Chain Of Lakes Middle School in Orlando, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 57.

8700 CONRO WNDMER RD
Orlando, FL 32835

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

Lake Eola Charter School (6.8 miles):	98
Tuskawilla Middle School (15.7 miles):	67
Tuskawilla Middle School (15.7 miles):	58
Chain Of Lakes Middle School:	57
Passport Charter School (9.9 miles):	51
C.O.P.E. School (17.4 miles):	37
Princeton House Charter School (8.3 miles):	21
Excel School (6.0 miles):	9

Chain Of Lakes Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
Orange County:	44
Orlando:	42
Chain Of Lakes Middle School:	57

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (407) 909-5400 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 48
School number: 1291
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: ORANGE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (407) 909-5410
Principal: Carol Kindt
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 8
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 41
Senate District: 9

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	80%
State average from 613 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	79%
State average from 612 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	93%
State average from 613 schools:	88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	55%
State average from 612 schools:	51%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	67%
State average from 613 schools:	64%

Making Math Gains

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	72%
State average from 612 schools:	70%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	66%
State average from 613 schools:	62%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	68%
State average from 613 schools:	68%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	580
State average from 613 schools:	545

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 613 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	65%
State average from 614 schools:	56%

Minority Rate

Here:	34%
State average from 614 schools:	49%

Region: 4

Title I: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 718 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 718 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 230
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	74%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 694
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 649

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	73%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 695
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 650
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 476 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 476 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 156
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	77%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 460
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 428

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	77%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 461
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 429
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 100 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 100 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 91 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 91 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 83
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 461 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 461 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 144
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	70%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 445
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 411

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	69%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 445
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 411
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 92 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 92 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 80
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 80
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	80%
State average from 613 schools:	70%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	80%
State average from 613 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	96%
State average from 613 schools:	92%

Meeting High Standards in Science

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	52%
State average from 613 schools:	49%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	74%
State average from 613 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	78%
State average from 613 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	86%
State average from 613 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	69%
State average from 613 schools:	67%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	615
State average from 613 schools:	553

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 613 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	58%
State average from 613 schools:	52%

Minority Rate

Here:	34%
State average from 613 schools:	48%

Region: 4

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 725 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 725 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 211
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	75%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 674
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 641

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	73%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 674
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 642
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 483 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 483 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 148
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	78%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 455
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 433

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	75%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 455
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 434
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 99 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 99 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 84
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 84
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 77 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 77 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 70
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 69
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 70
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 69
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 419 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 419 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 109
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 384
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 367

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	66%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 384
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 368
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 91 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 91 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 77
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 78
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	74%
State average from 603 schools:	69%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	73%
State average from 603 schools:	70%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	95%
State average from 603 schools:	88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	52%
State average from 602 schools:	46%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	66%
State average from 602 schools:	65%

Making Math Gains

Here:	68%
State average from 602 schools:	71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	63%
State average from 602 schools:	64%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	62%
State average from 602 schools:	69%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	553
State average from 602 schools:	543

Percent Tested

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	100%
State average from 604 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	49%
State average from 605 schools:	49%

Minority Rate

Here:	62%
State average from 605 schools:	48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 366 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 366 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 126
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	58%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 347
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 339

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	59%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 347
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 339
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 159 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 159 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 59
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	70%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 158
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 154

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 158
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 154
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 138 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 138 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	53%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 123
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 120

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	58%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 123
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 120
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 292 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 292 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 98
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	55%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 274
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 268

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	55%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 274
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 268
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 84 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 84 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	41%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	50%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 63 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	25%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 60

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	35%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 60
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	74%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	75%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	95%
State average from 539 schools:	91%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	56%
State average from 538 schools:	44%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	68%
State average from 539 schools:	61%

Making Math Gains

Here:	76%
State average from 539 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	73%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	69%
State average from 539 schools:	67%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	586
State average from 539 schools:	523

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 539 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	43%
State average from 541 schools:	49%

Minority Rate

Here:	59%
State average from 542 schools:	53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1290 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1290 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	96%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 445
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1187
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	69%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1186
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 527 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 527 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	96%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 183
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 503
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 502
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 398 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 398 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	97%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 137
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 358
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 358
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 236 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 236 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	95%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 79
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	57%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 201
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	64%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 201
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 86 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 86 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	100%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 554 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 554 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	95%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 177
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	52%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 497
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	54%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 496
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 212 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 212 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	48%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 186
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	57%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 186
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 155 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 155 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 51
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	32%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 147
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	38%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 146
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	74%
State average from 526 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	73%
State average from 526 schools:	63%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	93%
State average from 526 schools:	89%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	70%
State average from 526 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	77%
State average from 526 schools:	71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	78%
State average from 526 schools:	72%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	465
State average from 526 schools:	425

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 526 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	45%
State average from 525 schools:	50%

Minority Rate

Here:	57%
State average from 526 schools:	52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1287 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1287 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	96%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 385
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	65%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1189
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	66%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1187
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 551 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 551 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	99%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 170

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	77%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 526
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	81%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 526
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 395 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 395 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	96%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 100
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	49%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 352
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	42%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 351
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 219 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 219 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 79

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	57%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 200
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	57%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 199
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 81 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 81 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 29

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	80%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 74
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 74
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 568 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 568 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 160
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	49%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 510
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	48%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 508
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 190 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 190 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 62
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	39%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 168
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	51%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 167
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 172 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 172 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 43
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	25%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 152
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	25%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 151
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	66%
State average from 505 schools:	59%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	69%
State average from 505 schools:	60%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	87%
State average from 506 schools:	83%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	67%
State average from 505 schools:	61%

Making Math Gains

Here:	75%
State average from 505 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	72%
State average from 505 schools:	66%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	436
State average from 506 schools:	397

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 506 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	44%
State average from 506 schools:	51%

Minority Rate

Here:	58%
State average from 506 schools:	50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1804
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	328
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	12%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	12%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	29%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	35%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	12%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	76%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	15
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1898
State average:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	334
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	6%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	13%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	41%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	29%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	10%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	81%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	18
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1944
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	322
State average:	308

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	11%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	27%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	38%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	19%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	5%
State average:	3%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	62%
State average:	52%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	7
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1959
State average:	1922

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	319
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	20%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	28%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	32%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	16%
State average:	12%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	52%
State average:	45%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	11
State average:	11

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2005
State average:	1938

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	315
State average:	302

Percent Passing

Here:	64%
State average:	56%

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	27%
State average:	35%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	30%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	23%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	9%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	12%
State average:	12%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	43%
State average:	37%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	15
State average:	15

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	320
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	19%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	31%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	39%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	8%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	2%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	49%
State average:	41%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	9
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	319
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	17%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	34%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	39%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	8%
State average:	5%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	1%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	48%
State average:	36%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1750
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	328
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	18%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	15%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	27%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	28%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	11%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	66%
State average:	55%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1867
State average:	1786

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	325
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	11%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	15%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	41%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	24%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	8%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	74%
State average:	57%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1930
State average:	1892

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	329
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	10%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	15%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	40%
State average:	38%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	25%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	11%
State average:	10%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	75%
State average:	64%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1962
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	313
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	10%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	18%
State average:	22%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	39%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	23%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	10%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	72%
State average:	61%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2037
State average:	1995

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	336
State average:	326

Percent Passing

Here:	90%
State average:	80%

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	6%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	16%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	30%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	38%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 5

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	11%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	78%
State average:	69%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1810
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	329
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1870
State average:	1800

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	329
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1931
State average:	1864

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	319
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1942
State average:	1907

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1992
State average:	1921

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	312
State average:	299

Percent Passing: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	315
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	310
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1768
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	332
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1856
State average:	1799

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	323
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1921
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	327
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1979
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	318
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2016
State average:	1972

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	331
State average:	321

Percent Passing: 84%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 223

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	5
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 15%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 9%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 94%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 618

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 84%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1751
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	318
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1836
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	322
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1891
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	311
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1940
State average:	1894

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	315
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1981
State average:	1935

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	310
State average:	302

Percent Passing: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	312
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	320
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1699
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1861
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	324
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1929
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	329
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1967
State average:	1915

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	315
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2008
State average:	1984

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	329
State average:	323

Percent Passing: 83%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	433
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

Here:	678
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

Here:	69
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	8
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	454
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

Here:	688
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

Here:	72
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	13
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	416
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

Here:	695
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

Here:	71
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	13
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	14
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	672
State average:	273

Mean Scale Score

Here:	707
State average from 2275 schools:	694

Median NPR

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	73
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	11

Functional (max 18)

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	13
State average:	11

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	618
State average:	237

Mean Scale Score

Here:	720
State average from 2096 schools:	709

Median NPR

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	76
State average:	65

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	14
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	11
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 419

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	304
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 56%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 10%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 88%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 636

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	302
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 54%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 81%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1743
State average from 878 schools:	1661

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	317
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 84%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1777
State average:	1663

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1667
State average:	1592

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 110

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1855
State average from 808 schools:	1746

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	326
State average:	305

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 84%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1880
State average:	1743

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1784
State average:	1668

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 96

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1901
State average from 819 schools:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	313
State average:	294

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1918
State average:	1807

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

CHAIN OF LAKES MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1828
State average:	1738

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 91

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	312
State average:	290

% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1742
State average from 873 schools:	1641

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	326
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 84%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1773
State average:	1645

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1715
State average:	1620

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 58

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1879
State average from 804 schools:	1777

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	328
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 84%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1896
State average:	1774

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1783
State average:	1645

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 112

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1936
State average from 815 schools:	1851

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	331
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1945
State average:	1845

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1862
State average:	1755

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 84

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 416

Mean Scale Score

Here:	678
State average from 874 schools:	671

Median NPR: 70
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 395

Mean Scale Score

Here:	688
State average from 796 schools:	675

Median NPR: 73
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 483

Mean Scale Score

Here:	698
State average from 810 schools:	685

Median NPR: 73
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 415

Mean Scale Score

Here:	681
State average from 874 schools:	669

Median NPR: 73
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 395

Mean Scale Score

Here:	705
State average from 796 schools:	685

Median NPR: 81
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 479

Mean Scale Score

Here:	715
State average from 810 schools:	698

Median NPR: 81
Number Sense (max 9): 7
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 481

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	297
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 48%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 86%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 76%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AB	BC	MB	NB	NL	NS	NT
NU	ON	PE	QC	SK	YT