Charles R. Drew Middle School in Miami, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 7.

1801 NW 60TH ST
Miami, FL 33142

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Herbert A. Ammons Middle School (19.9 miles):

98
South Miami K-8 Center School (9.3 miles):

77
Somerset Academy Middle (Miramar Campus) School (10.5 miles):

64
Glades Middle School (11.1 miles):

52
Hubert O. Sibley Elementary School (3.8 miles):

35
Opa-Locka Elementary School (5.3 miles):

23
Citrus Grove Middle School (3.7 miles):

8
Charles R. Drew Middle School:

7
Charles R. Drew Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Miami-Dade County:

45
Miami:

44
Charles R. Drew Middle School:

7

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (305) 633-6057 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 6141
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 638-1307
Magnet Program.
Principal: Lillian Cooper
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 17
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 109
Senate District: 39
School Web Address: http://crdrew.dadeschools.net/

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

33%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

33%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

79%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

13%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

51%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

61%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

60%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

72%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

402
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: D

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: F

Grade in 2003: D

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 119999: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

95%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

100%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 5

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 547 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 547 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 199
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 502
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 488

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 502
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 488
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 523 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 523 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 189
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 482
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 468

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 482
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 468
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 522 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 522 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 183
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 478
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 464

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 478
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 464
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 92 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 92 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 77

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 77
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

33%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

35%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

81%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

16%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

54%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

75%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

64%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

417
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: F

Grade in 2003: D

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

90%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 688 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 689 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 222
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 635
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 619

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 635
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 620
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 663 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 664 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 216
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 612
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 601

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 612
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 601
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 622 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 623 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 196
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 576
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 563

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 576
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 564
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 95 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 94 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

34%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

35%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

95%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

16%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

51%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

70%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

429
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: F

Grade in 2003: D

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

89%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

100%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 638 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 637 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 184
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 595
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 575

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 595
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 576
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 608 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 608 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 173
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 571
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 551

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 572
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 553
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 567 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 566 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 152
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 531
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 513

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 530
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 514
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 79 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 78 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 70
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 70
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

37%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

36%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

95%
State average from 539 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

19%
State average from 538 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

53%
State average from 539 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

56%
State average from 539 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

65%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

58%
State average from 539 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

419
State average from 539 schools:

523
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 539 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: F

Grade in 2003: D

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

86%
State average from 541 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 542 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 730 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 735 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 278
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 679
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 682
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 690 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 694 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 264
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 642
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 646
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 627 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 632 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 243
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 591
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 594
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 93 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 97 (93%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

36%
State average from 526 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

33%
State average from 526 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

91%
State average from 526 schools:

89%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 526 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

61%
State average from 526 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

75%
State average from 526 schools:

72%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

363
State average from 526 schools:

425
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 526 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: F

Grade in 2003: D

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

89%
State average from 525 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 526 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 817 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 813 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 301
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 763
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 753
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 771 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 767 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 282
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 722
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 713
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (98%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 37

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 727 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 724 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 256
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 676
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 668
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 109 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 107 (96%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 38
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 101
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 96
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

24%
State average from 505 schools:

59%
Meeting High Standards in Math
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

28%
State average from 505 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

68%
State average from 506 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 505 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

64%
State average from 505 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

72%
State average from 505 schools:

66%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

314
State average from 506 schools:

397
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 506 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: F

Grade in 2003: D

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: F

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

92%
State average from 506 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 506 schools:

50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1377
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

12%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

12%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

43%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

76%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

17
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1665
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

6%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

35%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

38%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

83%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

21
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1756
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

31%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

17%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

77%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

11
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1402
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

256
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

54%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

22%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

6%
State average:

25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

29%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

10
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1595
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

37%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

35%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1725
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

40%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

39%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

15%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

4%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

21%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

342
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

44%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

65%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

11
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

9
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

257
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

59%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

1%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

10%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

6
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1450
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

31%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

35%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

73%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1579
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

40%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

11%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

74%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1714
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

343
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

26%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

13%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

64%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1513
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

273
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

48%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

30%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

18%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

4%
State average:

18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

22%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1675
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

278
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

38%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

32%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

4%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

29%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1776
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

290
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

33%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

35%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

6%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

32%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1403
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1701
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 07%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1695
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1523
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1590
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1721
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

256
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1461
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1597
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1688
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

337
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1538
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

278
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1649
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1771
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 97
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 85%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 238
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 76%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1495
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1626
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1676
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1428
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

260
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1601
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1768
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

260
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1531
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

350
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1529
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1699
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1478
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1704
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1793
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

101
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

640
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

67
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

96
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

657
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

73
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

10
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

99
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

676
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

79
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

213
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

640
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

34
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

9
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

236
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

660
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

47
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

11
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

189
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

670
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

48
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 93
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

305
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 60%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 78%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 190
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

293
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 47%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 13%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 92%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1472
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

268
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1478
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1465
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 13

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1664
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

289
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1679
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1565
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 114

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1730
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1734
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1645
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 89

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

264
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1523
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1524
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1587
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -63

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1653
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

272
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1670
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1533
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 137

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1749
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1749
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1674
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 75

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 207
Mean Scale Score
Here:

651
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 44
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 218
Mean Scale Score
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

663
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 50
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 286
Mean Scale Score
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

671
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 49
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 206
Mean Scale Score
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

646
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 42
Number Sense (max 10): 4
Operations (max 12): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 218
Mean Scale Score
Here:

666
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 53
Number Sense (max 9): 4
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 288
Mean Scale Score
CHARLES R. DREW MIDDLE SCHOOL:

680
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 53
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 290
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

272
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 34%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 91%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 79%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Miami, FL
  5. Charles R. Drew Middle School in Miami, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.