City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
36.
Other nearby schools ratings:
Cholee Lake Elementary School rating compared to average state and city schools ratings:Florida: | 45 |
Greenacres: | 48 |
Cholee Lake Elementary School: | 36 |
Discuss this school with others on our active
Florida forum
Phone: (561) 383-9600 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 50
School number: 2761
School type: Elementary
District Name: PALM BEACH
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (561) 383-9650
Principal: Eugenia L Smith-Feaman
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Year 1 in Need of Improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 19
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 85
Senate District: 27
School Web Address: www.edline.net/pages/Cholee_Lakes_Elementary_School
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 64% |
State average from 963 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 65% |
State average from 963 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 80% |
State average from 963 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 43% |
State average from 962 schools: | 53% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 61% |
State average from 963 schools: | 64% |
Making Math GainsCHOLEE LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 60% |
State average from 963 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 50% |
State average from 963 schools: | 58% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 61% |
State average from 963 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 484 |
State average from 963 schools: | 543 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 963 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: C
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: N
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 80% |
State average from 963 schools: | 58% |
Minority RateCHOLEE LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 88% |
State average from 963 schools: | 47% |
Region: 5
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 475 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 475 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientCHOLEE LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 131
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 57% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 439
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 428
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 60% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 440
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 429
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 72 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 55% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 61% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 329 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 330 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 87
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 54% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 300
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 294
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 57% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 301
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 295
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 378 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 378 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 94% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 104
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 54% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 345
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 337
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 55% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 346
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 338
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 205 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 206 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 59
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 42% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 188
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 187
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 52% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 189
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 188
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 64% |
State average from 959 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in MathCHOLEE LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 67% |
State average from 959 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 92% |
State average from 959 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 39% |
State average from 959 schools: | 52% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 69% |
State average from 959 schools: | 67% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 62% |
State average from 959 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 76% |
State average from 959 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 74% |
State average from 959 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)CHOLEE LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 543 |
State average from 959 schools: | 560 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 959 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: N
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 76% |
State average from 959 schools: | 54% |
Minority RateHere: | 84% |
State average from 959 schools: | 46% |
Region: 5
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 446 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 447 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 137
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 57% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 398
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 387
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 62% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 398
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 386
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 81% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 79% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 62
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 88 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 88 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 56% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 79
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 53% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 79
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 259 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 260 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 71
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 50% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 223
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 219
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 59% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 223
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 219
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 327 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 328 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 101
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 50% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 290
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 285
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 57% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 290
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 284
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 184 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 185 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 41% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 160
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 159
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 54% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 160
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 159
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 74 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 25% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 38% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere: | 68% |
State average from 954 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in MathHere: | 69% |
State average from 954 schools: | 76% |
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere: | 82% |
State average from 954 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere: | 53% |
State average from 954 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains Here: | 62% |
State average from 954 schools: | 65% |
Making Math GainsHere: | 62% |
State average from 954 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here: | 63% |
State average from 954 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere: | 67% |
State average from 954 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here: | 526 |
State average from 954 schools: | 544 |
Percent TestedHere: | 100% |
State average from 954 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere: | 66% |
State average from 954 schools: | 51% |
Minority RateHere: | 79% |
State average from 954 schools: | 45% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 545 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 544 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 93% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 163
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 63% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 512
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 495
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 64% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 511
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 495
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 132 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 132 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 75% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 126
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 79% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 126
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 141 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 141 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 93% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 63% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 128
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 120
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 60% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 128
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 232 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 231 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 89% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 65
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 53% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 215
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 209
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 55% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 214
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 208
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 341 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 340 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 90% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 109
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientCHOLEE LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 54% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 316
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 303
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 56% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 315
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 303
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 174 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 173 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 92% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 46% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 158
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 151
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 46% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 157
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 151
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 215 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 215 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 95% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 75
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 32% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 196
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 55% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 195
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 206 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 206 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere: | 95% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 75
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientCHOLEE LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 30% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 187
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 54% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 186
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 211 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 211 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientCHOLEE LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 95% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 73
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 33% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 193
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 55% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 192
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 15% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere: | 59% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 237 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 239 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 80% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 75
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 35% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 223
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientCHOLEE LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 45% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 224
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 222 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 224 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientHere: | 78% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 69
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 35% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 209
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 44% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 210
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 229 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 231 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent ProficientCHOLEE LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 79% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 73
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 33% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 216
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 44% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 217
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 14% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 35
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency - Percent ProficientHere: | 40% |
State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 35
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1170 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 279 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 34% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 17% |
State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 27% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 20% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 48% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9CHOLEE LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 4 |
State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1471 |
State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 301 |
State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 28% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 14% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 35% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 19% |
State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5CHOLEE LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 4% |
State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveCHOLEE LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 58% |
State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreCHOLEE LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1530 |
State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 289 |
State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 23% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 18% |
State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 38% |
State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 18% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 59% |
State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 293 |
State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 33% |
State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2CHOLEE LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 33% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 29% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 35% |
State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1346 |
State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500CHOLEE LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 310 |
State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 23% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 39% |
State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 19% |
State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5CHOLEE LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 6% |
State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 64% |
State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1500 |
State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 310 |
State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 16% |
State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 25% |
State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 30% |
State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 24% |
State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5CHOLEE LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 5% |
State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 59% |
State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7CHOLEE LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 5 |
State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1591 |
State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 317 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1Here: | 24% |
State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2Here: | 27% |
State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3Here: | 27% |
State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4Here: | 19% |
State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere: | 49% |
State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7CHOLEE LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 7 |
State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7CHOLEE LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 6 |
State average: | 7 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1238 |
State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 290 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1484 |
State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500CHOLEE LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 303 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 03%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 09
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1556 |
State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500CHOLEE LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 293 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 299 |
State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1388 |
State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 319 |
State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1491 |
State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 308 |
State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1586 |
State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500CHOLEE LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 315 |
State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 151
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 4 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 46%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 89%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreCHOLEE LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1302 |
State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 300 |
State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1438 |
State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 295 |
State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreCHOLEE LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1599 |
State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 301 |
State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 315 |
State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1406 |
State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 323 |
State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1445 |
State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 298 |
State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere: | 1654 |
State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500Here: | 330 |
State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of StudentsCHOLEE LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 189 |
State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 625 |
State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)CHOLEE LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 8 |
State average: | 9 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere: | 639 |
State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)CHOLEE LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 8 |
State average: | 8 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere: | 191 |
State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale ScoreCHOLEE LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 668 |
State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Median NPRCHOLEE LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 73 |
State average: | 71 |
Functional (max 18)CHOLEE LAKE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 13 |
State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 171
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - CombinedHere: | 293 |
State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 56%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 81%
- All Cities
- Florida forum
- Florida
- Greenacres, FL
- Cholee Lake Elementary School in Greenacres, Florida (FL)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: