	37.5%	32.7%	32.8%	26.2%	15.6%	22.7%	14.1%	18.3%
Male	24	50.0%	35.3%	20.8%	25.8%	12.5%	20.4%	16.7%	18.6%
Female	40	30.0%	30.1%	40.0%	26.7%	17.5%	25.2%	12.5%	18.1%
White	52	40.4%	23.4%	32.7%	24.1%	15.4%	26.3%	11.5%	26.2%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005

	Students Tested	Students Results
All Students	54	27.5%	33.3%	20.0%	26.1%	32.5%	22.4%	20.0%	18.2%
Male	24	22.2%	36.9%	33.3%	25.2%	22.2%	20.0%	22.2%	17.9%
Female	30	31.8%	29.5%	9.1%	27.1%	40.9%	24.8%	18.2%	18.6%
White	30	22.2%	23.8%	22.2%	23.7%	37.0%	26.3%	18.5%	26.1%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005

High School Proficiency Examination Mathematics Grade 11

Students Tested: 39

Here:	100.0%
Nevada:	99.0%

Studets Results in 2010/2011

Approaches Standard

This School:	12.8%
Nevada:	26.3%

Meets Standard

This School:	76.9%
State:	54.4%

Exceeds Standard

This School:	10.3%
State:	18.2%

Virtual High School Distance Education Results

Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective

All Students

Here:	15.9%
Nevada:	1.3%

Male

This School:	18.7%
State:	1.0%

Female

Here:	14.9%
State:	1.7%

White

Here:	13.9%
Nevada:	11.6%

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Virtual High School Distance Education Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	39	15.9%	1.3%	0.0%	1.1%	12.8%	26.3%	76.9%	54.4%	10.3%	18.2%
Male	10	18.7%	1.0%	0.0%	1.2%	10.0%	26.6%	80.0%	52.9%	10.0%	19.4%
Female	29	14.9%	1.7%	0.0%	1.0%	13.8%	26.1%	75.9%	56.0%	10.3%	17.0%
White	27	13.9%	11.6%	0.0%	0.5%	14.8%	16.6%	74.1%	57.7%	11.1%	25.2%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	50	14.7%	0.6%	0.0%	2.7%	14.0%	25.4%	74.0%	54.5%	12.0%	17.4%
Male	19	23.4%	1.5%	0.0%	3.3%	5.3%	23.9%	84.2%	53.8%	10.5%	19.1%
Female	31	9.3%	-0.4%	0.0%	2.2%	19.4%	26.9%	67.7%	55.2%	12.9%	15.7%
White	35	11.6%	11.0%	0.0%	1.5%	17.1%	16.1%	71.4%	58.4%	11.4%	23.9%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	23	29.0%	8.6%	0.0%	3.8%	9.1%	25.7%	81.8%	51.4%	9.1%	19.0%
Female	18	26.4%	6.8%	0.0%	3.5%	11.8%	27.8%	82.4%	51.7%	5.9%	17.0%
White	17	31.9%	17.7%	0.0%	2.3%	6.3%	18.1%	81.3%	54.2%	12.5%	25.4%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	24	25.6%	9.7%	0.0%	4.3%	12.5%	24.1%	70.8%	52.9%	16.7%	18.6%
Female	17	20.5%	7.4%	0.0%	4.3%	17.6%	26.4%	70.6%	52.9%	11.8%	16.4%
White	16	25.6%	19.5%	0.0%	2.5%	12.5%	16.1%	81.3%	56.9%	6.3%	24.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	34	-2.3%	11.8%	8.8%	4.0%	41.2%	32.0%	35.3%	47.4%	14.7%	16.7%
Female	27	-4.2%	8.0%	7.4%	3.6%	44.4%	36.1%	40.7%	46.5%	7.4%	13.8%
White	21	0.1%	22.1%	4.8%	2.2%	42.9%	23.4%	42.9%	52.5%	9.5%	21.9%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007

High School Proficiency Examination Mathematics Grades 10 & 11

Detailed Students Results

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	29	33.9%	19.8%	0.0%	4.4%	13.8%	23.5%	62.1%	58.0%	24.1%	14.1%
Male	13	40.0%	22.7%	0.0%	5.0%	7.7%	20.1%	61.5%	58.3%	30.8%	16.6%
Female	16	28.9%	17.0%	0.0%	3.8%	18.8%	26.9%	62.5%	57.7%	18.8%	11.6%
White	20	32.7%	29.1%	0.0%	2.4%	15.0%	16.2%	65.0%	63.3%	20.0%	18.1%

High School Proficiency Examination Reading Grade 11

Students Tested: 38

Here:	97.4%
Nevada:	99.4%

Studets Results in 2010/2011

Meets Standard

This School:	24.3%
State:	47.2%

Exceeds Standard

This School:	75.7%
Nevada:	47.2%

Virtual High School Distance Education Results

Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective

All Students

Here:	13.3%
Nevada:	7.7%

Male

Here:	13.3%
State:	6.1%

Female

Here:	13.3%
Nevada:	9.4%

White

Here:	13.3%
Nevada:	10.7%

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Virtual High School Distance Education Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	38	13.3%	7.7%	0.0%	0.6%	0.0%	5.0%	24.3%	47.2%	75.7%	47.2%
Male	10	13.3%	6.1%	0.0%	0.8%	0.0%	6.4%	40.0%	48.6%	60.0%	44.2%
Female	28	13.3%	9.4%	0.0%	0.5%	0.0%	3.4%	18.5%	45.7%	81.5%	50.4%
White	26	13.3%	10.7%	0.0%	0.4%	0.0%	2.2%	32.0%	36.2%	68.0%	61.2%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007

High School Proficiency Examination Reading Grades 10 & 11

Detailed Students Results

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	29	18.7%	11.9%	0.0%	1.8%	3.4%	8.5%	37.9%	46.3%	58.6%	43.5%
Male	13	22.1%	10.2%	0.0%	2.4%	0.0%	9.4%	38.5%	46.2%	61.5%	41.9%
Female	16	15.9%	13.5%	0.0%	1.1%	6.3%	7.5%	37.5%	46.3%	56.3%	45.1%
White	20	22.1%	16.6%	0.0%	1.0%	0.0%	4.6%	45.0%	40.0%	55.0%	54.4%

High School Proficiency Examination Science Grade 11

Students Tested: 38

Here:	100.0%
State:	98.6%

Studets Results in 2010/2011

Developing

This School:	2.6%
Nevada:	8.7%

Approaches Standard

This School:	7.9%
Nevada:	20.3%

Meets Standard

This School:	76.3%
State:	64.3%

Exceeds Standard

This School:	13.2%
Nevada:	6.8%

Virtual High School Distance Education Results

Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective

All Students

Here:	2.8%
State:	-15.7%

Male

Here:	13.3%
Nevada:	-13.6%

Female

Here:	-1.0%
State:	-17.8%

White

This School:	1.8%
State:	-2.5%

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Virtual High School Distance Education Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	38	2.8%	-15.7%	2.6%	8.7%	7.9%	20.3%	76.3%	64.3%	13.2%	6.8%
Male	10	13.3%	-13.6%	0.0%	9.2%	0.0%	17.7%	80.0%	64.1%	20.0%	9.1%
Female	28	-1.0%	-17.8%	3.6%	8.1%	10.7%	23.0%	75.0%	64.5%	10.7%	4.4%
White	26	1.8%	-2.5%	3.9%	3.8%	7.7%	12.0%	76.9%	73.4%	11.5%	10.9%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009

High School Proficiency Examination Writing Grade 11

Students Tested: 39

Here:	100.0%
State:	97.8%

Studets Results in 2010/2011

Approaches Standard

Here:	10.3%
Nevada:	20.1%

Meets Standard

Here:	89.7%
State:	76.4%

Virtual High School Distance Education Results

Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective

All Students

Here:	3.0%
State:	-8.0%

Male

This School:	-16.7%
State:	-13.7%

Female

Here:	9.9%
Nevada:	-2.1%

White

Here:	5.9%
Nevada:	0.9%

Detailed Students Results

Percent of Virtual High School Distance Education Students That Met or Exceeded Standard

	Students Tested	Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Students Results
		Students Above Annual Measurable Objective		Developing		Approaches Standard		Meets Standard		Exceeds Standard
		Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State	Here	State
All Students	39	3.0%	-8.0%	0.0%	1.2%	10.3%	20.1%	89.7%	76.4%	0.0%	2.3%
Male	10	-16.7%	-13.7%	0.0%	1.9%	30.0%	25.2%	70.0%	71.2%	0.0%	1.8%
Female	29	9.9%	-2.1%	0.0%	0.6%	3.5%	14.9%	96.6%	81.8%	0.0%	2.8%
White	27	5.9%	0.9%	0.0%	0.6%	7.4%	11.8%	92.6%	84.1%	0.0%	3.4%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AL	AZ	CA	CO	CT	DE	FL
GA	HI	IA	ID	IL	IN	KS
LA	MA	MD	MI	MN	MO	NC
NE	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	TN	TX	UT
VA	WA	WI	WV

AL	CA	CO	DC	DE	FL	GA
IA	ID	IL	IN	KS	KY	LA
MD	ME	MI	MN	NC	NE	NH
NJ	NV	NY	OH	OK	OR	PA
SC	TN	TX	UT	VA	WA	WI