Charles R. Drew Middle School in Miami, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 28.

1801 NW 60TH ST
Miami, FL 33142

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

Herbert A. Ammons Middle School (19.9 miles):	98
South Miami K-8 Center School (9.3 miles):	77
Somerset Academy Middle (Miramar Campus) School (10.5 miles):	64
Glades Middle School (11.1 miles):	52
Hubert O. Sibley Elementary School (3.8 miles):	35
Charles R. Drew Middle School:	28
Aspira Raul Arnaldo Martinez Charter School (5.2 miles):	21
Charter On The Beach Middle School (6.3 miles):	8

Charles R. Drew Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
Miami-Dade County:	45
Miami:	44
Charles R. Drew Middle School:	28

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (305) 633-6057 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 6141
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 638-1307
Magnet Program.
Principal: Annette Y Burks
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status:
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 17
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 109
Senate District: 39
School Web Address: http://crdrew.dadeschools.net/

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	33%
State average from 613 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	33%
State average from 612 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	79%
State average from 613 schools:	88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	13%
State average from 612 schools:	51%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	51%
State average from 613 schools:	64%

Making Math Gains

Here:	61%
State average from 612 schools:	70%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	60%
State average from 613 schools:	62%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	72%
State average from 613 schools:	68%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	402
State average from 613 schools:	545

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 613 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: D

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: F

Grade in 2003: D

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 119999: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	95%
State average from 614 schools:	56%

Minority Rate

Here:	100%
State average from 614 schools:	49%

Region: 5

Title I: YES

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 547 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 547 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 199
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	30%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 502
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 488

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	29%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 502
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 488
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 523 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 523 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 189
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	29%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 482
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 468

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	28%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 482
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 468
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 522 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 522 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 183
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	30%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 478
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 464

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	29%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 478
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 464
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 92 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 92 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	11%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 77

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	9%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 77
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	33%
State average from 613 schools:	70%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	35%
State average from 613 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	81%
State average from 613 schools:	92%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	16%
State average from 613 schools:	49%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	54%
State average from 613 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	59%
State average from 613 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	75%
State average from 613 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	64%
State average from 613 schools:	67%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	417
State average from 613 schools:	553

Percent Tested

Here:	98%
State average from 613 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: F

Grade in 2003: D

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	90%
State average from 613 schools:	52%

Minority Rate

Here:	100%
State average from 613 schools:	48%

Region: 5

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 688 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 689 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 222
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	29%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 635
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 619

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	31%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 635
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 620
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 663 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 664 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 216
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	29%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 612
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 601

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	31%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 612
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 601
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 622 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 623 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 196
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	30%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 576
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 563

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	31%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 576
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 564
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 95 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 94 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	34%
State average from 603 schools:	69%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	35%
State average from 603 schools:	70%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	95%
State average from 603 schools:	88%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	16%
State average from 602 schools:	46%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	51%
State average from 602 schools:	65%

Making Math Gains

Here:	60%
State average from 602 schools:	71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	70%
State average from 602 schools:	64%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	68%
State average from 602 schools:	69%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	429
State average from 602 schools:	543

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 604 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: F

Grade in 2003: D

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	89%
State average from 605 schools:	49%

Minority Rate

Here:	100%
State average from 605 schools:	48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 638 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 637 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 184
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	31%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 595
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 575

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	32%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 595
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 576
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 608 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 608 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 173
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	30%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 571
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 551

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	32%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 572
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 553
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 567 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 566 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 152
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	30%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 531
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 513

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	31%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 530
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 514
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 79 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 78 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 70
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 70
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	84%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	76%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	90%
State average from 539 schools:	91%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	68%
State average from 538 schools:	44%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	81%
State average from 539 schools:	61%

Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded

Making Math Gains

Here:	77%
State average from 539 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	73%
State average from 539 schools:	64%

% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	71%
State average from 539 schools:	67%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns

Here:	620
State average from 539 schools:	523

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 539 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	56%
State average from 541 schools:	49%

Minority Rate

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	36%
State average from 542 schools:	53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 448 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 447 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	95%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 103
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	76%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 433
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 432
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 282 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 282 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	95%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 65
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	81%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 273
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	75%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 273
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	64%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	55%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 242 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 241 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 57
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 232
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	59%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 231
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	40%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	86%
State average from 526 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	72%
State average from 526 schools:	63%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	82%
State average from 526 schools:	89%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	66%
State average from 526 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	69%
State average from 526 schools:	71%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	59%
State average from 526 schools:	72%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	434
State average from 526 schools:	425

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 526 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	57%
State average from 525 schools:	50%

Minority Rate

Here:	37%
State average from 526 schools:	52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 506 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 507 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 114
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	77%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 478
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	65%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 479
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 338 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 339 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 74

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 326
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	71%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 327
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (98%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	58%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 66

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	38%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 66
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	61%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 49

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 264 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 264 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 62

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 243
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	53%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 243
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 84 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 83 (98%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 23

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	42%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 77
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	37%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 76
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	86%
State average from 505 schools:	59%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	73%
State average from 505 schools:	60%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	86%
State average from 506 schools:	83%

Making Reading Gains

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	76%
State average from 505 schools:	61%

Making Math Gains

Here:	71%
State average from 505 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	66%
State average from 505 schools:	66%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	458
State average from 506 schools:	397

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 506 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	51%
State average from 506 schools:	51%

Minority Rate

Here:	30%
State average from 506 schools:	50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1377
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	313
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	12%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	12%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	43%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	23%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	9%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	76%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1665
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	334
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	11%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	6%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	35%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	38%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	10%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	83%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	21
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1756
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	329
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	7%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	16%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	30%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	31%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	17%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	77%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	11
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1402
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	256
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	54%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	18%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	22%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	6%
State average:	25%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	29%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	3
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	10
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1595
State average:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	276
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	37%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	28%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	30%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	5%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 5

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	35%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	13
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1725
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	276
State average:	308

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	40%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	39%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	15%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	4%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 5

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1%
State average:	3%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	21%
State average:	52%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	3
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	13
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	6
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	342
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	6%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	29%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	44%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	14%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	8%
State average:	4%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	65%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	11
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	9
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	257
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	59%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	31%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	8%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	1%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	10%
State average:	41%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	6
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	5
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	6
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	5
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1450
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	332
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	8%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	18%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	31%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	35%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	8%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	73%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1579
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	328
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	11%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	15%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	40%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	23%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	11%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	74%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1714
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	343
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	13%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	23%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	26%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	26%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	13%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	64%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1513
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	273
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	48%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	30%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	18%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	4%
State average:	18%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	22%
State average:	55%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	3
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	3
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1675
State average:	1786

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	278
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	38%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	32%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	25%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	4%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	29%
State average:	57%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	3
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1776
State average:	1892

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	290
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	33%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	35%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	25%
State average:	38%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	6%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	10%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	32%
State average:	64%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	3
State average:	5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1403
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	317
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1701
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	340
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 07%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1695
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	318
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1523
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	277
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1590
State average:	1800

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	275
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1721
State average:	1864

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	275
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	323
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	256
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1461
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	335
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1597
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	332
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1688
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	337
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1538
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	278
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1649
State average:	1799

Mean Scale Score 100-500

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	271
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1771
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	289
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 97

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 85%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 238

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 76%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1495
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	332
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1626
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	327
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1676
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	315
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1428
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	260
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1601
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	277
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1768
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	285
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	326
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	260
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1531
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	350
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1529
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	317
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1699
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	339
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1478
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	265
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1704
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	285
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1793
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	294
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	101
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

Here:	640
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

Here:	67
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	96
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

Here:	657
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

Here:	73
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	14
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	9
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	99
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

Here:	676
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

Here:	79
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	13
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	213
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	640
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

Here:	34
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	9
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	10
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	6
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	11
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	236
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

Here:	660
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

Here:	47
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	10
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	12
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	189
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

Here:	670
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

Here:	48
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	12
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 93

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	305
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 60%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 78%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 190

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	293
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 47%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 13%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 92%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1349
State average:	1342

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	308
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1595
State average from 1875 schools:	1542

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	322
State average:	313

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1612
State average:	1546

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1453
State average:	1397

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 159

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1724
State average from 1873 schools:	1629

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	323
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1757
State average:	1632

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1609
State average:	1532

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 148

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1859
State average from 878 schools:	1661

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	338
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1875
State average:	1663

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1753
State average:	1592

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 122

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	333
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 10
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1376
State average:	1413

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	317
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1546
State average from 1874 schools:	1525

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	321
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1558
State average:	1528

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1476
State average:	1414

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 82

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1701
State average from 1872 schools:	1647

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	340
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	1705
State average:	1649

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1529
State average:	1519

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 176

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1863
State average from 873 schools:	1641

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	354
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1891
State average:	1645

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1714
State average:	1620

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 177

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 104

Mean Scale Score

Here:	632
State average from 1891 schools:	633

Median NPR: 60
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 102

Mean Scale Score

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	651
State average from 1874 schools:	642

Median NPR: 69
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 108

Mean Scale Score

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	681
State average from 1870 schools:	667

Median NPR: 82
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 117

Mean Scale Score

Here:	699
State average from 874 schools:	671

Median NPR: 84
Literary (max 18): 16
Informational (max 18): 15
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 104

Mean Scale Score

Here:	621
State average from 1891 schools:	632

Median NPR: 60
Number Sense (max 14): 10
Operations (max 11): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 102

Mean Scale Score

CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:	656
State average from 1874 schools:	652

Median NPR: 78
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 108

Mean Scale Score

Here:	669
State average from 1870 schools:	663

Median NPR: 78
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 117

Mean Scale Score

Here:	703
State average from 874 schools:	669

Median NPR: 86
Number Sense (max 10): 7
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 103

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	325
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 73%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 14
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 85%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 77%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AL	AZ	CA	CO	CT	DE	FL
GA	HI	IA	ID	IL	IN	KS
LA	MA	MD	MI	MN	MO	NC
NE	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	TN	TX	UT
VA	WA	WI	WV

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY